DA Case No.: 2018ML Court Case No.: CRIMINAL COMPLAINT THE BELOW NAMED COMPLAINANT BEING DULY SWORN, ON INFORMATION AND BELIEF STATES THAT:

Similar documents
State of Wisconsin Circuit Court St. Croix County. Plaintiff, Defendant.

CIRCUIT COURT. Court Case No.: THE ABOVE NAMED COMPLAINING WITNESS BEING DULY SWORN, ON INFORMATION AND BELIEF STATES THAT:

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT LA CROSSE COUNTY

Said acts constituting the offense of Murder in the Second Degree in violation of MN Statute: (1) Maximum Sentence: 40 years.

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY COMPLAINT

State of Minnesota, MN PLAINTIFF, VS. NAME: first, middle, last DYMOND RENE HAYDEN

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT CRIMINAL CHARGE. Count 1: HOMICIDE BY INTOXICATED USE OF A VEHICLE WHILE HAVING PRIOR INTOXICANT- RELATED CONVICTION/REVOCATION

Summary of Investigation SiRT File # Referral from RCMP - PEI December 4, 2017

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

[ ] WARRANT [X] ORDER OF DETENTION v. [ ] AMENDED COMPLAINT. The Complainant, being duly sworn, makes complaint to the above-named Court and COUNT I

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

* * DISTRICT COURT STATE OF MINNESOTA SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF RAMSEY COURT FILE NO.: PROSECUTOR FILE NO.

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

SIM GILL DISTRICT ATTORNEY

Complaint DEFENDANT. Statute Number & Description. Level

STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF RAMSEY SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FILE NO.: PROSECUTOR FILE NO.: State of Minnesota,

NO IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I. STATE OF HAWAI'I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JONATHAN FONTES, Defendant-Appellant.

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE COMPLAINT. Count I. Murder 2nd Degree ( Y )

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Question 3. What crimes, if any, can Deanna and Alma reasonably be charged with, and what defenses might each assert? Discuss.

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).

STATE OF OHIO ROBERT HENDERSON

North Carolina Sheriffs Association

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 12, 2006

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 2, 2010

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs July 8, 2014

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY OF SHASTA PRESS RELEASE NO CRIMINAL CHARGES IN CLUB ICE DEATH. The Facts

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE COMPLAINT. Count I. Murder 2nd Degree ( Y )

Question With what crime or crimes, if any, can Dan reasonably be charged and what defenses, if any, can he reasonably assert? Discuss.

DISTRICT COURT STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FILE NO.: PROSECUTOR FILE NO.: State of Minnesota,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE COMPLAINT

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

California Bar Examination

STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : BROWN COUNTY. vs. Case No. 12 CF BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Eastern District Court Case No. 1:11-cv Jordan et al v. The City of New York et al.

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT Complaining Witness: Lt. Patrick Fortune

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

AND THE USE OF DEADLY FORCE

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Marquette University Police Department

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/09/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

CARLOS VIVEROS COLORADO

Case 1:11-cr LO Document 41 Filed 02/29/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 126 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

State of Wisconsin: Circuit Court: Milwaukee County: Defendant's Sentencing Memorandum. Background

Successful Criminal Prosecution of Energy Theft. Sue Opper District Attorney Waukesha County, Wisconsin

Mesa County Sheriff s Office

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Robert P. Cates, Judge.

Question What criminal charges, if any, should be brought against Art and Ben? Discuss.

NOT DESIGNATED for PUBLICATION. STATE Of LOUISIANA. COURT Of APPEAL. first CIRCUIT 2007 KA 0885 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JESSICA KELLY

United States Court of Appeals

COMMONWEALTH vs. EMMANUEL LOUIS. No. 17-P-966. Middlesex. July 9, November 6, Present: Blake, Sacks, & Ditkoff, JJ.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Oconto County: MICHAEL T. JUDGE, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ.

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

, ) Civil No. ) Petitioner, ) ) DOMESTIC VIOLENCE vs. ) PROTECTION ORDER ), ) ) Respondent. ) TO THE RESPONDENT:

CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: SUBJECT: REFERENCES: ENCLOSURES:

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

NEWS RELEASE ROCHESTER MAN CHARGED WITH FELONY FOR SHOOTING FAMILY MEMBER

Police Shooting of Ruka Hemopo

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Schudson, JJ.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No Filed November 21, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, John D.

DEPARTMENT OF POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY COMPLAINT SUMMARY REPORT. DATE OF COMPLAINT: 01/09/17 DATE OF COMPLETION: 01/12/18 PAGE# 1 of 4

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

CRIMINAL LAW ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION #2 MODEL ANSWER. 1. With what crime or crimes should Dan be charged? Discuss.

Follow this and additional works at:

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2007 KARLOS WILLIAMS STATE OF MARYLAND

Transcription:

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT MILWAUKEE COUNTY STATE OF WISCONSIN Plaintiff, DA Case No.: 2018ML019473 Court Case No.: vs. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT HARDY, ANTWUAN M 2147 SOUTH WINCHESTER STREET, #28 MILWAUKEE, WI 53207 DOB: 02/17/1982 KAUPER, NICOLE L 1019A SOUTH 15TH STREET MILWAUKEE, WI 53204 DOB: 12/16/1981 LANE, BRANDON MAURICE 2036 SOUTH 16TH STREET MILWAUKEE, WI 53204 DOB: 06/19/1984 Defendant(s). For Official Use THE BELOW NAMED COMPLAINANT BEING DULY SWORN, ON INFORMATION AND BELIEF STATES THAT: Count 1: ROBBERY, ARMED (USE OF FORCE) - PTAC, AS A PARTY TO A CRIME (As to in the City of Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, as a party to a crime, with intent to steal, by the use or threat of use of a dangerous weapon, did take property from the presence of TRJ, the owner, by use of force against the person of the owner with intent thereby to overcome that person's physical resistance or physical power of resistance to the taking or carrying away of said property, contrary to sec. 943.32(1)(a) and (2), 939.50(3)(c), 939.05 Wis. Stats. Upon conviction for this offense, a Class C Felony, the defendants may be fined not more than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000), or imprisoned not more than forty (40) years, or both. Count 2: ROBBERY, ARMED (THREAT OF FORCE) - PTAC, AS A PARTY TO A CRIME (As to in the City of Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, as a party to a crime, with intent to steal, by the use or threat of use of a dangerous weapon did take property from the presence of SHC, the owner, by threatening the imminent use of force against the person of the owner with intent thereby to compel the said owner to acquiesce in the taking or carrying away of said property, contrary to sec. 943.32(1)(b) and (2), 939.50(3)(c), 939.05 Wis. Stats.

Page 2 Upon conviction for this offense, a Class C Felony, the defendants may be fined not more than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000), or imprisoned not more than forty (40) years, or both. Count 3: ROBBERY, ARMED (USE OF FORCE) - PTAC, AS A PARTY TO A CRIME (As to in the City of Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, as a party to a crime, with intent to steal, by the use or threat of use of a dangerous weapon, did take property from the presence of SS, the owner, by use of force against the person of the owner with intent thereby to overcome that person's physical resistance or physical power of resistance to the taking or carrying away of said property, contrary to sec. 943.32(1)(a) and (2), 939.50(3)(c), 939.05 Wis. Stats. Upon conviction for this offense, a Class C Felony, the defendants may be fined not more than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000), or imprisoned not more than forty (40) years, or both. Count 4: ROBBERY, ARMED (USE OF FORCE) - PTAC, AS A PARTY TO A CRIME (As to in the City of Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, as a party to a crime, with intent to steal, by the use or threat of use of a dangerous weapon, did take property from the presence of RB, the owner, by use of force against the person of the owner with intent thereby to overcome that person's physical resistance or physical power of resistance to the taking or carrying away of said property, contrary to sec. 943.32(1)(a) and (2), 939.50(3)(c), 939.05 Wis. Stats. Upon conviction for this offense, a Class C Felony, the defendants may be fined not more than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000), or imprisoned not more than forty (40) years, or both. Count 5: FIRST DEGREE RECKLESS INJURY - PTAC, AS A PARTY TO A CRIME (As to in the City of Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, as a party to a crime, did recklessly cause great bodily harm to MS, another human being, under circumstances which showed utter disregard for human life, contrary to sec. 940.23(1)(a), 939.50(3)(d), 939.05 Wis. Stats. Upon conviction for this offense, a Class D Felony, the defendants may be fined not more than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000), or imprisoned not more than twenty five (25) years, or both. Count 6: SECOND DEGREE RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING SAFETY - PTAC, AS A PARTY TO A CRIME (As to in the City of Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, as a party to a crime, did recklessly endanger the safety of RB, contrary to sec. 941.30(2), 939.50(3)(g), 939.05 Wis. Stats. Upon conviction for this offense, a Class G Felony, the defendants may be fined not more than Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000), or imprisoned not more than ten (10) years, or both.

Page 3 Count 7: BURGLARY (HOME INVASION) - PTAC, AS A PARTY TO A CRIME (As to defendants Antwuan M Hardy and Brandon Maurice Lane) in the City of Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, as a party to a crime, did intentionally enter a dwelling without the consent of the person in lawful possession and with intent to steal, where another person was lawfully present in the dwelling at the time of the violation, contrary to sec. 943.10(2)(e), 939.50(3)(e), 939.05 Wis. Stats. Upon conviction for this offense, a Class E Felony, the defendants may be fined not more than Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000), or imprisoned not more than fifteen (15) years, or both. Count 8: BURGLARY (HOME INVASION) - PTAC, AS A PARTY TO A CRIME (As to defendants Antwuan M Hardy and Brandon Maurice Lane) in the City of Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, as a party to a crime, did intentionally enter a dwelling without the consent of the person in lawful possession and with intent to steal, where another person was lawfully present in the dwelling at the time of the violation, contrary to sec. 943.10(2)(e), 939.50(3)(e), 939.05 Wis. Stats. Upon conviction for this offense, a Class E Felony, the defendants may be fined not more than Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000), or imprisoned not more than fifteen (15) years, or both. Count 9: FALSE IMPRISONMENT - PTAC, AS A PARTY TO A CRIME (As to defendants Antwuan M Hardy and Brandon Maurice Lane) TRJ, without that person's consent, and with knowledge that they had no lawful authority to do so, Count 10: FALSE IMPRISONMENT - PTAC, AS A PARTY TO A CRIME (As to defendants Antwuan M Hardy and Brandon Maurice Lane) SHC, without that person's consent, and with knowledge that they had no lawful authority to do so, Count 11: FALSE IMPRISONMENT - PTAC, AS A PARTY TO A CRIME (As to defendants Antwuan M Hardy and Brandon Maurice Lane)

Page 4 RB, without that person's consent, and with knowledge that they had no lawful authority to do so, Count 12: FALSE IMPRISONMENT - PTAC, AS A PARTY TO A CRIME (As to defendants Antwuan M Hardy and Brandon Maurice Lane) SS, without that person's consent, and with knowledge that they had no lawful authority to do so, Count 13: FALSE IMPRISONMENT - PTAC, AS A PARTY TO A CRIME (As to defendants Antwuan M Hardy and Brandon Maurice Lane) MS, without that person's consent, and with knowledge that they had no lawful authority to do so, Count 14: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT BURGLARY (HOME INVASION) (As to defendant Nicole L Kauper) The above-named defendant Beginning 7/12/2018 and ending 7/13/2018, at 1241 North 116th Street, in the City of Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, conspired to intentionally enter a dwelling without the consent of the person in lawful possession and with intent to steal, where another person was lawfully present in the dwelling at the time of the violation, contrary to sec. 943.10(2)(e), 939.50(3)(e), 939.31 Wis. Stats. Upon conviction for this offense, a Class E Felony, the defendants may be fined not more than Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000), or imprisoned not more than fifteen (15) years, or both. Count 15: HARBORING OR AIDING A FELON (As to defendant Nicole L Kauper) The above-named defendant Beginning 7/12/2018 and ending 7/13/2018, at 1241 North 116th Street, in the City of Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, with intent to prevent the apprehension of a felon, did aid that person, and the offense committed by the felon being aided is a Class C felony, contrary to sec. 946.47(1)(a) and (2m)(a), 939.50(3)(g) Wis. Stats. Upon conviction for this offense, a Class G Felony, the defendants may be fined not more than Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000), or imprisoned not more than ten (10) years, or both. Count 16: HARBORING OR AIDING A FELON (As to defendant Nicole L Kauper)

Page 5 The above-named defendant Beginning 7/12/2018 and ending 7/13/2018, at 1241 North 116th Street, in the City of Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, with intent to prevent the apprehension of a felon, did aid that person, and the offense committed by the felon being aided is a Class C felony, contrary to sec. 946.47(1)(a) and (2m)(a), 939.50(3)(g) Wis. Stats. Upon conviction for this offense, a Class G Felony, the defendants may be fined not more than Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000), or imprisoned not more than ten (10) years, or both. Probable Cause: Complainant is a law enforcement officer employed by the City of Wauwatosa, and bases this complaint upon official reports prepared by fellow City of Wauwatosa law enforcement officers, which are of the kind that complainant has used in the past and found to be accurate and reliable and which complainant knows are prepared in the regular course of that department s business. Those reports reveal the following: Between the late evening hours of July 12, 2018 and the early morning hours of July 13, 2018, occupants of 1241 N 116 th Street and 1243 N 116 th Street, both in the City of Wauwatosa, Milwaukee County Wisconsin were victims of a home invasion armed robbery. The robbers were later determined to be Brandon Lane, hereinafter Defendant Lane, and Antwuan Hardy, hereinafter Defendant Hardy. The resident of 1243 N 116 th Street, TRJ walked into his residence at approximately 9:00 pm, and observed both robbers inside his residence. One was pointing a rifle at him, the other was pointing a handgun at him. Both had their faces partially covered, exposing their eyes. TRJ was pushed to the ground, his wrists were tied together and some piece of clothing was placed over his face. The robbers then left his residence and went to the upper residence at 1241 N 116 th Street. SHC, the resident at 1241 N 116 th Street, walked into the hallway leading upstairs to his residence and observed a robber pointing a rifle at him from the top of the stairs. The second robber approached SHC from behind and placed a handgun to his head. The robbers took him into 1243 N 116 th Street and threw him to the floor, tied his hands and legs together and placed a cover over his head. One robber asked who was upstairs and how much money his wife had. One robber said if you shout I will kill you. The robbers left and SHC heard his wife SS (female, dob 10/17/75), his mother RB (female dob1/10/56), and his 5-year-old son MS (male dob 5/16/13) screaming upstairs. While in 1241 N 116 th Street SS heard a scream and then another loud scream from RB. SS came out of a room to see what was happening and her 5 year-old son MS followed. SS observed one of the robbers point a gun similar to an AR 15 at her, poked her with it and told her to give him all the money. SS gave him money from her bag (approximately $400) and the robber demanded more. SS told him to search for himself because there was no more money. She gave the robber her debit card and said she had $5000 in the bank. The robber was upset and asked how she could come to the United States with only $5000. The second robber came into the bedroom and questioned what was happening, acted very aggressive, grabbed her by the hair and pushed her against a wall and then the floor, pressed a gun against her neck while she was face down and told her she was going to die. The robbers eventually put a black cloth over her face and took her out of the bedroom. One of the robbers threw her son MS on top of SS. MS was eventually taken away from SS and shut in another room where SS could hear MS screaming from. MS was then completely quiet. SS s hands were tied together. SS told the robbers $80,000 was in her bank account. One of the robbers told SS to remove money from her bank account by using her phone. One of the robbers said let s just kill them and be done with the whole thing. The robbers took SS to TRJ s residence below and placed her on the floor. The robbers tied SS s feet together.

Page 6 While downstairs, the robbers repeatedly asked SHC about money, accused him of lying about money, said they were aware of $80,000 in his wife s account, and struck him in the back of the head with a gun. One of the robbers took SHC s wallet from his shorts, which contained approximately $500. One of the robbers asked TRJ where he kept his money. TRJ told the robbers he had $500 in his closet, and the robbers took it. RB, while upstairs in 1241 N 116 th Street, heard someone run up the stairs. RB saw the two robbers enter the residence. RB was thrown to the floor, her wrists were tied up with a cord and a hat was placed over her head. RB heard the robbers asking where the money was. RB was moved to the living room. One of the robbers struck her in the head multiple times using the stock of a rifle, causing her to bleed profusely from her head. RB heard the robbers arguing about how they could get access to money. The robbers then moved RB downstairs where she heard one of the robbers say you all have to die. MS remained upstairs in a bedroom alone. RB was taken to the basement of the duplex. The robbers eventually left and SHC called police. Wauwatosa Police responded to the residence and located the victims. 5 year-old MS was located in a bedroom in 1241 N 116 th Street, bound, gagged and laying on the floor unconscious. Officer Rivera, who located the child, believed he was mortally wounded due to him not moving and the blood-stained shirts around him. Officer Rivera touched the 5 year-old and he immediately screamed and moved violently while his arms remained bound. Officer Rivera carried him down to SHC and medics arrived to render aid. MS was transported to Children s Hospital for treatment. SHC reported that MS suffered brain bleeds in four locations, numbness on his left side consistent with the areas of brain bleeds and damage to ligaments in his neck. RB was transported to Froedtert Hospital and received more than 20 staples to her head. It was learned that prior to the robbery, the occupants of 1241 N 116 th had been staying at the Days Inn at 1673 S 108 th Street for approximately 10 days, after having moved to the area from Saudi Arabia. While checking in at the Days Inn for their stay, SHC told the clerk he was travelling with a large amount of currency and requested a room with a safe. Nicole Kauper, hereinafter Defendant Kauper, was present during this conversation. During a mirandized interview, Defendant Hardy admitted that he is Defendant Kauper s boyfriend, that she told him about a family staying at the Day s Inn that had a lot of money, which she estimated to be approximately $100,000. Defendant Hardy and Defendant Kauper discussed following the victims when they moved out to later burglarize their residence and get the money. On at least two occasions Defendant Hardy and Defendant Kauper parked across from the Day s Inn to watch the victims in an effort to see where they reside. On July 10, while doing surveillance they watched the victim s leave the Day s Inn and followed them to 1241 N 116 th Street, parked on 116 th Street and watched the residence, until a neighbor came out and approached them, causing Defendant Kauper and Defendant Hardy to leave the area. Defendant Hardy admitted that on July 12, he and Defendant Lane drove in Hardy s Nissan and parked a few blocks from 1241 N 116 th Street. Defendant Hardy admitted he and Defendant Lane went into the upper and lower units (1243 and 1241 N 116 th street) and robbed the occupants. Defendant Hardy admitted that after the robbery, he and Defendant Lane were picked up by Defendant Kauper, Tanya Sobczak, and Lamondre Lane in Sobczak s Dodge Intrepid. During a mirandized interview, Sobczak informed law enforcement that she is Defendant Kauper s roommate and that on July 12, 2018, Defendant Kauper called her frantically asking if she could pick Defendant Kauper up and go look for Defendant Hardy. Sobczak drove with her boyfriend Lamondre Lane to pick up Defendant Kauper, and Defendant Kauper told them she thought Defendant Hardy was

Page 7 near Watertown Plank Rd and N 116 th Street (a location within 1 block of the victims residence). They could not locate Defendant Hardy so they left. Defendant Kauper called Sobczak frantically again around 11:45 pm and begged Sobczak to take her again to get Defendant Hardy from that same area. Sobczak and Lamondre Lane again picked up Defenant Kauper and went to that area and picked up Defendant Hardy and Defendant Lane. Sobczak heard Defendant Hardy and Defendant Lane arguing about taking a pillow case off a lady and about striking a lady in the head. During a mirandized interview, Defendant Kauper admitted that after leaving work at the Day s Inn, she told her boyfriend Defendant Hardy about a family staying at the Day s Inn that had a lot of money. Defendant Kauper admitted that she and Defendant Hardy planned to find out where the victims lived. They planned that Defendant Hardy could go to the house when no one was home and take the money without anyone getting hurt. Defendant Kauper admitted that she knew Defendant Hardy told Defendant Lane about the money and about the plan to steal the money. Defendant Kauper admitted she and Defendant Hardy went to the house a few times after seeing where the victims lived so Defendant Hardy could get a look at the house. Defendant Kauper claimed she got cold feet and no longer wanted to go through with it. Defendant Kauper admitted that on July 12, she tried to call Defendant Hardy multiple times and his phone went to voicemail, at which point she became concerned because she knew in her heart that Defendant Hardy and Defendant Lane were probably in Wauwatosa doing the burglary. At about 10:30 pm, she called Sobczak and asked for a ride to Wauwatosa to look for Defendant Hardy. Sobczak and Lamondre Lane picked Defendant Kapuer up and she directed them to the area of the victim s residence, but could not find Defendant Hardy so they went back home. Defendant Kapuer got a call from Defendant Hardy twenty minutes later. Defendant Hardy asked Defendant Kauper to pick him up. Defendant Kauper then got Sobczak and Lamondre Lane to pick her up again and directed them to go back to the area of the victims residence. While on the way there, Defendant Hardy called Defendant Kauper and told her he had done the burglary. Defendant Kauper, Sobczak, and Lamondre Lane picked up Defendant Hardy near the victims residence. Defendant Hardy then told Defendant Kauper that Defendant Lane was still in the house and started yelling at everyone stating we went into the house and it s all messed up. Brandon was going crazy pointing guns at people. He tied up all the people in the house, put pillow cases over their heads and started busting those ladies in the head. As they drove in the neighborhood, they observed Defendant Lane walking down a driveway near the victims residence carrying a backpack. They picked him up. Defendant Lane and Defendant Hardy began yelling at each other about the robbery. Investigation revealed that phones belonging to RB and SS were taken from the residence while they were present. Defendant Kauper, Defendant Hardy, Lamondre Lane and Sobczak viewed a booking photo of Defendant Lane and identified it as the person who did the robbery with Defendant Hardy. None of the victims gave consent for any of the described actions by Defendant Hardy or Defendant Lane or Defendant Kauper. ****End of Complaint**** Electronic Filing Notice: This case was electronically filed with the Milwaukee County Clerk of Circuit Court office. The electronic filing system is designed to allow for fast, reliable exchange of documents in court cases. Parties who register as electronic parties can file, receive and view documents online through the court electronic filing website. A document filed electronically has the same legal effect as a document filed by traditional means. You may also register as an electronic party by following the instructions found at http://efiling.wicourts.gov/ and may withdraw as an electronic party at any time. There is a $ 20.00 fee to register as an electronic party. If you are not represented by an attorney and would like to register an electronic party, you will need to

Page 8 contact the Clerk of Circuit Court office at 414-278-4120. Unless you register as an electronic party, you will be served with traditional paper documents by other parties and by the court. You must file and serve traditional paper documents. Criminal Complaint prepared by Catelin Ringersma. Subscribed and sworn to before me on 07/27/18 Electronically Signed By: Catelin Ringersma Assistant District Attorney State Bar #: 1081218 Electronically Signed By: Detective Martin Keck Complainant