UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Judge:

Similar documents
Case3:13-cv SC Document99 Filed06/05/15 Page2 of 7 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Arville Winans and Wilma Fritz in this action entitled Arville 2 Winans

Case 1:14-cv JBS-JS Document 217 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 9513 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

AUG I 0 NIB. By: G. mend=, Clerk I 2 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case 4:06-cv CW Document 81 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 10

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 3:18-cv DMS-MDD Document 256 Filed 10/09/18 PageID.4031 Page 1 of 6

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 1:12-cv RM-KMT Document 239 Filed 03/06/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SUSAN DOHERTY and DWIGHT SIMONSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. l:10-cv nlh-kmw

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 71

Case5:10-cv JF Document72 Filed09/16/11 Page1 of 7

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Case5:10-cv RMW Document207 Filed03/11/14 Page1 of 7

Case 2:14-cv MCE-KJN Document 87 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document 133 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 5:08-cv EJD Document Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv WHP Document 571 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 5:07-cv FB Document 116 Filed 10/13/10 Page 1 of 7 ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

mg Doc 4808 Filed 08/23/13 Entered 08/23/13 08:51:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 12

Case 2:11-cv WJM-MF Document 88-3 Filed 05/17/16 Page 1 of 71 PageID: Exhibit A

Case 3:16-cv SI Document 39 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 5

Case4:13-cv YGR Document104 Filed05/12/15 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

Case 4:08-cv JSW Document 250 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case4:10-cv CW Document75 Filed03/08/12 Page1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case3:12-cv WHO Document276 Filed02/14/14 Page1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:15-cv YK Document 84 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CIV CIV DS MISC ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT filed

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 82 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 7

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE AND SCHEDULING A FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:13-cv LMB-TCB Document 127 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 30 PageID# 2647 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

Case: 1: 1 0-cv Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:569

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/11/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 58 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/11/2016 EXHIBIT 2

Case 4:14-md CW Document 615 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 9

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

Case3:14-cv MMC Document53 Filed06/26/15 Page1 of 10

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:16-cv DPG Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/20/2017 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

\ 'C,_ \) ~THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 25 Filed: 10/18/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:156 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

v. No. D-202-CV MAILED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 2:08-cv R-E Document 179 Filed 09/20/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:3675 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 4:16-cv ERW Doc. #: 95 Filed: 12/15/17 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 734

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT (FOR MEMBERS OF SUBCLASS 2)

Transcription:

Case :-cv-0-dms-bgs Document Filed // Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RICK DOLFO and SUSAN DOLFO, on behalf of Themselves, All Others Similarly Situated and the General Public, v. Plaintiffs, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, Defendants. Case No.: :-cv--dms-bgs CLASS ACTION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Judge: Crtrm: Hon. Dana M. Sabraw A, th Floor Case No. :-cv--dms-bgs

Case :-cv-0-dms-bgs Document Filed // Page of 0 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Rick Dolfo and Susan Dolfo and Defendants Bank of America, N.A. and BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP have entered into a Settlement Agreement ( Settlement ), filed December,, after substantial discovery and lengthy arms-length settlement discussions; AND, WHEREAS, the Court has received and considered the Settlement, including the accompanying exhibits, and the record in this Action; AND, WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have made an application, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule (e), for an order preliminarily approving the settlement of this Action, and for its dismissal with prejudice upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Settlement; AND, WHEREAS, the Court has reviewed the Plaintiffs application and the supporting memorandum for such order, and has found good cause for the same. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:. If not otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms have the same meanings as set forth in the Settlement Agreement.. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule (c), the Court previously certified the following Class: All persons who had a residential mortgage loan secured by property located in the State of California and whose loan was serviced by Bank of America, where Bank of America created an impound account up until May,, as a result of Bank of America s evaluation of eligibility for a loan modification pursuant to the Home Affordable Modification Program, and not because of a circumstances permitted by Civil Code. Excluded from the Class are those who entered a trial period program pursuant to the Home Affordable Modification Program and defendants and any of their officers, directors and employees.. Further, the Court previously appointed Rick Dolfo and Susan Dolfo as the Class Representatives for the Class and Timothy G. Blood and Thomas J. Case No. :-cv--dms-bgs

Case :-cv-0-dms-bgs Document Filed // Page of 0 O Reardon II of Blood Hurst & O Reardon, LLP as Class Counsel. See Court s Order Granting Plaintiff s Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. No. ).. The Court hereby preliminarily approves the Settlement and the terms and conditions of settlement set forth therein, subject to further consideration at the Final Approval Hearing.. The Court has conducted a preliminary assessment of the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement, and hereby finds that the settlement falls within the range of reasonableness meriting possible final approval. The Court therefore preliminarily approves the proposed Settlement.. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule (e) the Court will hold a final approval hearing on April,, at :0 p.m., in the Courtroom of the Honorable Dana M. Sabraw, United States District Court for the Southern District of California, West Broadway, San Diego, California 0, for the following purposes: a) Determining whether the proposed settlement of the Action is fair, reasonable and adequate and should be approved by the Court; b) Considering the application of Class Counsel for an award of attorneys fees and expenses as provided for under the Settlement; c) Considering the application for service awards to the Plaintiffs as provided for under the Settlement; d) Considering whether the Court should enter the [Proposed] Final Judgment and Order Approving Settlement; e) Considering whether the release by the Class Members of the Released Claims as set forth in the Settlement should be provided; and f) Ruling upon such other matters as the Court may deem just and appropriate. Case No. :-cv--dms-bgs

Case :-cv-0-dms-bgs Document Filed // Page of 0. The Court may adjourn the Final Approval Hearing and later reconvene such hearing without further notice to the Class Members.. Any Class Member may enter an appearance in the Action, at his or her own expense, individually or through counsel. All Class Members who do not enter an appearance will be represented by Class Counsel.. The Parties may further modify the Settlement prior to the Final Approval Hearing so long as such modifications do not materially change the terms of the settlement provided therein. The Court may approve the Settlement with such modifications as may be agreed to by the Parties, if appropriate, without further notice to Class Members. 0. Opening papers in support of final approval of the Settlement and any application for attorneys fees and expenses and/or plaintiffs service awards must be filed with the Court and served at least days prior to the Final Approval Hearing. Defendants opposition, if any, to Plaintiffs application for attorneys fees and expenses must be filed with the Court and served at least days prior to the Final Approval Hearing. Reply papers, if any, must be filed and served at least days prior to the Final Approval Hearing.. The Court approves, as to form and content, the proposed class notice (collectively the Class Notice ), which is Exhibit, to the Settlement on file with this Court.. The Court finds that the distribution of Class Notice substantially in the manner and form set forth in this Order and the Settlement meets the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure and due process, is the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and shall constitute due and sufficient notice to all Persons entitled thereto.. The Court approves the designation of Garden City Group, Inc. to serve as the Court-appointed Settlement Administrator for the Settlement. The Case No. :-cv--dms-bgs

Case :-cv-0-dms-bgs Document Filed // Page of 0 Settlement Administrator shall disseminate Class Notice and supervise and carry out the notice procedure, the processing of Request Forms, and other administrative functions, and shall respond to Class Member inquiries, as set forth in the Settlement and this Order under the direction and supervision of the Court.. The Court directs the Settlement Administrator to establish a Settlement Website, making available copies of this Order, the Class Notice, Request Forms that may be downloaded and submitted online or by mail, the Settlement and all exhibits thereto, and such other information as may be of assistance to Class Members or required under the Settlement.. No later than 0 days before the Final Approval Hearing, the Settlement Administrator is ordered to substantially complete dissemination of the Class Letter, which shall be mailed to the last known address (after updating addresses by reference to the National Change of Address database) of all Class Members (the Initial Mailed Notice ). The mailing shall also include a Request Form for those Class Members with a Covered Mortgage Loan currently serviced by Bank of America.. The Settlement Administrator shall perform reasonable address traces for all Class Letters returned as undeliverable from the Initial Mailed Notice. No later than days from the Initial Mailed Notice, the Settlement Administrator shall substantially complete the re-mailing of Class Letters and Request Forms to those Class Members whose new addresses were identified as of that time through address traces (the Notice Re-mailing Process ).. The costs of the Class Notice, administering the claims portion of the Settlement, creating and maintaining the Settlement Website, and all other Claims Administrator expenses shall be paid by Defendants in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Settlement. Case No. :-cv--dms-bgs

Case :-cv-0-dms-bgs Document Filed // Page of 0. Class Members must submit their Request Form, should they choose to do so, no later than 0 days after the date first set by the Court for the Final Approval Hearing. Such deadline may be further extended without notice to the Class by Court order, by agreement between the Parties, or as set forth in the Settlement. Procedure for Objecting To the Settlement. Any Class Member who desires to object to the proposed settlement, including the requested attorneys fees and expenses or service awards to the Plaintiffs, must timely file with the Clerk of this Court a notice of the objection(s), together with all papers that the Class Member desires to submit to the Court no later than 0 days before the date first set for the Final Approval Hearing (the Objection Date ). The objection must also be served on Class Counsel and Bank of America s Counsel no later than the Objection Date. The Court will consider such objection(s) and papers only if such papers are received on or before the Objection Date provided in the Class Notice, by the Clerk of the Court and by Class Counsel and Bank of America s Counsel. In addition to the filing with this Court, such papers must be sent to each of the following persons: Timothy G. Blood Blood Hurst & O Reardon, LLP 0 B Street, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Chad R. Fuller Troutman Sanders LLP El Camino Real, Ste. 00 San Diego, CA 0. The written objection must include: (a) a heading which refers to the Action; (b) the objector s name, residential address, telephone number and, if represented by counsel, of his/her counsel (notwithstanding, the objector s actual residential address, not just his/her counsel s, must also be included); (c) an explanation of the basis upon which the objector claims to be a Class Member; (d) a statement whether the objector intends to appear at the Final Approval Hearing, either in person or through counsel; (e) all grounds for the objection, Case No. :-cv--dms-bgs

Case :-cv-0-dms-bgs Document Filed // Page of 0 accompanied by any legal support for the objection known to the objector or his/her counsel; (f) copies of any papers, briefs, or other documents upon which the objection is based; and (g) the objector s handwritten, dated signature (an electronic signature, /s/, or an attorney s signature are not sufficient).. Any Class Member who files and serves a written objection, as described in the preceding Section, may appear at the Final Approval Hearing, either in person or through counsel hired at the Class Member s expense, to object to any aspect of the fairness, reasonableness, or adequacy of this Agreement, including attorneys fees. Class Members or their attorneys who intend to make an appearance at the Final Approval Hearing must serve a notice of intention to appear on the Class Counsel identified in the Class Letter and to Bank of America s Counsel, and file the notice of appearance with the Court, no later than twenty () days before the Final Approval Hearing.. Any Class Member who fails to comply with the provisions of the preceding paragraph shall waive and forfeit any and all rights he or she may have to appear separately and/or to object, and shall be bound by all the terms of the Agreement and by all proceedings, orders and judgments, including, but not limited to, the Release, in the Action.. Counsel for the Parties are hereby authorized to utilize all reasonable procedures in connection with the administration of the settlement which are not materially inconsistent with either this Order or the terms of the Settlement. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December, THE HON. DANA M. SABRAW UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. :-cv--dms-bgs