IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:1

Case 0:10-cv MJD-FLN Document 1 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Court File No.

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:16-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND PARTIES

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2013 Page 1 of 17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:18-cv WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 COMPLAINT

USDC IN/ND case 1:18-cv document 1 filed 04/09/18 page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No.

Case 2:18-cv JAD-CWH Document 1 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:14-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:10-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 8

Case: 4:13-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 08/01/13 Page: 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:07-cv CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

Case 9:13-cv KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/24/2015 EXHIBIT C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 2:11-cv CEH-DNF Document 1 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 55 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Case 2:12-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 6:13-cv MHS Document 1 Filed 03/01/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv JFW-JC Document 1 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Civil Action No. 07-CV-571

Case 1:18-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 10

Case: 5:17-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/21/17 1 of 19. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Case No.

NO. EDMUNDS.COM, INC. IN THE DISTRICT COURT a New York Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demanded)

Case 1:11-cv JRH -WLB Document 1 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case 1:07-cv LTS Document 1 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 1 of 20

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/10/11 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND TRADEMARK

Case3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv JVB-APR document 1 filed 05/16/18 page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. Civil Action No. Defendant. JURY DEMANDED

Case: 2:17-cv MHW-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/23/17 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/08/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No. 5:13-CV-679 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. Plaintiff, Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:14-cv RWZ Document 1 Filed 05/08/14 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:16-cv Vale v. Cava et al. Document 7. View Document.

IC 24-2 ARTICLE 2. TRADEMARKS, TRADE NAMES, AND TRADE SECRETS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:14-cv JPM-tmp Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case 2:13-cv J Document 1 Filed 06/27/13 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/07/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No.: 3:17-CV-398.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 8:15-cv SDM-TGW Document 1 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION. Case No.: Judge:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COMPLAINT

3 James A. McDaniel (Bar No ) 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case: 4:16-cv DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 1 Dockets.Justia.com

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Central District Court Case No. 2:16-cv WBS, Inc. v. Stephen Pearcy et al. Document 2.

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. PS AUDIO, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, vs. JAMES ALLEN, an individual, Defendant. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Plaintiff PS Audio, Inc., alleges as follows: PARTIES 1. Plaintiff PS Audio, Inc. ( PS Audio ), is a corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Colorado, with its principal place of business in Boulder, Colorado. The City of Boulder is in Boulder County, Colorado. 2. Defendant James Allen ( Mr. Allen ) is an individual who resides in Holland, Missouri. The City of Holland is in Pemiscot County, Missouri. JURISDICTION & VENUE 3. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Mr. Allen because he committed the torts set forth in this Complaint, causing damage to PS Audio in Colorado. C.R.S. 13-1-124(1)(a).

4. This Court has federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 & 1388(a), and 15 U.S.C. 1121(a) over the subject matter of this case because this action arises under the trademark laws of the United States, the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1051, et seq. 5. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332(a)(2) because the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between a citizen of the State of Colorado and a citizen of the State of Missouri. 6. Venue of this matter is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2) because this is a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred. Alternatively, venue of this matter also is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(3) because there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in section 1391, and Mr. Allen is subject to this court's personal jurisdiction with respect to this action. BACKGROUND 7. PS Audio manufactures high-end home entertainment audio and power electronic components. With its headquarters in Boulder, Colorado, PS Audio employs 30 people, designs and manufactures products in the US that are sold through authorized dealers throughout the US and distributors doing business in some 40 countries. PS Audio is an industry leader of innovative high-end consumer electronics, including but not limited to after-market power cords. http://www.psaudio.com/products/ 2

8. PS Audio manufactures and sells, on a nationwide and international basis, three after-market power cords for audiophile consumers: (1) the AC3 Power Cable; (2) the AC5 Power Cable; and the AC12 Power Cable. A 1.5 meter PS Audio Power Cable retails between $165 for an AC3 to $999 for an AC12. 9. PS Audio, Inc., owns the registered trademark, PS Audio, a word mark, US Registration Number: 3487193, as well as the following Mark Drawing: 10. PS Audio discovered counterfeit AC12 power cables being sold as legitimate PS Audio products on Audiogon, a website devoted to the sale of new and used high-end audio components, including audiophile grade power cords. 11. Kevin Jackson, PS Audio s Retail Sales Manager, received a telephone call from a customer named Rich Coleman, who asked if PS Audio cables would make a difference in his system. After Kevin answered his question, in effect, Mr. Coleman said he found one at a steep discount on Audiogon from a seller with the pseudonym WesternWoods. Audiogon confirmed that Mr. Allen is that seller with the pseudonym WesternWoods. 12. Kevin told him to be careful because he had heard of non-genuine cables being sold through sites like Audiogon. Mr. Coleman told Kevin he had actually just purchased the cable, and it would be arriving with the next few days. 3

Kevin asked if he would send this cable to PS Audio, and PS Audio would provide a factory certified cable back to him at no charge. Mr. Coleman happily agreed, sent the cable he purchased through Audiogon, which turned out to be counterfeit, and PS Audio supplied a genuine cable AC12 power cable to Mr. Coleman. Mr. Coleman even provided screen shots of the entire purchase process through Audiogon to PS Audio. 13. Although packaging and construction closely mimics legitimate PS Audio power cables, the packaging and cable itself Mr. Allen has been selling are counterfeit. 14. The counterfeit box was darker in color (off white) compared to the legitimate one. A counterfeit box has the following characteristics: The counterfeit states WORLDS FINEST POWER CABLES when it really should say THE WORLD S FINEST POWER CABLES. Notice THE and the apostrophe in WORLD S has been left out. The image of the power cable line is overly dark like it has been photocopied. The third item in the comparison chart is misspelled Conductiors instead of Conductors. Under the section Removable ground pin, the green check marks have been left out. A legitimate PS Audio box will have all cables checked except the Jewel AC model. 15. The legitimate PS Audio AC12 power cables and Mr. Allen s counterfeit cables differ as follows: PS logo on IEC is upside down compared to a legitimate PS Audio cable. The cable jacket on the counterfeit cable has finer weaving When cut in half, the counterfeit has a small cable with extra insulation in order to fool the buyer into thinking it s a thick power cable. The weight of a legitimate AC12 is 3.4 pounds. The counterfeit weighed in at only 2.9 pounds. 4

16. Mr. Allen s counterfeit cable is the top cable in the following photo, while the legitimate PS Audio AC12 power cable is on the bottom of the photo: 17. Mr. Allen has sold 122 PS Audio power cords on Audiogon. It is more likely than not that they are all counterfeit. The sale of these counterfeit power cords is an infringement on PS Audio s federally registered trademark. 18. Mr. Allen s counterfeit power cables do not provide the same level of high performance PS Audio power cables provide to audiophiles, who normally are PS Audio customers. 5

FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Lanham Act Violation) 19. PS Audio incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 16, inclusive, of this Complaint. 20. This is a Claim for Relief for counterfeiting and federal trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. 1114. 21. Mr. Allen s sale of counterfeit PS Audio power cables constitutes repeated violations of the Lanham Act. See sections 32 and 43 of the Lanham Act, codified at 15 U.S.C. 1114 and 1125. 22. In a letter to Mr. Allen dated December 6, 2017, PS Audio demanded that he immediately stop selling counterfeit PS Audio Power Cables, agree to an injunction, and pay damages. Mr. Allen did not respond to this letter. 23. On Audiogon, Mr. Allen advertised counterfeit PS Audio Power Cables. Mr. Allen uses commerce that may lawfully be regulated by Congress in connection with the sale, offering for sale, and advertising of goods in connection with which such use is likely to cause confusion or mistake or to deceive purchasers as to the source of origin or sponsorship or endorsement of such goods, or wrongly lead them to conclude that some connection exists between Mr. Allen, and PS Audio, all in violation of 15 U.S.C.A. 1114(1). 24. Mr. Allen s use of the "PS Audio" designation in conjunction with the sale of products bearing counterfeit serial numbers is a reproduction, counterfeit copy and/or colorable imitation of PS Audio s federal registered "PS Audio" marks. This use is likely 6

to cause confusion, mistake, and/or deception, and will cause serious and irreparable damage to the reputation and goodwill of PS Audio, all in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1114. 25. Mr. Allen, by such conduct, are unfairly competing with PS Audio and its authorized dealers, creating confusion with its goods, trading on the fame and goodwill of PS Audio s PS Audio mark, diluting them and unfairly creating through false allegations in trade an appearance that the owner of the mark has endorsed, or sponsored, or is connected with, Defendants goods, to the discredit of plaintiff s goods, in violation of plaintiff s rights at common law under 15 U.S.C.A. 1114(1). 26. Mr. Allen committed these acts with knowledge that such imitation is intended to be used to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive. 27. The goodwill attached to PS Audio s mark "PS Audio", and such mark, each have a value considerably in excess of $100,000, and Defendants conduct directly affects such goodwill and has caused and will cause damage to plaintiff in excess of that amount, exclusive of interest and costs. 28. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(a), PS Audio is entitled to recover all of the damages PS Audio has sustained as a result of Mr. Allen s sale of 122 counterfeit power cords, calculated as the amount of lost sales for each of the power cables. 29. As an alternate to actual damages, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(a), PS Audio is entitled to the disgorgement of all profits generated by Mr. Allen for the sale of counterfeit PS Audio power cords. 30. As an alternate to actual damages or disgorgement of gross sales, PS Audio is entitled to $1,000 for each of the counterfeit power cables sold, plus if the court 7

finds that the use of the counterfeit mark was willful, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(2), not more than $2,000,000 per counterfeit mark per type of goods sold, as the court considers just. 31. Because Mr. Allen s violation is of section 32(1)(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(a), PS Audio is entitled to recover all of its attorney fees and costs incurred in bringing and prosecuting this action. 32. U.S.C. 1116(a), entitled, Jurisdiction; service, states: The several courts vested with jurisdiction of civil actions arising under this chapter shall have power to grant injunctions, according to the principles of equity and upon such terms as the court may deem reasonable, to prevent the violation of any right of the registrant of a mark registered in the Patent and Trademark Office or to prevent a violation under subsection (a), (c), or (d) of section 1125 of this title. Any such injunction may include a provision directing the defendant to file with the court and serve on the plaintiff within thirty days after the service on the defendant of such injunction, or such extended period as the court may direct, a report in writing under oath setting forth in detail the manner and form in which the defendant has complied with the injunction. Any such injunction granted upon hearing, after notice to the defendant, by any district court of the United States, may be served on the parties against whom such injunction is granted anywhere in the United States where they may be found, and shall be operative and may be enforced by proceedings to punish for contempt, or otherwise, by the court by which such injunction was granted, or by any other United States district court in whose jurisdiction the defendant may be found. 33. Mr. Allen s continued conduct in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1114, will cause PS Audio irreparable harm. 8

infringement. injunction. trademarks. 34. PS Audio is likely to succeed on its claims against Mr. Allen for trademark 35. The harm suffered by PS Audio tips heavily in favor of granting the 36. Public policy supports that an injunction be issued against those infringing 37. PS Audio is entitled to a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction and permanent injunction prohibiting Mr. Allen from sell counterfeit PS Audio AC3 Power Cables, AC5 Power Cables and/or AC12 Power Cables. 38. PS Audio is entitled to an injunction impounding all PS Audio products in Mr. Allen s possession. Further, as part of the injunction, Mr. Allen should be ordered to file with the court and serve on PS Audio within thirty days after the service on Mr. Allen of such injunction, or such extended period as the court may direct, a report in writing under oath setting forth in detail the manner and form in which Mr. Allen has complied with the injunction. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Colorado Consumer Protection Act Violation) 39. PS Audio incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 16, inclusive, of this Complaint. 40. Mr. Allen advertises PS Audio power cords for sale in Colorado over Audiogon and similar website and, upon information and belief, sells those products in Colorado. 9

41. This is a Claim for Relief for violation of Colorado Consumer Protection Act, C.R.S. 6-1-101. The CCP defines deceptive trade practices at C.R.S. 6-1-105, as including, but not limited to, knowingly passing off goods or services as those of another, knowingly misrerpresenting the source the goods, and knowlingly misrepresenting the standard quality or grade of a good. 42. PS Audio is entitled to maintain a private cause of action against Mr. Allen for violating the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, C.R.S. 6-1-101. C.R.S. 6-1- 113(1)(c). practices by: 43. Mr. Allen violated C.R.S. 6-1-105 by engaging in deceptive trade (a) Knowingly pass[ing] off goods, services, or property as those of another; (b) Knowingly mak[ing]... false representation[s] as to the source, sponsorship, approval, or certification of goods, services, or property;.... (g) Represent[ing] that goods, food, services, or property are of a particular standard, quality, or grade, or that goods are of a particular style or model, if he knows or should know that they are of another; and.... (u) Fail[ing] to disclose material information concerning goods, services, or property which information was known at the time of an advertisement or sale if such failure to disclose such information was intended to induce the consumer to enter into a transaction. 44. Under C.R.S. 6-1-113(2)(a), PS Audio is entitled to damages against Mr. Allen for the greater of actual damages or $500 for each violation. 10

45. Because Mr. Allen s conduct was in bad faith, under C.R.S. 6-1-113(2)(a)(iii), PS Audio is entitled to treble damages against Mr. Allen (three times actual damages). 46. Under C.R.S. 6-1-113(2)(b), PS Audio is entitled to recover its attorney fees and costs against Mr. Allen. 47. PS Audio is entitled to a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction and permanent injunction prohibiting Mr. Allen from sell counterfeit PS Audio AC3 Power Cables, AC5 Power Cables and/or AC12 Power Cables. 48. Mr. Allen s continued conduct in violation of C.R.S. 6-1-105 will cause PS Audio irreparable harm. 49. PS Audio is likely to succeed on its claims against Mr. Allen for his violation of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act. 50. The harm suffered by PS Audio tips heavily in favor of granting the injunction. 51. Public policy supports that an injunction be issued against those violating the Colorado Consumer Protection Act. 52. PS Audio is entitled to an injunction impounding all PS Audio products in Mr. Allen s possession. WHEREFORE, PS Audio requests judgment against Mr. Allen as follows: A. On the First Claim for Relief, for a judgment in favor of PS Audio and against Mr. Allen for compensatory damages or disgorgement in the sum of at least $500,000, plus interest, or such other amount as may be proven at trial. 11

B. On the First Claim for Relief, for a judgment in favor of PS Audio and against Mr. Allen, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(2), for $2,000,000 per counterfeit mark per type of goods sold, or in such other amount as the court considers just. C. On the First Claim for Relief, because Mr. Allen s violation is of section 32(1)(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(a), for a judgment in favor of PS Audio and against Mr. Allen for all of PS Audio s attorney fees and costs incurred in bringing and prosecuting this action. D. On the First Claim for Relief, PS Audio is entitled to a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction and permanent injunction prohibiting Mr. Allen from sell counterfeit PS Audio AC3 Power Cables, AC5 Power Cables and/or AC12 Power Cables. E. On the First Claim for Relief, because this is an exceptional case, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(a), for attorneys fees and costs in an amount to be proven at trial. F. On the Second Claim for Relief, for a judgment in favor of PS Audio and against Mr. Allen for compensatory damages in the sum of at least $500,000, plus interest, or such other amount as may be proven at trial. G. On the Second Claim for Relief, PS Audio is entitled to a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction and permanent injunction prohibiting Mr. Allen from sell counterfeit PS Audio AC3 Power Cables, AC5 Power Cables and/or AC12 Power Cables. 12

H. On the Second Claim for Relief, pursuant to C.R.S. 6-1-113(2)(b), for a judgment in favor of PS Audio and against Mr. Allen for all of PS Audio s attorney fees and costs incurred in bringing and prosecuting this action. I. On all Claims for Relief, for such other and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate. JURY DEMAND Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 38(b), PS Audio demands a trial by jury of any issue triable of right by jury. Dated: January 26, 2018. PS Audio, Inc. 4826 Sterling Drive Boulder, Colorado 80301 /s/ Mark A. Larsen MARK A. LARSEN (UTAH 3727) LARSEN & RICO, PLLC ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 170 SO. MAIN STREET, SUITE 1150 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101 TELEPHONE: (801) 364-6500 MLARSEN@LARSENRICO.COM Attorneys for Plaintiff PS Audio, Inc. 13