Case 1:18-cv WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Similar documents
Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2013 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No.

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

USDC IN/ND case 1:18-cv document 1 filed 04/09/18 page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Case 1:18-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv JVB-APR document 1 filed 05/16/18 page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

Case 9:13-cv KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case 2:12-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No.: 3:17-CV-398.

Case 1:14-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No.

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 14

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:16-cv Vale v. Cava et al. Document 7. View Document.

Case: 4:16-cv DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. Plaintiff, Defendants.

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Case 1:11-cv CMA-MEH Document 6 Filed 08/10/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/15/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case: 4:13-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 08/01/13 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 2:08-cv JAM-DAD Document 220 Filed 07/25/12 Page 1 of 21

Case 2:17-cv JFW-JC Document 1 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1

Case 5:14-cv HE Document 1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Case 2:10-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 8

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv RWZ Document 1 Filed 05/08/14 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

3 James A. McDaniel (Bar No ) 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 6:13-cv MHS Document 1 Filed 03/01/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division

Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:12-cv P Document 1 Filed 06/14/12 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1

Case 1:11-cv JRH -WLB Document 1 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 6

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demanded)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:11-cv CEH-DNF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 55 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv CW Document 2 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Civil Action No.

Case 2:18-cv JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. Civil Action No. Defendant. JURY DEMANDED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: COMPLAINT

Case 1:11-cv RMC Document 1 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv DPW Document 1 Filed 10/30/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Civil Action No. 07-CV-571

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND TRADEMARK

Case 1:17-cv GMS Document 35 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 195 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Central District Court Case No. 2:16-cv WBS, Inc. v. Stephen Pearcy et al. Document 2.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Attorneys for Plaintiffs LARRY KING ENTERPRISES, INC. and ORA MEDIA LLC

Transcription:

Case 1:18-cv-02874-WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO David A. Kupernik Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 24K Real Estate Group, Inc. Defendant. VERIFIED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY Plaintiff David A. Kupernik (hereinafter Mr. Kupernik or Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this Complaint against Defendant, 24K Real Estate Group, Inc. (hereinafter 24K RE or Defendant ), and states as follows: I. NATURE OF ACTION 1. This is an action for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(a), unfair competition, passing off, and false designation of origin under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a), common law trademark infringement, and violation of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, C.R.S. 6-1-105m, arising from Defendant s unauthorized use of Plaintiff s Federal Trademark Registration, 24K REAL ESTATE, for real estate brokerage services, as well as a Declaratory Judgment that Plaintiff s Federal Registration No. 4,691,674 is valid. 1

Case 1:18-cv-02874-WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 13 2. Defendant brought an action before the US Trademark Trial and Appeals Board ( TTAB ), Proceeding No. 92065525, to cancel Plaintiff s Registration to the mark 24K REAL ESTATE. Plaintiff is moving to stay the TTAB proceeding in light of this action. II. PARTIES 3. Mr. Kupernik is an individual residing in Parker, Colorado, having a valid Colorado Real Estate Broker s license as seen in Exhibit A (Real Estate License). Mr. Kupernik serves Colorado clients and out-of-state clients who are relocating to and from Colorado. 4. Upon information and belief, Defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New Mexico, whose sole director is Kay Azbill, with a principal place of business at 6225 Agate Ave. NW, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 5. Upon information and belief, 24K RE regularly solicits and does business with parties located and domiciled in Colorado through real estate acquisitions and corporate relocation services in New Mexico. III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1121, and Title 28 of the United States Code, 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1338(a) and (b) and 1367. The amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Therefore, this Court also has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332. 7. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and (c). 8. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant pursuant to C.R.S. 13-1- 124 (a) because Defendant has purposefully directed its activities and availed itself of the 2

Case 1:18-cv-02874-WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 13 privilege of carrying out business with residents of Colorado. Claims and damages in this lawsuit are attributable to those activities, along with federal due process principles. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 9. On June 30, 2014, Mr. Kupernik, acting pursuant to Section 1(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1051(a), filed his application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office ( USPTO ) to register 24K REAL ESTATE, in International Class 36 for real estate brokerage services. Plaintiff s application was assigned serial number 86-324943. The USPTO issued Registration No. 4,691,674 on February 24, 2015. 10. Mr. Kupernik owns U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,691,674 for the mark 24K REAL ESTATE for real estate brokerage services in International Class 36. A copy of the Certificate of Registration is attached as Exhibit B (the 24K Registration ). The Certificate of Registration is valid and subsisting, and Mr. Kupernik owns record title to the 24K REAL ESTATE mark. 11. The 24K REAL ESTATE Certificate of Registration is prima facie evidence of the validity of the 24K REAL ESTATE trademark, Mr. Kupernik s ownership of the registered trademark, and Mr. Kupernik s exclusive right to use the registered trademark in connection with the services listed in the certificate of registration under 15 U.S.C. 1115(a), as well as nationwide constructive notice of Mr. Kupernik s claim of ownership under 15 U.S.C. 1072. 12. Mr. Kupernik has used the 24K REAL ESTATE mark since at least 2012, advertising his services in connection with the mark extensively, through his website at 24krealestate.net, including through other channels, including the Employee Relocation Counsel and National Association of Realtors. 3

Case 1:18-cv-02874-WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 13 13. As a result of Mr. Kupernik s use of the 24K REAL ESTATE mark since at least 2012, and through extensive interstate advertising and promotional efforts, Mr. Kupernik has built up substantial good will in the 24K REAL ESTATE mark. 14. Examples of Mr. Kupernik s use of the 24K REAL ESTATE mark in interstate commerce prior to the filing date of the 24K Registration are attached as Exhibit C. These include: Lexicon, a Florida relocation company, hired Plaintiff on December 2, 2013 to sell a client s house so she could relocate to Richmond, Virginia. Allegiance Relocation Services, a Virginia relocation company, hired Plaintiff on September 12, 2013 as a vendor to help with relocation of employees to or from Colorado that were referred to Allegiance. Robert and Jennifer Allen of San Antonio Texas hired Plaintiff on June 6, 2013 to sell their house in Colorado. Jennifer and Robert had been living in San Antonio for two years when they put their Colorado house on the market and it subsequently sold, as posted on her Facebook page. Brian and Ann Harrington of Arkansas hired Plaintiff on May 21, 2014 to sell their house in Colorado. The Warranty Deed was executed in Arkansas, where the Harrington s were living at the time. Alisha Ugarte and Diane Hayes hired Plaintiff on May 7, 2014 to purchase a condominium in Colorado. Ms. Hayes signed the Deed of Trust for the condominium in California, where she was living at the time of the purchase. 4

Case 1:18-cv-02874-WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 13 15. Upon information and belief, Defendant 24K RE was organized in 2016 for the purpose of offering real estate brokerage services to prospective customers for the sale of real estate in and around Albuquerque, New Mexico. 16. Upon information and belief, Defendant has used, and continues to use, 24K Real Estate Group in connection with soliciting clients from Colorado who are relocating to New Mexico through advertising within Colorado, and throughout the United States. 17. Upon information and belief, beginning at least as early as October 2016, Defendant has used 24K Real Estate Group in connection with selling properties in New Mexico to residents of Colorado, among other states. 18. On January 26, 2017, Mr. Kupernik, through his attorneys, sent a letter to Defendant providing her with actual notice of his rights to the 24K REAL ESTATE mark. (Exhibit D). 19. Upon information and belief, both Plaintiff and Defendant have been members of the National Association of Realtors since 2016. 20. The National Association of Realtors is an interstate association, with both parties to this action belonging to Region 11, which consists of Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Wyoming and Utah. 21. 24K RE is offering identical and related services as Plaintiff, in an identical commercial field, through identical channels of trade, to identical prospective customers, using the identical words 24K Real Estate, which is confusingly similar to Plaintiff s registered trademark, 24K REAL ESTATE. 5

Case 1:18-cv-02874-WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 13 22. Defendant s use of 24K Real Estate in conjunction with advertising and selling real estate services is causing, and will continue to cause, confusion in the marketplace between the sources of the like services provided by Plaintiff and Defendant, such that customers are likely to be mistakenly led to believe the Defendant s services are produced or sponsored by Plaintiff. 23. Upon information and belief, Defendant s services, which are offered under the name 24K Real Estate Group are actually causing customers to be confused as to the sponsorship and origin of the services. 24. Upon information and belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Plaintiff s registered trademark rights since it began use of the infringing name 24K Real Estate Group. 25. Despite having actual knowledge of Plaintiff s trademark rights, Defendant began, and continues to market its services under the infringing 24K Real Estate Group name, including on its website https://24krealestategroup.com/ (Exhibit E). 26. Upon information and belief, Defendant fraudulently and intentionally copied Plaintiff s registered trademark in an effort to deceive the consuming public and to benefit from the goodwill associated with Plaintiff s services. 27. Upon information and belief, Defendant s infringement of Plaintiff s registered trademark is willful, deliberate, fraudulent and intentional. IV. Claims for Relief forth herein. Count I (Trademark Infringement under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(a)) 28. Plaintiff repeats and realleges all paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully set 6

Case 1:18-cv-02874-WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 13 29. Mr. Kupernik is the exclusive owner of the 24K Registration, which is valid and subsisting. 30. Defendant s aforementioned acts in using the words 24K Real Estate Group in its advertising and on its website promoting Defendant s identical services constitute trademark infringement in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(a). 31. Such acts by the Defendant are without authority or permission of Plaintiff, and are likely to cause confusion or mistake or to deceive as to the source of origin and sponsorship of such services, and are believed to already have caused actual confusion in the marketplace. 32. As a direct result of Defendant s infringing actions, Plaintiff has suffered, and will continue to suffer, actual monetary damages in an amount to be established at trial. 33. The actions of Defendant have and will continue to cause irreparable harm to Plaintiff, including but not limited to, irreparable harm to Plaintiff s goodwill associated with its 24K Registration and his reputation, for which there is no adequate remedy at law. Count II (False Designation -- Lanham Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a)) 34. Plaintiff repeats and realleges all paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 35. Plaintiff is the exclusive owner of the trademark 24K Registration, which is valid and subsisting. 36. Defendant has, on or in connection with its services, used in commerce and continues to use in commerce, the nearly identical mark 24K Real Estate Group. 7

Case 1:18-cv-02874-WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 13 37. Such use is without permission or authority of Plaintiff, and is likely to cause confusion, to cause mistake, and to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of Defendant with Plaintiff, and as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of Defendant s services by Plaintiff. 38. Defendant s violation of Plaintiff s rights in the 24K REAL ESTATE mark is knowing, willful, deliberate, fraudulent, and intentional, and was made with the knowledge that such violation would damage Plaintiff and its trademark. 39. As a direct result of Defendant s wrongful conduct, as aforesaid, Plaintiff has suffered, and will continue to suffer, actual monetary damages in an amount to be established at trial. 40. As a direct result of Defendant s violations, as aforesaid, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer irreparable harm, including but not limited to, irreparable harm to Mr. Kupernik s goodwill associated with the 24K Registration and his reputation, for which there is no adequate remedy at law. 41. Defendant is liable for false designation pursuant to Section 43 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125. forth herein. Count III (Common Law Unfair Competition) 42. Plaintiff repeats and realleges all paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully set 43. Defendant, by means of its activities in promoting and offering for sale Defendant s services in the United States, has knowingly, willfully and/or intentionally violated 8

Case 1:18-cv-02874-WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 13 Plaintiff s Colorado common law unfair competition rights by creating a likelihood of confusion on the part of customers as to the origin and sponsorship of its services. 44. Defendant has intentionally copied Plaintiff s 24K REAL ESTATE mark in an effort to deceive the consuming public, and to benefit from the goodwill associated with Plaintiff s services and has, as a result, unfairly reaped a substantial commercial advantage to Plaintiff s detriment. 45. As a direct result of Defendant s wrongful conduct, as aforesaid, Plaintiff has suffered, and will continue to suffer, actual monetary damages in an amount to be established at trial. 46. As a direct result of Defendant violating Plaintiff s Colorado common law unfair competition rights, as aforesaid, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer irreparable harm, including but not limited to, irreparable harm to Plaintiff s goodwill associated with its trademark and reputation, for which there is no adequate remedy at law. forth herein. Count IV (Declaratory Judgment, 28 U.S.C. 2201) 47. Plaintiff repeats and realleges all paragraphs of this Complaint as though fully set 48. Defendant has brought an action before TTAB to cancel Plaintiff s 24K Registration, Proceeding No. 92065525. 49. An actual justiciable controversy exists between Plaintiff and Defendant regarding the validity of Plaintiff s 24K Registration. 50. As a result of the Defendant s actions, Plaintiff seeks the relief as set forth at the end of this Complaint, including that Plaintiff s 24K Registration is valid. 9

Case 1:18-cv-02874-WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 13 Count V (Colorado Consumer Protection Act, C.R.S. 6-1-105) 51. Plaintiff repeats a realleges the preceding paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 52. Defendant s conduct, described above, constitutes deceptive trade practices in violation of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, C.R.S. 6-1-105 by its use of 24K Real Estate Group, Defendant knowingly: (1) passes off its services as those of another; (2) makes a false representation as to the source, sponsorship, approval, and/or certification of its services; and (3) makes a false representation as to affiliation, connection, and/or association with Kupernik. 53. Defendant s unlawful acts significantly impact the public as actual or potential consumers of Defendant s real estate brokerage services. 54. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s actions described herein, Plaintiff has suffered, and will continue to suffer, irreparable injury to its business, reputation, and goodwill, unless and until the Court enjoins Defendant s actions. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law. 55. Defendant s wrongful use of the Plaintiff s 24K REAL ESTATE mark and infringing actions is knowing, deliberate, and willful, meeting the definition of bad faith conduct under C.R.S. 6-1-105. 10

Case 1:18-cv-02874-WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 13 V. Demand for Relief WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, respectfully demands a judgment in its favor and against Defendant and additional relief as follows: A. Preliminarily and permanently enjoining Defendant, including its officers, directors, employees, agents, servants, successors and assigns, as well as those in active concert in participation with it, from further infringement of Plaintiff s 24K REAL ESTATE trademark; B. Declare that Plaintiff s 24K Registration is valid; C. Order that all infringing articles in Defendant s possession, including but not limited to labels, signs, prints, packaging and advertisements bearing the infringing mark, be delivered to an officer of the Court to be destroyed; D. Assess against Defendant, and award to Plaintiff, all monetary damages caused by Defendant s willful infringing conduct, including damage to reputation and goodwill, lost profits, post-judgment and pre-judgment interest, costs, attorney s fees, punitive damages and/or treble damages; E. Three times the amount of actual damages sustained, as provided for in C.R.S. 6-1-105; and F. That the Court grants such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. 11

Case 1:18-cv-02874-WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 12 of 13 Demand for Jury Trial Plaintiff hereby demands a jury trial on all claims and issues so triable. Respectfully submitted, Plaintiff, David A. Kupernik By his attorneys, Date: November 7, 2018 /s/ Ralph (Rick) Martin Ralph (Rick) Martin, Esq. (CO Bar No.20688) PATENT LAW OFFICES OF RICK MARTIN, P.C. P.O.1839 Longmont, Colorado 80502 Telephone: (303) 651-2177 E-mail: rmartin@patentcolorado.com rickpattm@yahoo.com Counsel for Plaintiff Jodi-Ann McLane, Esq. (MA Bar No. 635567) John T. McInnes, Esq. (MA Bar No. 657488) MCINNES & MCLANE, LLP 128 Dorrance Street Suite 220 Providence, RI 02903 jodi@mcmcip.com john@mcmcip.com Telephone: 401-223-5853 12

Case 1:18-cv-02874-WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 13 of 13 13