ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

Similar documents
ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 18

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1279

RESOLUTION NO /0001/62863v1

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3414

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3402

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4673

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4010

ORDINANCE NO

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA,

City of Carpinteria. COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT April 27, 2015

The above recitals are all true and correct.

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1312

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4919

VILLAGE OF NORTH RIVERSIDE ORDINANCE NO. 17-O-09

RESOLUTION NUMBER 2757

BOROUGH OF ELMER, COUNTY OF SALEM, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO C.S.

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCATA AMENDING THE ADMINISTRATION CITATION PROCEDURE OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE

ORDINANCE NO. 553 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1255

CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY REPORT. Agenda No. Keywords: Sewer Connection Fee Ordinance Amendment October Meeting Date: PREPARED BY:

CITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 09/05/2017 AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business

Agenda Item A.2 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: June 16, 2009

CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ORDINANCE NO. 2645

City of Calistoga Staff Report

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

Resolution No

ORDINANCE NO OF THE BOROUGH COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF EPHRATA LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Public hearing to adopt Ordinance 1375 C.S. amending Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Martinez Municipal Code

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Perris hereby ordains as follows:

CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE NO. New Series

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY OF COCOA BEACH, FLORIDA, as follows:

Sponsor: Janet Venecz Councilwoman at Large ORDINANCE NO. 9332

LOAN AGREEMENT RECITALS

ORDINANCE NO

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4797

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, California Government Code Section provides, in pertinent

RESOLUTION NO

ORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MISSION VIEJO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HAPEVILLE, GEORGIA, CHAPTER 11, BUSINESS LICENSING AND

RESOLUTION NO

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO

RESOLUTION NO. 18/19-21

NOTICE OF INTENT TO BORROW MONEY AND RIGHT TO FILE PETITION. Notice is hereby given that pursuant to Ordinance Number 513, adopted April 28, 2009, the

City of Los Alamitos

MARINA COAST WATER DISTRICT

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: April 18, City Council. FROM: Regan M. Candelario, City Manager. PRESENTER: Claudia Laughter, City Clerk

Appendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance

BOND RESOLUTION (SUBJECT TO PERMISSIVE REFERENDUM) (sewage treatment plant improvements)

EXHIBIT B-1 RESOLUTION NO.

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT. between the CITY OF CREVE COEUR, MISSOURI, and the

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO. O

(Published in the Tulsa World,

BILL NO ORDINANCE NO. 5244

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Perris City Council wishes to remove the bond requirement from the application process; and

AN ORDINANCE AFFIRMING ADOPTION OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DEVELOPMENT AREA, AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF

1 [Proposing Adoption of Infrastructure Financing Plan - Infrastructure and Revitalization Financing District No. 2 (Hoedown Yard, Pier 70)] 2

ORDINANCE NO

Item 8C 1 of 17

ORDINANCE NUMBER -2..Q.Q..3~) (City Council Series)

ORDINANCE NO. O

STAFF REPORT HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MARTIN D. KOCZANOWICZ, CITY ATTORNEY

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City Commission discussed a proposal to eliminate odd year elections; and

ORDINANCE NO. 730 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA AMENDING THE CALISTOGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 8

AGENDA. 5. Executive Director s Report Thomas C. Chatmon Jr., Executive Director

Borough of Susquehanna Depot Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania. Ordinance No. 467 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE

WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule Unit pursuant to the Illinois

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION OF CHAPTER ( PARKING AND

ORDINANCE NO The Board ofsupervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

October 6, 2014 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council. THROUGH: Legislative Policy Committee (September 24, 2014)

TOWN OF JACKSON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA DOCUMENTATION

CITY OF FREEPORT STEPHENSON COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO

Attachment 2. Planning Commission Resolution No Recommending a Zone Text Amendment

St. Louis City Ordinance 63154

CHAPTER 4-17 PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING

URGENCY ORDINANCE NO O13

RESOLUTION NO. l 11 i".;t..

NOTICE OF BOND ELECTION TO THE RESIDENT, QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE PFLUGERVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT:

WHEREAS, the Township has elected to exercise these redevelopment entity powers directly, as permitted by Section 4 of the Redevelopment Law; and

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA HABRA, CALIFORNIA REPEALING AND REPLACING SECTIONS AND OF CHAPTER 18.

WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and

WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the Village of Shorewood to conduct a public

IMPERIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM

Egg Harbor Township. Ordinance No

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Moreno Valley does hereby ordain as follows:

ORDINANCE NO. O

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CONCORD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 66, (OFFENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS), ARTICLE III (CURFEW FOR MINORS)

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF YORK WASHTENAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 145 EFFECTIVE DATE: April 25, 2014

RICHLAND COUNTY, NORTH DAKOTA HOME RULE CHARTER PREAMBLE

AGENDA ITEM E-1 Community Development

FIRST AMENDMENT TO SUBORDINATE TRUST INDENTURE. by and between HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA. and

Transcription:

ORDINANCE NO. 1248 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT-1994 PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.2(d), AMENDING RELATED ORDINANCES AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Perris approved and adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project-1994 (the "Original Plan") pursuant to Ordinance No. 982 adopted on June 27, 1994, thereby creating the "Redevelopment Project- 1994" which encompassed the certain area within the City of Perris (the "Project Area"); and WHEREAS, the Original Plan was adopted pursuant to the California Redevelopment Law, constituting Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq. ("CRL"); and WHEREAS, the Original Plan was subsequently amended with respect to certain limitations by Ordinance No. 1171 adopted on September 27, 2005 to add one year to the effectiveness and tax increment limitations pursuant to SB 1045 (the Original Plan, as amended by said Ordinances shall be referred to herein and the "Redevelopment Plan"); and WHEREAS, Section 33333.2(d) of the CRL (enacted by SB 1096, Stats. 2004, Chap. 211) provides that when an agency is required to make a payment to the county's Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund ("ERAF") pursuant to Section 33681.12 of the CRL (during fiscal year 2004-05 and/or 2005-06), the legislative body may amend the redevelopment plan by adoption of an ordinance to extend, by one year for each year in which a payment is made, the time limit on the effectiveness of the redevelopment plan and the time limit on the repayment of indebtedness and receipt of tax increment funds (hereinafter referred to as an "SB 1096 Amendment") upon the making of certain findings if time limit for the effectiveness of the redevelopment plan is more than 10 years but less than 20 years from the last day of the fiscal year in which a payment is made; and WHEREAS, Redevelopment Plan has more than 10 years but less than 20 years remaining from the last day of the Fiscal Years 2004/05 and 2005/06 in which the ERAF payment was made for such fiscal years; and WHEREAS, because the Agency made payments to the County of Riverside ERAF pursuant to Section 33681.12 of the CRL during Fiscal Years 2004/05 and 2005-06, the Agency has proposed that the Redevelopment Plan be amended for the purpose of extending, by two years, the time limit on the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan and the time limit on the repayment of indebtedness and receipt of tax increment funds; and WHEREAS, Section 33333.2(d) of the CRL further provides that in adopting an SB 1096 Amendment, neither the legislative body nor the redevelopment agency is required to comply

with Section 33354.6 or Article 12 of the CRL or any other provision of the CRL relating to the amendment of redevelopment plans; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing in the City Council Chambers, 101 North D. Street, Perris, California, on September 30, 2008, to consider adoption of the proposed SB 1096 Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan with respect to the Project Area; and WHEREAS, a notice of said hearing was duly and regularly published in The Perris Progress, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Perris on September 17, 2008, and a copy of said notice and affidavit of publication are on file with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, copies of the notice of public hearing were mailed to each taxing entity which receives taxes from property in the Project Area on or before August 31, 2008; and WHEREAS, the City Council has provided an opportunity for all persons to be heard and has received and considered all written and oral evidence and testimony presented for or against any and all aspects of the proposed SB 1096 Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan with respect to the Project Area; and WHEREAS, the Perris Redevelopment Agency (the Agency ) has analyzed the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan and the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 33333.2(d), and has determined that the Redevelopment Plan may be amended as provided herein; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Redevelopment Plan in accordance with the terms hereof as authorized pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33333.2(d); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agency's request, the City Council desires to restate certain of the financial limitations related to the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Agency has prepared and submitted and the City Council has reviewed and considered the staff report on the SB 1096 Amendment; and WHEREAS, the amendment is not a "project" under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15378(b) (2), (4) and (5) of the CEQA Guidelines; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS: Section 1. and correct. The City Council hereby finds and declares that the above recitals are true Section 2. The City Council has reviewed the items submitted herewith, the information related to the findings in the Staff Report, the Redevelopment Plan, the testimony at the hearing and the current Five Year Implementation Plan, adopted November 29, 2005, relating to the Agency's project areas and hereby finds and declares that: 2

(a) The Agency is in compliance with the requirements of Sections 33334.2 and 33334.6 of the CRL, as applicable; and (b) The Agency has adopted an implementation plan in accordance with the requirements of Section 33490 of the CRL; and (c) The Agency is in compliance with subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 33413, to the extent applicable; and (d) The Agency is not subject to sanctions pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 33334.12 for failure to expend, encumber or disburse an excess surplus from its Housing Fund; and (e) The funds used by the Agency to make the payments to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund pursuant to Section 33681.12 would otherwise have been used to pay the costs of projects and activities necessary to carry out the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. Section 3. The Redevelopment Plan amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference incorporated herein is hereby adopted as an official amendment to the Redevelopment Plan (the "Amendment"). Section 4. The amendment to the Redevelopment Plan to extend by two years the effectiveness to June 27, 2027 and the time for receipt of tax increment and payment of indebtedness to June 27, 2042 is hereby adopted, approved and designated as part of the official Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that the Amendment be implemented as part of the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. Section 5. To the extent of the amendment set forth in the Amendment, this Ordinance amends the prior Ordinances enacting and amending the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. Section 6. The City Council hereby authorizes the filing of a CEQA Notice of Exemption for the Amendment. Section 7. If any provision, section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or the Amendment is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or portions of the Ordinance or the Amendment. Section 8. All provisions of the Redevelopment Plan not specifically amended or repealed in this Amendment shall continue in full force and effect. Section 9. This Ordinance shall be posted according to the City's normal practice before its final passage, and shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage. 3

ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 14 th day of October, 2008. ATTEST: Daryl R. Busch, Mayor Judy L. Haughney, City Clerk I, Judy L. Haughney, City Clerk of the City of Perris, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 1248 was duly and regularly introduced and presented for first reading on the 30 th day of September, 2008, and passed and adopted, on second reading, by the City Council of the City of Perris at a regularly scheduled City Council meeting held on the 14 th day of October, 2008 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Yarbrough, Landers, Motte, Busch NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Rogers ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None Judy L. Haughney, City Clerk 4

5

EXHIBIT A Amendment to Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project-1994 Pursuant to Ordinance No. 1248, adopted on October 14, 2008, this Amendment ("Amendment") is adopted and incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project-1994 as follows: I. The following definitions shall apply to this Amendment. "Community Redevelopment Law" shall mean the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California, constituting Sections 33000 et. seq. of the California Health and Safety Code. "Plan" or "Redevelopment Plan" shall mean the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project-1994, adopted by the City Council of the City of Perris pursuant to Ordinance No. 982 adopted on June 27, 1994, as amended by Ordinance No. 1171 adopted on September 27, 2005, as amended by Ordinance No. 1248 adopted on October 14, 2008, and as the same may be amended from time to time by action of the City Council of the City of Perris. II. Pursuant Ordinance No. 1248 adopted on October 14, 2008 and Ordinance No. 1171, adopted on September 27, 2005, Section 640 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced as set forth below: "E. (640*) Financing Limitations Consistent with Sections 33333.2 and 33334.1 of the Community Redevelopment Law and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan the following financing limitations are imposed on this Plan: 1. The time limit for the effectiveness of the Plan is June 27, 2027. 2. No loans, advances or indebtedness to finance, in whole or in part, the Perris Redevelopment Project-1994, and to be repaid from the allocation of taxes to the Agency shall be established or incurred by the Agency beyond twenty (20) years from the date of adoption of the Redevelopment Plan unless such time limitation is extended by an amendment to the Plan. However, such loans advances or indebtedness my be repaid over a period of time longer than such time limit. 3. The time limit for the receipt of tax increment and repayment of debt pursuant to Section 33670 of the California Health and Safety Code is June 27, 2042. 4. From time to time as may be appropriate, the agency may issue bonds and/or notes for any of its corporate purposes. The Agency may issue such types of bond on which the principal and interest are payable in whole or in part from tax increments. The total outstanding principal of any bonds so issued and repayable from said tax

increment shall not exceed one hundred million dollars ($100,000,000) at any one time, except by amendment of the Plan. For purposes of determining the above limitations, the base year assessment roll applicable for the Redevelopment Project-1994 shall be the 1993/94 assessment roll." III. Section 710 of the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project-1994 is hereby deleted and replaced as set forth below: "B. (710) Duration of This Plan's Development Controls Except for the nondiscrimination and nonsegregation provisions which shall run in perpetuity, the land use and development control provisions of this Plan shall be effective and the provisions of the other documents pursuant to this Plan may be made effective from the effective date of the Ordinance approving this Plan until the effectiveness of the Plan expires as set forth in Section 640." IV. Except as amended by this Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. From and after the effectiveness of this Amendment, any references to "Plan" or "Redevelopment Plan" shall refer to the Plan, as amended hereby and as may be amended from time to time by action of the City Council of the City of Perris. 7