A SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA HAYWARD DIVISION. Karuk Tribe of California; and Leaf Hillman, ) ) ) Plaintiffs,

Similar documents
Karuk Tribe of California v. United States Forest Service

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNADINO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION

Case 2:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 09/22/11 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document 133 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 5

NATURE OF THE ACTION. enforcement of the Arbitration Award entered November 24, 2015 styled In the

Karuk Tribe of California v. United States Forest Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TILLIE HARDWICK, et al., Plaintiffs

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

WYOMING S COMPACTS, TREATIES AND COURT DECREES


SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

PETITION FOR INSTRUCTION

1. "Bear River" means the Bear River and its tributaries from its source in the Uinta Mountains to its mouth in Great Salt Lake;

Case 3:05-cv JZ Document 12-1 Filed 09/22/2005 Page 1 of 11

E COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO

IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF ARIZONA

BEFORE THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA. Case No.

Case 7:15-cv AT-LMS Document 129 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 8

A Assembly Bill No. 120 CHAPTER 133

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

DUBLIN SCHOOLS DUBLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 8-1 Filed: 09/06/17 Page 397 of 420 PageID #:481

Case 2:08-cv EJL Document 97 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:13-cv ABJ Document 54 Filed 03/24/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress of the United States of America

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AMONG THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CITY OF ELK GROVE AND THE WILTON RANCHERIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 30 Filed 05/04/2006 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WHEREAS, Portland General Electric Company ( PGE ) is an Oregon corporation;

PROTEST to the California State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Rights regarding

Case KRH Doc 3040 Filed 07/12/16 Entered 07/12/16 17:55:33 Desc Main Document Page 62 of 369

Ff LED. l'fi) lc!fl- ~ SEP ENDORSED. CLERK OF THE COURT BY: MA. 8ENIGNA D. GOODMAN Deputy Clerk

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES D. SALISBURY DEPUTY CLERK B. HALL, CSL/CT.ASST.

Case 1:12-cv RBW Document 44-1 Filed 01/29/14 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

Case Document Filed in TXSB on 10/31/2007 Page t of 12 EXHIBIT A

Congressional Record -- Senate. Thursday, October 8, 1992 (Legislative day of Wednesday, September 30, 1992) 102nd Cong. 2nd Sess.

Case No HO ORDER (1) APPROVING SETTLEMENT WITH SETTLING BROKERS and (2) ENTERING FINAL CLAIMS BAR ORDER AND INJUNCTION

TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT

RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AND AGREEMENT (Employee Housing)

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ORDER

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

Nos , , , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case KG Doc 2912 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : :

Subject: Opinion on Whether Trinity River Record of Decision is a Rule

Case 3:68-cv KI Document 2589 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 3145


v. DECISION AND ORDER

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EEOC and Quianna M. Knowles v. Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

CONTACT: Brian Young Ron Lunt (623) (623)

Intervening Defendant. STIPULATION FOR CONSENT JUDGMENT. Insurance Company HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

The Delta Plan. Ensuring a reliable water supply for California, a healthy Delta ecosystem, and a place of enduring value DELTA STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL

A Practitioner s Guide to Instream Flow Transactions in California

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 82 Filed 12/20/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

What does it mean to domesticate a foreign judgment?

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case BLS Doc 2398 Filed 03/21/16 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Plaintiffs, Defendants. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO : CASE NO. DR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION NO. 1, STATE OF COLORADO

COMMITTEE REPORTS. 110th Congress, 1st Session. SENATE Report S. Rpt. 172 LEWIS AND CLARK MOUNT HOOD WILDERNESS ACT OF 2007

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard before the undersigned judge on the plaintiff^ State of

Case3:13-cv SC Document99 Filed06/05/15 Page2 of 7 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Arville Winans and Wilma Fritz in this action entitled Arville 2 Winans

Case 2:17-sp RSM Document 40 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION Case No. CGC EXIDBITSA-B

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY WEST VIRGINIA. v. Case No.

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

No. 137, Original STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF WYOMING. and. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA Defendants.

Supreme Court of the United States

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case 1:18-cv AJN Document 6 Filed 09/29/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Richmond Division

Case 1:14-at Document 6 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EXHIBIT 1. Settlement Agreement. (to Declaration of Christina A. Humphrey)

1,=-= := usns son~ 1,.!oocume?~t " LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i!

Michael T. Gibbs, State Bar No Kevin L. Borgen, State Bar No Attorneys for Defendant MIRA COST A COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiffs, )

Public Law Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled.

Transcription:

//0 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA HAYWARD DIVISION 0 Plaintiffs, vs. California Department of Fish and Game; and Ryan Broddrick, Director, California Department of Fish and Game, Defendants. Karuk Tribe of California; and Leaf Hillman, Case No.: RG 0 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED JUDGMENT DEPT: (Hayward JUDGE: Hon. Bonnie Sabraw - A00

//0 0 STIPULATED JUDGMENT In this action, Plaintiffs Karuk Tribe of California and Leaf Hillman have filed a Complaint against Defendants California Department of Fish and Game ( DF&G, and Ryan Broddrick, Director of DF&G. Plaintiffs alleged in their Complaint that Defendants had violated the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA, Cal. Pub. Res. Code 000 et seq., and Fish and Game Code (b in issuing permits for suction dredge mining, and sought declaratory and injunctive relief. Defendants have denied these allegations. The Court has been advised that the Parties have reached a settlement of this matter and has now received a Joint Stipulation for Entry of Judgment (hereinafter Joint Stipulation, bearing a header dated November, 0, executed by the Plaintiffs and the Defendants, in which the Parties stipulate to the entry of this Stipulated Judgment. The Court having considered the Joint Stipulation and the other papers and pleadings filed, and good cause existing therefor, hereby issues the following as its Stipulated Judgment herein. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:. As used in this Stipulated Judgment, permits for suction dredge mining refers to the permits issued by Defendants pursuant to Fish and Game Code -., and the regulations codified at Cal. Code Regs.,... DF&G is hereby enjoined and restrained from issuing permits for suction dredge mining that allow suction dredge mining during any of the periods of a year prohibited in Exhibit attached hereto for the Klamath, Salmon, and Scott Rivers, their tributaries and thermal refugia.. In the event that DF&G hereinafter adopts amendments to its regulations for permits for suction dredge mining, which amendments address the same areas as are covered in Exhibit, it may apply to this Court for a termination of the injunction set forth in paragraph above. Any such application by Defendants shall be filed within days of DF&G s adoption of the amendments and shall include a copy of the amendments to the regulations so adopted. - A00

//0 0. Plaintiffs shall have 0 days after the filing of any such application to state whether they object to the termination of the injunction, provided that Plaintiffs shall not file any such objections if the amendments to the regulations provide for the closures of the water bodies in Exhibit for periods identical to or longer than the periods set forth therein. Any such objections shall include a statement of the grounds for the objections, which are limited to the scope of the claims in Plaintiffs Complaint, and may include allegations of a failure to comply with CEQA or Fish & Game Code, section. Upon the filing of proper objections by the Plaintiffs, they shall request that the Court set a hearing date to determine the merits of Plaintiffs objections, and the Parties may request that the Court set intermediate deadlines for the filing of an administrative record for the amendments, for briefing and for such other matters as are necessary to bring the matter on for hearing. Plaintiffs may also seek to amend their Complaint herein, as provided by law.. In the event that the Court determines that Defendants have not complied with law in the adoption of the regulations, the Court may continue the injunction in Paragraph in effect or enter such other relief as the Court determines is just and proper.. The injunction set forth in paragraph of this Stipulated Judgment shall otherwise terminate if Defendants have filed an application for termination of the injunction pursuant to Paragraph above, and either (i no proper objection has been filed thereto by Plaintiffs pursuant to Paragraph above, or (ii the Court has entered an order or judgment ruling against all of Plaintiffs objections. In either case the injunction shall remain in effect until the amendments to the regulations submitted to the Court pursuant to Paragraph have become effective under California law.. DF&G shall pay Plaintiffs reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred in this action.. This Stipulated Judgment is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective agents, employees, successors, assigns, trustees, and personal representatives. - A000

//0 Dated:. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to interpret, modify, and enforce the terms and conditions of this Stipulated Judgment and to enforce the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Judgment until such time that the injunction is terminated pursuant to paragraphs and above. The Honorable Bonnie Sabraw Judge of the Superior Court 0 - A00

//0 0 EXHIBIT TO STIPULATED JUDGMENT PROHIBITIONS ON SUCTION DREDGE MINING I. THE KLAMATH RIVER AND ITS TRIBUTARIES SUCTION DREDGE MINING SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED: On the main stem of the Klamath River from its confluence with the Trinity River to Iron Gate Dam except from July through September. On the following tributaries of the Klamath at any time of the year: Indian, Elk, Dillon, Independence, Bluff, Red Cap, Camp and Clear Creeks. On all other Klamath River tributaries, except from July through September. II. THE SALMON RIVER AND ITS TRIBUTARIES SUCTION DREDGE MINING SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED: On the main stem Salmon River from its confluence on the Klamath River to the Forks of the Salmon River (i.e., the confluence of the North and South Forks of the Salmon River at any time during the year. On the North and South Forks of the Salmon River, except from July through September. On the following tributaries of the Salmon River at any time of the year: Butler Creek, East Fork Knownothing Creek, Indian Creek, Kelly Gulch, Knownothing Creek, Little North Fork, Methodist Creek, Negro Creek, Nordheimer Creek, and Specimen Creek. III. THE SCOTT RIVER AND ITS TRIBUTARIES SUCTION DREDGE MINING SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED: On the Scott River from its mouth to Headwaters, except from July through September. On the following tributaries of the Scott River at any time of the year: Big Mill Creek (East Fork, Boulder Creek (South Fork, Canyon Creek, Etna Creek, French Creek, Kangaroo Creek (East Fork, Kelsey Creek, Kidder Creek, McAdam Creek, Mill Creek (Scott Bar, Mill Creek (aka Shackleford/Mill, Miners Creek, Moffett Creek, Patterson - A00

//0 0 Creek, Shackleford Creek, South Fork Scott River, Sugar Creek, Tompkins Creek, Wildcat Creek, and Wooliver Creek. IV. THERMAL REFUGIA Thermal refugia areas are located at the confluence of the tributary and the main stem of the river. Suction dredge mining shall not be permitted at the thermal refugia areas designated below within five hundred (00 feet up the named tributary from the confluence with the main stem and five hundred (00 feet up and downstream on the main stem from the confluence of the tributary with the main stem. SUCTION DREDGE MINING SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED AT ANY TIME IN THE FOLLOWING THERMAL REFUGIA: The thermal refugia on all direct tributaries on the Klamath, Salmon, and Scott Rivers that are closed to suction dredge mining for the entire year as listed above. The thermal refugia areas at the confluence of the following tributaries with the main stem of the Klamath River: Beaver Creek, Bluff Creek, Bogus Creek, Boise Creek, Camp Creek, Clear Creek, Coon Creek, Elk Creek, Grider Creek, Hopkins Creek, Horse Creek, Hunter Creek, Independence Creek, Indian Creek, Irving Creek, Little Grider Creek, Pearch Creek, Pecwan Creek, Red Cap Creek, Rogers Creek, Salmon River, Salt Creek, Scott River, Slate Creek, Swillup Creek, Thomas Creek, Ti Creek, Tom Marten Creek, Trinity River, and Ukonom Creek. The thermal refugia at the confluence of all tributaries on the North Fork of the Salmon River from Eddie Gulch to the Forks of the Salmon (i.e., the confluence of the North and South Forks of the Salmon River and Crapo Creek on the mainstem below the Forks of the Salmon. - A00