Plaintiff SCOTT STEPHENS (hereinafter Plaintiff ) through his attorney respectfully alleges: INTRODUCTION

Similar documents
Case 1:17-cv CMH-JFA Document 1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:18-cv LO-TCB Document 1 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

.FARMERS DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

GIBSON LOWRY BURRIS LLP

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:12-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

.BOSTIK DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-50

Case 2:11-cv JEM Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2011 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

.NIKE DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Guide to WIPO Services

.BOOKING DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case: 1:11-cv DAP Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/19/11 1 of 9. PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

EXPERT DETERMINATION LEGAL RIGHTS OBJECTION DotMusic Limited v. Victor Cross Case No. LRO

Background on ICANN s Role Concerning the UDRP & Courts. Tim Cole Chief Registrar Liaison ICANN

Case 1:15-cv LMB-JFA Document 37 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 374

Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1

Appendix I UDRP. Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. (As Approved by ICANN on October 24, 1999)

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

. 淡马锡 REGISTRATION POLICIES

If you are registering the domain for a third party, you further agree that they have read and agree to the Nominet T&Cs as well.

(i) the data provided in the domain name registration application is true, correct, up to date and complete,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO:

Case: 1:18-cv MRB Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/08/18 Page: 1 of 16 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

In the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. No. Complaint NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 3:19-cv GPC-LL Document 4 Filed 03/22/19 PageID.16 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:14-cv WTL-MJD Document 1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case3:12-cv VC Document46 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 5

1:13-cv TLL-CEB Doc # 1 Filed 07/28/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Primary DNS Name : TOMCAT.ASAHI-NET.OR.JP Primary DNS IP: Secondary DNS Name: SKYHAWK.ASAHI-NET.OR.JP Secondary DNS IP:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. Plaintiff, Defendants.

REGISTRY AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1. DELEGATION AND OPERATION OF TOP LEVEL DOMAIN; REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

TUCOWS.INFO domain APPLICATION SERVICE TERMS OF USE

Form of Registration Agreement

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:18-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/05/ :16 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/08/2018

Case: 4:12-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 12/21/12 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

MEMORANDUM OPINION. HILTON, Chief Judge.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Summary of Changes to Base Agreement for New gtlds Draft for Discussion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 14

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/21/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/21/2013

REGISTRY AGREEMENT ARTICLE 1. DELEGATION AND OPERATION OF TOP LEVEL DOMAIN; REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

.VIG DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/15/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

Case 1:17-cv GMS Document 1 Filed 10/25/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Attachment 3..Brand TLD Designation Application

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/08/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv WHW-CLW Document 1 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 25 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/16/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv TWP-DML Document 1 Filed 01/06/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed07/10/15 Page1 of 12

1. The Plaintiff, Richard N. Bell, took photograph of the Indianapolis Skyline in

Case 1:18-cv PKC Document 24 Filed 05/10/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 9:17-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2017 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOURTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case: 4:16-cv DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY. Plaintiffs, Defendant[s].

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:17-cv JCH-JHR Document 17 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

COMPLAINT FOR IN REM RELIEF. Plaintiffs CostaRica.com, Inc. Sociedad Anonima ( CostaRica.com ) and

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/30/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Dominion Registries - Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy

26 th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference

Case 3:17-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Case No.

Case 2:13-cv KSH-CLW Document 1 Filed 12/30/13 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Exhibit A. Registration Agreement

Application and Agreement.name WHOIS Extensive Search Database

Case 2:16-cv SDW-LDW Document 5 Filed 09/01/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 22

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------x SCOTT STEPHENS, : Civil Action Plaintiff, : : No. v. : : COMPLAINT TRUMP ORGANIZATION LLC, : DONALD J. TRUMP, and : ALAN GARTEN, : Defendants. : -------------------------------------------------------x Plaintiff SCOTT STEPHENS (hereinafter Plaintiff ) through his attorney respectfully alleges: INTRODUCTION 1. Plaintiff seeks money damages and a declaratory judgment against Defendants TRUMP ORGANIZATION LLC, DONALD J. TRUMP, and ALAN GARTEN (collectively the Defendants ), who are liable to Plaintiff for defamation and tortious interference of business relations regarding Plaintiff s exclusive right to use the domain name trumpestates.com as its lawful authorized user, registrant, or domain holder. 2. Plaintiff is a natural person. JURISDICTION 3. Plaintiff is a citizen of the State of California. 4. Defendant TRUMP ORGANIZATION LLC is a New York limited liability company. 5. Defendant TRUMP ORGANIZATION LLC is a citizen of the State of New York. 6. Defendant TRUMP ORGANIZATION LLC s members are citizens of the State of New York. 7. Defendant TRUMP ORGANIZATION LLC s New York State Department of State DOS ID # is 2405651. 1

8. Defendant TRUMP ORGANIZATION LLC s New York State Department of State Initial DOS Filing Date is August 4, 1999. 9. Defendant TRUMP ORGANIZATION LLC s New York State Department of State Current Entity Status is Active. 10. Defendant TRUMP ORGANIZATION LLC may be served process via its registered agent, National Registered Agents, Inc., 111 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10011. 11. Defendant DONALD J. TRUMP is a natural person. 12. Defendant DONAL J. TRUMP is a citizen of the State of New York. 13. Defendant DONAL J. TRUMP may be served process at 725 5 th Avenue, New York, New York 10022. 14. Defendant ALAN GARTEN is a natural person. 15. Defendant ALAN GARTEN is a citizen of the State of New York. 16. Defendant ALAN GARTEN may be served process at 725 5 th Avenue, New York, New York 10022. 17. The matter in controversy in this civil action exceeds the sum or value or $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs. 18. This civil action is between citizens of different States. 19. Jurisdiction is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a)(1). VENUE 20. Defendant TRUMP ORGANIZATION LLC resides in this judicial district. 21. Defendant TRUMP ORGANIZATION LLC is an entity with the capacity to sue and be sued in its common name under applicable law. 2

22. Defendant TRUMP ORGANIZATION LLC is subject to this court s personal jurisdiction with respect to this civil action. 23. Defendant DONALD J. TRUMP resides in this judicial district. 24. Defendant DONALD J. TRUMP is domiciled in this judicial district. 25. Defendant ALAN GARTEN resides in this judicial district. 26. Defendant ALAN GARTEN is domiciled in this judicial district. 27. Venue is proper in this court under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(1). 28. A substantial part of the events giving rise to this claim occurred in this judicial district. 29. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2). COUNT I - DEFAMATION 30. Plaintiff repeats, realleges, and incorporates the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 29. 31. Plaintiff is in the business of buying, marketing, and selling internet domain names. 32. A domain name is an identification string that defines a realm of administrative autonomy, authority, or control within the internet. 33. The internet is a global system of interconnected computer networks that use the standard Internet protocol suite (TCP/IP) to link several billion devices worldwide. It is a network or networks that consists of millions of private, public, academic, business, and government networks of local to global scope, linked by a broad array of electronic, wireless, and optical networking technologies. The Internet carries an extensive range of information resources and services, such as the inter-linked hypertext documents and applications of the World Wide Web (WWW), the infrastructure to support email, and peer-to-peer networks for file sharing and telephony. 3

34. Domain names are formed by the rules and procedures of the Domain Name System (DNS). 35. Any name registered in the DNS is a domain name. 36. Domain names are used in various networking contexts and application-specific naming and addressing purposes. 37. In general, a domain name represents an Internet Protocol (IP) resource, such as a personal computer used to access the internet, a server computer hosting a website, or the web site itself or any other service communicated via the internet. 38. In 2014, the number of active domains reached approximately 271 million. 39. The right to use a domain name is delegated by domain name registrars, which are accredited by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the organization charged with overseeing the name and number systems of the Internet. 40. In addition to ICANN, each top-level domain (TLD) is maintained and serviced technically by an administrative organization operating a registry. 41. A registry is responsible for maintaining the database of names registered within the TLD it administers. 42. The registry receives registration information from each domain name registrar authorized to assign names in the corresponding TLD and publishes the information using a special service, the WHOIS protocol. 43. Registries and registrars usually charge an annual fee for the service of delegating a domain name to a user and providing a default set of name servers. Often, this transaction is termed a sale or lease of the domain name, and the registrant may sometimes be called an owner, but no such legal ownership is actually associated with the transaction, only the exclusive right to 4

use the domain name. More correctly, authorized users are known as registrants or domain holders. 44. Domain names are often seen in analogy to real estate in that the domain names are foundations on which a website can be built, and the highest quality domain names, like sought-after real estate, tend to carry significant value, usually due to their online brandbuilding potential, use in advertising, search engine optimization, and many other criteria. 45. The business of resale of registered domain names is known as the domain aftermarket. 46. Various factors influence the perceived value or market value of a domain name. 47. Most of the high-prize domain sales are carried out privately. 48. Plaintiff is in the business of resale of registered domain names in the domain aftermarket. 49. Plaintiff is the authorized user of the domain name trumpestates.com. 50. Plaintiff is the registrant of the domain name trumpestates.com. 51. Plaintiff is the domain holder of the domain name trumpestates.com. 52. Plaintiff has the exclusive right to use the domain name trumpestates.com. 53. Plaintiff became the authorized user, registrant, or domain holder of trumpestates.com in 2004. 54. Plaintiff has maintained his status as authorized user, registrant, or domain holder of trumpestates.com since 2004. 55. Trumpestates.com is not registered as a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. 56. A plural and singular, and live and dead search of trumpestates.com on the United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS) yields no results. 5

57. Defendants have made false statements about Plaintiff that has harmed his reputation. 58. Defendants have made communicated false statements to at least one third party about Plaintiff that has harmed his reputation. 59. Defendants have communicated to at least one third party that Plaintiff is violating the law because of his status as authorized user, registrant, or domain holder of trumpestates.com. 60. Defendants have communicated to at least one third party that Plaintiff is cyber squatting because of his status as authorized user, registrant, or domain holder of trumpestates.com. 61. Defendants have communicated other false statements to at least one third party regarding Plaintiff s status as authorized user, registrant, or domain holder of trumpestates.com. 62. Defendants are liable to Plaintiff for defamation for their aforementioned alleged conduct. COUNT II - TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE OF BUSINESS RELATIONS 63. Plaintiff repeats, realleges, and incorporates the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 62. 64. Defendants interfered with Plaintiff s business relations with the intent to harm Plaintiff. 65. Defendants are liable to Plaintiff for tortious interference of business or contractual relations. COUNT III - DECLARATORY JUDGMENT No Trademark or Service Mark Infringement 66. Plaintiff repeats, realleges, and incorporates the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 65. 67. Trumpestates, trump estates, or trumpestates.com are not registered trademarks. 68. Trumpestates, trump estates, or trumpestates.com are not registered service marks. 69. Defendants do not own the marks trumpestates, trump estates, or trumpestates.com. 70. Plaintiff is not in violation of U.S. Trademark law as a result of his status as authorized user, registrant, or domain holder of trumpestates.com. 6

COUNT IV - DECLARATORY JUDGMENT No Violation of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy 71. Plaintiff repeats, realleges, and incorporates the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 69. 72. Plaintiff is subject to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the Policy ) adopted by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ( ICANN ) on October 24, 1999, as a result of his status as authorized user, registrant, or domain holder of trumpestates.com. 73. Plaintiff has not violated the Policy as a result of his status as authorized user, registrant, or domain holder of trumpestates.com. COUNT V - DECLARATORY JUDGMENT No Violation of the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy 74. Plaintiff repeats, realleges, and incorporates the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 73. 75. Plaintiff has not violated the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy as a result of his status as authorized user, registrant, or domain holder of trumpestates.com. COUNT VI - DECLARATORY JUDGMENT No Violation of the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy 76. Plaintiff repeats, realleges, and incorporates the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 75. 77. Plaintiff has not violated the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy as a result of his status as authorized user, registrant, or domain holder of trumpestates.com. 7

PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE Plaintiff requests entry of judgment against Defendants, each of them, as follows: COUNT I - DEFAMATION a. Compensatory damages of twenty-one million dollars ($21,000,000.00 U.S.); b. Punitive damages of sixty-three million dollars ($63,000,000.00 U.S.); and c. All further and other relief as this Court may deem just and proper. COUNT II - TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE OF BUSINESS RELATIONS d. Compensatory damages of twenty-one million dollars ($21,000,000.00 U.S.); e. Punitive damages of sixty-three million dollars ($63,000,000.00 U.S.); and f. All further and other relief as this Court may deem just and proper. COUNT III - DECLARATORY JUDGMENT No Trademark or Service Mark Infringement g. Declaratory judgment that Plaintiff is not in violation of U.S. Trademark law as a result of his status as authorized user, registrant, or domain holder of trumpestates.com. COUNT IV - DECLARATORY JUDGMENT No Violation of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy h. Declaratory judgment that Plaintiff has not violated the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy as a result of his status as authorized user, registrant, or domain holder of trumpestates.com. COUNT V - DECLARATORY JUDGMENT No Violation of the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy 8

i. Declaratory judgment that Plaintiff has not violated the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. COUNT VI - DECLARATORY JUDGMENT No Violation of the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy j. Declaratory judgment that Plaintiff has not violated the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. Respectfully submitted, Dated: New York, New York April 18, 2015 s/ Brian L. Ponder BRIAN L. PONDER, ESQ. BRIAN PONDER LLP 200 Park Avenue, Suite 1700 New York, New York 10166 Telephone: 1 (646) 450-9461 Facsimile: 1 (646) 607-9238 Email: brian@brianponder.com Attorney for Plaintiff SCOTT STEPHENS 9