Case: 4:09-cv ERW Doc. #: 1617 Filed: 07/21/14 Page: 1 of 5 PageID #: 27975

Similar documents
United States District Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE (For Offenses Committed On or After November 1, 1987)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

United States District Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

United States District Court

United States District Court Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

United States District Court Western District of Kentucky PADUCAH DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California

United States District Court

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

United States District Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cr AJS Document 46 Filed 05/24/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Western District of Pennsylvania )

Case: 4:07-cr RGK-RGK Document #: 176 Date Filed: 08/21/09 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Southern District of Florida Miami Division

United States District Court Southern District of Florida MIAMI DIVISION

Case: 5:15-cr DCR-REW Doc #: 141 Filed: 07/03/17 Page: 1 of 8 - Page ID#: 1579 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/24/ :19 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2015 EXHIBIT 9

Case 1:14-cr SS Document 50 Filed 06/17/15 Page 1 of 7. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURI Western District of Texas AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:11-cr RWS -CCH Document 50 Filed 02/07/12 Page 1 of 5

United States District Court LOOGED I CEMD

Case 1:11-cr LO Document 66 Filed 03/30/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 937 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Eastern District ofvirginia

CASE NUMBER: /,' 6*3/"*7*7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JULIA bu COLD; cl_

Case 2:13-cr TJH Document 59 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:280. United States District Court Central District of California

Case 8:15-cr JLS Document 59 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:300 United States District Court Central District of California

Case 8:07-cr AG Document 141 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:2159. United States District Court Central District of California

Case 8:16-cr JLS Document 59 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:269 United States District Court Central District of California

Case 8:07-cr CJC Document 50 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:213. United States District Court Central District of California

Case 1:12-cr LMB Document 128 Filed 01/25/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 929. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Eastern District of Virginia

Case 2:08-cr DDP Document 37 Filed 10/19/2009 Page 1 of 5. United States District Court Central District of California

Case 8:06-cr DOC Document 43 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 5. United States District Court Central District of California

United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Case 2:06-cr DDP Document 92 Filed 10/03/2008 Page 1 of 8. United States District Court Central District of California

United States District Court Southern District of Florid a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of South Carolina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of New Jersey

Case 1:08-cr RJL Document 17 Filed 01/06/09 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. District of. Signature of Judge. Richard J.

Case 1:03-cr BBM-GGB Document 162 Filed 02/18/05 Page 1 of 5

Case 5:14-cr Document 589 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 15273

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Eastern District of Virginia Alexandria Division

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of New Jersey

I am proud to share with you one of the great wins of anybody s legal career.

5B1.1 GUIDELINES MANUAL November 1, 2015

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 108,207. In the Matter of CHRISTOPHER Y. MEEK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

PlainSite. Legal Document. Missouri Eastern District Court Case No. 4:09-cv Jo Ann Howard and Associates, P.C. et al v.

On March 27, 2008, Scott Shields ("Shields" or. pleaded guilty to one count of Conspiracy to Fraudulently Obtain

Case 1:15-cr NGG Document 11 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: X - - -X

Unlawfully Entering or Remaining in the United States. (1) (Apply the Greater) If the defendant committed the instant offense after sustaining

JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SAC COUNTY

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 388

Case 3:04-cr JAH Document 309 Filed 01/17/13 PageID.1104 Page 1 of 6

ORDER MODIFYING SENTENCE

Department of Corrections

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS TRANSCRIPT OF SENTENCING HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE CARLOS MURGUIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 85 1

NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW VS. OF McLENNAN COUNTY, TEXAS

15A Conditions of probation. (a) In General. The court may impose conditions of probation reasonably necessary to insure that the defendant

Monday April 19, JUDGE POLK

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR WOODBURY COUNTY

Case: 2:13-cr MHW-TPK Doc #: 56 Filed: 08/28/14 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 368

AN ACT RELATING TO DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR OR DRUGS; INCREASING THE PENALTY FOR HOMICIDE BY

OCCAOnline Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Southern District of Texas

Selected Ohio Felony Sentencing Statutes Ohio Rev. Code Ann

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

Session of HOUSE BILL No By Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice 1-18

JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE (42 PA.C.S.) AND LAW AND JUSTICE (44 PA.C.S.) - OMNIBUS AMENDMENTS 25, 2008, P.L.

Ehrenclou & Grover. attorneys at law

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEN COUNTY, OHIO

TYPE OF OFFENSE(S) AND SECTION NUMBER(S) LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) 3. CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)

Ohio Felony Sentencing Statutes Ohio Rev. Code Ann (2018)

14.12: Judgment and Sentencing at Arraignment or Trial

PART C IMPRISONMENT. If the applicable guideline range is in Zone B of the Sentencing Table, the minimum term may be satisfied by

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of New Jersey

H 7688 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Case 2:18-cr JPS Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 16 Document 3

Case 3:15-cv GNS Document 1 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 144 Filed: 09/29/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1172

FLORIDA STATUTES ANNOTATED TITLE 46. CRIMES CHAPTER 775. DEFINITIONS; GENERAL PENALTIES; REGISTRATION OF CRIMINALS (2010)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE VEHICLE CODE MISDEMEANOR GUILTY PLEA FORM. 1. My true full name is

United States Court of Appeals

Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16

U.S. District Court District of South Carolina (Greenville) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE#: 6:17-cr KFM All Defendants

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY GREENLEAF, FONTANA, SCHWANK, WILLIAMS, WHITE AND HAYWOOD, AUGUST 29, 2017 AN ACT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA

THE FOLLOWING ITEMS MUST BE SENT IN WITH YOUR APPLICATION IN ORDER FOR IT TO BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE:

G.S. 15A Page 1

_ term of imprisonment is imposed. The defendant is also ordered _ and a penalty assessment in the amount of

PUBLIC INFORMATION. INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE PLACED ON THE GUAM FAMILY VIOLENCE REGISTRY

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 82 1

SENATE BILL NO. 34 IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE - FIRST SESSION A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED

Effect of Nonpayment

Transcription:

Case: 4:09-cv-01252-ERW Doc. #: 1617 Filed: 07/21/14 Page: 1 of 5 PageID #: 27975 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION JO ANN HOWARD AND ASSOCIATES, P.C., SPECIAL DEPUTY RECEIVER OF LINCOLN MEMORIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, MEMORIAL SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AND NATIONAL PREARRANGED SERVICES, INC., ET AL., v. Plaintiffs, J. DOUGLAS CASSITY; RANDALL K. SUTTON; BRENT D. CASSITY; J. TYLER CASSITY; RHONDA L. CASSITY; ET AL., Defendants. Case No. 09-CV-1252-ERW PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT J. DOUGLAS CASSITY Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a(2, Plaintiffs respectfully request an Order of the Court approving dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiffs claims against Defendant J. Douglas Cassity ( Cassity. The decision to grant a Rule 41(a(2 motion to dismiss without prejudice lies within the sound discretion of the district court. Thatcher v. Hanover Ins. Grp., Inc., 659 F.3d 1212, 1213 (8th Cir. 2011 (quoting Hamm v. Rhone Poulenc Rorer Pharm., Inc., 187 F.3d 941, 950 (8th Cir. 1999. In exercising its discretion, the court should consider: (1 whether the party presents a proper explanation for its desire to dismiss; (2 whether a dismissal would result in waste of judicial resources; (3 whether a dismissal will prejudice the opposing party; and (4 whether the party seeks dismissal merely to avoid an adverse decision or to seek a more favorable forum. Id. at 1213-14 (quoting Hamm, 187 F.3d at 950. 1809292

Case: 4:09-cv-01252-ERW Doc. #: 1617 Filed: 07/21/14 Page: 2 of 5 PageID #: 27976 All four of these factors weigh in favor of granting Plaintiffs motion. First, Plaintiffs reasons for seeking voluntary dismissal of their claims against Cassity are simple and pragmatic. Since filing their Third Amended Complaint, a $435,000,000 restitution order has entered against Cassity in the parallel criminal case, with the Special Deputy Receiver named as the primary victim to receive restitution payments. See Ex. A at 6. Representations made by Cassity indicate that he will be financially unable to pay even a fraction of this award, let alone an additional judgment. See ECF No. 1442 (Exs. A & B. In addition, costly and time-consuming challenges related to Cassity s access to case information will only increase through the remainder of discovery and trial. Continuing to litigate this matter against Cassity makes little economic sense in light of the fact that any recovery by Plaintiffs would be duplicative and outweighed by the time and effort spent pursuing their claims. Second, dismissal will conserve, rather than waste, judicial resources by avoiding any additional rulings or motion practice that may be prompted by Cassity s continued presence in this lawsuit. Dismissing Cassity will simplify matters before the Court and the presence of fewer defendants will streamline the case for both pretrial and trial purposes. Cf. Furminator, Inc. v. Ontel Prods. Corp., 246 F.R.D. 579, 594 (E.D. Mo. 2007 (grant of voluntary dismissal would conserve judicial resources expended on hearings, motion practice, and trial. Third, no prejudice will be suffered by Cassity or by any of the remaining Defendants as a result of Cassity s dismissal from this lawsuit. Cassity has not filed any motions for summary judgment, has not been served with any discovery directed at him, and has not initiated any discovery. Cassity also has asserted no counterclaims or cross claims, and no cross claims have been asserted against him. Not only will Cassity suffer no prejudice, he will benefit from not 1809292 2

Case: 4:09-cv-01252-ERW Doc. #: 1617 Filed: 07/21/14 Page: 3 of 5 PageID #: 27977 having to expend time, costs, and resources to prepare for trial and will avoid the risk of additional adverse judgments. Finally, Plaintiffs do not seek voluntary dismissal of their claims against Cassity to avoid an adverse decision or to seek a more favorable forum. Plaintiffs have already defeated two motions to dismiss filed by Cassity and dismissal does not give them any tactical advantage. Plaintiffs will continue to pursue their claims in this court. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request the Court dismiss Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Douglas Cassity without prejudice. Dated this 21st day of July 2014. Respectfully submitted, s/ Wendy B. Fisher Daniel M. Reilly (Admitted Pro Hac Vice Larry S. Pozner, E.D. Missouri Bar No. 2792CO Wendy B. Fisher (Admitted Pro Hac Vice Glenn E. Roper (Admitted Pro Hac Vice Farrell A. Carfield (Admitted Pro Hac Vice Lauren G. Jaeckel (Admitted Pro Hac Vice Sean Connelly (Admitted Pro Hac Vice Michael P. Robertson (Admitted Pro Hac Vice Michael T. Kotlarczyk (Admitted Pro Hac Vice Dru R. Nielsen (Admitted Pro Hac Vice Ashley D. Morgan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice Reilly Pozner LLP 1900 16th Street, Suite 1700 Denver, CO 80202 (303 893-6100 1809292 3

Case: 4:09-cv-01252-ERW Doc. #: 1617 Filed: 07/21/14 Page: 4 of 5 PageID #: 27978 Maurice B. Graham, Bar No. 3257 Morry S. Cole, Bar No. 77854 Gray, Ritter & Graham, P.C. 701 Market Street, Suite 800 St. Louis, MO 63101 (314 241-5620 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jo Ann Howard and Associates, P.C., in its capacity as Special Deputy Receiver of Lincoln Memorial Life Insurance Company, Memorial Service Life Insurance Company, and National Prearranged Services, Inc.; the National Organization of Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Associations; the Missouri Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Association; the Texas Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Association; the Illinois Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Association; the Kansas Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Association; Oklahoma Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Association; the Kentucky Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Association; and the Arkansas Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Association 1809292 4

Case: 4:09-cv-01252-ERW Doc. #: 1617 Filed: 07/21/14 Page: 5 of 5 PageID #: 27979 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on July 21, 2014, the foregoing PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT DOUGLAS CASSITY was filed electronically with the Clerk of Court and served by operation of the Court s electronic filing system upon all counsel of record in this case participating in Electronic Case Filing. I hereby further certify that on July 21, 2014, the foregoing was sent by United States Postal Service or by electronic means, as indicated below, to the following non-participants in Electronic Case Filing: Randall J. Singer 10833 Forest Circle Dr. St. Louis, MO 63128 Pro se Tony B. Lumpkin, III 2125 Amur Drive Austin, TX 78745-2085 Pro se Brent Douglas Cassity, Pro se Register # 38224-044 USP Leavenworth U.S. Penitentiary Satellite Camp P.O. Box 1000 Leavenworth, KS 66048 Sharon Nekol Province, Pro se Register # 36759-044 FMC Carswell Federal Medical Center P.O. Box 27137 Fort Worth, TX 76127 David R. Wulf, Pro se Register # 38227-044 FCI Terre Haute Federal Correctional Institution Satellite Camp P.O. Box 33 Terre Haute, IN 47808 James Douglas Cassity, Pro se Register # 02005-045 USP Marion U.S. Penitentiary Satellite Camp P.O. Box 1000 Marion, IL 62959 Randall K. Sutton, Pro Se Register Number 36549-044 FCI Terre Haute Federal Correctional Institution Satellite Camp P.O. Box 33 Terre Haute, IN 47808 s/ Wendy B. Fisher Wendy B. Fisher (Admitted Pro Hac Vice Attorney for Plaintiffs 1809292 5

Case: 4:09-cv-01252-ERW Doc. #: 1617-1 Filed: 07/21/14 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 27980 Exhibit A

AO 2458 (Rev 09112 Sheet 1- Judgment in a Criminal Case United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE THE DEFENDANT: JAMES DOUGLAS CASSITY I:8J pleaded guilty to count(s O Case: 4:09-cv-01252-ERW 4:09-cr-00509-JCH Doc. #: #: 648 1617-1 Filed: Filed: 11/14/13 07/21/14 Page: Page: 1 of 92 PageID of 10 PageID #: 5590 #: 27981 USM Nwnber: 02005-045 --------------------------- N. Scott Rosenblum and Gilbert C. Sison Defendant's Attorney 7, 17,21,24,36 and 48 ofthe Second Superseding Indictment. pleaded nolo contendere to count(s which was accepted by the court, ------------------------------------------------------------ was found guilty on count(s after a plea of not guilty The defendant is adjudicated guilty of these offenses: Date Offense Count Title & Section Nature of Offense Concluded Number(s 18 U.S.c. 1344 Bank Fraud Prior to 1992 and Seven(7 continued until on or about April 28,2010 18 U.S.C. 1343 Wire Fraud Prior to 1992 and Seventeen( 17 continued until on or about April 28,2010 18 U.s.c. 1343 Wire Fraud Prior to 1992 and Twenty-one(21 continued until on or about April 28,2010 The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 8 of this judgment. The sentence is imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The defendant has been found not guilty on count(s ------------------------------------------------- Count( s 1-6,8-16,18-20,22,23,25-35,44-47,49 are dismissed on the motion ofthe United States. It is ordered that the defendant must notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days ofany change ofname, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid. Ifordered to pay restitution, the defendant must notify the court and United States attorney ofmaterial changes in economic circumstances. November 14, 2013 Date of Imposition ofjudgment ature ofjudge Honorable Jean C. Hamilton United States District Judge Name & Title ofjudge November 14,2013 Date signed

AO 245B (Rev 09i!2 Sheet la Judgment in a Criminal Case DEFENDANT: JAMES DOUGLAS CASSIlY District: Case: 4:09-cv-01252-ERW 4:09-cr-00509-JCH Doc. #: #: 648 1617-1 Filed: Filed: 11/14/13 07/21/14 Page: Page: 2 of 93 PageID of 10 PageID #: 5591 #: 27982 Eastern District of Missouri ADDITIONAL COUNTS OF CONVICTION Judgment-Page 2 Of 8 Title & Section Nature of Offense Offense Ended 18 U.s.c. 1341 Mail Fraud Prior to 1992 and continued until on or about April 28,2010 18 U.S.c. 1957(a and 18 US.c. 1957(bXI 18 US.c. 1033(bXI and 18 US.c. 1033(bX2 Money Laundering Misappropriation oflnsurance Funds Jeopardizing Soundness ofinsurer Prior to 1992 and continued until on or about April 28,20 10 Prior to 1992 and continued until on or about April 28,2010 Twenty-four(24 Thirty-six(36 Forty-eight( 48

AO 245B (Rev 09112 Judgment in Criminal Case Sheet 2 - Imprisonment DEFENDANT: JAMES DOUGLAS CASSITY District: Case: 4:09-cv-01252-ERW 4:09-cr-00509-JCH Doc. #: #: 648 1617-1 Filed: Filed: 11/14/13 07/21/14 Page: Page: 3 of 94 PageID of 10 PageID #: 5592 #: 27983 Eastern District of Missouri ------------------- IMPRlSONMENT Judgment-Page _3_ of _8 The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total term of 115 months. This term consists of a term of 115 months on each of Counts 7, 17,21,24,36, and 48, all such terms to be served concurrently. J:8J The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: It is recommended that the defendant participate in the Financial Responsibility Program while incarcerated, if that is consistent with Bureau of Prisons policies. It is also recommended that the defendant be evaluated for participation in the Residential Drug Abuse Program, if this is consistent with the Bureau of Prisons policies. Further recommended the defendant be placed in the BOP Facility at FMC Lexington if this is consistent with the Bureau of Prisons policies. o The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal. o The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district: at a.m.ipm on o as notified by the United States Marshal. J:8J The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons: o before 2 p.m. on J:8J as notified by the United States Marshal Designation requested to be extended past the Holidays on Jan. 6, 2014. o as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office MARSHALS RETURN MADE ON SEPARATE PAGE

AD 245B (Rev 0911 2 Judgment in Criminal Case Sheet J - Supervised Release DEFENDANT: JAMES DOUGLAS CASSITY District: Case: 4:09-cv-01252-ERW 4:09-cr-00509-JCH Doc. #: #: 648 1617-1 Filed: Filed: 11/14/13 07/21/14 Page: Page: 4 of 95 PageID of 10 PageID #: 5593 #: 27984 Eastern District of Missouri SUPERVISED RELEASE Judgment-Page _4_ of _8 Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be on supervised release for a term of _fi_v_e-"-y_ear_s. This term consists ofa term of five years on Count 7, and a term of three years on each of Counts 17,21,24,36, and 48, all such terms to run concurrently. The defendant must report to the probation office in the district to which the defendant is released within 72 hours of release from the custody ofthe Bureau of Prisons. The defendant shall not commit another federal, state, or local crime. The defendant shall not unlawfully possess a controlled substance. The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use ofa controlled substance. The defendant shall submit to one drug test within 15 days of release from imprisonment and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter, as determined by the court The above drug testing condition is suspended, based on the court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse. (Check, if applicable. The defendant shall not possess a firearm, ammunition, destructive device, or any other dangerous weapon. (Check, if applicable. The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of DNA as directed by the probation officer. (Check, if applicable. The defendant shall comply with the requirements ofthe Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (42 U.S.C. 16901, et seq. as directed by the probation officer, the Bureau of Prisons, or any state sex offender registration agency in which he or she resides, works, is a student, or was convicted of a qualifying offense. (Check, if applicable. The defendant shall participate in an approved program for domestic violence. (Check, if applicable. If this judgment imposes a fine or a restitution obligation, it shall be a condition of supervised release that the defendant pay in accordance with the Schedule of Payments sheet ofth is judgment The defendant shall comply with the standard conditions that have been adopted by this court as well as with any additional conditions on the attached page. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISION 1 the defendant shall not leave the judicial district without the perm ission of the court or probation officer; 2 the defendant shall report to the probation officer in a manner and frequency directed by the court or probation officer; 3 the defendant shall answer truthfully all inquiries by the probation officer and follow the instructions of the probation officer; 4 the defendant shall support his or her dependents and meet other family responsibilities; 5 the defendant shall work regularly at a lawful occupation, unless excused by the probation officer for schooling, training, or other acceptable reasons; 6 the defendant shall notify the probation officer at least ten days prior to any change in residence or employment; 7 the defendant shall refrain from excessive use of alcohol and shall not purchase, possess, use, distribute, or administer any controlled substance or any paraphernalia related to any controlled substances, except as prescribed by a physician; 8 the defendant shall not frequent places where contro lied substances are illegally sold, used, distributed. or adm inistered; 9 the defendant shall not associate with any persons engaged in criminal activity, and shall not associate with any person convicted of a felony un less granted permission to do so by the probation officer; 10 the defendant shall permit a probation officer to visit him or her at any time at home or elsewhere and shall permit confiscation of any contraband observed in plain view of the probation officer; 11 the defendant shall notify the probation officer within seventy-two hours of being arrested or questioned by a law enforcement officer; 12 the defendant shall not enter into any agreement to act as an informer or a special agent of a law enforcement agency without the perm iss ion of the court; 13 as directed by the probation officer, the defendant shall notify third parties of risks that may be occasioned by the defendant's crim inal record or personal history or characteristics, and shall permit the probation officer to make such notifications and to confirm the defendant's compliance with such notification requirement.

Case: 4:09-cv-01252-ERW 4:09-cr-00509-JCH Doc. #: #: 648 1617-1 Filed: Filed: 11/14/13 07/21/14 Page: Page: 5 of 96 PageID of 10 PageID #: 5594 #: 27985 AO 245B (Rev 09112 Judgment in Criminal Case Sheet 3C - Supervised Release DEFENDANT: JAMES DOUGLAS CASSITY District: Eastern District of Missouri SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISION Judgment-Page 5_ of _8 While on supervision, the defendant shall comply with the standard conditions that have been adopted by this Court and shall comply with the following additional conditions. If it is determined there are costs associated with any services provided, the defendant shall pay those costs based on a co-payment fee established by the probation office. I.The defendant shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance and submit to a drug test within 15 days of commencement of supervision and at least two periodic drug tests thereafter for use of a controlled substance. 2.The defendant shall participate in a substance abuse treatment program approved by the probation office, which may include substance abuse testing, counseling, Residential Re-entry Center placement, residential or inpatient treatment. 3.The defendant shall abstain from the use of alcohol andlor all other intoxicants. 4.The defendant shall participate in a domestic violence counseling program approved by the probation office. 5.The defendant shall provide the probation office and the Financial Litigation Unit (FLU of the U.S. Attorney's Office access to any requested financial information. The defendant is advised that the probation office may share financial information with FLU. 6.The defendant shall be prohibited from incurring new credit charges or opening additional lines of credit without the approval of the probation office so long as there is a balance on the Court-imposed financial obligation. 7.The defendant shall apply all monies received from any anticipated and/or unexpected financial gains, including any income tax refunds, inheritances, or judgments, to the outstanding Court-ordered financial obligation. The defendant shall immediately notify the probation office of the receipt of any indicated monies. 8.The defendant shall pay the restitution as previously ordered by the Court. 9.The defendant shall not be self-employed or be employed as a "consultant" without the written permission ofthe probation office. 1O.The defendant shall submit his person, residence, office, or vehicle to a search conducted by the probation office based upon reasonable suspicion of contraband or evidence of a violation of a condition of release. The defendant shall warn any other residents that the premises may be subject to searches pursuant to this condition. II.The defendant shall not create, operate, manage or participate in the creation, operation or management of any business entity, including a family business without the written permission of the probation office.

-.-~..--~-.-~-..~~ Case: 4:09-cv-01252-ERW 4:09-cr-00509-JCH Doc. #: #: 648 1617-1 Filed: Filed: 11/14/13 07/21/14 Page: Page: 6 of 97 PageID of 10 PageID #: 5595 #: 27986 AO 2458 (Rev 09/12 Judgment in Criminal Case Sheet 5 - Criminal Penalties DEFENDANT: JAMES DOUGLAS CASSITY District: Eastern District of Missouri CRIMINAL MONETARY PENALTIES Judgment-Page _6_ of _8 The defendant must pay the total criminal monetary penalties under the schedule of payments on sheet 6 A ssessm ent Fine Restitution Totals: $600.00 $435,515,234.00 The determination of restitution is deferred until will be entered after such a determination. An Amended Judgment in a Criminal Case (AO 245C D The defendant must make restitution (including community restitution to the following payees in the amount listed below. If the defendant makes a partial payment, each payee shall receive an approximately proportional payment unless specified otherwise in the priority order or percentage payment column below. However, pursuant ot 18 U.S.C. 3664(1, all nonfederal victims must be paid before the United States is paid. Name of Pavee Total Loss* Restitution Ordered Priority or Percentage Jo Ann Howard & Associates, P.e. Attn: Special Deputy Receiver P.O. Box 160050 Austin, Texas 78716 $435,515,234.00 $435,515,234.00 Restitution amount ordered pursuant to plea agreement D The defendant must pay interest on restitution and a fine of more than $2,500, unless the restitution or fine is paid in full before the fifteenth day after the date ofthe judgment, pursuant to 18 U.S.c. 3612(f. All ofthe payment options on Sheet 6 may be subject to penalties for delinquency and default, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3612(g. ~ The court determined that the defendant does not have the ability to pay interest and it is ordered that: ~ The interest requirement is waived for the. 0 fine 181 restitution. The interest requirement for the 0 fine 0 restitution is modified as follows: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3663A, for each of Counts 7, 17,21, 24, 36, and 48, the defendant shall make restitution in the total amount of $43 5,515,234.00. THE COURT FINDS that the defendant does not have the ability to pay a fine. * Findings for the total amount of losses are required under Chapters 109A, 110, 11 OA, and 113A of Title 18 for offenses committed on or after September 13,1994 but before April 23, 1996.

AO 2458 (Rev 09!12 Judgment in Criminal Case Sheet SA - Criminal Monetary Penalties DEFENDANT: JAMES DOUGLAS CASSITY District: Case: 4:09-cv-01252-ERW 4:09-cr-00509-JCH Doc. #: #: 648 1617-1 Filed: Filed: 11/14/13 07/21/14 Page: Page: 7 of 98 PageID of 10 PageID #: 5596 #: 27987 Eastern District of Missouri ADDITIONAL TERMS FOR CRIMINAL MONETARY PENALTIES Judgment-Page 7 of _8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3663A, for each of Counts 7, 17, 21, 24, 36, and 48, the defendant shall make restitution in the total amount of $435,515,234.00. This obligation is joint and several with Brent Douglas Cassity, Howard A. Wittner, Randall K. Sutton, David R. Wulf, and Sharon Nekol Province, meaning that no further payments shall be required after the sum of the amounts actually paid by all defendants has fully covered the compensable injuries. Payments of restitution shall be made to the Clerk of the Court for transfer to the victims. The interest requirement for the restitution is waived. All criminal monetary penalties are due in full immediately. The defendant shall pay all criminal monetary penalties through the Clerk of Court. Jfthe defendant cannot pay in full immediately, then the defendant shall make payments under the following minimum payment schedule: During incarceration, it is recommended that the defendant pay criminal monetary penalties through an installment plan in accordance with the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program at the rate of 50% of the funds available to the defendant. {fthe defendant owes any criminal monetary penalties when released from incarceration, then the defendant shall make payments in monthly installments of at least $300 or no less than \0% of the defendant's gross earnings, whichever is greater, with payments to commence no later than 30 days after release from imprisonment. Until all criminal monetary penalties are paid in full, the defendant shall notify the Court and this district's United States Attorney's Office, Financial Litigation Unit, of any material changes in the defendant's economic circumstances that might affect the defendant's ability to pay criminal monetary penalties. The defendant shall notify this district's United States Attorney's Office, Financial Litigation Unit, of any change of mailing or residence address that occurs while any portion of the criminal monetary penalties remains unpaid. It is recommended that the defendant participate in the Financial Responsibility Program while incarcerated, ifthat is consistent with Bureau of Prisons policies.

AO 245B (Rev. 09i12 in Criminal Case Sheet 6 - Schedule of Payments DEFENDANT: JAMES DOUGLAS CASSITY District: Eastern District of Missouri SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS Judgment-Page 8_ of _8 Having assessed the defendant's ability to pay, payment ofthe total criminal monetary penalties shall be due as follows: A ~ Lump sum payment of $435,515,834.00 due immediately, balance due o not later than, or o in accordance with 0 C, 0 D, or 0 E below; or ~ F below; or B 0 Payment to begin immediately (may be combined with o C, 0 D, or 0 E below; or 0 F below; or C 0 Payment in equal (e.g., equal, weekly, monthly, quarterly installments of over a period of e.g., months or years, to commence (e.g., 30 or 60 days after the date of this judgment; or ------ o 0 Payment in equal (e.g., equal, weekly, monthly, quarterly installments of over a period of e.g., months or years, to commence (e.g., 30 or 60 days after release from imprisonment to a term of supervision; or E 0 Payment during the term of supervised release will commence within (e.g., 30 or 60 days after Release from imprisonment. The court will set the payment plan based on an assessment ofthe defendant's ability to pay at that time: or F ~ Case: 4:09-cv-01252-ERW 4:09-cr-00509-JCH Doc. #: #: 648 1617-1 Filed: Filed: 11/14/13 07/21/14 Page: Page: 8 of 9 PageID of 10 PageID #: 5597 #: 27988 Special instructions regarding the payment of criminal monetary penalties: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment ofsloo on each occounts 7,17, 21, 24,36, and 48, for a total of $600, which shall be due immediately. Restitution ordered in the amount of $435,515,234.00 see pgs. 6&7. Unless the court has expressly ordered otherwise, if this judgment imposes imprisonment, payment of criminal monetary penalties is due during the period of imprisonment. All criminal monetary penalty payments, except those payments made through the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program are made to the clerk of the court. The defendant will receive credit for all payments previously made toward any criminal monetary penalties imposed. Joint and Several Defendant and Co-defendant Names and Case Numbers (including defendant number, Total Amount, Joint and Several Amount, and corresponding payee, if appropriate. This obligation is joint and several with Brent Douglas Cassity, Howard A. Wittner, Randall K. Sutton, David R. Wulf, and Sharon Nekol Province, meaning that no further payments shall be required after the sum of the amounts actually paid by all defendants has fully covered the compensable injuries. Payments of restitution shall be made to the Clerk of the Court for transfer to the victims. The interest requirement for the restitution is waived. o The defendant shall pay the cost ofprosecution. o The defendant shall pay the following court cost(s: I:8J The defendant shall forfeit the defendant's interest in the following property to the United States: Payments shall be applied in the following order: (I assessment; (2 restitution principal, (3 restitution interest, (4 fine principal, (5fine interest (6 community restitution.(7 penalties, and (8 costs, including cost of prosecution and court costs.

Case: 4:09-cr-00509-JCH Doc. #: 648 Filed: 11/14/13 Page: 9 of 9 PageID #: 5598 Case: 4:09-cv-01252-ERW Doc. #: 1617-1 Filed: 07/21/14 Page: 10 of 10 PageID #: 27989 I have executed this judgment as follows: DEFENDANT: JAMES DOUGLAS CASSITY CASE NUMBER: 4:09-CR-00509-JCH-J USM \lumber: 02005-045 ~~~~------------- UNITED STATES MARSHAL RETURN OF JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE The Defendant was delivered on to at, with a certified copy of this judgment. UNITED STATES MARSHAL By Deputy U. S. Marshal o The Defendant was released on to Probation o -------- ---------- ----------- The Defendant was released on to Supervised Release o and a Fine of 0 and Restitution in the amount UNITED STATES MARSHAL By Deputy U.S. Marshal I certify and Return that on, I took custody of at and delivered same to on F.F.T. U.S. MARSHAL ElMO By DUSM