UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Similar documents
Case 2:16-cv MMD-CWH Document 1 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

cij;'l~jl NO~ AC..

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv SS Document 1 Filed 09/11/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:14-cv HRH Document 37 Filed 12/08/14 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

Case 2:14-cv PMW Document 4 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 20

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA C O M P L A I N T. COMES NOW, Plaintiff, JUAN ANTONIO CASTRO RIOS, (hereinafter

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Complaint for Patent Infringement

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:07-cv GEL Document 1 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:10-cv TJW-CE Document 1 Filed 05/19/10 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:15-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 09/25/15 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v. COMPLAINT

Case 2:10-cv JLR Document 1 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Case No.

Case 1:16-cv BMC Document 8 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 93 PageID #: 73 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Civil Action No JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

Transcription:

SHAWN J. KOLITCH, OSB No. 063980 E-mail: shawn@khpatent.com KOLISCH HARTWELL, P.C. 200 Pacific Building 520 S.W. Yamhill Street Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: (503) 224-6655 Facsimile: (503) 295-6679 Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION ACUMED LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Case No. 3:15-cv-01581 v. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT SKELETAL DYNAMICS L.L.C., a Florida limited liability company, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Defendant. Plaintiff Acumed LLC alleges, based on actual knowledge with respect to plaintiff and plaintiff s acts, and on information and belief with respect to other matters, as follows: NATURE OF THE CASE 1. This is a civil suit for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq., and specifically under 35 U.S.C. 271 and 281. Page 1

THE PARTIES 2. Plaintiff Acumed LLC ( Acumed ) is a Delaware limited liability company, with a principal place of business and a mailing address at 5885 N.W. Cornelius Pass Road, Hillsboro, Oregon 97124. 3. Defendant Skeletal Dynamics L.L.C. ( Skeletal Dynamics ) is a privately held Florida limited liability company, with a principal place of business and a mailing address at 8905 S.W. 87 Avenue, Suite 201, Miami, Florida 33176. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. This Court has federal question and diversity subject matter jurisdiction of this action. The Court has federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a) because of the claim under 35 U.S.C. 271 for patent infringement. The Court has diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332 because the parties are citizens of different states (Oregon and Florida), and because the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, exceeds seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000). 5. This Court has personal jurisdiction in this action because Skeletal Dynamics conducts business, including selling and/or offering to sell products in connection with the allegations of this lawsuit, in the state of Oregon and in this judicial district. 6. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400, because the injuries from the defendant s actions are felt in this district, where Acumed s principal place of business is located, and because Skeletal Dynamics is subject to personal jurisdiction in this district. Page 2

ACUMED S PATENT 7. Acumed owns all right, title, and interest in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,030,162 ( the 162 patent ), including the right to sue thereon and the right to recover for infringement thereof. The 162 patent is titled Axial Tension Screw and issued on February 29, 2000. A copy of the 162 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The 162 patent gives Acumed the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, and selling the invention claimed in the patent within the United States and from importing the invention claimed in the patent into the United States. THE SKELETAL DYNAMICS INFRINGING PRODUCTS 8. Skeletal Dynamics is making, using, offering for sale, selling, and/or importing bone fixation screws that include sections with varying thread pitch and diameter, under the name REDUCT Headless Compression Screw, constituting infringement of Acumed s 162 patent. A copy of a publicly available Skeletal Dynamics brochure advertising the REDUCT Headless Compression Screws and related instrumentation is attached hereto as Exhibit B. CAUSES OF ACTION 9. Skeletal Dynamics has infringed and is infringing the 162 patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell, and/or importing the Skeletal Dynamics REDUCT Headless Compression Screws. 10. Infringement by Skeletal Dynamics has been and continues to be willful. 11. Acumed has suffered, and will continue to suffer, substantial damages in an amount to be proven at trial, through lost profits, lost sales, and/or lost royalties, due to infringement by Skeletal Dynamics. 12. Acumed has suffered, and will continue to suffer, permanent and irreparable injury, for which Acumed has no adequate remedy at law. Page 3

13. Acumed is entitled to relief provided by 35 U.S.C. 281, 283, 284, and 285. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Acumed prays for judgment as follows: A. That Skeletal Dynamics has infringed, and is infringing, the 162 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271; B. That infringement by Skeletal Dynamics is willful; C. That Skeletal Dynamics be preliminarily and permanently enjoined against all acts of patent infringement, including but not limited to making, using, selling, offering to sell, and importing the Skeletal Dynamics REDUCT Headless Compression Screws; D. That Skeletal Dynamics be required to deliver to Acumed for destruction any and all articles in its possession and/or under its control that infringe the 162, including but not limited to all Skeletal Dynamics REDUCT Headless Compression Screws, and associated packaging and advertisements; E. That Skeletal Dynamics be ordered to pay Acumed the damages that Acumed has suffered due to patent infringement by Skeletal Dynamics, together with interest thereon; F. That Skeletal Dynamics be ordered to account for and pay Acumed the total profits Skeletal Dynamics has received from the sale of products infringing the 162 patent; G. That this case be declared exceptional pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285, due to willful infringement by Skeletal Dynamics, and that Acumed be awarded trebled damages and its reasonable attorneys fees and costs; and H. That Acumed have such other and further relief as the Court and/or a jury deems just and proper. Page 4

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Acumed hereby demands a trial by jury of all matters so triable. DATED this 20th day of August, 2015. Respectfully submitted, KOLISCH HARTWELL, P.C. By s/ Shawn J. Kolitch SHAWN J. KOLITCH, OSB No. 063980 E-mail: shawn@khpatent.com 200 Pacific Building 520 S.W. Yamhill Street Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: (503) 224-6655 Facsimile: (503) 295-6679 Attorney for Plaintiff Page 5