Case Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 1 of 18

Similar documents
i Case No (KJC)

rdd Doc 381 Filed 09/01/17 Entered 09/01/17 17:18:41 Main Document Pg 1 of 27

Signed July 27, 2018 United States Bankruptcy Judge

mew Doc 354 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 10:23:03 Main Document Pg 1 of 15

rdd Doc 648 Filed 08/25/15 Entered 08/25/15 09:58:02 Main Document Pg 1 of 19

Case CSS Doc 84 Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11

Case bjh11 Doc 957 Filed 04/16/19 Entered 04/16/19 14:24:44 Page 1 of 12

Case: jtg Doc #:404 Filed: 05/17/16 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN.

1. On November 30, 2018, Toisa Limited and certain of its affiliates,

scc Doc 930 Filed 11/28/18 Entered 11/28/18 16:57:42 Main Document Pg 1 of 33

Case 2:18-bk ER Doc 1153 Filed 12/27/18 Entered 12/27/18 17:22:11 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 24

CHAPTER: 11. This form is mandatory. It has been approved for use by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California.

Case KG Doc 357 Filed 10/09/18 Page 1 of 34 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : :

scc Doc 848 Filed 10/04/18 Entered 10/04/18 13:26:18 Main Document Pg 1 of 41

Case Document 951 Filed in TXSB on 11/23/16 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Case cec Doc 326 Filed 10/30/14 Entered 10/31/14 10:01:10

Signed November 1, 2016 United States Bankruptcy Judge

Upon the motion, dated June 20, 2009 (the Motion ), as orally modified at the

This document has been electronically entered in the records of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio.

EXECUTION VERSION PLAN SUPPORT AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Baltimore Division)

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case KJC Doc 603 Filed 01/20/17 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.

scc Doc 15 Filed 06/19/18 Entered 06/19/18 12:49:01 Main Document Pg 1 of 10

scc Doc 591 Filed 07/26/17 Entered 07/26/17 14:35:45 Main Document Pg 1 of 222

Case bjh11 Doc 915 Filed 04/10/19 Entered 04/10/19 20:08:04 Page 1 of 43

Case Document 21 Filed in TXSB on 07/12/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case KJC Doc 441 Filed 09/11/18 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA DURHAM DIVISION PLAN OF LIQUIDATION

GUARANTY OF PERFORMANCE AND COMPLETION

shl Doc 726 Filed 12/18/12 Entered 12/18/12 15:50:51 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

mkv Doc 458 Filed 04/12/17 Entered 04/12/17 14:12:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 5 : : : : : : : )

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

mg Doc 208 Filed 05/30/12 Entered 05/30/12 14:07:11 Main Document Pg 1 of 17

CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT

COOPERATION AGREEMENT

Case ast Doc 631 Filed 08/23/17 Entered 08/24/17 14:27:44. (Jointly Administered)

Case Doc 227 Filed 02/26/18 Page 1 of 18. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Greenbelt Division

Signed May 8, 2018 United States Bankruptcy Judge

rdd Doc 1001 Filed 09/11/14 Entered 09/11/14 14:52:49 Main Document Pg 1 of 54

Case KG Doc 451 Filed 11/15/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

SECURITY SHARING AGREEMENT. THIS SECURITY SHARING AGREEMENT (this Agreement) is made as of June 25, 2014.

SECURITY AGREEMENT. NOW, THEREFORE, the Debtor and the Secured Party, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

Case: jtg Doc #:596 Filed: 09/08/17 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN.

BENEFICIAL HOLDER BALLOT FOR ACCEPTING OR REJECTING THE DEBTORS JOINT CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION CLASS 4 ADDITIONAL NOTES CLAIMS

Case: swd Doc #:288 Filed: 01/18/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN ) ) ) ) ) )

Case Document 1058 Filed in TXSB on 09/14/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

ENTERED TAWANA C. MARSHALL, CLERK THE DATE OF ENTRY IS ON THE COURT'S DOCKET

(Jointly Administered)

THIS CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE IS BEING ISSUED IN REGISTERED FORM PURSUANT TO A CERTIFICATE; AND IS RECORDED ON THE BOOKS OF THE COMPANY.

SECURITY AGREEMENT :v2

Case Document 1045 Filed in TXSB on 09/13/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case Document 1122 Filed in TXSB on 10/19/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case Document 563 Filed in TXSB on 03/08/18 Page 1 of 298 ENTERED 03/08/2018

alg Doc 4107 Filed 06/21/13 Entered 06/21/13 15:25:45 Main Document Pg 1 of 3. Chapter 11. Debtors.

Case: HJB Doc #: 3310 Filed: 03/08/16 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 179 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

LAND TRUST AGREEMENT W I T N E S S E T H

[FORM OF] COLLATERAL AGREEMENT. made by AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION. in favor of THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

PROMISSORY NOTE SECURED BY DEED OF TRUST. Date: City of Milpitas, CA 95035

TRANSOCEAN PARTNERS LLC 2014 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

Case Document 593 Filed in TXSB on 03/16/18 Page 1 of 9

Case Doc 1443 Filed 06/08/17 Entered 06/08/17 13:49:03 Main Document Pg 1 of 91

Case LSS Doc 166 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : Chapter 11

INTERIM ORDER UNDER 11 U.S.C. 105, 362 AND 541 AND FED R. BANKR. P

Case BLS Doc 2646 Filed 04/11/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. Debtors. (Jointly Administered)

NON-RELOCATION AGREEMENT. by and between CLARK COUNTY STADIUM AUTHORITY, and RAIDERS FOOTBALL CLUB, LLC. Clark County, Nevada

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. x : : : : : : : : x

Case Doc 541 Filed 01/13/17 Entered 01/13/17 16:07:14 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 102

AMERICAN EXPRESS ISSUANCE TRUST

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CONTRIBUTION AND CONVEYANCE AGREEMENT

AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF TRUST

Case BLS Doc 314 Filed 03/26/18 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : :

DRAFT FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT DATED Surety Bond No. SURETY BOND

Case KRH Doc 3040 Filed 07/12/16 Entered 07/12/16 17:55:33 Desc Main Document Page 62 of 369

PURCHASE AGREEMENT, CONSENT AND RELEASE

ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.

Signed June 24, 2017 United States Bankruptcy Judge

CONTRIBUTION, CONVEYANCE AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT. by and among PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY PHILLIPS 66 GULF COAST PIPELINE LLC

VOTING AGREEMENT RECITALS

mew Doc 2184 Filed 01/19/18 Entered 01/19/18 13:54:34 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

Case Document 3084 Filed in TXSB on 05/12/14 Page 1 of 37 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF MASTERCARD INCORPORATED

NOBLE MIDSTREAM GP LLC FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT. Dated Effective as of September 20, 2016

Case Document 866 Filed in TXSB on 05/25/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case Document 19 Filed in TXSB on 04/14/16 Page 1 of 42

SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE

CARTOGRAM, INC. VOTING AGREEMENT RECITALS

mew Doc 954 Filed 07/20/17 Entered 07/20/17 14:25:17 Main Document Pg 1 of 14

ERIN ENERGY CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Case Document 675 Filed in TXSB on 08/31/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

CLAIM SERVICE AGREEMENT

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF TRANSUNION * * * * * ARTICLE I NAME. The name of the Corporation is TransUnion.

[FORM OF] COLLATERAL AGREEMENT. made by AMBAC LSNI, LLC, in favor of THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON. as Note Collateral Agent and Trustee

PURCHASE CONTRACT , 2015

Chapter 11: Reorganization

THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Transcription:

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 LOCKWOOD HOLDINGS, INC., et al., 1 Case No. 18-30197 (DRJ) Debtors. Jointly Administered ORDER AUTHORIZING (I) THE SALE OF CERTAIN ASSETS OF THE ESTATE FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS, CLAIMS, ENCUMBRANCES AND OTHER INTERESTS (SPRING, TEXAS HANGAR AND RELATED EQUIPMENT); (II) THE DEBTOR TO ASSUME AND ASSIGN AGREEMENT WITH NORTHWEST AIRPORT MANAGEMENT, LP, AND (III) GRANTING RELATED RELIEF (relates to Docket No. 740) Upon the motion (the Motion ) 2 of Lockwood Holdings, Inc. and certain of its affiliates, the above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (collectively the Debtors ), for entry of an order, pursuant to sections 105(a), 363, 365, 503 and 507 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the Bankruptcy Code ) and Rules 2002, 6004, 9007 and 9014 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the Bankruptcy Rules ), authorizing and approving the following: ENTERED 11/07/2018 (i) (ii) the sale of the Assets (as defined below); the entry into, performance under and terms and conditions of the Commercial Contract Improved Property and addendum (collectively the Pearsall PSA ), whereby the Debtors have agreed to sell, and Mason Pearsall, Jr. (the Purchaser ) has agreed to buy, certain of the Debtors assets (specifically as set forth and defined in the Pearsall PSA, and described on Exhibit B to the Motion, the Assets ), free and clear of all claims, liens, encumbrances and other to; 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor s federal tax identification number are: Lockwood Holdings, Inc. (9726); LH Aviation, LLC (6984); Piping Components, Inc. (0197); Lockwood International, Inc. (8597); LMG Manufacturing, Inc. (9468); Lockwood Enterprises, Inc. (6504); and 7807 Eagle Lane, LLC (7382). 2 Unless indicated otherwise, capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Pearsall PSA and the Motion.

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 2 of 18 (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) payment of certain fees and expenses at Closing; distribution of sale proceeds as authorized below; assumption and assignment of a certain executory contract; and other related relief. and the Court having reviewed and considered the Motion and the Pearsall PSA; and upon all of the proceedings conducted before the Court, and no objections and responses to the relief requested in the Motion having been timely filed or otherwise received, and it appearing that due notice of the Motion and the Pearsall PSA having been provided; and it appearing that the relief requested in the Motion is in the best interests of the Debtors, their estates, creditors and all other parties in interest; and it appearing that the Court has jurisdiction over this matter; and it further appearing that the legal and factual bases set forth in the Motion establish just cause for the relief granted herein; and after due deliberation thereon, THE COURT EXPRESSLY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: JURISDICTION, VENUE AND FINAL ORDER A. This Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the Motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1334. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157(b)(2) (A), (N) and (O). Venue is proper in this District and in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1408 and 1409. B. This Order constitutes a final and appealable order within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 158(a). Notwithstanding Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h), 6006(d) and 7062, and to the extent necessary under Bankruptcy Rule 9014 and Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as made applicable by Bankruptcy Rule 7054, this Court expressly finds that there is no just reason for delay in the implementation of this Order and expressly directs entry of this Order as set forth herein.

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 3 of 18 NOTICE OF THE PEARSALL PSA AND CURE COSTS C. January 18, 2018 (the First Petition Date ), Lockwood Holdings, Inc., LH Aviation, LLC and Piping Components, Inc. filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. On January 24, 2018 (the Second Petition Date, and together with January 18, 2018 the Petition Dates ), Lockwood International, Inc., LMG Manufacturing, Inc., Lockwood Enterprises, Inc., and 7807 Eagle Lane, LLC ( Eagle Lane ) filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Since the Petition Dates, the Debtors have continued in possession and management of its businesses and properties as debtor-in-possession pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. D. As evidenced by the certificates of service previously filed with this Court, due, proper, timely, adequate and sufficient notice of the Motion and the Pearsall PSA has been provided in accordance with sections 102(1) and 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, and Bankruptcy Rules 2002, 6004 and 9014. The Debtors have complied with all obligations to provide notice of the Motion and the Pearsall PSA. The aforementioned notices are good, sufficient and appropriate under the circumstances, and no other or further notice of the Motion or the Pearsall PSA is or shall be required. E. A reasonable opportunity to object or to be heard regarding the relief requested in the Motion was afforded to all interested persons and entities. F. As evidenced by the certificates of service filed with this Court, the service and notice was good, sufficient and appropriate under the circumstances and no further notice is or shall be required in respect of assumption and assignment of the Airport Agreement to the Purchaser or establishing a cure cost for the Airport Agreement. G. The Airport has had an adequate opportunity to object to or to be heard

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 4 of 18 regarding assumption and assignment of the Airport Agreement and the cure cost (including objections related to the adequate assurance of future performance and objections based on whether applicable law excuses the non-debtor counterparty from accepting performance by, or rendering performance to, the Purchaser for purposes of section 365(c)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code). The deadline to file an objection to the assumption and assignment to the Purchaser of the Airport Agreement has expired, and to the extent any such party timely filed an objection to the assumption and assignment of the Airport Agreement, all such objections have been resolved, withdrawn, overruled, or continued to a later hearing by agreement of the parties. To the extent that any such party did not timely file an objection to the assumption and assignment of the Airport Agreement, such party is deemed to have consented to (i) the assumption and assignment of the Airport Agreement pursuant to the terms of this Order; and (ii) the proposed cure cost set forth in the Motion. MARKETING PROCESS H. The Debtors and their professionals have, under the circumstances, adequately and appropriately marketed the Assets. HIGHEST OR OTHERWISE BEST OFFER; BUSINESS JUDGMENT I. The Pearsall PSA, including the form and total consideration to be realized by the Debtors under the Pearsall PSA, (i) constitutes the highest and best offer received by the Debtors for the Assets; (ii) is fair and reasonable; and (iii) is in the best interests of the Debtors, their estates, their creditors and all other parties in interest. J. The Debtors determination that the consideration provided by the Purchaser under the Pearsall PSA constitutes the highest or otherwise best offer for the Assets constitutes a valid and sound exercise of the Debtors business judgment. K. Consistent with their fiduciary duties, the Debtors have demonstrated good,

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 5 of 18 sufficient and sound business reasons and justifications for entering into the Pearsall PSA and the performance of their obligations under the Pearsall PSA, including, but not limited to, the fact that (i) the consideration provided by the Purchaser under the Pearsall PSA will provide a greater recovery for the Debtors estates than would be provided by any other available alternative, including a separate liquidation of the Assets; and (ii) unless the sale is concluded expeditiously as provided for in the Motion and pursuant to the Pearsall PSA, recoveries of creditors will likely be diminished. GOOD FAITH; ARMS LENGTH SALE L. The sales process engaged in by the Debtors and the Purchaser, including, without limitation, the negotiation of the Pearsall PSA, was at arms' length, non-collusive, in good faith, and substantively and procedurally fair to all parties. M. The Purchaser is a good faith buyer within the meaning of section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code, and is therefore entitled to the full protection of that provision, and otherwise has proceeded in good faith in all respects in connection with this proceeding. Neither the Debtors nor the Purchaser has engaged in any conduct that would prevent the application of section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code. N. The Pearsall PSA was proposed, negotiated and entered into by and between the Debtors and the Purchaser without collusion, and neither the Debtors nor the Purchaser has engaged in any conduct that would cause or permit the Pearsall PSA to be avoided, or costs or damages to be imposed, under section 363(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. O. The form and total consideration to be realized by the Debtors under the Pearsall PSA constitutes fair value, full and adequate consideration, reasonably equivalent value and the reasonable market value for the Assets.

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 6 of 18 CORPORATE AUTHORITY P. The Debtors have (i) full corporate or other power to execute, deliver and perform their obligations under the Pearsall PSA and all other transactions contemplated thereby, and entry into the Pearsall PSA has been duly and validly authorized by all necessary corporate or similar action; (ii) all of the corporate or other power and authority necessary to consummate the Pearsall PSA; and (iii) taken all actions necessary to authorize and approve the Pearsall PSA and the transactions contemplated thereby. No consents or approvals, other than those expressly provided for herein or in the Pearsall PSA, are required for the Debtors to consummate the Pearsall PSA. SECTION 363 IS SATISFIED Q. The Assets constitute property of the Debtors estates and exclusive title thereto is presently vested in the Debtors estates within the meaning of section 541(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. R. The sale of the Assets to the Purchaser under the terms of the Pearsall PSA meets the applicable provisions of section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code such that the sale of the Assets will be free and clear of any and all liens, claims, encumbrances or other interests (collectively the Liens ) (including, without limitation, the Liens of the Coopers, Wells Fargo and Houston County, et al. property tax authorities) except for the Permitted Encumbrances; the transfer of the Assets to the Purchaser will be free and clear of all Liens and will not subject the Purchaser or any of the Purchaser's assets to any liability for any Liens, claims and encumbrances whatsoever (including, without limitation, under any theory of equitable law, antitrust, setoff, or successor or transferee liability) except for the Permitted Encumbrances. The term Permitted Encumbrances includes all encumbrances, restrictions or other interests filed in

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 7 of 18 the deed records office of Harris County, Texas regarding or relating to the Assets, excluding the liens and claims of Coopers, Wells Fargo and the Houston County et al. property tax authorities. All holders of Liens who did not object, or withdrew their objections to the Motion, are deemed to have consented to the relief requested in the Motion pursuant to section 363(f)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code. All holders of Liens are adequately protected thus satisfying section 363(e) of the Bankruptcy Code by either receiving a portion of the cash proceeds pursuant to paragraph 13 of this Order or having their Liens, if any, attach to the remaining net cash proceeds of the Assets ultimately attributable to the property against which they assert a Lien, in the same order of priority and with the same validity, force and effect that such Lien holder had prior to the consummation of the Pearsall PSA, subject to any rights, claims and defenses of the Debtors or their estates, as applicable, or as otherwise provided herein. S. The Purchaser would not have entered into the Pearsall PSA and would not consummate the transactions under the Pearsall PSA, thus adversely affecting the Debtors, their estates, creditors, employees and other parties in interest, if the sale of the Assets was not free and clear of all Liens or if the Purchaser would, or in the future could, be liable for any Liens, including, without limitation and as applicable, certain liabilities that expressly are not assumed by the Purchaser as set forth in the Pearsall PSA or in this Order. The Purchaser asserts that it will not consummate the transactions unless the Pearsall PSA specifically provides, and this Court specifically orders, that none of the Purchaser, its assets or the Assets will have any liability whatsoever with respect to, or be required to satisfy in any manner, whether at law or in equity, whether by payment, setoff or otherwise, directly or indirectly, any (i) Lien; or (ii) any successor or transferee liability for any of the Debtors other than the Permitted Encumbrances.

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 8 of 18 T. The Purchaser is not a successor to the Debtors or their respective estates by reason of any theory of law or equity, and neither the Purchaser nor any of its affiliates shall assume or in any way be responsible for any liability or obligation of the Debtors or their respective estates, except as otherwise expressly provided in the Pearsall PSA or this Order. The Purchaser is not a continuation of the Debtors or their respective estates and there is no continuity between the Purchaser and the Debtors. The Purchaser is not holding itself out to the public as a continuation of the Debtors or their respective estates and the transactions contemplated by the Pearsall PSA do not amount to a consolidation, merger or de facto merger of the Purchaser and the Debtors. U. The transfer of the Assets to the Purchaser under the Pearsall PSA will be a legal, valid and effective transfer of all of the legal, equitable and beneficial right, title and interest in and to the Assets free and clear of all Liens (other than Permitted Encumbrances). V. There is no legal or equitable reason to delay the consummation of the transactions. The Transactions must be approved and consummated promptly in order to preserve the value of the Debtors assets. All factual predicates to the waiver of any stay of this Order under Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d) have been satisfied. W. The Debtors have demonstrated both (i) good, sufficient and sound business judgment, purposes and justifications; and (ii) compelling circumstances for the transactions pursuant to section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code prior to, and outside of, a plan of reorganization in that, among other things, absent the immediate consummation of the transactions, the value of the Debtors assets will be harmed. ASSUMPTION AND ASSIGNMENT OF THE AIRPORT AGREEMENT X. The assumption and assignment of the Airport Agreement (as defined in the

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 9 of 18 Motion) is integral to the Pearsall PSA, does not constitute unfair discrimination, is in the best interests of the Debtors, their estates, creditors and all other parties in interest, and represents the reasonable exercise of sound and prudent business judgment by the Debtors. Y. The Debtors have met all requirements of section 365(b) of the Bankruptcy Code for the Airport Agreement. No monetary or non-monetary defaults exist in the Debtors performance under the Airport Agreement as of the date of this Order other than (a) defaults that are not required to be cured as contemplated in section 365(b)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code, and (b) the amount to cure all defaults of $1,024.00. The Purchaser has provided compensation or adequate assurance of compensation to any counterparty for actual pecuniary loss to such party resulting from a default prior to the Closing under the Airport Agreement, within the meaning of section 365(b)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code. Z. The Purchaser has demonstrated adequate assurance of its future performance under the Airport Agreement within the meaning of sections 365(b)(1)(C) and 365(f)(2)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code. Pursuant to section 365(f) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Airport Agreement shall be assigned and transferred to, and remain in full force and effect for the benefit of, the Purchaser at Closing notwithstanding any provision in the Airport Agreement or other restrictions prohibiting its assignment or transfer. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. The Motion is granted to the extent provided herein. 2. Any objections to the Motion or the relief requested therein that have not been withdrawn, waived or settled, and all reservations of rights included therein, are hereby overruled on the merits and denied with prejudice.

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 10 of 18 3. The findings and conclusions set forth herein constitute the Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7052, made applicable to this proceeding pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9014. To the extent any of the findings of fact constitute conclusions of law, they are adopted as such. To the extent any of the following conclusions of law constitute findings of fact, they are adopted as such. APPROVAL OF THE PEARSALL PSA 4. The Pearsall PSA, all the terms and conditions thereof, and consummation of all of the transactions contemplated therein, are authorized and approved in all respects pursuant to section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. 5. The Debtors and their officers, employees and agents are authorized and directed to (a) take any and all actions necessary, appropriate or reasonably requested by the Purchaser to perform, consummate, implement and close the Pearsall PSA and related transactions, including, without limitation, (i) the sale of all Assets to the Purchaser in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Pearsall PSA and this Order; (ii) the performance of its obligations under the Pearsall PSA and related agreements; and (iii) executing, acknowledging and delivering such deeds, assignments, conveyances and other assurance, documents and instruments of transfer and taking any action for purposes of assigning, transferring, granting, conveying and confirming to the Purchaser, or reducing to possession, the Assets. SALE AND TRANSFER FREE AND CLEAR OF LIENS 6. Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Pearsall PSA and the terms of this Order with respect to the Permitted Encumbrances, pursuant to sections 105(a) and 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Assets shall be sold free and clear of all Liens, whether arising prior to or subsequent to the commencement of the Debtors chapter 11 cases, and whether imposed by

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 11 of 18 agreement, law, equity or otherwise. To the extent Harris County has a tax lien on the Assets securing payment of any 2018 taxes not paid at Closing, the sale shall not be free and clear of such 2018 tax lien. All such Liens shall attach to the remaining cash proceeds of the transactions following the payments to the parties pursuant to paragraph 13 of this Order, with the same validity, force, priority and effect which they now have as against the Assets, subject to any claims and defenses the Debtors may possess with respect thereto. 7. At Closing, all of the Debtors right, title and interest in and to, and possession of, the Assets shall be immediately vested in the Purchaser, pursuant to sections 105(a), 363(b), and 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code free and clear of any and all Liens, except for Permitted Encumbrances. Such transfer shall constitute a legal, valid, binding and effective transfer of, and shall vest the Purchaser with good and marketable title to, the Assets. All persons or entities, presently or on or after the Closing, in possession of some or all of the Assets are directed to surrender possession of the Assets to the Purchaser or its designees on the Closing or at such time thereafter as the Purchaser may request. 8. This Order is and shall be binding upon and govern the acts of all entities, including, without limitation, all filing agents, filing officers, title agents, title companies, recorders of mortgages, recorders of deeds, registrars of deeds, administrative agencies, governmental departments, secretaries of state, federal and local officials and all other persons and entities who may be required by operation of law, the duties of their office or contract, to accept, file, register or otherwise record or release any documents or instruments; and each of the foregoing persons and entities is hereby authorized and directed to accept for filing any and all of the documents and instruments necessary and appropriate to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Pearsall PSA.

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 12 of 18 9. Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Pearsall PSA and this Order with respect to Permitted Encumbrances, all persons and entities (and their respective successors and assigns), including, but not limited to, all debt security holders, equity security holders, affiliates, governmental, tax and regulatory authorities, lenders, customers, vendors, employees, trade creditors, litigation claimants and other creditors holding Liens against the Debtors or the Assets arising under or out of, in connection with, or in any way relating to, the Debtors, the Debtors predecessors or affiliates, the Assets, the ownership, sale or operation of the Assets and the Debtors business prior to Closing or the transfer of the Assets to the Purchaser, are hereby forever barred, estopped and permanently enjoined from asserting such Liens against the Purchaser, its successors or assigns, its property or the Assets. Following the Closing, no holder of any Lien shall interfere with the Purchaser's title to or use and enjoyment of the Assets based on or related to any such Lien, or based on any action the Debtors may take in their chapter 11 cases. 10. If any person or entity that has filed financing statements, mortgages, deeds of trust, mechanic's Liens, lis pendens or other documents or agreements evidencing Liens against or in the Assets shall not have delivered to the Debtor prior to the Closing of the transactions contemplated by the Pearsall PSA, in proper form for filing and executed by the appropriate parties, termination statements, instruments of satisfaction, releases of all Liens (other than the Permitted Encumbrances) that the person or entity has with respect to the Assets, (a) the Purchaser is hereby authorized to file, register or otherwise record a certified copy of this Order, which, once filed, registered or otherwise recorded, shall constitute conclusive evidence of the release of all such Liens against the Purchaser and the Assets; and (b) the Purchaser may seek in this Court or any other court to compel appropriate parties to execute termination statements,

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 13 of 18 instruments of satisfaction and releases of all such Liens with respect to the Assets. This Order is deemed to be in recordable form sufficient to be placed in the filing or recording system of each and every federal, state, or local government agency, department or office. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of this Order authorizing the sale and assignment of the Assets free and clear of Liens shall be self-executing, and none of the Debtors nor the Purchaser shall be required to execute or file releases, termination statements, assignments, consents or other instruments in order to effectuate, consummate and implement the provisions of this Order. GOOD FAITH; ARMS LENGTH SALE 11. The Pearsall PSA has been negotiated and executed, and the transactions contemplated by the Pearsall PSA are and have been undertaken, by Debtors, the Purchaser and their respective representatives at arms' length, without collusion and in good faith, as that term is used in section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, the reversal or modification on appeal of the authorization provided herein to consummate the sale shall not affect the validity of the transactions (including the assumption and assignment of the Airport Agreement), unless such authorization and consummation of the sale are duly and properly stayed pending such appeal. The Purchaser is a good faith purchaser within the meaning of section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code and, as such, are entitled to the full protections of section 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code. 12. None of the Debtors or the Purchaser have engaged in any conduct that would cause or permit the Pearsall PSA or the transactions to be avoided, or damages or costs, to be imposed, under section 363(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. The consideration provided by the Purchaser for the Assets under the Pearsall PSA is fair and reasonable, and the transactions may not be avoided under section 363(n) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 14 of 18 DISTRIBUTION OF SALE PROCEEDS 13. From the cash proceeds at the Closing of the transactions contemplated by the Pearsall PSA, the Debtors are authorized to pay up to (but not exceeding) the amounts set forth below in this paragraph 13 free and clear of Liens. Description Debtors pro rata portion of year 2018 Property Taxes on the Assets owing to Harris County Miscellaneous Other Closing Costs $15,000.00 Coopers (as of October 11, 2018) $523,286.58 Coopers (per diem interest accrual after October 11, 2018 through payoff of $83.70) Sky Real Estate Professionals (buyer s broker) $17,500.00 The Airport (cure costs) $1,024.00 Up to, but not exceeding the following amounts: $5,000.00 Wells Fargo (as partial payment reducing any allowed secured claim of Wells Fargo subject to Debtors right to request usage of these funds) Debtors $30,885.18 Balance of the sale proceeds to be held by Debtors at a financial institution of Debtors choosing pending further order of this Court. ASSUMPTION AND ASSIGNMENT OF THE AIRPORT AGREEMENT 14. Pursuant to sections 105(a) and 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors are authorized and directed to assume and assign the Airport Agreement to the Purchaser upon the Closing of the transactions, free and clear of all Liens (other than the Permitted Encumbrances). The total cure cost to the Airport is $1,024.00 that will be paid at Closing from the sale proceeds. Since there are no other cure costs owing by the Purchaser to the Airport under the Airport Ageement and this Order (a) Purchaser has cured all monetary defaults existing

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 15 of 18 thereunder as of the Closing Date; (b) compensated the Airport for any actual pecuniary loss resulting from such default; and (c) together with the assumption of the Airport Agreement by the Debtors and the assignment of the Airport Agreement to the Purchaser, constitutes adequate assurance of future performance thereof. 15. To the extent that the Airport did not timely file an objection to the assumption and assignment of the Airport Agreement, the Airport is deemed to have consented to (i) the assumption and assignment of the Airport Agreement pursuant to the terms of this Order; and (ii) the $1,024.00 cure cost pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 365(b)(1). 16. Any provision in the Airport Agreement that purports to prohibit or condition the assignment of the Airport Agreement or the sale of the Assets or allows the Airport to impose any penalty, fee, rent increase, profit sharing arrangement or other condition on renewal or extension, or to modify any term or condition upon the assignment of the Airport Agreement, constitutes an unenforceable anti-assignment provision that is void and of no force and effect in connection with the transactions. All other requirements and conditions under sections 363 and 365 of the Bankruptcy Code for the assumption by the Debtors and assignment to the Purchaser of the Airport Agreement have been satisfied. Upon the Closing, in accordance with sections 363 and 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Purchaser shall be fully and irrevocably vested with all right, title and interest of the Debtors under the Airport Agreement, and the Airport Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for the benefit of the Purchaser. 17. Upon the Closing, the Purchaser shall be deemed to be substituted for the Debtors as a party to the Airport Agreement, and the Debtors and their estates shall be released, pursuant to section 365(k) of the Bankruptcy Code, from any liability under the Airport

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 16 of 18 Agreement occurring after such assignment. 18. The Airport is forever barred, estopped, and permanently enjoined from asserting against the Debtors or the Purchaser or their respective property (including, without limitation, the Assets) in connection with this transaction (i) any assignment fee, acceleration, default, breach or claim or pecuniary loss, or condition to assignment existing, arising or accruing as of the Closing Date or arising by reason of the Closing, including any breach related to or arising out of change-in-control in the Airport Agreement, or any purported written or oral modification to the Airport Agreement; or (ii) any claim, counterclaim, defense, breach, default, condition, setoff or other claim asserted or capable of being asserted against the Debtors existing as of the Closing Date or arising by reason of the Closing, except for the Permitted Encumbrances. 19. Other than the Airport Agreement or as otherwise expressly set forth in the Pearsall PSA, the Purchaser assumed none of the Debtors other contracts or leases and shall have no liability whatsoever thereunder. 20. Nothing in the Motion or this Order shall be deemed or construed as a waiver of any claims or causes of action that the Debtors or the Purchaser have or may have against Airport, whether or not such claims arise under, are related to the assumption of or are independent of the Airport Agreement. OTHER PROVISIONS 21. The requirements set forth in Bankruptcy Rules 6003(b), 6004 and 6006 have been satisfied or otherwise deemed waived. 22. The Purchaser shall not be required to seek or obtain relief from the automatic stay under section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code to give any notice permitted by the Pearsall PSA or to enforce any of its remedies under the Pearsall PSA or any other sale-related document. The automatic stay imposed by section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code is modified solely to the extent

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 17 of 18 necessary to implement the preceding sentence; provided however, that this Court shall retain exclusive jurisdiction over any and all disputes with respect thereto. 23. The provisions of this Order and the Pearsall PSA are non-severable and mutually dependent. 24. The Pearsall PSA and any related agreements, documents or other instruments may be modified, amended or supplemented by the parties thereto and in accordance with the terms thereof, without further order of the Court; provided that any such modification, amendment or supplement does not have a material adverse effect on the Debtors estates. 25. The Court shall retain exclusive jurisdiction to, among other things, interpret, implement, and enforce the terms and provisions of this Order and the Pearsall PSA, all amendments thereto and any waivers and consents thereunder and each of the agreements executed in connection therewith to which the Debtor is a party or which has been assigned by the Debtors to the Purchaser, and to adjudicate, if necessary, any and all disputes concerning or relating in any way to the transactions. This Court retains jurisdiction to compel delivery of the Assets, to protect the Purchaser and its assets, including the Assets, against any Liens and successor and transferee liability and to enter orders, as appropriate, pursuant to sections 105(a) and 363 (or other applicable provisions) of the Bankruptcy Code necessary to transfer the Assets to the Purchaser. 26. As provided by Bankruptcy Rules 7062 and 9014, the terms and conditions of this Order shall be effective immediately upon entry and shall not be subject to the stay provisions contained in Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d) or any similar rule that would delay the effectiveness of this Order. Time is of the essence in closing the sale and the Debtors and Purchaser intend to close the sale and consummate the Transactions as soon as possible.

Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 18 of 18 27. This Order and the Pearsall PSA shall be binding in all respects upon all creditors of (whether known or unknown), and holders of equity interests in, any Debtor, any holders of Liens in, against or on all or any portion of the Assets, all successors and assigns of the Purchaser, the Debtors and their affiliates and subsidiaries and any subsequent trustee appointed in these chapter 11 cases or upon a conversion to chapter 7 under the Bankruptcy Code, and shall not be subject to rejection. Nothing contained in any chapter 11 plan confirmed in these chapter 11 cases, any order confirming any such chapter 11 plan or any order approving wind-down or dismissal of these chapter 11 cases or any subsequent chapter 7 cases shall conflict with or derogate from the provisions of the Pearsall PSA or this Order, and to the extent of any conflict or derogation between this Order or the Pearsall PSA and such future plan or order, the terms of this Order and the Pearsall PSA shall control. 28. To the extent any provisions of this Order conflict with, or are otherwise inconsistent with, the terms and conditions of the Pearsall PSA, this Order shall govern and control. Signed: November 06, 2018. Dated:, 2018 Houston, Texas DAVID R. JONES DAVID R. UNITED JONES STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE CHIEF UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE