Employment Index, Arrests, Court Actions, and Commitments in Illinois, The

Similar documents
1. refers to the ability of criminal justice personnel to choose from an array of options or outcomes. Due process Discretion System viability Bias

Problems of Criminal Statistics in the United States

Crime in San Francisco--A Study of the Police Court Docket--December 1924 through February 1925

CENTER FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, POLICY AND PRACTICE

Center for Criminal Justice Research, Policy & Practice: The Rise (and Partial Fall) of Illinois Prison Population. Research Brief

The Crime Drop in Florida: An Examination of the Trends and Possible Causes

Evidence-Based Policy Planning for the Leon County Detention Center: Population Trends and Forecasts

Protecting the Public by Parole and by Parole Prediction

Executive Celemency in Wisconsin

In class, we have framed poverty in four different ways: poverty in terms of

Case Disposition Timeliness. In 1990, a 12-member commission established by the National Center for State

The Poor in the Indian Labour Force in the 1990s. Working Paper No. 128

Probation and Penal Treatment in Baltimore

How s Life in Austria?

Safety and Justice Challenge: Interim performance measurement report

STATISTICS OF UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE WORK OF EMPLOYMENT OFFICES

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women

Public Attitudes Survey Bulletin

What the Courts, The Prisons, The Employer and the Public Should Know of the Released Prisoner

Overview of Annual Survey Data Across Three New York County Jails from Working Paper # November 2017

Sentence THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES NEWSLETTER MAY 2005 ISSUE 02

Crime in Oregon Report

Arson Investigation in Selected American Cities

THE EFFECTIVENESS AND COST OF SECURED AND UNSECURED PRETRIAL RELEASE IN CALIFORNIA'S LARGE URBAN COUNTIES:

Economic and Social Council

Jail Operations. Courthouse Security. Electronic Home Monitoring. Chief Joyce Klein Lieutenant Carolyn Parnow

A Profile of Women Released Into Cook County Communities from Jail and Prison

GROWTH OF LABOR ORGANIZATION IN THE UNITED STATES,

English Prison Systm and What We Can Learn from It

Report. Poverty and Economic Insecurity: Views from City Hall. Phyllis Furdell Michael Perry Tresa Undem. on The State of America s Cities

Winnebago County s Criminal Justice System: Trends and Issues Report

Spain s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

SUMMARY LABOUR MARKET CONDITIONS POPULATION AND LABOUR FORCE. UNRWA PO Box Sheikh Jarrah East Jerusalem

Offender Population Forecasts. House Appropriations Public Safety Subcommittee January 19, 2012

Public Attitudes Survey Bulletin

St. Clair County s Criminal Justice System: Trends and Issues Report

McHenry County s Criminal Justice System: Trends and Issues Report

How s Life in Belgium?

The Fingerprinting of Juveniles

PINELLAS DETENTION UTILIZATION STUDY

Criminal Sanctions Agency STATISTICAL YEARBOOK

National Assessments on Gender and Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) Overall Results, Phase One September 2012

Key Facts and Figures from the Criminal Justice System 2009/2010. March 2011

Chile s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

Public Attitudes Survey Bulletin

placement in a juvenile correctional facility.

11. Demographic Transition in Rural China:

FOCUS. Native American Youth and the Juvenile Justice System. Introduction. March Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency

Prison statistics. England and Wales 2000

Chapter 1. Crime and Justice in the United States

Italy s average level of current well-being: Comparative strengths and weaknesses

JUVENILE JUSTICE IN ILLINOIS 2015

Winnebago County s Criminal Justice System: Trends and Issues Report

Maine Statistical Analysis Center. USM Muskie School of Public Service.

Volume Title: Domestic Servants in the United States, Volume URL:

Commentaries on the Wisconsin Law of Probation

The Sudan Consortium African and International Civil Society Action for Sudan. Sudan Public Opinion Poll Khartoum State

REALIZING POTENTIAL & CHANGING FUTURES

Juristat Article. The changing profile of adults in custody, 2006/2007. by Avani Babooram

How s Life in Iceland?

Marijuana: FACT SHEET December 2018

How s Life in Portugal?

COMPARISON OF SOCIO-CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC STATUS OF INDUSTRIAL MIGRANT AND LOCAL LABOURERS

This paper presents an analysis of criminality in Hungary. In the introductory part I

City and County of San Francisco. Office of the Controller City Services Auditor. City Services Benchmarking Report: Jail Population

The Justice System Judicial Branch, Adult Corrections, and Youth Corrections

Review of the Northern Territory Sentencing Amendment (Mandatory Minimum Sentences) Act 2013

How s Life in Hungary?

Santa Clara County, California Baseline and Alternative Jail Population Projections Report

Does Owner-Occupied Housing Affect Neighbourhood Crime?

SUMMARY LABOUR MARKET CONDITIONS !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! POPULATION AND LABOUR FORCE. UNRWA PO Box Sheikh Jarrah East Jerusalem

Persistent Inequality

DECENT WORK IN TANZANIA

Statistics on offences and coercive methods

Backgrounder. This report finds that immigrants have been hit somewhat harder by the current recession than have nativeborn

Monthly Census Bureau data show that the number of less-educated young Hispanic immigrants in the

Post-Secondary Education, Training and Labour September Profile of the New Brunswick Labour Force

How s Life in Norway?

Survey sample: 1,013 respondents Survey period: Commissioned by: Eesti Pank Estonia pst. 13, Tallinn Conducted by: Saar Poll

REAL RATE OF UNEMPLOYMENT IN CANADA: TYPICAL EXAMPLE

Baseline Measures for Illinois. The MacArthur Foundation s Juvenile Justice Initiative

SCHOOLS AND PRISONS: FIFTY YEARS AFTER BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION

The Impact of Interprovincial Migration on Aggregate Output and Labour Productivity in Canada,

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Economics and Finance 6 ( 2013 )

Executive summary. Strong records of economic growth in the Asia-Pacific region have benefited many workers.

CENTER ON JUVENILE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Jail: Who is in on bail?

Pretrial Release of Felony Defendants, 1992

How s Life in France?

Vermont in Transition: A Summary of Social Economic and Environmental Trends

ARTICLES. Poverty and prosperity among Britain s ethnic minorities. Richard Berthoud

Arizona Crime Trends: A System Review,

Youth in Crisis. Characteristics of Homeless Youth Served by Covenant House Alaska. Final Report

Assessing the impact of the Sentencing Council s Fraud, Bribery and Money Laundering Definitive Guideline

New York Smashes the Lunacy Commission Racket

Telephone Survey. Contents *

CHAPTER 17 - ARREST POLICIES Alternatives to Arrest and Incarceration Criminal Process Immigration Violations

Crime and Justice in the United States and in England and Wales,

At yearend 2014, an estimated 6,851,000

Raise the Age Presentation: 2017 NYSAC Fall Seminar. September 21, 2017

Transcription:

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 24 Issue 5 January-February Article 6 Winter 1934 Employment Index, Arrests, Court Actions, and Commitments in Illinois, The Ray Mars Simpson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Ray Mars Simpson, Employment Index, Arrests, Court Actions, and Commitments in Illinois, The, 24 Am. Inst. Crim. L. & Criminology 914 (1933-1934) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons.

THE EMPLOYMENT INDEX, ARRESTS, COURT ACTIONS, AND COMMITMENTS IN ILLINOIS RAY MAs SjMpSoN 2 It is frequently stated or assumed that any marked downward trend in business conditions is likely to be accompanied by a marked increase in the amount of criminal activity and delinquency. Without going into the facts, surface opinion -at present would probably assume that any marked amount of unemployment should be accompanied by fear of economic insecurity in addition to stark necessity which somehow might force those with criminal propensities to violate the law. The material presented in this article shows that, in the. main, such blanket assumptions are not in harmony with certain significant facts. At the present time we are in the midst of a serious panic in business. Coincident with the depression it so happens that our prisons are seriously overcrowded. The co-existence of overcrowded prisons with a vast amount of unemployment might easily lead to the unwarranted assumption that unemployment is a significant cause of crime. However, it should be noted that mere co-existence of two factors does not prove that one is the cause of the other. For many years the Illinois Department of Labor has been collecting basic data from various industries in the state. In December, 1931, over one thousand industries reported the number of wage earners employed as well as the total expenditures on payrolls. Since 1925 the number of reporting industries has been large enough to give a fairly reliable index of business conditions in the City of Chicago and the State of Illinois. The monthly average for 1925, 1926 and 1927 (combined) is considered as a basic index of 100 by the Illinois Department of Labor. The accompanying charts and tables are arranged to contrast crime conditions with business conditions. Chart I shows that there has been a consistent tendency for the number of arrests in the City of Chicago to follow the trend of business as indicated by the employment index from 1926 to 1931. The number of traffic summonses also consistently followed the rise and "Studies from the Institute for Juvenile Research, Chicago, Paul L. Schroeder, M.D., Director. Series C, Number 218. [Special appreciation should be expressed to Dr. Andrew W. Brown and to Dr. Clifford Shaw for several suggestions.] 2 Psychologist, Institute for Juvenile Research, Chicago, Illinois. [914]

THE EMPLOYMENT INDEX 915 CHART I Arrests in Chicago compared with Employment Index Chicago (Unnthlv Employment nver.e 1925-27= Index lo00) Number of i12-1 08 104 Employment Index.00 96 92 88 Arrests in Chicago... arrests I " 270,000 260,000 250,000 240,000 230,000 820,000 210,000 84 I 200,000 I 80 I 76 1 if S\ 190,000 180,000 I * I 68 "N----- 9 64.1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 170,000 160.000 150,000 11 Figures covering the number of arrests were supplied by James P, Allman Commissioner of Police, of the City of Chicago

RAY MARS SIMPSON fall of business. The yearly number of arrests in the City of Chicago from 1926 to 1931 was as follows: 211,317; 161,239; 150,885; 194,- 999; 183,434; and 150,197. The increase in population for the City of Chicago from 1920 to 1930 was 25 per cent. It is significant that there were practically the same number of arrests in 1928 (good business) as in 1931 (very bad business) in spite of the increase in population. It is evident that arrests, court actions, and commitments to various penal and correctional institutions do not give a complete picture of the crime situation in Illinois. Many other subtle factors must be considered. Therefore, it seems unwise to draw too radical conclusions from the data presented. However, it must be admitted that the criteria of criminal activity used in the accompanying charts and tables are highly significant. It is a difficult task to weigh the influence exerted by newspaper publicity, increased vigilance on the part of law enforcing agencies, or of changes in political administration. For example, the newspaper publicity which followed the St. Valentine's Day Massacre (1929) and the Lingle murder (1930) might have been responsible, in part, for the increases in the number of arrests in Chicago during those two years (600 policemen were added to the force in 1929). Again, in 1931 the indictment of Al Capone (with 61 others) by the Federal Government might have driven the criminals to cover in 1931. Following careful study the writer has been unable to find any consistent tendency for increases or decreases in number of arrests to follow the dates of taking office by varidus mayors, chiefs of police, or state's attorneys. Temporary co-existence does not afford sufficient grounds for asserting causal relationship between two factors. However, continued consistent parallel rise and fall between two factors over a period of years seems to warrant the assumption of a causal connection. Of course, there is the ever present possibility that other factors. may fluctuate in such a manner as to create an appearance of causal relationship between two factors. The burden of proof in such an event would seem to rest upon those who support the more radical assumption, namely, that all other factors would somehow appear in an orderly sequence at regular intervals to produce a co-existerit consistent variation. In dealing with the number of arrests it is shown in Chart I that there Ts a consistent co-existent rise and fall in both business and number of arrests. If other factors were equal, one would logically assume that there was some relationship between

THE EMPLOYMENT INDEX 917 these two factors. Uowever, it should be remembered that the number of arrests is only ONE criterion of crime. Since various inconsistent fluctuations appear in later comparisons between significant criteria of crime and the criterion of business used here (see Charts II, III, and IV) the only conclusion one seems justified in drawing from these figures on arrests is that no relationship between unemployment and crime has been demonstrated, in fact, just the opposite relationship seems to be suggested, namely, that crime and "good business" may go hand in hand. However, the full significance of the facts must remain obscure until future studies have succeeded in placing many variant factors under satisfactory control. In Table I, Chicago Court Actions are compared with the employment index for the City of Chicago. Column A shows that there was a slight increase in the number of cases handled by the Juvenile Court from 1927 to 1930. It is possible that this increase may be due to improved facilities for detection. In 1931 the number of cases handled decreased in spite of the tragic depression in business. Column E shows the employment index computed by the Illinois Department of Labor. The comparisons between Columns B, C and D with Column E shows no consistent tendency for court actions to follow the rise and fall in the employment index. Admissions to misdemeanant institutions in Illinois are compared with the Employment Index in Table II. Columns A, B, C, and D should be compared with Column E. There has been a steady rise in the number of female admissions (Column B) to the House of Correction in Chicago since 1926. The sharp rise in female admissions in 1930 and 1931 might be attributed to an increase in prostitution TABLE I CHICAGO CouRT AcTIONS COMPARED WITH EMPLOYMENT INDEX Year A B C D E 1925... 2,513 62,250 28,669 5,666 97.6 1926... 2,265 94,044 21,862 5,342 103.0 1927... 2,197 78,404 19,948 6,560 99.4 1928... 2,617 65,936 20,192 7,441 94.9 1929... 2,538 32,336 45,544 5,459 99A 1930... 3,095 117,659 22,999 5,428 86.7 1931... 2,701 68,178 21,411 6,736 70.1 A-Delinquent cases handled by the Juvenile Court. B-Convictions by the Municipal Court for violations of municipal ordinances. C-Convictions for misdemeanors by the Municipal Court. D--Cases held to the Criminal Court by the Municipal Court. E-Employment Index for Chicago factories (Monthly average 1925-27= 100).

918 RAY MARS SIMPSON TABLE II ADMISSIONS TO MISDEMEANANT INSTITUTIONS COMPARED WITH EMPLOYMENT INDEX Year A B C D E 1925... 20,471 1,551 650 22,672 100.5 1926... 15,245 1,315 718 17,278 103.3 1927... 16,684 1,537 1,181 19,402 96.1 1928... 14,774 1,658 1,181 17,613 95.4 1929... 13,980 1,860 1,249 17,089 101.0 1930... 14,792 2,144 1,403 18,339 89.3 1931... 15,687 2,861 1,663 20,211 75.0 A-Male admissions to the House of Correction in Chicago. B-Female admissions to the House of Correction in Chicago. C-Admissions to Vandalia State Farm. D-Admissions to all Misdemeanant Institutions. E-Employment Index for the State of Illinois (Monthly average 1925-27= 100). due to the business depression. However, this assumption is weakened by the fact that the increase started in 1926! The number of admissions to Vandalia State Farm also shows a steady increase from 1925 to 1931. Here again the business depression in 1930-31 cannot be blamed per se since other factors certainly were influencing this trend as far back at 1925. For example, the increase between 1926 and 1927 was greater than the total increase between 1929 and 1931. Probably there has been an increased inclination on the part of Judges to commit men to Vandalia State Farm for minor felonies rather than to send them to the Penitentiary. At any rate the total admissions to all misdemeanant Institutions (Column D), when compared with the employment index (Column E), fluctuates from level to level in a manner which leads one to question the causal relationship between unemployment and the number of individuals admitted to misdemeanant Institutions. The business depression in 1930-31 has actually been accompanied by a decrease in the number of boys committed to the St. Charles School for Boys. This is shown in Chart II. From 1926 to 1928 there was a marked increase in commitments to St. Charles School; from 1928 to 1930 the number of commitments remained at practically the same level; while in 1931 there was a sharp drop' to the 1926 level. The admissions to the State Training School for Girls 3 An unpublished follow-up study of boys paroled from St. Charles School for Boys made by Owen C. Connorton showed that a very large proportion of these boys continued in crime following release. When the results of this study were brought to the attention of the judges in the Cook County Juvenile Court in the year 1931 there was a tendency to reduce th; number of commitments to St. Charles.

THE EMPLOYMENT INDEX CHART II Juvenile Commitments compared with Employment Index Illinois (Monthly 116 Employment Index average 1925-27=100) I -I I Juvenile Commitments 800 112 108 104 100 96 92 Male Commitments Female Commitments... Employment 14dex 750 700 660 600 550 500 88 84 8o 76 72,..- - -0 450 400 350 300 250 68 1926 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 200 (Geneva) has been slowly increasing since 1927. In 1931 there were 265 girls admitted while in 1929 there were 277 girls admitted. In fact, the business depression has been accompanied by a slight decrease in the number of girls admitted to the State Training School

920 RAY MARS SIMPSON for Girls. Chart II affords a striking commentary upon the relationship between unemployment and delinquency. Since 1926 or 1927 there has been a marked increase in the trend of yearly admissions to the Illinois State Penitentiary at Joliet and to the Illinois State Reformatory at Pontiac. This is shown clearly in Table III and Chart III. The yearly admissions to the Southern Illinois Penitentiary at Menard have remained at about the same level since 1926. Since an average of 71 per cent of Illinois State Penitentiary (Joliet) admissions (1925-31) came from Cook County (in CHART III Admissions to Penal Instit tions compared with Employment Index Illinois Employment Index (Monthly average 1925-27= 100) Admissions 12 1-1300 Illinois State Penitentiary... Illinois State Reformatory 108-Southern Illinois Penitentiary...-, Employment Index -4 J" 1200 10 11 I00 10a 1000 6 o 900 9,800 88 o700 41 84-600 80, 5.- 00, 76 400 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 00

THE EMPLOYMENT INDEX 921 ADMISSIONS TO TABLE III PENAL INSTITUTIONS COMPARED wrrn EMPLOYMENT INDEX Year A B C D E 1925... 770 611 725 2,106 100.5 1926... 679 517 519 1,715 103.3 1927... 669 513 626 1,808 96.1 1928... 768 445 710 1,923 95.4 1929... 1,054 547 895 2,496 101.0 1930... 1,204 535 889 2,628 89.3 1931... 964 594 966 2,524 75.0 A-Admissions to the Illinois State Penitentiary. B-Admissions to the Southern Illinois Penitentiary. C-Admissions to the Illinois State Reformatory. D-Admissions to all Penal Institutions. E-Employment Index for the State of Illinois (Monthly average 1925-27= 100). which Chicago is located) while the Southern Illinois Penitentiary admissions came mainly from smaller towns and rural districts, it seems possible that there might be factors at work in the larger cities which are operating somewhat independently of the employment index. Certainly there is little support here for those who maintain that unemployment causes crime. The significant point here is that the sharp rise in admissions started as far back as 1926 or 1927. It also seems highly significant that the number of men admitted to the Illinois State Penitentiary in 1931 fell considerably below the number admitted in 1929. The foregoing figures are even more significant when it is noted that the population for the State of Illinois increased 17 per cent from 1920 to 1930. If unemployment were a significant cause of crime any marked increase in admissions should be accompanied by a corresponding increase in the percentage of those who were unemployed when the crime was committed if all other factors were the same each year. Chart IV shows that the number of admissions to the Penitentiary does not rise and fall in unison with the rise and fall of the percentage of prisoners who were unemployed when the crime was committed. For exampla in 1929 there were 1,054 men admitted to the Illinois State Penitentiary (see Table III) of which group 37.0 per cent were unemployed when the crime was committed; in comparison, during 1927 there were 669 men admitted of which group 48.0 per cent were unemployed when the crime was committed. Furthermore, the index in employment for 1927 was only slightly below that for 1929. During 1926-1927 (good business) the percentage of unemployed increased in about the same proportion as in 1930-31 (business depres-

922 RAY MARS SIMPSON CEART IV Percentage of prisoners who were unemployed when the crime was oommitted oompared with yearly admissions to the Illinois State Penitentiary Percent of Unemployed Prisoners Admissions 54 I 1 I 1 1300 Admissions m7\, 1200 Unemployed Prisoners 60 F 48 k 46-4 1100 1000 900 42 40 Z61 I 800 700 600 500 400 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 sion). In short, yearly admissions seem to depend very little upon the percentage of unemployment. The following conclusions may be drawn from the facts presented: 1. The yearly rise and fall in the number of arrests in the City of Chicago shows a consistent tendency to follow the rise and fall of business as indicated by the employment index. 2. The trend in court actions does not consistently follow the trend in business as indicated by the employment index. 3. The trend in admissions to misdemeanant institutions does not consistently follow the trend in business as indicated by the employment index. 4. The trend in Juvenile commitments does not consistently follow the trend in business as indicated by the employment index. 5. The trend in admissions to penal institutions does not consistently follow the trend in business as indicated by the employment index. 6. Yearly admissions to the Penitentiary seem to depend very little upon the percentage of men who were unemployed when the crime was committed. 300