Hatch Opens Narrow Lead Over Pawlenty

Similar documents
Minnesota State Politics: Battles Over Constitution and State House

Minnesota Public Radio News and Humphrey Institute Poll

Minnesota Public Radio News and Humphrey Institute Poll. Backlash Gives Franken Slight Edge, Coleman Lifted by Centrism and Faith Vote

Minnesota Public Radio News and Humphrey Institute Poll. Coleman Lead Neutralized by Financial Crisis and Polarizing Presidential Politics

Minnesota Public Radio News and Humphrey Institute Poll

Minnesota Public Radio News and Humphrey Institute Poll

Minnesota Public Radio News and Humphrey Institute Poll. Dayton Starts with Edge in Democratic Primary and Fall Election

Minnesota Public Radio News and Humphrey Institute Poll. Dayton Jumps to Double-Digit Lead Over Emmer

DATE: October 7, 2004 CONTACT: Adam Clymer at or (cell) VISIT:

POLITICS AND THE PRESIDENT April 6-9, 2006

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD. FOR RELEASE September 12, 2014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THIS REPORT:

THE 2004 NATIONAL SURVEY OF LATINOS: POLITICS AND CIVIC PARTICIPATION

Moral Values Take Back Seat to Partisanship and the Economy In 2004 Presidential Election

NBC News/Marist Poll. Do you consider your permanent home address to be in Minnesota? Which county in Minnesota do you live in?

The Cook Political Report / LSU Manship School Midterm Election Poll

U.S. Catholics split between intent to vote for Kerry and Bush.

PRESIDENT BUSH GAINS ON TERRORISM, NOT ON IRAQ August 17-21, 2006

POLL: CLINTON MAINTAINS BIG LEAD OVER TRUMP IN BAY STATE. As early voting nears, Democrat holds 32-point advantage in presidential race

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL MONDAY, OCTOBER 27, am EDT. A survey of Virginians conducted by the Center for Public Policy

The Republican Race: Trump Remains on Top He ll Get Things Done February 12-16, 2016

PPIC STATEWIDE SURVEY

THE HEALTH CARE BILL, THE PUBLIC OPTION, ABORTION, AND CONGRESS November 13-16, 2009

WHITE EVANGELICALS, THE ISSUES AND THE 2008 ELECTION October 12-16, 2007

TIS THE SEASON TO DISLIKE WASHINGTON LEADERS, ESPECIALLY CONGRESS

Wide and growing divides in views of racial discrimination

CONTACTS: MURRAY EDELMAN, Ph.D., (917) (cell) TIM VERCELLOTTI, Ph.D., (732) , EXT. 285; (919) (cell)

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Negative Views of New Congress Cross Party Lines

CALIFORNIA: CD48 REMAINS TIGHT

PRESIDENT OBAMA AT ONE YEAR January 14-17, 2010

THE WMUR GRANITE STATE POLL THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SURVEY CENTER

CONTACTS: MURRAY EDELMAN, Ph.D., (917) (cell) TIM VERCELLOTTI, Ph.D., (732) , EXT. 285; (919) (cell)

First-Term Average 61% 29

CONTRADICTORY VIEWS ON NEW JERSEY SENATE RACE

Swing Voters in Swing States Troubled By Iraq, Economy; Unimpressed With Bush and Kerry, Annenberg Data Show

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2016, 2016 Campaign: Strong Interest, Widespread Dissatisfaction

BLISS INSTITUTE 2006 GENERAL ELECTION SURVEY

Morrissey leads crowded contest for Richmond mayor; voters sour on current City Council and School Board

The President, Congress and Deficit Battles April 15-20, 2011

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Free Trade Agreements Seen as Good for U.S., But Concerns Persist

Heading into the Conventions: A Tied Race July 8-12, 2016

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, December, 2016, Low Approval of Trump s Transition but Outlook for His Presidency Improves

*Embargoed Until Monday, Nov. 7 th at 7am EST* The 2016 Election: A Lead for Clinton with One Day to Go November 2-6, 2016

Obama Viewed as Fiscal Cliff Victor; Legislation Gets Lukewarm Reception

CORRUPTION IN THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

DELAWARE VOTERS GIVE A COLLECTIVE YAWN FOR STATE RACES BUT ARE LARGELY UPBEAT ABOUT LEADERS AND STATE S HEALTH

1996 NEW JERSEY ELECTIONS CLINTON LEADS DOLE; LOW AWARENESS OF SENATE CANDIDATES

Economic Issues in Ohio Work to Kerry s Advantage

Kerry Gains in Personal Ratings, Though Bush Maintains a Lead

FOR RELEASE MAY 10, 2018

THE 2008 ELECTION: 1 DAY TO GO October 31 November 2, 2008

Executive Summary of Economic Attitudes, Most Important Problems, Ratings of Top Political Figures, and an Early Look at the 2018 Texas Elections

NEWS RELEASE. Poll Shows Tight Races Obama Leads Clinton. Democratic Primary Election Vote Intention for Obama & Clinton

Young Voters in the 2010 Elections

After his Convention, a Tepid Bump for Kerry

MASON-DIXON ARKANSAS POLL

The Battleground: Democratic Perspective September 7 th, 2016

Growing share of public says there is too little focus on race issues

NEW JERSEY: CD03 STILL KNOTTED UP

VIRGINIA: GOP TRAILING IN CD10

PENNSYLVANIA: UNCERTAIN DEM EDGE IN CD07

FOR RELEASE NOVEMBER 07, 2017

A A P I D ATA Asian American Voter Survey. Sponsored by Civic Leadership USA

Campaign Finance Charges Raise Doubts Among 7% of Clinton Backers FINAL PEW CENTER SURVEY-CLINTON 52%, DOLE 38%, PEROT 9%

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DATE: August 3, 2004 CONTACT: Adam Clymer at or (cell) VISIT:

Public Opinion on Health Care Issues October 2012

NATIONAL: 2018 HOUSE RACE STABILITY

BOOKER V. RIVERA AND THE POWER OF CABLE NEWS OBAMA APPROVAL DOWN SLIGHTLY

The 2016 Republican Primary Race: Trump Still Leads October 4-8, 2015

GOP Makes Big Gains among White Voters

It s Democrats +8 in Likely Voter Preference, With Trump and Health Care on Center Stage

THE ECONOMY, THE DEFICIT, AND THE PRESIDENT July 24-28, 2009

Nigeria heads for closest election on record

The University of Akron Bliss Institute Poll: Baseline for the 2018 Election. Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics University of Akron

NEW JERSEY: DEM HAS SLIGHT EDGE IN CD11

Franklin Pierce University / WBZ Poll

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2015, Negative Views of Supreme Court at Record High, Driven by Republican Dissatisfaction

CONTACT: TIM VERCELLOTTI, Ph.D., (732) , EXT. 285; (919) (cell) CRANKY ELECTORATE STILL GIVES DEMOCRATS THE EDGE

RUTGERS-EAGLETON POLL: NEW JERSEYANS SAY KEEP MENENDEZ IN OFFICE UNLESS PROVEN GUILTY

PEW RESEARCH CENTER FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

PPIC STATEWIDE SURVEY

PEW RESEARCH CENTER. FOR RELEASE January 16, 2019 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS U.S. SENATE POLL Sept , ,005 Registered Voters (RVs)

Support for Restoring U.S.-Cuba Relations March 11-15, 2016

EMBARGOED NOT FOR RELEASE UNTIL: SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1993

FOR RELEASE MARCH 20, 2018

NEW JERSEY: DEM MAINTAINS EDGE IN CD11

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, February, 2015, Growing Support for Campaign Against ISIS - and Possible Use of U.S.

NBC News/WSJ/Marist Poll

REGISTERED VOTERS October 30, 2016 October 13, 2016 Approve Disapprove Unsure 7 6 Total

NEW JERSEY VOTERS TAKE ON 2008

Obama Maintains Approval Advantage, But GOP Runs Even on Key Issues

THE BUSH PRESIDENCY AND THE STATE OF THE UNION January 20-25, 2006

Rock the Vote September Democratic Strategic Analysis by Celinda Lake, Joshua E. Ulibarri, and Karen M. Emmerson

HYPOTHETICAL 2016 MATCH-UPS: CHRISTIE BEATS OTHER REPUBLICANS AGAINST CLINTON STABILITY REMAINS FOR CHRISTIE A YEAR AFTER LANE CLOSURES

CONTACT: TIM VERCELLOTTI, Ph.D., (732) , EXT. 285; (919) (cell) CLINTON SOLIDIFIES LEADS OVER PRIMARY RIVALS

CRUZ & KASICH RUN STRONGER AGAINST CLINTON THAN TRUMP TRUMP GOP CANDIDACY COULD FLIP MISSISSIPPI FROM RED TO BLUE

Any Court Health Care Decision Unlikely to Please

TWELVE DAYS TO GO: BARACK OBAMA MAINTAINS DOUBLE-DIGIT LEAD October 19-22, 2008

CLINTON MAINTAINS LEAD IN THE DEMOCRATIC RACE January 9-12, 2008

Republicans Are Losing Ground on the Deficit, But Obama s Not Gaining

Transcription:

Hatch Opens Narrow Lead Over Pawlenty Lawrence R. Jacobs Director, Center for the Study of Politics and Governance Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs University of Minnesota Joanne M. Miller Research Associate, 2006 Elections Project Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science University of Minnesota October 30, 2006 Even though the race remains too close to call, Attorney General Mike Hatch has opened up a narrow 6 point lead over Governor Tim Pawlenty, 45 percent to 39 percent, with just over a week before Election Day. Independence Party candidate Peter Hutchinson is drawing 9 percent, with 7 percent still undecided. The Humphrey Institute survey of 663 likely Minnesota voters was conducted October 23-28, 2006 and has a 3.8 margin of error. Hatch s edge results from three factors: The Minnesotan electorate is tilting toward the Democratic Party. Democrats are more fired up to vote and the Republican Party s brand name has been tarnished. Voters are adopting a more sour evaluation of the state s circumstances, the Governor s performance, and his personality compared to Hatch s. The concerns of voters are dominated by Democratic issues (health care, education, and the Iraq War); the issues promoted by the Governor and Republicans (illegal immigration, gay marriage, and terrorism) do not rank highly on voters agenda. A backlash against President Bush and the Iraq War is hurting the Governor. Hatch s Edge Horse Race Among Likely Voters Pawlenty Hatch Hutchinson Other/ Refused Total 39% 45% 9% 7% Republican 87% 6% 4% 3% Independent 26% 30% 23% 21% Democrat 7% 78% 10% 5% Hatch has widened his advantage from 2 points (44% to 42%) in the mid-september Humphrey Survey to 6 points in late October. Hutchinson s support has remained unchanged. (Previous surveys can be found at the Center s website: 1

http://www.hhh.umn.edu/centers/cspg/elections_projects/polling_archives/2006_hhh_sur veys.html) The independent voter that is, Minnesotans who do not identify with either the Democratic or Republican parties -- slightly favors Hatch over Pawlenty (30% to 26%). Hutchinson continues to come in third among voters who should be his political base, drawing only 23 percent of support from independents. Election Outcome Can Still Change Although Hatch s 6 point lead is greater than the margin of error (3.8%), there are three factors that can shift the outcome in the Governor s favor during the final days of the campaign. First, 7 percent of likely voters have not made up their mind and 21 percent of independents remain undecided. A sharp swing of these voters could tip the outcome of this close race. Second, more than 2 out of 10 Democrats remain unwilling to sign on with Hatch. By comparison, Pawlenty has about half as many potential defectors among Republicans. The defection of Democrats from Hatch could be an opportunity for Pawlenty. Fourteen percent of likely Minnesotan voters who support Democratic Senate candidate Amy Klobuchar plan to support the Governor rather than Hatch. But the full effect of Democratic defections from Hatch is being dulled by Hutchinson s candidacy, which is drawing 10 percent of Democrats. Third, more than 1 out of 10 likely voters who currently support Pawlenty or Hatch may change their mind and support a different candidate. About half of Hutchinson s supporters indicate a willingness to consider another candidate. Some Voters May Switch Candidates Definitely Might Change Mind Don't Know Governor Vote Pawlenty 86% 13% 1% Hatch 88% 12% 0% Hutchinson 48% 48% 4% Changing Party Motivation and Support Although the contest for governor remains fluid, Hatch s lead is anchored in significant developments. The most important factor in the 2006 Minnesota elections is the Democratic tilt of voters. Minnesotans harbor different levels of devotion to the Republican and Democratic parties. The most loyal are individuals who outright declare themselves a member of one party or the other (what we call strict partisans ). A somewhat less devoted group of partisans are the leaners who initially decline to indicate a party loyalty but when 2

prodded indicate that they lean towards one party. There is also a group of true independents who insist that they do not belong to either party. Among likely voters, Democratic voters (including leaners) hold an 11 point advantage over Republicans 48 percent to 37 percent, with 13 percent independent and 2 percent not willing to respond. Identification with the Democratic and Republican parties do change over time as new voters emerge, circumstances change, and Americans update their evaluations of the each party. Minnesotan Likely Voters (includes leaners) Identification with Political Parties Republican (including leaners) 37% Independent 13% Democrat (including leaners) 48% Don t Know / Refused 2% Two factors explain the current Democratic advantage heading toward Election Day. First and most important, the Democrats are more fired up than the Republicans. The strong interest of Democrats has substantially increased since mid-september, growing from a 6 point advantage over Republicans to a 13 point gap. This disparity helps to explain why more Democrats than Republicans were identified as likely to vote in our survey. There is also a noticeable drop off in interest among independents since mid-september. Very interested in the 2006 election (all Minnesotans 18 and over) September October Change Identification with Political Parties Republican 58% 60% 2 Independent 54% 39% -15 Democrat 64% 73% 9 Evidence that Democrats have more fire in the belly than Republicans has been consistently found at the national level. A recent study of registered voters by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center reported an 18 point Democratic advantage in showing more enthusiasm about voting and an 11 point Democratic lead in having given a lot of thought to the election. (This is comparable to the Republican gaps before their sweeping victories in the 1994 congressional elections.) A second factor is that the Republican name brand has been tarnished in the eyes of likely Minnesotan voters. The Democratic advantage stems from several factors. The most important is the erosion of Republicanism there is a four percentage point decline in affiliation with the Republican Party from 29 percent in mid-september to 25 percent in late October. Rather than switching to Democrats, these Republicans appear to be gravitating toward thinking of themselves as independents. 3

Independent voters are slightly more inclined to report that they lean toward the Democratic Party. Minnesotan adults who report that they are independents who lean toward the Democratic Party have grown from 8 percent in mid-september to 10 percent in late October. The core support for the Democratic Party has not, however, increased, remaining stuck at 36 percent. Identification with Democratic and Republican Parties (all Minnesotans 18 and over) September October Identification with Political Parties Republican 29% 25% Republican Leaning Independent 9% 9% Independent / Other / No Response 18% 20% Democratic Leaning Independent 8% 10% Democrat 36% 36% The avalanche of bad news for Republicans from the Mark Foley scandal to Iraq has registered in the running tally that Minnesotans keep of the parties. Minnesotan Republicans are becoming more hesitant and are shifting to calling themselves independents while independents are toying with the idea of calling themselves Democrats. Impact of Minnesota Issues and Personalities Hatch is also being helped by the more sour evaluation of the state s circumstances, the Governor s performance, and his personality as well as by an agenda that is dominated by Democratic issues. Each of these advantages has been targeted, with only mixed results, by the Pawlenty campaign. Souring on Minnesota and Pawlenty: Pawlenty has lost one of his strongest assets at the beginning the general election a generally positive evaluation of Minnesota s direction. By late October, likely voters are split over the state s direction 46 percent report that Minnesota is off on the wrong track versus 44 percent that indicate it is heading in the right direction. This is a reversal from mid- September when 48 percent were optimistic compared to 43 percent who offered a more dire outlook. More Pessimistic Evaluation of Minnesota s Direction (likely voters) September October Direction of Minnesota Right Direction 48% 44% Wrong Track 43% 46% Don't Know / Refused 9% 10% 4

The stronger negative view of the state s direction is boosting Hatch s candidacy. About three-quarters of Minnesotans who see the state off on the wrong track support the Attorney General. A similar proportion of likely voters who are optimistic about the state s direction support the Governor. The problem for the Pawlenty campaign is that there are fewer optimistic voters. Concerns about Minnesota are echoed in a more tepid evaluation of the Governor s performance. Since mid-september, the Governor s approval has dropped by 6 points while his disapproval rating has risen by 7 points. Although the trend is moving away from the Governor, a 50% approval rating during this election cycle is respectable and is a sign of Pawlenty s enduring appeal. About three- quarters of likely voters who approve of the Governor s job performance plan to vote for him. Tepid Approval of Pawlenty s Job Performance September October Pawlenty s Job as Governor Approve 56% 50% Disapprove 40% 47% Don't Know / Refused 4% 3% Democratic Issues Dominate Policy Agenda: The issues that likely Minnesotan voters identify as the single most important challenges facing the state are health care (up 4 points since September), education, and the Iraq War (up 3 points). The issues promoted by the Governor and Republicans illegal immigration, gay marriage, and terrorism -- have not become primary concerns of voters. Education and Health Care Dominate as Single Most Important Problems September October Most Important Issue Education 23% 22% Health Care 23% 27% The economy 15% 15% The war in Iraq 12% 15% Illegal Immigration 7% 7% Gas Prices 5% 2% Terrorism 5% 4% Gay marriage 4% 4% Don't Know / Other / Refused 6% 6% 5

Hatch Enjoys Large Advantage on Voters Top Issues: The Attorney General holds a commanding 10 to 15 percentage point lead over Pawlenty on the two issues singled out most by likely Minnesotan voters health care and education and is reaping 8 out of ten voters who are optimistic about the job he will do in these areas. On handling the economy, Hatch has fought the Governor to a draw even as the economy has grown. Hatch Holds Commanding Advantage on the State s Two Top Problems Total Plan to vote for Pawlenty Plan to vote for Hatch Plan to vote for Hutchinson Other/ Refused Candidate Expected to do Better Job on: Health Care Pawlenty 30% 94% 3% 2% 2% Hatch 46% 8% 84% 5% 4% Hutchinson 8% 10% 19% 65% 6% Education Pawlenty 32% 92% 4% 2% 3% Hatch 45% 8% 83% 6% 3% Hutchinson 8% 9% 28% 59% 4% The Economy Pawlenty 39% 88% 7% 3% 2% Hatch 39% 3% 90% 4% 4% Hutchinson 8% 6% 25% 64% 6% The Governor enjoys substantially larger advantages on terrorism, gay marriage, and illegal immigration. The problem is that they are not salient and therefore fail to influence many voters. 6

The Unexpected Personality Twist: The Pawlenty campaign set out to capitalize on what it saw as Hatch s slashing personal style and reap the benefits of the Governor s popularity. This strategy has not worked. The Governor is consistently perceived far more negatively than Hatch on a range of personality traits from leadership to caring about people like you, honesty, and independent thinking. By contrast, the Pawlenty campaign has failed to define Hatch in negative terms for a number of likely voters: by more than 2 to 1, more voters report that they don t know about Hatch s personality than they do about Pawlenty s personality. 30.0% 25.0% 25.9% 20.0% 15.0% 13.4% 16.3% 12.3% 12.4% 14.8% 17.5% 18.7% 16.3% 10.0% 5.0% 9.2% 3.9% 5.8% 8.1% 5.9% 9.1% 7.8% 0.0% Not Well Don t Know Not Well Don t Know Not Well Don t Know Not Well Don t Know Leadership Cares Honest Independent Thinker Pawlenty Hatch Backlash Against President Bush and Iraq War Mid-term elections are usually run as local affairs that focus on state personalities and issues. The 2006 elections are departing from this common pattern. National personalities and issues are hurting Republican candidates and Governor Pawlenty in particular. 7

President Bush remains quite unpopular, with 62% disapproving of his job performance (52 percent strongly disapprove). Two thirds of likely voters who disapprove of the President s handling of his job plan to vote for Hatch. Only 11 percent of these Bush critics support Pawlenty, this is a 5 percentage point decline since mid-september. Bush s Unpopularity Rubs Off on Pawlenty Total Pawlenty Hatch Hutchinson Other/ Refused President Bush s handling of his job Approve 37% 86% 5% 4% 5% Disapprove 62% 11% 69% 13% 7% Don t Know / Refused 1% 43% 14% 14% 29% The President s handling of the Iraq War is also a liability for the Governor. Sixtyfour percent disapprove of the President s handling of Iraq (56 percent strongly disapprove). Only 16 percent of these War critics support Pawlenty. Disapproval of Bush s Handling of Iraq War Weighs Down Pawlenty Total Pawlenty Hatch Hutchinson Other/ Refused President Bush s handling of Iraq War Approve 34% 84% 6% 5% 5% Disapprove 64% 16% 66% 11% 7% Don t Know / Refused 2% 18% 27% 27% 27% Mark Foley s inappropriate behavior toward congressional pages along with the corruption scandal involving Jack Abramoff also appear to be casting a bit of a cloud over the Governor s campaign. By a 2 to 1 margin, Minnesotan likely voters perceive the Democrats in Congress as more ethical than congressional Republicans. Only 8 percent of those who view the Democrats as more ethical support Pawlenty. Total Pawlenty Hatch Hutchinson Other/ Refused More Ethical Party Democrats in Congress 41% 8% 79% 10% 4% Republicans in Congress 21% 89% 4% 4% 4% Don't Know / Refused 38% 47% 30% 12% 11% 8

Modest Gender Gap: The swirl of partisan, state, and national issues are creating a modest gender gap. Women favor Hatch over Pawlenty by 9 points. The Governor s 7 point advantage among male voters in mid-september has disappeared by late October. Pawlenty Hatch Hutchinson Other/ Refused Gender Male 40% 41% 11% 7% Female 39% 48% 7% 6% 9

About the Survey The Center for the Study of Politics and Governance at the University of Minnesota s Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs designed the survey. The Center and Humphrey Institute are non-partisan academic institutions that are committed to rigorous research that contributes to informed discussions of elections and public affairs more generally. The research team was Lawrence R. Jacobs (director) and Joanne M. Miller. Melanie Burns provided superior research assistance. Jacobs and Miller are responsible for designing and analyzing the survey. No statements of fact, interpretations, or conclusions should be attributed to the Humphrey Institute. The survey was fielded by the Center for Survey Research and Analysis (CSRA) at the University of Connecticut, which has extensive national and state experience conducting non-partisan surveys on politics and government policy. CSRA called a sample of telephone exchanges that was randomly selected by a computer from a list of active residential exchanges within the State of Minnesota. Within each exchange, random digits were added to form a complete telephone number, thus permitting access to both listed and unlisted numbers. The sample was designed to represent different regions of the state in proportion to the number of adults living in each region. Within each household, one adult was selected to be the respondent for the survey. 1,186 residents of Minnesota were interviewed by telephone between October 23 and October 28, 2006, and 663 were determined to be likely to vote. Results are based on a model that adjusts responses according to the likelihood of a respondent voting. Likelihood to vote is based on the following factors: the likelihood of voting as reported by the respondent, voter registration, past voting behavior, and interest in the election. In addition, the results have been weighted to reflect the number of adults in a household and the number of telephone lines reaching the household as well as the demographic characteristics of Minnesota based on region, sex, age, education, and race. The distribution of party identification among likely voters analyzed in this survey is as follows: Republican 37% Independent 13% Democrat 48% Don t Know / Refused 2% In theory, in 19 cases out of 20 the results among likely voters will differ by no more than 3.8 percentage points in either direction from what would have been obtained by interviewing all likely voters in the state. For smaller subgroups the margin of sampling error is larger. 10

In addition to sampling error, the practical difficulties of conducting any survey of public opinion may introduce sources of error into the poll. Variations in the wording and order of questions, for example, may lead to somewhat different results. 11