Business Court Annual Report

Similar documents
Metro Atlanta Business Court 2017 Annual Report

THE PHI KAPPA TAU FRATERNITY CLAIM AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION PLAN AND RULES

An Overview of Civil Litigation in the U.S. presented by Martijn Steger May 24, 2014

Oakland County Circuit Court & District Court Case Evaluation. Guidelines

JUDICIAL REFORM AND COMMERCIAL JUSTICE: THE EXPERIENCE OF TANZANIA S COMMERCIAL COURT

Blue Ribbon Commission

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO ENTRY

CIVIL TRIAL LAW CERTIFICATION STANDING COMMITTEE POLICIES 100 ADMINISTRATION

UNIFORM STANDING ORDER FOR ALL COMMERCIAL CALENDARS

Effective Case Management for City Attorneys

Court-Annexed Mandatory Arbitration

CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY FAMILY DIVISION. Differentiated Case Management Plan

ADR QUARTERLY. COURT-ANNEXED ADR PROGRAM 18 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DuPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS 18 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT SUMMER 2006

ATTORNEY HANDBOOK. State Bar of California Certified Lawyer Referral Service #134

THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO (Court Administration) ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO

Uniform Arbitration Act; Mediation or Arbitration of Trust Instruments; HB 2571

Ten Steps to Better Case Management: A Guide for Multidistrict Litigation Transferee Judges

CONTRACT FOR JUDICIAL SERVICES

JUDGE GABRIELLE N. SANDERS Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations For Osceola County Civil Division 60-G, Courtroom 4B

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 17 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CHAPTER 100 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Order on Smart Games' Motion to Dismiss (MICHAEL MACKE)

FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION. (1) The chief judge shall be a circuit judge who possesses administrative ability.

SOUTHERN GLAZER S WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC. EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION POLICY

Order on Defendant Elkik's Motion for Summary Judgment (PAYLESS CAR RENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.)

Legal Referral Service Rules for Panel Membership

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES

Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (Federal Acquisition Regulation - Subpart 33.2)

CERTIFIED SPECIALIST PROGRAM STANDARDS FOR CERTIFICATION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW (PATENT/TRADEMARK/COPYRIGHT)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:16-CV MHC

Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal. Business Plan to 2019

Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes)

LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B

Construction Industry Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Construction Disputes)

Alpena County. Version 1.0 JURY DUTY HANDBOOK

LAW DIVISION, CIVIL PART COMPLEMENTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION (CDR) PROGRAMS RESOLVING CIVIL CASES WITHOUT A TRIAL

North Carolina Uniform Power of Attorney Act Judicial Relief and Procedure

LOCAL RULES OF PROCEDURE AND RULES OF DECORUM FOR THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE COURTS WOOD COUNTY, TEXAS

Order ( JOHN BEASLEY)

ATLANTA BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER REFERRAL AND INFORMATION SERVICE OPERATING RULES

Order on Motion to Amend Counterclaim, Add Counterclaim Defendants, and Conduct Additional Discovery (SATISH S. LATHI)

Equity Investment Agreement

Victim / Witness Handbook. Table of Contents

AGREEMENT FOR PHYSICIAN SERVICES RECITALS. B. The District owns and operates Hospital in, Washington (the "Hospital");

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

RULES OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT IMPLEMENTING SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES IN EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION AND OTHER FAMILY FINANCIAL CASES

Chapter 36 Mediation and Arbitration 2015 EDITION

63rd District Court 1950 East Beltline Avenue, Grand Rapids, MI Phone: (616) Fax: (616)

THE COURTS. Title 231 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT SUPREME COURT RICHMOND COUNTY UNIFORM CIVIL TERM RULES

Spinosa Order on Plaintiff 's Motion to Compel Discovery

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA

Arbitration in Vermont 140 th Annual Meeting September 28, 2018


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Permanent Editorial Board for the Uniform Commercial Code PEB COMMENTARY NO. 18. July 2014

OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR-GENERAL OF COBB COUNTY. Procedures and Requirements:

APPENDIX F PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES

Social Security Tribunal of Canada Achievements Report

Common law reasoning and institutions Civil and Criminal Procedure (England and Wales) Litigation U.S.

CHAPTER CONFESSION OF JUDGMENT FOR POSSESSION OF REAL PROPERTY

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO

2018: No. 2 June. Filing: File the amended pages in your Member s Manual as follows:

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

LOCAL RULES OF PROCEDURE AND RULES OF DECORUM FOR THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE COURTS PARKER COUNTY, TEXAS

JACKSONVILLE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY PUBLIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS RULE (RULE NO.006)

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 114,853 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. FIFTH THIRD BANK, Appellee, ERIC M. MUATHE, Appellant.

Substantive Best Practices Best Practices in Mediation/Arbitration

DOMESTIC RELATION CASES ARE GOVERNED BY SUGGESTED GUIDELINES AND PRACTICES IN DOMESTIC RELATIONS CASES

MUTUAL AGREEMENT TO ARBITRATE CLAIMS

The Pre-Hearing Conference in Arbitration A Step by Step Guide

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

E. E XPE DI T E D DU E PR O C ESS H E A RIN GS

Chapter 36 Mediation and Arbitration 2013 EDITION Declaration of purpose of ORS to

Woodland Bank. Mobile Check Deposit Application End User License Agreement

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Civ

acquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

ARBITRATION AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO RESOLVING DISPUTES ARISING IN THE WORKPLACE

OFFICE OF CIRCUIT JUDGE ELIZABETH V. KRIER COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, BUILDING L NAPLES, FLORIDA TELEPHONE:

Memorandum of Agreement Between the United States Department of Justice and the St. Louis County Family Court

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

Coleman & Horowitt, LLP CLIENT MEMORANDUM. Discussing Issues of Interest to our Clients COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING COLLECTIONS

RULES GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 17 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

TRAVERSE JUROR HANDBOOK

bonus chapter. Working within the Legal Environment what's new in this edition A.2 brief chapter outline and learning objectives A.

May 7, Dear Ms. England:

Case 2:10-cv HGD Document 31 Filed 06/27/11 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Oregon State Bar Judicial Voters Guide 2018

The Judicial Ethics Committee of the California Judges Association has issued the following formal opinions:

CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH (CDRH)

1 HB By Representative Hill. 4 RFD: Constitution, Campaigns and Elections. 5 First Read: 07-FEB-17 6 PFD: 01/27/2017.

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

NORTH AMERICAN REFRACTORIES COMPANY ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST

LOCAL RULES FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT AND THE COUNTY COURT-AT-LAW RUSK COUNTY, TEXAS

B. Considerations Regarding So-Called Boilerplate Clauses in Cross-Border Commercial Transactions

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 SESSION LAW SENATE BILL 853

Sure to stir a wide range of emotions, restraining orders have become ubiquitous in our society.

Court Review: Volume 42, Issue A Profile of Settlement

Transcription:

2 2011 Annual Report Fulton County Superior Court

Governing Rules The Supreme Court of Georgia promulgated Atlanta Judicial Circuit Rule 1004 governing the procedures of the on June 3, 2005, as amended on June 6, 2007, May 6, 2009, and September 1, 2010. Purpose provides just, accurate, timely, and efficient resolution of complex commercial and business cases, in addition to retaining legal business in Georgia and developing a robust body of business law in Georgia. More than 500 businesses have chosen to resolve their cases because of the expert judicial attention given to complicated business cases by experienced judges with specialized training in business law subjects. Litigants benefit from reduced resolution time through increased case management components, including: Comprehensive scheduling orders addressing all aspects of a case, including electronic discovery, Responsiveness to discovery disputes, Prompt scheduling of oral arguments and written rulings on all substantive motions, Mediation, and Cases are not scheduled behind a general docket of criminal and civil cases Judges Three Senior Judges Judge Long, Judge Bonner, and Judge Westmoreland and one Active Judge Judge Goger serve the and receive case assignments on a rotating basis. The Chief Judge appoints the Bench for up to a two year term. With support staff, these Judges have the experience and time necessary to administer the complex cases. Senior Judges Judge John Goger are readily available to address any discovery disputes or other emergency that may arise during the course of a case. While the Active Judge still maintains a general docket, he devotes 2

blocks of time to the exclusive administration of cases. Senior Judge Alice Bonner Senior Judge Elizabeth Long A panel of five Active Judges is designated to oversee the operations of the and to vet the eligibility of cases seeking transfer to by assessing the procedural and substantive complexity presented in the cases. Currently, the Committee is comprised of Chief Judge Wright, Judge Goger (Chief Business Case Division Judge), Judge Shoob (Vice Chair of the Committee), Judge Glanville, and Judge Lee. Upon a majority vote of the Committee, cases can transfer to for assignment to a Judge. The Business Case Division Judges and the staff attorney attend a series of monthly lectures coordinated with the assistance of the State Bar of Georgia. The lectures cover topics such as fiduciary duties, capitalization issues, corporate governance, derivative actions, mergers and acquisitions, among other business law topics. Senior Judge Melvin Westmoreland The utilizes early case management conferences (within 30 days of transfer), mediation, and ready availability to address discovery issues as they arise. Together, these features comprise a program that is dedicated to the efficient, just, and timely resolution of complex commercial and business cases with an emphasis on providing superior service to litigants throughout the process. 2011 Highlights State Bar Corporate Section Gift In August 2011, the was delighted to receive a generous gift from the Corporate Section of the State Bar of Georgia in the amount of $20,000, which will ensure the continued success and expansion of the s operations despite the difficult economic climate. Seminar on New Evidence Rules In September, hosted a seminar on the New Evidence Rules in Georgia presented by Professor Paul Milich. Professor Milich was the Reporter for the State Bar of Georgia's Evidence Study Committee, which successfully urged the adoption of new rules Professor Paul Milich 3

of evidence in Georgia. He is the author of three books, Georgia Rules of Evidence (3rd ed.), Courtroom Handbook on Georgia Evidence and Trial Practice: Exercises in Witness Examination and the Rules of Evidence. Business Law Institue In October, the was invited to participate in the Business Law Institute, an intensive two day seminar attended by hundreds of attorneys from across the southeast featuring presentations on the leading issues facing business lawyers. Substantive rulings were highlighted by several panel participants. Additionally, personnel hosted a booth and fielded questions from attendees. Corporate Counsel Institute Again, in December 2011, the was invited to provide opening remarks at the Corporate Counsel Institute, a two day gathering of corporate counsel from businesses all across the southeast. Participants were provided an overview of the program and shown how the can benefit their companies in the event that they are faced with litigation. Survey Finally, in October and November, the conducted a satisfaction survey among litigants who had cases disposed of from 2009 2011. The Division received positive feedback about its performance in categories such as quality of case management, timeliness of rulings, availability of the Court for motions, hearings and conferences, quality of legal analysis and impartiality of the bench. Overall, practitioners opinions of the were overwhelmingly positive, with 88% of respondents indicating that they were satisfied, or very satisfied, with. 46% Survey 42% 5% 1% 6% Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied Case Activity Case Eligibility Cases that implicate the Georgia Securities Act of 1973, UCC, Georgia Business Corporation Code, Uniform Partnership Act, Uniform Limited Partnership Act, Georgia Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, or Georgia 4 Limited Liability Company Act are eligible to be transferred to the. Additionally, any other action in which the amount in controversy exceeds $1 million and warrants the attention of the, including

large contract and business tort cases and other complex commercial litigation may also be considered. Cases involving personal injury, wrongful death, employment discrimination, or consumer claims in which each individual s claims are in the aggregate less than $1 millions are typically not eligible to be transferred to the. However, exclusions may be waived with consent of all parties. Cases Transferred into Cases are identified for transfer to Business Court upon the motion of one or more parties or by judicial request. In 2011, 29% of the cases transferred were initiated by a judicial request while 28% were initiated by the plaintiff s motion. In 2011, more litigants than ever sought transfer to, with a total of 30 requests to transfer to, an increase from the 20 requests made in 2010. 24% How Cases Were Trasferred into (2011) 28% 19% 29% Defense Motion Plaintiff Motion Joint Motion Judicial Request Collection of Transfer Fees In 2011, the collected a record amount of transfer fees. Transfer fees are assessed against the moving party(ies) once a case is accepted for transfer into. These funds are used to continue operations and to assist in judicial funding for Senior Judges. Annual Tranfer Fees $17,000 $15,000 $6,000 2009 2010 2011 Docket by Types of Cases accepts a variety of cases dealing with multiple areas of business law including shareholder derivative class actions, large contractual disputes, disputes over corporate governance and complex business tort cases. In 2011, the reviewed 42 cases for consideration for transfer to 5

, and a total of 29 new cases were added to the docket. Docket by Types of Cases 8% Breach of Contract 22% 37% Corporate Governance 33% Shareholder Derivative Business Tort Caseload Activity The has steadily maintained its level of productivity, handling a total of 69 cases in 2011, a slight decrease from 2010 numbers. The had a record breaking year in terms of the number of cases moved through resolution, with a total of 42 cases closed. 100 80 60 40 20 Cases Handled in (2006 2011) 50 40 30 20 10 Cases Disposed in (2006 2011) 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Age of Docket 30% 30% 26% 15% Pending 18+months Pending 12 18 months Pending 6 12 months Pending 0 6 months As evidenced by the chart to the left, 60% of cases have only been pending for a year or less since transfer to. Of the eleven cases that have been pending for more than a year, all but three are stayed pending the outcome of appeal or a related action. For more information about and its operations, please contact Megan K. Johnson at 404 613 3690 or megan.johnson@fultoncountyga.gov. 6