Unequal participation: Why workers don t vote (anymore) and why it matters

Similar documents
Voter Turnout, Income Inequality, and Redistribution. Henning Finseraas PhD student Norwegian Social Research

Characteristics of the Ethnographic Sample of First- and Second-Generation Latin American Immigrants in the New York to Philadelphia Urban Corridor

Ambar Narayan (The World Bank)

Unequal Recovery, Labor Market Polarization, Race, and 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Maoyong Fan and Anita Alves Pena 1

Europe and the US: Preferences for Redistribution

A Profile of the Gauteng Province: Demographics, Poverty, Income, Inequality and Unemployment from 2000 till 2007

For slides and the paper.

A Profile of the Northern Cape Province: Demographics, Poverty, Income, Inequality and Unemployment from 2000 till 2007

A Profile of the Mpumalanga Province: Demographics, Poverty, Income, Inequality and Unemployment from 2000 till 2007

Chapter 10. Resource Markets and the Distribution of Income. Copyright 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

U.S. Family Income Growth

A Profile of the Limpopo Province: Demographics, Poverty, Income, Inequality and Unemployment from 2000 till 2007

ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT: BELARUS

Korea s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

EXAMINATION 3 VERSION B "Wage Structure, Mobility, and Discrimination" April 19, 2018

Majorities attitudes towards minorities in European Union Member States

PORTUGUESE SOCIAL CLUB PAWTUCKET, RHODE ISLAND EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS February 25, 2010

The impact of Chinese import competition on the local structure of employment and wages in France

How s Life in Germany?

Supplementary Materials for Strategic Abstention in Proportional Representation Systems (Evidence from Multiple Countries)

Documentation of Indicators

Toward a New Social Contract:

How s Life in Mexico?

How s Life in Switzerland?

Part 1: Focus on Income. Inequality. EMBARGOED until 5/28/14. indicator definitions and Rankings

Gender attitudes in the world of work: cross-cultural comparison

Household Inequality, Corporate Capital Structure and Entrepreneurial Dynamism by Fabio Braggion, Mintra Dwarkasing, and Steven Ongena

Caste Networks in the Modern Indian Economy

A Perpetuating Negative Cycle: The Effects of Economic Inequality on Voter Participation. By Jenine Saleh Advisor: Dr. Rudolph

Emigrating Israeli Families Identification Using Official Israeli Databases

INCOME INEQUALITY WITHIN AND BETWEEN COUNTRIES

Inequality in Indonesia: Trends, drivers, policies

ST. FRANCIS XAVIER PARISH EAST PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

Poverty among immigrants upon arrival in Sweden - a comparison by the type of migration

How s Life in Germany?

Intergenerational mobility during South Africa s mineral revolution. Jeanne Cilliers 1 and Johan Fourie 2. RESEP Policy Brief

GENDER AND ETHNO-RACIAL INEQUALITIES IN LABOR MARKET OUTCOMES AMONG THE SECOND GENERATION IN TORONTO

Global Income Inequality by the Numbers: In History and Now An Overview. Branko Milanovic

Beyond Unemployment: Further differences in Catholic and Protestant performance in the Northern Ireland labour market 1

ST. ANTHONY PARISH PAWTUCKET, RHODE ISLAND EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

THE PORTUGUESE ORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL SERVICES AND OPPORTUNITIES SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

Comparing Foreign Political Systems Focus Questions for Unit 1

Japan s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

Perceptions of inequality: perspectives of national policy makers

Ipsos MORI November 2016 Political Monitor

The State of Working Wisconsin 2017

Liberty, Equality, Prosperity

Rise in Populism: Economic and Social Perspectives

Definition: The number of disposed cases as a percentage of the Active Caseload.

Earnings Inequality: Stylized Facts, Underlying Causes, and Policy

SAMARA S 2017 DEMOCRACY 360: APPENDIX

Tracing Emigrating Populations from Highly-Developed Countries Resident Registration Data as a Sampling Frame for International German Migrants

Can you measure social cohesion in South Africa?

CAN FAIR VOTING SYSTEMS REALLY MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

Poverty and Inequality

Flash Eurobarometer 364 ELECTORAL RIGHTS REPORT

Italy s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

Demographic Data. Comprehensive Plan

Globalization and Inequality : a brief review of facts and arguments

Analysis of Categorical Data from the California Department of Corrections

19 ECONOMIC INEQUALITY. Chapt er. Key Concepts. Economic Inequality in the United States

Online supplement to:

How s Life in Estonia?

Majorities attitudes towards minorities in (former) Candidate Countries of the European Union:

How s Life in Norway?

How s Life in Slovenia?

EGGE EC s Expert Group on Gender and Employment

How s Life in Canada?

Political ignorance & policy preference. Eric Crampton University of Canterbury

Edexcel (A) Economics A-level

Maastricht University

Public Attitudes toward Asylum Seekers across Europe

IMMACULATE CONCEPTION PARISH NEW BEDFORD, MA EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

Lab 3: Logistic regression models

The Rich, The Poor, and The Changing Gap: An Investigation of the Determinants of Income Inequality from

Social Stratification and Its Transformation in Brazil

Online Appendix: The Effect of Education on Civic and Political Engagement in Non-Consolidated Democracies: Evidence from Nigeria

How s Life in Australia?

Attitudes towards minority groups in the European Union

CONSUMER PROTECTION IN THE EU

5A. Wage Structures in the Electronics Industry. Benjamin A. Campbell and Vincent M. Valvano

Special Eurobarometer 471. Summary

Wage Premia and Wage Differentials in the South African Labour Market

AQA Economics A-level

Male labor migration and migrational aspirations among rural women in Armenia. Arusyak Sevoyan Victor Agadjanian. Arizona State University

Appendix A: Economic Development and Culture Trends in Toronto Data Analysis

The Transmission of Economic Status and Inequality: U.S. Mexico in Comparative Perspective

Inclusion and Gender Equality in China

Access to Food, Poverty and Inequality by Social and Religious groups in India: Estimation with Unit Level Data. Panchanan Das & Anindita Sengupta

Policy Deliberation and Electoral Returns: Evidence from Benin and the Philippines. Léonard Wantchékon, Princeton University 5 November 2015

How s Life in the Slovak Republic?

1 Year into the Trump Administration: Tools for the Resistance. 11:45-1:00 & 2:40-4:00, Room 320 Nathan Phillips, Nathaniel Stinnett

GLOBALIZATION AND THE GREAT U-TURN: INCOME INEQUALITY TRENDS IN 16 OECD COUNTRIES. Arthur S. Alderson

THE (SECTARIAN) POLITICS OF PUBLIC-SECTOR EMPLOYMENT IN BAHRAIN

ST. ANTHONY PARISH TAUNTON, MA EVALUATION OF THE 2008 ELECTIONS

ATTITUDES TOWARDS INCOME AND WEALTH INEQUALITY AND SUPPORT FOR SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE OVER TIME AND THE INTERACTION WITH NATIONAL IDENTITY

How s Life in Sweden?

Poverty and Inequality

Where are the Middle Class in OECD Countries? Nathaniel Johnson (CUNY and LIS) David Johnson (University of Michigan)

How s Life in the Czech Republic?

Transcription:

Unequal participation: Why workers don t vote (anymore) and why it matters Political and Economic Inequality: Concepts, Causes and Consequences Armin Schäfer Zürich, 28.1.2016

The increase of income inequality (23 countries) 120 115 110 105 100 1980 1990 2000 2010 Market income Household income Data: SWIID. 1980=100.

Inequality Feedback Loop Income inequality Unequal responsivenes s Unequal participation Unequal representation

Outline I. Income inequality and unequal participation (cross section) II. Unequal turnout in Germany III. Unequal representation IV. Opinion differences between social classes V. Unequal Responsiveness?

Income inequality and self-reported voter turnout (87 elections, 23 countries, ~1980-2010) 1.9 Reported turnout.8.7.6 20 24 28 32 36 40 Income inequality (Gini) Note: This graph shows the predicted probability to vote calculated from a logistic regression based on 87 elections in 23 countries over three decades. It controls for age, age², gender, unemployment, union membership, and several country level variables.

Income inequality and voter turnout (23 countries) 1.9.8.7.6 20 24 28 32 36 40 Inequality (Gini index) Education high medium low Note: This graph shows the predicted probability to vote calculated from a logistic regression based on 87 elections in 23 countries over three decades. It controls for age, age², gender, unemployment, union membership, and several country level variables.

Income inequality and voter turnout (23 countries) 1.9.8.7.6 20 24 28 32 36 40 Inequality (Gini index) Income quintiles highest 2. 3. 4. lowest Note: This graph shows the predicted probability to vote calculated from a logistic regression based on 87 elections in 23 countries over three decades. It controls for age, age², gender, unemployment, union membership, and several country level variables.

UNEQUAL TURNOUT IN GERMANY

Unequal turnout in German general elections 1 Income 1 Education 1 Subjective class.9.9.9.8.8.8.7.7.7.6.6.6 1983 1987 1990 1994 1998 2002 2005 2009 2013 1983 1987 1990 1994 1998 2002 2005 2009 2013 1983 1987 1990 1994 1998 2002 2005 2009 2013 low medium high Source: ALLBUS 1980-2014. The graph shows predicted probabilities based on a logistic regression that includes age, age², gender, political interest, and a trend variable as controls.

Social Class and turnout in German general elections 1983 1987 1990 1994 1998 2002 Social class Worker Technician Non-manual routine Lower service Higher service Self-employed Employers 2005 2009.6.7.8.9 1 Reported turnout Source: ALLBUS 1980-2014. Social class is based on occupations and follows the Goldthorpe- Erikson scheme.

UNEQUAL (DESCRIPTIVE) REPRESENTATION

Social Class and Party Membership in Germany (2000-2010) Semi- and Unskilled Workers Routine Non-Manual Skilled Workers Lower-grade Professionals Self-Employed Higher-grade Professionals 0.02.04.06.08 Source: ALLBUS 1980-2012.

Workers in Parliament (Bundestag) Civil Servants (Beamte) Political Organization Freelancers Salaried Employees Self-Employed Other Public Sector Employees Missing Workers 0 50 100 150 200 Source: Kintz 2010: 495-496.

OPINION DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SOCIAL CLASSES

Range of opinion differences Data: Elsässer-Hense-Schäfer 2015. Each vertical line stands for one survey item (N=255). The box includes 50 percent of all cases and the vertical line inside the box is the median. Self-employed Civil servants Higher ranking white collar Routine white collar Skilled korkers 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Percentage point differences to unskilled workers

Opinion differences within different groups Unskilled workers vs. self-employed Low vs. high education Women vs. men East vs. west German 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Percentage point difference Data: Elsässer-Hense-Schäfer 2015.. Each vertical line stands for one survey item (N=255). The box includes 50 percent of all cases and the vertical line inside the box is the median

UNEQUAL RESPONSIVENESS?

How the Bundestag decides 1 Selfemployed 1 Unskilled workers.8.8.6.4.2 Probability of policy change.6.4.2 0 0.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 1 Share of self-employed who support policy change 0 0.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 1 Share of workers who support policy change Data: Elsässer-Hense-Schäfer 2015. The graph shows the predicted probability of a policy change depending on the share of a social class who supports this change. The graph is based on a logistic regression.

How the Bundestag decides 1 Civil servants 1 Skilled workers.8.8.6.4.2 Probability of policy change.6.4.2 0 0.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 1 Share of civil servants who support policy change 0 0.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 1 Share of workers who support policy change Data: Elsässer-Hense-Schäfer 2015. The graph shows the predicted probability of a policy change depending on the share of a social class who supports this change. The graph is based on a logistic regression.

Summary With rising social inequality, voter turnout declines. Lower turnout means unequal turnout. Turnout rates have dramatically declined for members of the working class. At the same time, workers are neither present in parties nor in Parliament. Political preferences between social classes differ systematically and more strongly so than educational groups of women and men. Political decisions do not reflect the preferences of workers but those of civil servants and the self-employed.

Unequal participation: Why workers don t vote (anymore) and why it matters Political and Economic Inequality: Concepts, Causes and Consequences Armin Schäfer Zürich, 28.1.2016

Opinion differences in different policy fields Foreign Policy Social & Cultural Issues Environment & Energy Labor Market & Social Policy Economy & Finance Migration 0 5 10 15 20 25 Opinion differences among social groups (median) Education Region Gender Social class Data: Elsässer-Hense-Schäfer 2015.

Turnout differences within the working class 1983 1987 1990 1994 1998 Income low medium high 2002 2005 2009.5.6.7.8.9 Reported turnout Source: ALLBUS 1980-2014.

Social Class and turnout in German regional elections, 1978-2011 1.8.6.4.2 0 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 higher civil servants lower civil servants higher employees medium-level employees lower-level employees high-skilled workers skilled workers unskilled worker Source: Based on 110 Länder elections, various surveys. The graph shows predicted probabilities that result from a multinomial logistic regression with controls for age, cohort, gender and religion.

Workers choice between Social Democracy and abstention, 1978-2011.6.5.4.3.2.1 0 SPD Abstention 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 Source: Based on 110 Länder elections, various surveys. The graph shows predicted probabilities that result from a multinomial logistic regression with controls for age, cohort, gender and religion.