Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 5 Filed 05/18/2006 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Similar documents
Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY PASSAIC COUNTY, LAW DIVISION CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO.: COMPLAINT & JURY DEMAND

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Case No.

2. One of the defendant in the case is Parker & Gould (P&G). What is exactly P&G?

Case5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION. Nature Of The Action

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

Case 2:07-cv JFB-WDW Document 15-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 10 CIVIL ACTION INTRODUCTION

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14

P H I L L I P S DAYES

Case 4:15-cv RLY-DML Document 1 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DIVISION OF OHIO EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

Filing # E-Filed 06/13/ :25:39 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

3:18-cv JMC Date Filed 05/22/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:10-cv CW Document 1 Filed 10/13/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv RBK-AMD Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2015 Page 1 of 9. Exhibit A

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16

Case 9:17-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. No.: Defendants.

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON

Case 4:04-cv LLP Document 1 Filed 12/28/2004 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

: : : : : : Plaintiffs Amy Morgan, Terri Smith, and Erin Harris ( Plaintiffs ), upon their INTRODUCTION

Case 3:13-cv JAH-KSC Document 1 Filed 02/06/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

(212) (collectively referred to as "Plaintiffs"), individually and on behalf of all others similarly

2:18-cv CSB-EIL # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 4:12-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/04/12 Page 1 of 6

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

IN TI-[E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. ..-ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION n/k/a DISH, LTD.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 4:11-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 3:10-cv HEH Document 1 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:11-cv LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/23/17 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:19-cv LY Document 1 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 23. Plaintiff,

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 3:07-cv TEH Document 1 Filed 09/11/2007 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Filing # E-Filed 11/06/ :26:27 AM

Case 2:15-cv LFR Document 1 Filed 11/11/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

This is an action under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/27/16 Page 1 of 15

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI

Case 7:17-cv KMK Document 1 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Transcription:

Case 3:06-cv-01453-JAP-TJB Document 5 Filed 05/18/2006 Page 1 of 4 HARRIET HEUER MILLER, ESQ. (4508) 955 West Side Avenue Jersey City, New Jersey 07306 201.333.3344 Attorney for Plaintiff Roniss G. Mason IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) Civ. No 2:06-cv-1453 (JAP)(MCA) RONISS G. MASON, ) Plaintiff; ) ) v. ) COMPLAINT and ) JURY DEMAND UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., ) Defendant. ) ) NATURE OF ACTION Plaintiff Roniss Mason brings this action against United Parcel Service, Inc., (UPS or defendant) seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and damages resulting from unlawful religious discrimination in hiring. JURISDICTION 1. This action is brought under, and jurisdiction is vested in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. section 1331 through 42 U.S.C.A. section 2000e (Title VII) and pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. section 1367 as to the pendent state law claim of unlawful discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10:5-1. The amount in controversy, exclusive of costs, interest and attorneys fees, exceeds $75,000.00. VENUE 2. Venue is proper because the unlawful employment practices were and are being committed within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, and the venue of this action is properly placed in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. section 1391. PARTIES 3. Plaintiff Roniss C. Mason resides at 845 Bergen Avenue, in the City of Jersey City, County of Hudson, State of New Jersey. 4. Defendant UPS is, and at all times mentioned in this complaint, was a business organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, and was operating and maintaining a business for the delivery of packages at 493 County Avenue, in the Town of

Case 3:06-cv-01453-JAP-TJB Document 5 Filed 05/18/2006 Page 2 of 4 Secaucus, County of Hudson, State of New Jersey and at numerous other locations in the United States and abroad. 5. At all relevant times UPS has been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A. sections 2000e, and has more than 15 employees employed at its Secaucus facility. 6. At all relevant times UPS has been an employer within the definition of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10:5-5. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES 7. Plaintiff has exhausted his administrative procedures under 42 U.S.C.A. 2000e, in that the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed this action against UPS on or about March 27, 2006, after issuing a Determination on June 13, 2005 that UPS discriminated against plaintiff and against other individuals of plaintiff s religion and of certain other religions as a class (Exhibit A). Plaintiff had filed with the EEOC a Charge of Religious Discrimination against defendant on or about February 14, 2005 (Exhibit B). STATEMENT OF CLAIMS FIRST COUNT (Title VII and NJLAD) 8. On or about November 18, 2004 plaintiff applied for the job of seasonal driver s helper at the UPS facility located at 493 County Avenue, Secaucus, New Jersey. 9. Plaintiff was at all times fully qualified for the position of seasonal driver s helper. 10. Plaintiff completed the written application and was interviewed for the job. 11. During the November 18, 2004 hiring process, Plaintiff was advised by UPS that he was required to shave his beard to qualify for the position of seasonal driver s helper. 12. Plaintiff explained to UPS that he could trim his beard, but he could not remove it because of his religion. 13. Plaintiff is a Rastafarian, and as a Rastafarian he sincerely believes that he must wear a beard to observe his religion. 14. During the hiring process on November 18, 2004, UPS advised plaintiff that he could not complete the application for the seasonal driver s helper position because he refused to shave his beard, as UPS had guideline requirements which prohibited beards and goatees for certain positions including that of seasonal driver s helper. 2

Case 3:06-cv-01453-JAP-TJB Document 5 Filed 05/18/2006 Page 3 of 4 15. UPS further advised plaintiff that he could apply for an inside position because an inside position would not involve contact with the public. 16. The inside position paid less than that the seasonal driver s helper s position. 17. Defendant UPS refused to enter the interactive process of reasonably accommodating plaintiff s religious observance. 18. Defendant UPS refused to hire plaintiff and/or to consider plaintiff for hiring because he was unable for religious reasons to shave off his beard. 19. These refusal constituted unlawful discrimination based on plaintiff s religion. 20. As a consequence of Defendant s wrongful acts, Plaintiff has been deprived of income, benefits, pension, and suffered anxiety, detriment to their health,, humiliation, pain and suffering and other damages. Wherefore, plaintiff requests judgment as follows: A. This court issue a declaratory judgment that defendant's acts, policies, practices and procedures complained of herein violated plaintiffs' rights as secured by the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 et seq. (NJLAD), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. section 2000e, as amended; and B. This court enjoin defendant's acts, policies, practices and procedures complained of herein; and C. This court award plaintiff actual and compensatory damages including lost wages, front pay, fringe benefits, social security, seniority rights and other remuneration; and D. This court award plaintiff punitive damages because of defendant s intentional acts in defiance of the NJLAD and Title VII which acts, if allowed to persist, would effectively thwart the public policy of the United States and the State of New Jersey; and E. This court award plaintiff costs of suit, interest and attorneys' fees; and F. This court award such other relief as this court determines appropriate. DATED: May 18, 2006 s/harriet Heuer Miller HARRIET HEUER MILLER 3

Case 3:06-cv-01453-JAP-TJB Document 5 Filed 05/18/2006 Page 4 of 4 JURY DEMAND The Plaintiff hereby demands trial by a jury on all of the triable issues of this complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 38. DATED: May 18, 2006 s/harriet Heuer Miller HARRIET HEUER MILLER 4

Case 3:06-cv-01453-JAP-TJB Document 5-2 Filed 05/18/2006 Page 1 of 3

Case 3:06-cv-01453-JAP-TJB Document 5-2 Filed 05/18/2006 Page 2 of 3

Case 3:06-cv-01453-JAP-TJB Document 5-2 Filed 05/18/2006 Page 3 of 3