Course of patent infringement proceedings before the Unified Patent Court

Similar documents
European Patent with Unitary Effect and

The Unitary Patent and UPC is coming soon?

Preliminary set of provisions for the Rules of procedure of the Unified Patent Court

The Unified Patent Court explained in detail. Managing Intellectual Property European Patent Reform Forum 19 September 2013 Munich

UPC FUTURE OF PATENT LITIGATION IN EUROPE. Alexander Haertel

European Unitary Patents and the Unified Patent Court

Rules of Procedure ( Rules ) of the Unified Patent Court

Rules of Procedure for UPC

Preliminary set of provisions for the Rules of Procedure ( Rules ) of the Unified Patent Court

European Patent with Unitary Effect

The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court EPLAW European Patent Lawyers Association Brussels 2 December 2011

Draft agreement on a Unified Patent Court and draft Statute - Revised Presidency text

The Unitary Patent Unified Patent Court. Taylor Wessing LLP

Patent Protection: Europe

Preparatory Committee for the Unified Patent Court. Rules on Court fees and recoverable costs. I. Proposal for

Dehns Guide to the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court

Dr Julian M. Potter February 2014

The German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (GRUR)

Patent litigation. Block 2. Module Jurisdiction and procedure Complementary reading: Unified Patent Court Agreement ( UPCA )

the UPC will have jurisdiction over certain European patents (see box The unitary patent and the UPC: a recap ).

Nine years after Ebay Should German courts have discretion when deciding on injunctions in patent infringement litigations?

Effective Mechanisms for Challenging the Validity of Patents

Unitary patent and Unified Patent Court: the proposed framework

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 19 March /08 PI 14

Understanding the Unified Patent Court: The Next Rocket-Docket for Patent Owners?

Unitary Patent in Europe & Unified Patent Court (UPC)

European Patent Litigation: An overview

Revision of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal

ADR INSTITUTE OF CANADA, INC. ADRIC ARBITRATION RULES I. MODEL DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE

Europe-wide patent protection and the competence of the Unified Patent Court

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTION NO. 2008/6. The Special Representative of the Secretary-General,

Patent Litigation. Block 2; Module Plaintiff /Claimant. Essentials. The patent proprietor as plaintiff/claimant in infringement proceedings

UNITARY PATENT PROTECTION (UPP) PACKAGE

The EU Unitary Patent System in its current state. EU-Japan Policy Seminar 22 November 2016

UNIFIED PATENT COURT (UPC) Einheitliches Patentgericht (EPG) Juridiction Unifiée du Brevet (JUB)

Revision of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal. First public draft online user consultation. 1 February 2018

Rules for the Conduct of an administered Arbitration

Industrial Property Course Patents, 2018 Edition Corso di Proprietà Industriale Brevetti, edizione 2018 Politecnico di Milano

Patent litigation in Europe Major changes to come. Anne-Charlotte Le Bihan, Partner, Bird & Bird ABPI, Rio de Janeiro August 20, 2013

The Unitary Patent & The Unified Patent Court IP Key & Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University of London 8 November 2016

Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court

PROPOSALS FOR CREATING UNITARY PATENT PROTECTION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Patent amendments in Germany: Formal aspects

UNIFIED PATENT SYSTEM: A NEW OPPORTUNITY FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN EUROPE

THE NEW EUROPEAN UNIFIED PATENT COURT & THE UNITARY PATENT

Welcome to the. The. But. The. that in such handled by a team CASALONGA. constituted. Consequently, in. three. Now KPN).

Harmonisation across Europe - comparison and interaction between the EPO appeal system and the national judicial systems

Developments towards a unitary European patent system

17229/09 LK/mg 1 DG C I

The European Patent and the UPC

Patent Enforcement UK perspectives

DUBAI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE RULES 2007 AS OF 22 ND FEBRUARY Introductory Provisions. Article (1) Definitions

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 27 September /12 PI 113 COUR 66 WORKING DOCUMENT

The potential impact of Brexit on the European Patenting landscape

A Guide through Europe s New Unified Patent System

The proposed amendments to the Rules of the Boards of Appeal. Patentee s Perspective. Bayerischer Patentanwaltsverein e.v.

PATENT SYSTEM STATUS OFREFORMS

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court. Guide to Key Features & Perspectives

ARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL

CIArb/IMPRESS ARBITRATION SCHEME RULES ( the Rules ) FOR USE IN ENGLAND & WALES

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE COURTS ACT. Rules made by the Chief Justice, after consultation with the Rules Committee and the Judges, under section 198 of the Courts Act

Belgium. Belgium. By Annick Mottet Haugaard and Christian Dekoninck, Lydian, Brussels

Developments towards a unitary European patent system

The World Intellectual Property Organization

CHAPTER 4 THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT. Arrangement of Sections.

European Patent Law. Gwilym Roberts Daniel Brook

The Intellectual Property Regulation Board (incorporating The Patent Regulation Board and the Trade Mark Regulation Board)

GUIDELINES FOR THE PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO A DECLARATION OF INVALIDITY OF A REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGN

Strategies for successful Patent Enforcement in Germany. Michael Knospe, Partner, SJ Berwin LLP

The effects of the EPC

Olivier MANDEL, Partner, MANDEL & ASSOCIES Law firm

Norway. Norway. By Rune Nordengen, Bull & Co Advokatfirma AS

Patent Infringement Proceedings

Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court

Table of Contents I INTERNATIONAL PHASE BEFORE THE RECEIVING OFFICE AND INTERNATIONAL BUREAU.. 14

The Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court

Brinkhof. Defendant s Objection to the Application for Provisional Measures. Merva. Pentapharm

Overview of Trial for Invalidation and Opposition Systems in Japan. March 2017 Trial and Appeal Department Japan Patent Office

PART 8 ARBITRATION REGULATIONS CONTENTS

RULES FOR EXPEDITED ARBITRATION. of the Finland Chamber of Commerce

ti Litigating Patents Overseas: Country Specific Considerations Germany There is no "European" litigation system.

CONFEDERATION OF FINNISH INDUSTRIES EK P.O. Box 30, FI Helsinki, Finland Register ID (6) 31 July 2015

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTORY RULES...

Decision on Patent Law. Patent Act Secs. 104 ter, 123, 128, Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 338 Knife-processing Device

Design Protection in Europe

INTERNAL REGULATIONS OF THE FEI TRIBUNAL

RULES FOR ARBITRATION BETWEEN THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS AND PRIVATE PARTIES

R 84a EPC does not apply to filing date itself as was no due date missed. So, effective date for and contacts subject matter is

ICDR INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION ARBITRATION RULES

Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration King Fahad Branch Rd, Al Mutamarat, Riyadh, KSA PO Box 3758, Riyadh Tel:

In accordance with Article 12 of the Unitary Patent Regulation, the renewal fees have to be inter alia:

JAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures

ARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013)

The Rules of the Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Serbia

PAMS ARBITRATION RULES

AAA Employment Arbitration Flowchart

SUMMARY OF CONTENTS SC-1.

Recent Developments with respect to the Litigation Protocol. by Jochen Pagenberg Chairman of Special Committee Q165

Transcription:

proceedings before the Unified Patent Court AIPPI Forum 7 September 2013, Helsinki by Dr. Klaus Grabinski Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), Germany

I. Written Procedure I. Statement of claim 1. Which Local/Regional Division? place of infringement or seat of defendant if seat of defendant is not in a PMS: Central Division if the MS has no LD/RD: Central Division 2. Which language? official language(s) of MS hosting the LD or RD and/or one or more of the official languages of EPO or language of the EP-in-suit with the agreement of the parties and approval of the panel at the request of one party by decision of the President of the CoFI 3. Fully fledged, no skeleton statement, in particular with regard to facts and evidence relied on reasons why the facts constitute an infringement 2

I. Written Procedure II. Preliminary objection 1. Within 1 month (of service of the Statement of claim) 2. Objections concerning the jurisdiction and competence of the Court the competence of the division indicated by the claimant the language of the Statement of claim 3. Request for a transfer from a Regional Division to the Central Division all facts and evidence that support the existence of the same infringement in 3 or more Regional Divisions, cf. Art. 33 (2) 2 Agreement 4. Decision by the Judge-Rapporteur 5. Rejection of a preliminary objection may only be appealed with leave of the Court. 3

I. Written Procedure III. Statement of defence + (possibly) counterclaim for revocation 1. Within 3 months (of service of the Statement of claim) 2. Statement, in particular with regard to facts and challenge to the facts relied on by the claimant/the evidence relied on reasons why the action shall fail (possibly) grounds of revocation (possibly) statement with regard to the option provided for in Art. 33 (3) 4

I. Written Procedure IV. Reply to the Statement of defence + Defence to the counterclaim for revocation + (possibly) Application to amend the patent 1. Within 2 months (of service of the Statement of defence) if no counterclaim for revocation: within 1 month 2. Statement, in particular with regard to facts and evidence relied on reasons why the counterclaim for revocation shall fail statement with regard to the option provided for in Art. 33 (3) explanation as to why the (auxiliary) amendments satisfy the requirements of Art. 84, 123 (2) and (3) EPC any subsequent request to amend the patent may only be admitted with the permission of the court! 5

I. Written Procedure V. Rejoinder to the reply to the Statement of defence + Reply to the Defence to the counterclaim for revocation + Defence to the Application to amend the patent 1. Within 1 month (of service of the Statement of defence) 2. Statement, in particular with regard to facts and evidence relied on reasons as to why the proposed (auxiliary) amendments are not allowable under Art. 84, 123 (2) and (3) EPC 6

I. Written Procedure VI. Application of Article 33 (3) of the Agreement 1. As soon as possible after the closure of the written procedure 2. the Panel shall decide by way of order how to proceed with respect to 3. Art. 33 (3) a) proceed with both the action for infringement and the counterclaim for revocation + request the allocation of a technical judge b) refer the counterclaim for revocation for decision to the central division + suspend or proceed with the action for infringement c) with the agreement of the parties, refer the case for decision to the central division. 7

II. Interim Procedure 1. Judge-Rapporteur as case manager. 2. Interim conference where appropriate. 3. Aim of the interim conference: identify the main issues and determine which relevant facts are in dispute establish a schedule for the further progress of proceedings explore the possibilities to settle the case issue orders regarding production of further evidence, inspections, witnesses, etc. prepare the oral hearing 4. Interim conference may be held by telephone or video conference. 5. Duration of Interim Procedure: up to 3 months (as a general rule). 8

III. Oral Procedure 1. Oral hearing held before the panel under control of the presiding judge 2. Course of the oral hearing: (possibly) preliminary introduction to the action by presiding judge (PJ) and the judges parties oral submissions can be limited by the PJ after consulting the panel questions to parties or representatives by judges questions to witnesses or experts by judges and parties 3. Duration of oral hearing: 1 day (as a general rule). 4. Adjournment in exceptional cases, when further evidence is required. 9

IV. Decision on the merits 1. Issue of decision (possibly) within 6 weeks after the closure of the oral hearing in exceptional cases, immediately after the oral hearing 2. Orders: permanent injunction corrective measures (recall, destruction, etc.) communication of information publication of decision damages and compensation revocation of patent, entirely or partially 3. In case of a split of proceedings: decision on the merits of the infringement claim under the condition that the patent is not held to be entirely or partially invalid or stay of proceedings in the discretion of the panel mandatory when there is a high likelihood of success of the counterclaim for revocation 10

V. Procedure for the determination of damages and compensation 1. Separate proceedings The determination of the amount of damages ordered for the successful party may be the subject of separate proceedings. 2. Request to lay open books 11

VI. Procedure for cost order 1. Separate proceedings A cost order may be the subject of separate proceedings following a decision on the merits and, if applicable, a decision for the determination of damages. 2. Rule in Art. 69 (1) of the Agreement Reasonable and proportionate legal costs and other expenses incurred by the successful party shall, as a general rule, be borne by the unsuccessful party, unless equity requires otherwise, up to a ceiling set in accordance with the rules of procedure. 3. Rules of Procedure Representation costs Administrative Committee shall set ceilings to such costs by reference to the value of the dispute Costs of experts, witnesses, interpreters and translators 12

VII. End Thank you for your attention! 13