EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

Similar documents
EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

EEOC v. Altec Industries

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

Case 2:01-cv MLM Document 59 Filed 11/20/2002 Page 1 of 16

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tri-Spur Investment Company, Inc., dba Sbarro's Italian Eatery

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

EEOC v. Cleveland Construction, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Foodscience Corporation

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Case 1:16-cv CCB Document 98 Filed 06/28/16 06/23/16 Page 1 of 14 11

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

EEOC v. Eastern Engineered Wood Products, Inc.

EEOC v. Sunrise Hospitality BC II, LLC d/b/a Microtel Inns & Suites

UNITED STA1ES DISTRICT COURT EAS1ERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No. 06 CV 2697 (ARR)(RER) CONSENT DECREE

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. CONSENT DECREE INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~~"A"!tOl'T~'CTCOURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEX~eRQUE, New MI!XICO ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

EEOC and Quianna M. Knowles v. Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc.

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

PROHIBITION OF HARASSMENT & DISCRIMINATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

Case 5:11-cv F Document 13 Filed 01/24/12 Page 1 of 9

NO , Chapter 5 TALLAHASSEE, March 13, Human Resources UNLAWFUL HARASSMENT AND UNLAWFUL SEXUAL HARASSMENT

Anita Robinson, et al., v. Boeing Company, d/b/a Boeing Defense & Space Group

EEOC v. Michoacan Seafood Group. LLC

Case 3:06-cv JMM Document 140 Filed 06/12/09 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

EEOC v. PVNF, L.L.C., d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors and Big Valley Auto

Discrimination and Harassment Policy and Procedure I. Purpose II. General Statement of Policy III. Definitions A. Discrimination

State of Oregon LEGISLATIVE BRANCH PERSONNEL RULES

Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

Transcription:

Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 3-18-2004 EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel Judge Mary Ann L. Medler Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec Thank you for downloading this resource, provided by the ILR School's Labor and Employment Law Program. Please help support our student research fellowship program with a gift to the Legal Repositories! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Labor and Employment Law Program at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consent Decrees by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact hlmdigital@cornell.edu.

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel Keywords EEOC, Hiten Hospitality LLC d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Kay Kishan Hospitality Inc., Mike Patel, 4:03CV01158MLM, Consent Decree, Hostile Work Environment, sexual harassment, retaliation, constructive discharge, sex, female, hospitality, Employment Law, Title VII This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec/639

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 1 of 24 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, HITEN HOSPITALITY L.L.C. d/b/a FAMILY MOTOR INN and JAY KISHAN HOSPITALITY, INC., and Defendants. TINA SETTLES, CAROLYN ROGERS, AND NATASHA DELONG, v. Plaintiff-Intervenors, HITEN HOSPITALITY L.L.C. d/b/a FAMILY MOTOR INN and MIKE PATEL, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION CASE NO: 4: 03CV01158 MLM } CONSENT DECREE Introduction Plaintiff, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (hereinafter the "Commission", has instituted this action alleging that Defendants violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e et s e q. (hereinafter "Title 686884

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 2 of 24 VII", by sexually harassing Tina Settles, Carolyn Rogers, and Natasha Delong, by retaliating against Tina Settles and Natasha Delong, and by constructively discharging Carolyn Rogers because of their sex. Tina Settles, Carolyn Rogers, and Natasha Delong, by and through their attorneys, have intervened in this lawsuit, alleging violations of Title VII, and tort claims under Missouri state law. For purposes of settlement and compromise only, the parties have advised the Court that they wish to resolve the instant controversy without the expense, delay, and burden of further litigation; THEREFORE, it is the finding of this Court, made on the pleadings and on the record as a whole and upon agreement of the parties, that: (i this Court has jurisdiction over the parties to and the subject matter of this action, (ii the requirements of Title VII will be carried out by the implementation of this Decree, (iii this Decree is intended to and does resolve all matters in controversy in this lawsuit among the parties, and (iv the terms of this Decree constitute a fair and equitable settlement of all issues in this lawsuit. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: I. General Provisions 1. This Decree, being entered with the consent of the parties for purposes of settlement, shall not constitute an 2

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 3 of 24 adjudication on the merits of this lawsuit and shall not be construed as an admission by Defendants of any violation of Title VII or claims made under Missouri state law, or any executive order, law, rule or regulation dealing with or in connection with sex discrimination in employment. 2. Defendants shall not discriminate or retaliate against any person because she has opposed any practices alleged in this action as unlawful under Title VII, has participated in an investigation conducted under Title VII with respect to this complaint, or because she has participated in this lawsuit or has benefited in any way as a result of this Consent Decree. II. Relief for Charging Party 3. By March 19, 2004, Defendants shall forward to Darrell Graham, Anthony Gray, and/or Sandra Baker, attorneys for the three individual plaintiffs/intervenors the gross sum of One Hundred Eighty Thousand Dollars, ($180,000.00. 4. Within thirty (30 days of the entry of this Decree, Defendants will prepare a letter in the form shown in Exhibit A on appropriate Hiten Hospitality letterhead, and will make a signed copy of the resulting letter part of the permanent employment record of Tina Settles, Natasha Delong, and Carrie Rogers. Defendants will provide a copy of this letter for review to Plaintiff-Intervenors1 attorneys. In the case of any inquiries by any prospective employers regarding Tina Settles, Natasha Delong, 3

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 4 of 24 or Carrie Rogers, Defendants will limit their response to the information contained in this letter, which shall be available to the prospective employer and a copy provided, if requested. III. Training 5. Within sixty days (60 days after the Consent Decree is approved by the Court, Defendants shall provide mandatory sexual harassment and retaliation training for all of its owners, managers, supervisors and employees, either in person or by videotape, within any Missouri facility owned and/or operated by Hiten Hospitality, Inc. and/or Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc., including but not limited to, the Family Motor Inn of Sullivan, Missouri, and the Super 8 Motel in Sullivan, Missouri. The content of this training shall include sexual harassment, sex discrimination, and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. This training shall be presented by an outside, third-party consultant who is approved by the Regional Attorney of the EEOC's St. Louis District Office. The training shall include information regarding Title VII1s prohibition against the sexual harassment and retaliation of employees, and shall be at least three hours in duration. Defendants shall submit to the Regional Attorney the names and qualifications of the designated trainers, along with a draft of the training curriculum and materials to be distributed at the training, sufficiently in advance of the training to allow for Commission comment and discussion. 4

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 5 of 24 6. In the event that the proposed training is not acceptable to the EEOC, the parties will confer in good faith and attempt to reach an agreement no later than fifteen (15 days after receiving the EEOC's objection. In the event the parties are unable to reach an agreement, they shall submit their dispute to a neutral and mutually agreeable third party for mediation before pursuing remedies with the Court. Defendants agree that, should this dispute be referred to a third party for mediation as described above, Defendants shall bear all costs, if any, related thereto. Once the EEOC approves of the content of the training and the trainers, the EEOC will be notified at least five (5 days before the training occurs. This notification shall contain the training date, time and location. The EEOC may observe some or all of Defendants' training to ascertain the trainer's effectiveness. This training will be completed no later than one year from the Court's approval of this Consent Decree. At the conclusion of all training, a certificate or other proof of course completion by all employees of this training shall be provided to the EEOC. 7. Within sixty (60 days of providing any training pursuant to paragraph 5, Defendants shall send to the EEOC's Regional Attorney in its St. Louis Office a report describing the training, and listing the names, addresses, and phone numbers of all Defendants' employees who were trainees, and the names and business addresses and phone numbers of all trainers. 5

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 6 of 24 IV. Posting and Policies 8. Defendants shall post and cause to remain posted copies of the notice in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B in locations publicly visible to all employees and applicants in all facilities owned and/or operated by Hiten Hospitality, L.L.C. and/or Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc., including but not limited to, the Family Motor Inn of Sullivan, Missouri, and the Super 8 Motel in Sullivan, Missouri for a period of two years starting from the date of entry of this Decree. 9. Within sixty days of the entry of this Decree, Defendants shall cause the policy attached hereto as Exhibit C to be signed by Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. and/or Jay Kishan Inc.'s Chief Executive Officer and distributed to each and every management official employed at any facility owned and/or operated by either Defendant in the states of Missouri and/or Illinois. Defendants shall also cause all of the aforementioned officials to sign the statement attached hereto as Exhibit D to indicate that they have received and read the policy. V. Reporting, Record-keeping, and Access 10. Within forty-five days of the entry of this Decree, Defendants shall prepare and submit to the EEOC's Regional Attorney in its St. Louis District Office a letter indicating as follows: a. that the notice (Exhibit B required by paragraph 8 above has been posted, 6

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 7 of 24 b. that the Equal Employment Opportunity policy (Exhibit C has been distributed as required by paragraph 9, above, and c. that the training required by paragraph 5 above has been completed. The signed copies of Exhibit D shall be enclosed with the letter. 11. During the term of this Decree, Defendants shall allow representatives of the Commission to review Defendants' compliance with this Decree by inspecting and photocopying relevant documents and records, interviewing employees and management officials on their premises, and inspecting their premises. Such review of compliance shall be initiated by written notice to the Defendants' attorney of record at least three business days in advance of any inspection of Defendants' documents or premises. VI. Term and Effect of Decree 12. By entering into this Decree, the parties do not intend to resolve any charges of discrimination currently pending before the Commission other than the charge that created the procedural foundation for the complaint in this case. 13. This Decree shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. Defendants shall affirmatively notify any purchasers of the obligations of this Consent Decree prior to any sale which may take place. 7

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 8 of 24 14. This Decree shall be for a period of four years and can only be extended for good cause shown. During the Decree's term the Court shall retain jurisdiction of this cause for purposes of compliance. 15. Each party shall bear its own costs. UNITED SKATES MAGISTRATE BY CONSENT: FOR DEFENDANTS: FOR PLAINTIFF: HATHI L. CHESTNUT Fed. #2814 JOY URBOM TAYLOR Fed. #13415 Greensfelder, Hemker & Gale, P.C. 10 S. Broadway 2000 Equitable Building St, Louis, MO 63102 (314 241-9090 FAX: (314 241-3643 tobert G. J< Regional At 8

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 9 of 24 r h BARBARA A. SEELY Supervisory Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION St. Louis District Office Robert A. Young Federal Bldg. 1222 Spruce, Room 8.100 St. Louis, MO 63103 (314 539-7918 FOR PLAINTIFF-INTERVENORS: SANDRA LEE BAKER Attorney at Law 906 N. Albany Avenue Bolivar, MO 65613 (417 864-5797 Fax: (417 864-5944 DARRELL E. GRAHAM ANTHONY GRAY 7318 South Florissant Rd. St. Louis, MO 63121 (314 385-9500 Fax: (314 385-9504 9

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 10 of 24 EXHIBIT A LETTER OF REFERENCE Hiten Hospitality letterhead To Whom it May Concern: Carolyn Rogers was employed at Family Motor Inn in the position of front desk clerk. Her job performance was consistently acceptable, her attendance was regular, and she is eligible for re-hire. Sincerely, Site Manager

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 11 of 24 EXHIBIT A LETTER OF REFERENCE Hiten Hospitality letterhead To Whom it May Concern-. Tina Settles was employed at Family Motor Inn in the position of front desk clerk. Her job performance was consistently acceptable, her attendance was regular, and she is eligible for re-hire. Sincerely, Site Manager

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 12 of 24 EXHIBIT A LETTER OF REFERENCE Hiten Hospitality letterhead To Whom it May Concern: Natasha Delong was employed at Family Motor Inn in the position of front desk clerk. Her job performance was consistently acceptable, her attendance was regular, and she is eligible for rehire. Sincerely, Site Manager

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 13 of 24 EXHIBIT B NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES Federal law prohibits discrimination against any employee or applicant for employment because of the individual's race, national origin, color, religion, sex, or age (forty and over with respect to hiring, promotion, firing, compensation, or other terms, conditions or privileges of employment. It also prohibits retaliation against employees because they have opposed practices they believe discriminate on the basis of race, national origin, color, religion, sex, or age (forty and over or because they have filed charges with the EEOC or participated in or cooperated with an EEOC investigation. In particular, Federal law prohibits harassment of employees on the basis of their sex. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. support and will comply with such Federal law in all respects and will not take any action against employees because they have exercised their rights under the law. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc will not tolerate harassment of employees based upon sex. Specifically, Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. will not tolerate language that is demeaning to persons of a particular sex, inappropriate touching, sexual jokes and comments, and unwelcome advances toward persons of a particular sex. Employees should feel free to report instances of prohibited harassment to any management official at any time. In the event the management official is engaged in the harassment, Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. provide additional avenues for the employees to use to report instances of sexual harassment. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. have established policies and procedures to promptly investigate any such reports and to protect the person making the reports from retaliation. Employees are also free to make complaints about sexual harassment or about other employment discrimination to the Office of the Regional Attorney, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Robert A. Young Building, 1222 Spruce Street, Room 8.100, St. Louis, MO 63103, (Attention: Jan Shelly, Senior Trial Attorney or by telephone at (314539-7918. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER DATE

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 14 of 24 EXHIBIT C POLICY ON HARASSMENT Pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, it is unlawful for an employer to subject any employee to acts of harassment based upon the employee's sex, race, color, religion or national origin, or to permit or encourage a work environment in which such conduct occurs. Sexual harassment is defined as any unwelcome sexual advance, requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature where any one of the three criteria below are met: 1 Submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment; 2 Submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individual; or 3 Such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual's work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment. Harassment based upon sex, race, color, religion or national origin includes any verbal or other conduct that demeans, insults or intimidates an employee or a group of employees because of their sex, race, color, religion or national origin. Prohibited conduct includes, but is not limited to jokes, labels, names, or stories offensive to a particular group of persons.

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 15 of 24 It is the policy of Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. to prohibit the harassment described above. All persons, including all managers, who engage in such conduct, shall be discharged. Employees also should be aware of the following: 1 That the harassment described above is unlawful and such conduct will not be tolerated or condoned by this company; 2 That persons subjected to such harassment may complain to anyone in management and that within 10 (ten calendar days management shall conduct a full investigation, report back to the complaining individual, and take appropriate action against an offending party; 3 Every employee has a right to file a charge alleging sexual harassment with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Robert A. Young Building, 1222 Spruce Street, Room 8.100, St. Louis,MO 63103; and 4 Any employee who files a sexual harassment complaint shall not be fired or otherwise harmed because he or she filed a complaint. Chief Executive Officer

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 16 of 24 EXHIBIT D The undersigned managers employed by Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. certify that they have received a copy of their employer's policies relating to sex discrimination, and that they have read this policy by the date indicated. NAME TITLE DATE

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 17 of 24 EXHIBIT B NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES Federal law prohibits discrimination against any employee or applicant for employment because of the individual's race, national origin, color, religion, sex, or age (forty and over with respect to hiring, promotion, firing, compensation, or other terms, conditions or privileges of employment. It also prohibits retaliation against employees because they have opposed practices they believe discriminate on the basis of race, national origin, color, religion, sex, or age (forty and over or because they have filed charges with the EEOC or participated in or cooperated with an EEOC investigation. In particular, Federal law prohibits harassment of employees on the basis of their sex. Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. d/b/a Sullivan Super 8 Motel ("Jay Kishan" supports and will comply with such Federal law in all respects and will not take any action against employees because they have exercised their rights under the law. Jay Kishan will not tolerate harassment of employees based upon sex. Specifically, Jay Kishan will not tolerate language that is demeaning to persons of a particular sex, inappropriate touching, sexual jokes and comments, and unwelcome advances toward persons of a particular sex. Employees should feel free to report instances of prohibited harassment to any management official at any time. In the event the management official is engaged in the harassment, Jay Kishan provides additional avenues for the employees to use to report instances of sexual harassment, has established policies and procedures to promptly investigate any such reports and to protect the person making the reports from retaliation. Employees are also free to make complaints about sexual harassment or about other employment discrimination to the Office of the Regional Attorney, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Robert A. Young Building, 1222 Spruce Street, Room 8.100, St. Louis, MO 63103, (Attention: Jan Shelly, Senior Trial Attorney or by telephone at (314539-7918. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER DATE

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 18 of 24 EXHIBIT B NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES Federal law prohibits discrimination against any employee or applicant for employment because of the individual's race, national origin, color, religion, sex, or age (forty and over with respect to hiring, promotion, firing, compensation, or other terms, conditions or privileges of employment. It also prohibits retaliation against employees because they have opposed practices they believe discriminate on the basis of race, national origin, color, religion, sex, or age (forty and over or because they have filed charges with the EEOC or participated in or cooperated with an EEOC investigation. In particular, Federal law prohibits harassment of employees on the basis of their sex. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn supports and will comply with such Federal law in all respects and will not take any action against employees because they have exercised their rights under the law. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn will not tolerate harassment of employees based upon sex. Specifically, Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn will not tolerate language that is demeaning to persons of a particular sex, inappropriate touching, sexual jokes and comments, and unwelcome advances toward persons of a particular sex. Employees should feel free to report instances of prohibited harassment to any management official at any time. In the event the management official is engaged in the harassment, Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn provides additional avenues for the employees to use to report instances of sexual harassment. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn has established policies and procedures to promptly investigate any such reports and to protect the person making the reports from retaliation. Employees are also free to make complaints about sexual harassment or about other employment discrimination to the Office of the Regional Attorney, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Robert A. Young Building, 1222 Spruce Street, Room 8.100, St. Louis, MO 63103, (Attention: Jan Shelly, Senior Trial Attorney or by telephone at (314539-7918. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER DATE

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 19 of 24 EXHIBIT C POLICY ON HARASSMENT Pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, it is unlawful for an employer to subject any employee to acts of harassment based upon the employee's sex, race, color, religion or national origin, or to permit or encourage a work environment in which such conduct occurs. Sexual harassment is defined as any unwelcome sexual advance, requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature where any one of the three criteria below are met: 1 Submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment; 2 Submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individual; or 3 Such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual's work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment. Harassment based upon sex, race, color, religion or national origin includes any verbal or other conduct that demeans, insults or intimidates an employee or a group of employees because of their sex, race, color, religion or national origin. Prohibited conduct includes, but is not limited to jokes, labels, names, or stories offensive to a particular group of persons.

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 20 of 24 It is the policy of Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. d/b/a Sullivan Super 8 Motel ("Jay Kishan" to prohibit the harassment described above. All persons, including all managers, who engage in such conduct, shall be discharged. Employees also should be aware of the following: 1 That the harassment described above is unlawful and such conduct will not be tolerated or condoned by this company; 2 That persons subjected to such harassment may complain to anyone in management and that within 10 (ten calendar days management shall conduct a full investigation, report back to the complaining individual, and take appropriate action against an offending party; 3 Every employee has a right to file a charge alleging sexual harassment with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Robert A. Young Building, 1222 Spruce Street, Room 8.100, St. Louis, MO 63103; and 4 Any employee who files a sexual harassment complaint shall not be fired or otherwise harmed because he or she filed a complaint. Chief Executive Officer

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 21 of 24 EXHIBIT C POT JCY ON HARASSMENT Pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, it is unlawful for an employer to subject any employee to acts of harassment based upon the employee's sex, race, color, religion or national origin, or to permit or encourage a work environment in which such conduct occurs. Sexual harassment is defined as any unwelcome sexual advance, requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature where any one of the three criteria below are met: 1 Submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment; 2 Submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individual; or 3 Such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual's work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment. Harassment based upon sex, race, color, religion or national origin includes any verbal or other conduct that demeans, insults or intimidates an employee or a group of employees because of their sex, race, color, religion or national origin. Prohibited conduct includes, but is not limited to jokes, labels, names, or stories offensive to a particular group of persons.

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 22 of 24 It is the policy of Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn to prohibit the harassment described above. All persons, including all managers, who engage in such conduct, shall be discharged. Employees also should be aware of the following: 1 That the harassment described above is unlawful and such conduct will not be tolerated or condoned by this company; 2 That persons subjected to such harassment may complain to anyone in management and that within 10 (ten calendar days management shall conduct a full investigation, report back to the complaining individual, and take appropriate action against an offending party; 3 Every employee has a right to file a charge alleging sexual harassment with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Robert A. Young Building, 1222 Spruce Street, Room 8.100, St. Louis, MO 63103; and 4 Any employee who files a sexual harassment complaint shall not be fired or otherwise harmed because he or she filed a complaint. Chief Executive Officer

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 23 of 24 EXHIBIT D The undersigned managers employed by Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. d/b/a Sullivan Super 8 Motel certify that they have received a copy of their employer s policies relating to sex discrimination, and that they have read this policy by the date indicated. NAME TITLE DATE

Case 4:03-cv-01158-MLM Document 30 Filed 03/18/2004 Page 24 of 24 EXHIBIT D The undersigned managers employed by Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn certify that they have received a copy of their employer's policies relating to sex discrimination, and that they have read this policy by the date indicated. NAME TITLE DATE