USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/23/2015. DISTRICT OF COWMBAaijh 1

Similar documents
USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/23/2015 Page 1 of Constitution Avenue,

ORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 Z015 ) ) ) ) ) ) PETITION FOR ) REVIEW ) ) ) No DEC FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCLED^^SSSmi^

ORU l;~]i ^i^totestodhhfw^

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

\{."--, Under Section 307 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(b), Section 706 of

FOR DISTRIGT OF COLUMBIA 9fHE UNITED STATES COURT OF URAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION; BASIN ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE; EAST

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

NITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS RECEIVEHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT PETITION FOR REVIEW

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

CLERK RECEIVED. JTW OR UiSThICT ØF OL tikbta. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRC1 lit ETSY, INC., Petitioner

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

PETITION FOR REVIEW. Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 402(a), 28 U.S.C. 2342(1) and 2344, and Federal

PETITION FOR REVIEW. Pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Circuit

No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APP: AJllS--~---- PETITION FOR REVIEW. and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 15( a), the Mozilla Corporation

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2014 Page 1 of 1

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ReCEIVED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU CLERK

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 03/24/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

18 105G. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT Oi, FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMB &!IPANIC MEDIA COALITION, Petitioner CASE NO. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

B t NA L. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAl. wr FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU] f FOR DITRIT Q QCLJMHA ILtUIt

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED: OCTOBER 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

In the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOTION OF AMERICAN CABLE ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

No ORAL ARGUMENT HELD JUNE 1, 2015 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2 AND 3, 2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD DECEMBER 10, 2013 DECIDED APRIL 15, 2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, No and Consolidated Cases

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/19/2011 Page 1 of 8 [NOT SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] No

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petition for Review

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 15, 2010] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

LegalFormsForTexas.Com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendant.

Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., BRIEF OF FIVE U.S. SENATORS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS

Information or instructions: Motion Order Affidavit for substituted service package PREVIEW

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2011 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD APRIL 12, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case , Document 1-1, 04/21/2017, , Page1 of 2

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Nos , ,

*west 1 CO > % as *<\S. State of West Virginia Office of the Attorney General. Attorney General. December 14, 2016

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, et al.,

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU

HARVARD LAW SCHOOL Environmental Law Program

GOVERNOR AG LEGISLATURE PUC DEQ

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD APRIL 13, 2012 No and consolidated cases (COMPLEX)

Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 779

October 21, 2005 RE: APPLICATION /INVESTIGATION

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT : : : : MOTION TO GOVERN

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 08/28/2018 Page 1 of 15 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

Auto accident Motion for Summary Judgment complete package

15-20-CV FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. ALLCO FINANCE LIMITED Plaintiff-Appellant

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 15, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

October 4, 2005 RE: APPLICATION /INVESTIGATION

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Intervenor-Respondent. Contested Case Hearing in the above-identified consolidated cases (the "Consolidated Appeals").

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Petitioner v. CHANBOND, LLC Patent Owner

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Transcription:

ti8ict -U[ UbIMIf QtrcrO IVUfl1 VI rffij1i.ij OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT USCA Case #15-1368 Document #1579754 Filed: 10/23/2015 r rfl 15 FOR Page 1 of 6 DISTRICT OF COWMBAaijh 1 OCT THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APP1 ALL FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRC1 JIT 23 U15 CLERK AMERICAN COALITION FOR CLEAN COAL ELECTRICITY v. Petitioner, Case No. 15-1368 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. \c PETITION FOR REVIEW Pursuant to Section 307(b (1 of the Clean Mr Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(b (1, Section 702 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 702, and Rule 15(a of the Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure, the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity ( ACCCE hereby petitions this Court to review the final action of the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency in promulgating a final rule entitled Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utifity Generating Units, published in the Federal Register at $0 Fed. Reg. 64,662 (Oct. 23, 2015.

USCA Case #15-1368 Document #1579754 Filed: 10/23/2015 Page 2 of 6 Respectfully submitted, Date: October 23, 2015 Je rey. Holmstead DCB rnumber: 457974 Sandra Y. Snyder DC Bar Number: 981418 Bracewell & Giuliani LLP 2000 K Street, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, D.C. 20006-1872 (202 828-5800 (Telephone (202 857-4812 (Facsimile Counselfor Petitioner American Coalitionfor Clean CoalBlectrici y -2-

USCA Case #15-1368 Document #1579754 Filed: 10/23/2015 Page 3 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to Rule 15(c of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, I hereby certify that I have this day caused the foregoing Petition for Review by American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity and Corporate Disclosure Statement to be served, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, upon the following: Gina McCarthy, Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Room 3000, William Jefferson Clinton Building 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20460 John Cruden, Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources Division U.S. Department of Justice RFK DOJ Building, Room 2143 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20530 Date: October 23, 2015 Je rey R!IoJLstead DC Bar Number: 457974

bar USCA Case #15-1368 Document #1579754 Filed: 10/23/2015 Page 4 of 6 FOR D1STRCT OF COLUMtA CRCUfT OCT UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE Usj QC 2301 RECtE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCI IT CLERK AMERICAN COALITION FOR CLEAN COAL ELECTRICITY, v. Petitioner, Case No. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. CORPOTE DISCLOSU STATEMENT The American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity ( ACCCE subits the following corporate disclosure statement pursuant to Rule 26.1 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 2. ACCCE is a is a partnership of companies that are involved in the production of electricity from coal. ACCCE recognizes the inextricable linkage between energy, the economy and our environment. Toward that end, ACCCE supports policies that promote the wise use of coal, one of America s largest domestically produced energy resources, to ensure a reliable and affordable supply of electricity to meet our nation s demand for energy. 3. The ACCCE is a trade association within the meaning of Circuit Rule 26.1(b. It has no parent corporation, and no publicly held company owns a 10 percent or greater interest in the ACCCE.

USCA Case #15-1368 Document #1579754 Filed: 10/23/2015 Page 5 of 6 Respectfully submitted, Date: October 23, 2015 Jef rey R. ohtead Sandra Y. Snyder Bracewell & Giuliani LLP 2000 K Street, NW Suite 500 Washington, DC 20006-1872 202.828.5800 telephone 202.857.4812 facsimile jeff. ho1msteadbgllp.com Counselfor Petitioner American Coalitionfor Clean CoalElectriciy -3-

USCA Case #15-1368 Document #1579754 Filed: 10/23/2015 Page 6 of 6 B Jj\ ]VQ f Texas Jeffrey R. Holmstead L.I. New York Partner & GT1LIT Ij\f4sJI Washington, DC I L1 I Connecticut 1.202.828.5852 Office UNITED STAI t0urt OF APPEALS FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Uu 3ZO15 Seattle Dubai London I 1.202.857.4812 Fax Jeff. HoImsteadbgIIp.com JNifD stai FUR OI5TRCr Of MIoClnoUi I 20006-1809 INLED L 3 2015 RECEIVED October23,2015 I [ CLERK Mr. Mark J. Langer, Clerk United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. 333 Constitution Aye, NW Room 5205 Washington, DC 20001 ni LLP Re: American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity s Petition for Review Dear Mr. Langer: Enclosed please find an original and four copies of American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity s Petition for Review. Also enclosed is a receipt copy to be stamped and returned. Thank you very much for your assistance with this matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Bracewell & Giuliani LLP c5ala 7 Jeffrey R. Holmstead