IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM

Similar documents
AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 145 OF 2002 MATHEW MBATA...APPLICANT VERSUS DENIS CATHELESS...RESPONDENT RULING

2yh August, Supplement No THE BASIC RIGHTS AND DUTIES ENFORCEMENT (CAP.

Criminal Procedure (Approved Forms) (Made under section 394) THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (APPROVED FORMS) NOTICE, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2003 JUDGMENT

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 120 OF (From Criminal Case No. 82 of 2004, RM'S Court of Kibaha) P.W. Bampikya, RM JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL REFERENCE NO.12 OF 2004 DAVID MWAKIKUNGA. APPELANT VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (OAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT OAR ES SALAAM MISC. CIVIL CAUSE NO.157 OF 2005 ELIZABETH AUGUSTINO SAID PETITIONER

The plaintiff filed a suit against the ATIORNEY GENERALand

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RULING

pc. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2002 (Original Civil Appeal No. 37 of 2001 IIala District Court before Mr. Mnengo H.M.)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CRIMINAL SESSION CASE NO. 36 OF 2003 REPUBLIC VERSUS PROCEEDINGS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

UGANDA

FACT SHEET. Juveniles (children aged 16 or under):

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981

Guidebook for Sentence Appeals

In the High Court of Tanzania at Mwanza the appellant and two. others were charged with murder c/s 196 of the Penal Code. It was

An Act to amend the Employment Ordinance

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RULING. This is an application for extension of time to apply for

NOTICE OF APPEAL BY PERSON CONVICTED. Part 6, Criminal Procedure Act In the Court of Appeal of New Zealand. [Name] v [R or Police or prosecutor]

TANGANYIKA. No. 29 OF 1963

deprived of his or her liberty by arrest or detention to bring proceedings before court.

Revised Rates of Payment to Lawyers (1 May 2014) No Service Provided Rates Before 1 May 2014 Rates From 1 May 2014

THE SPECIAL COURTS FOR SPEEDY TRIALS ACT, 1992

Criminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme Standards of competence for the accreditation of solicitors representing clients in the magistrates court

THE MAGISTRATES COURTS (AMENDMENT) BILL, A Bill for AN ACT of parliament to amend the Magistrates Courts Act

NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Part 6, Criminal Procedure Act In the Court of Appeal of New Zealand

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA. No. 35 OF An Act to amend the Criminal Procedure Code

This is an application for revision in terms of the provisions of

MAGISTRATES COURT (BAIL) (PRESCRIBED FORMS) RULES 2006 BR 12 / 2006 MAGISTRATES ACT : 25

COURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009

Execution of Sentences

In this omnibus application there are two basic prayers. Extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal AND leave

REGIONAL MANAGER, TANROADS KAGERA.. APPLICANT VERSUS RUAHA CONCRETE COMPANY LIMITED... RESPONDENT

1. YUSUFU SAME 2. HAWA DADA APPELLANTS VERSUS

GOVERNMENT GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY, 2ND MAY, 1963 ACT

SELEMANI RAJABU MIZINO... APPLICANT VERSUS 1. SHABIR EBRAHIM BHAIJEE 2. FAYEZA SHABIR BHAIJEE... RESPONDENTS 3. HUZAIRA SHABIR BHAIJEE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CRIMINAL SESSIONS CASE NO. 61 OF 2001 VERSUS SIZA PEMBE MANENO

Examinable excerpts of. Bail Act as at 10 April 2018 PART 1 PRELIMINARY

THE DAY CARE CENTRES ACT, Title 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. PART II

BELIZE ALIENS ACT CHAPTER 159 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE

THE IMMIGRATION ACT, 1972 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I PRELIMINARY PART II

Contempt of Courts (CAT) Rules, Rules to Regulate Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court, 1975

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) JUDGMENT

Examinable excerpts of. Bail Act as at 30 September 2018 PART 1 PRELIMINARY

(CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And KAJI, J.A.) 1. JOSEPH CHUWA 2. HASHIM MOTTO.. APPELLANTS VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.RESPONDENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RULING

GOVERNMENT GAZETTE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM. (CORAM: MROSO, J. A, MSOFFE, J. A. AND KAJI, J. A.) CIVIL REFERECE NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM VERSUS SALMA AHMAD RESPONDENT.

LAWS OF WESTERN SAMOA CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ANALYSIS PART II PROCEDURE FOR PROSECUTION OF OFFENCES. Arrest

APPLICATION FOR RELEASE PENDING APPEAL

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT BUKOBA CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6 OF 2014 PHILMON ZUBERI APPLICANT VERSUS

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CORAM: RAMADHANI, J. A. NSEKELA, J. A. AND KAJI, J. A. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: SAMATTA, C.J, MUNUO,J, A, AND RUTAKANGWA, J, A.)

MAGISTRATES COURTS (FORMS) RULES

Bail Frequently Asked Questions

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA. 30th

STAY OF EXECUTION-whether the application has been overtakenusually,

INDUSTRIAL COURT ACT

THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRffiUNAL. Judge Patrick Robinson, President. Mr. John Hocking PUBLIC

THE MAGISTRATES' COURTS ACT, Title PART I. Short title and commencement. Interpretation. PART II

Q. What is Bail? Q. What is a Bailable and Non-Bailable offence?

Legal Supplement Part B Vol. 55, No st April, RULES THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES, 2016

BE it enacted by the King's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with

THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its eightieth session, November 2017

ELIGI EDWARD MASSAWE AND THREE OTHERS (On behalf of 104 others)..applicants ATTORNEY GENERAL AND TWO OTHERS...RESPONDENTS

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS APPELLANT VERSUS MT SGT FABIAN KIMARO.. RESPONDENT

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE FOREIGN VEHICLES TRANSIT CHARGES ACT CHAPTER 84 REVISED EDITION 2006

THE RULES TO REGULATE PROCEEDINGS FOR CONTEMPT OF THE SUPREME COURT, 1975'

Transport Licencing (Goods Carrying Vehicles) (Amendment) SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION

evidence Saint Augustine University of Tanzania From the SelectedWorks of DR SPENCER JR

IN THE FAIR COMPETITION TRIBUNAL AT DAR ES SALAAM TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2013 TANZANIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. LTD...APPELLANT VERSUS JUDGMENT

This Bill would amend the Magistrate s Courts Act, Cap. 116A to (a)

CHAPTER 127 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

In this application, the applicant has moved the Court to review its. decision in Criminal Appeals Nos. 128 and 129 of 2007.

Penalties and Sentences Act 1985

BY JOHN O.E ARUTU, REGISTRAR MEDIATION, COMMERCIAL COURT DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIIVIL APPLICATION NO.111 OF 2006 STANBIC BANK TANZANIA LTD.. APPLICANT VERSUS

The appellants, through the services of the Women's Legal Aid. Centre (WLAC) lodged the present appeal to challenge the dismissal of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM VERSUS

In this application made under Rule 11 (2) (b) of the Court of. Appeal Rules, 2009, the applicant, Indian Ocean Hotels Ltd. t/a

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM ON APPEAL FROM: THE COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL DIVISION C1/2014/0269/QBACF/C1/2014/0269(A)/FC3

Governors Adjudications. Easy Read Self Help Toolkit

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE TAX REVENUE APPEALS ACT CHAPTER 408 REVISED EDITION 2006

CHILDREN AND YOUNG PERSONS

THE NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ACT, NO. 34 OF 2008 [31st December, 2008.]

1994 No. 405 BAIL ACT 1978 REGULATION. PART 1 PRELIMINARY Citation 1. This Regulation may be cited as the Bail Regulation 1994.

AT DODOMA DOM CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1 OF HARUNI PIASON 2. IBRAHIM MTANI... APPLICANTS VERSUS DORINA NDALIJE...

AN APPLICATION BY JULIAN ASSANGE TO CANCEL AN ARREST WARRANT RULING OF THE SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE (THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE) EMMA ARBUTHNOT,

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA

Fiji Islands Extradition Act 2003

PART VI BAIL AND REMAND

A BILL. i n t i t u l e d. An Act to amend and extend the Prevention of Crime Act 1959.

RULE 82 CRIMINAL APPEAL RULE INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS

versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI

Transcription:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.170 OF 2004 (Originating fr~m Cr. Case No.l043/2000 From the Decision of Resident Magistrate Court of Kisutu AT DAR ES ES SALAAM IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR BAIL PENDING APPEAL AMIN MOHAMED VERSUS APPLICANT SHANGWA, J. RULING This is an application for bail pending appeal. It has been brought by the applicant Amin Mohamed under 5.368 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1985. It is supported by his affidavit. At present, he is serving a sentence of three years' term of imprisonment at Keko Prison, which was imposed on him by the Court of the Resident Magistrate at Kisutu, in Criminal Case No.1043 of 2000, after having been found guilty and convicted of the offence

2 of Breaking into a building and committing an offence Cis 296 (2) of the Penal Code. He was jointly and together charged with five others. His name appears on the charge sheet as accused number six. After having been convicted and sentenced to imprisonment, he appealed to this court as he was not satisfied with both conviction and sentence imposed on him. His appeal is number 170 of 2004. It is yet to be heard and determined. He is now praying to be released on bail pending the hearing and determination of his appeal. Learned counsel for the applicant Prof. Safari has raised two major grounds for this application. First, that the applicant is ill. Second, that his appeal against conviction and sentence by the Court below has overwhelming chances of success. On the first ground, Prof. Safari submitted that the applicant is suffering from hypertension, headache and diabetes. On the second ground, he submitted that the applicant's appeal has overwhelming

In reply to his submissions, learned State Attorney for the Republic Mr. MWipopo submitted on the first ground that the applicant's illness which is composed of hypertension, headache and diabetes is treatable while in Prison. On the second ground, he submitted that there is strong evidence on record to prove that the applicant committed the offence with which he was charged and found guilty by the court below which convicted him thereof and sentenced him to imprisonment. Whereas learned counsel for the applicant prayed that the applicant's application be allowed on the two grounds advanced by. him, learned State Attorney prayed that the applicant's application be There is no dispute that the applicant is ill. The issue is whether his illness constitutes a sufficient cause to grant him bail

4 pending appeal. For me, I think it does. His health problems namely hypertension, headache and diabetes with which he is affected cannot be controlled when one is living in poor Prison conditions as those at Keko Prison from where he is serving his sentence. The said prison is crowded with prisoners. The majority of them are very noisy. Those who are serving long sentences are in a State of despair and are quite trouble some in their daily life. The prison food services are notoriously poor. fed on porridge, Ugali, beans and broth. Mostly, the prisoners are Sometimes they put much sugar in porridge and much salt in the beans and broth. Patients with diabetes and hypertension such as the applicant are advised by medical Doctors not to. take sugared and salty foods. When such a patient is in prison such as is the applicant, it becomes next to impossible to avoid noisy situations which are prevalent there. Also, it is next to impossible to avoid sugared and salty foods which are detrimental to diabetic patients and patients who are suffering from hypertension such as is the applicant. This means that the

applicant's illness is not controllable in prison and for this reason, there is a sufficient cause for him to be granted bail pending the hearing and determination of his appeal.. One of the tests which is commonly applied by this court in considering applications of this nature is whether or not the applicant's appeal has overwhelming chances of success. This is an old test. I find that this old test has some disadvantages in applying it. One of its greatest disadvantage is that it attracts pre-mature comments by the court on the merit of the appeal and it calls for a pre judgment in the pending appeal. Due to such a disadvantage, I will not apply it in this case. For the reason which I have earlier given, I hereby grant this application and order that the applicant be released on bail pending appeal in the sum of shs.l0,ooo,ooo/=with two reliable sureties

The sureties have to be approved by the District Registrar. The applicant has to surrender his passport if any to the Central Police Station, Dar es Salaam. In addition to that, the applicant has to report to the District Registrar once in every month starting from next month uhtil his appeal is heard and finally determined. ~... A.F. Shangwa JUDGE Delivered in chambers in the presence of the applicant and his learned counsel Prof. Safari together with learned State Attorney Mr. Mwipopo for the Republic. ~-0{ A.F. Shangwa