ICA ASSESSMENT APPEALS PROCEDURE ICAB584

Similar documents
COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE ICAB584

Ribston Hall High School. Complaints Policy

COTHAM SCHOOL COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURES

STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE: NON-ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS INCLUDING PRINCIPALS AND VICE-PRINCIPALS IN GRANT-AIDED SCHOOLS WITH FULLY DELEGATED BUDGETS

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS, INCLUDING PRINCIPALS AND VICE-PRINCIPALS, IN GRANT AIDED SCHOOLS WITH FULLY DELEGATED BUDGETS

DISCIPLINARY RULES. Board means the Board of Directors for the time being of the Society;

This Guidance applies to complaints where the Complaint Form was received between 01/03/13 and 08/07/15.

Complaints Policy. Policy: Complaints Policy Effective Date: December 2014 Revision Number : 3.0 Revised: January 2018

New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants RULES OF THE NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS EFFECTIVE 26 JUNE 2017 CONTENTS

As far as possible all concerns should be dealt with as informally as possible.

The Federation of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom

STUDENT DISCIPLINE PROCEDURE 2016

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES

THE EXPERT WITNESS INSTITUTE COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINE RULES

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES

1.2 The ABC will apply the following criteria in determining proportionate complaint handling:

COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE. This complaints procedure was adopted by Deddington Parish Council on 15 th October Version 1.4 dated 15 th October 2014

Making a Complaint Against Members of the Institute of Certified Public Accountants In Ireland

ECCLESIASTICAL OFFICES (TERMS OF SERVICE) REGULATIONS 2009 CAPABILITY PROCEDURE

COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE: GWENT POLICE AND CRIME COMMISSIONER AND GWENT DEPUTY POLICE AND CRIME COMMISSIONER

THE CHARTERED INSURANCE INSTITUTE Disciplinary Procedure Rules

CRICKET SCOTLAND CODE OF DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

Making a complaint about a Member of the Board of the Authority

THE UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM SENATE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE - RULES OF PROCEDURE

ITCHEN ABBAS PRIMARY SCHOOL. Habitual or Vexatious Complainants Policy. IAPS HVCPolicy Page 1

COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE JUDICIARY (SCOTLAND) RULES 2017

Ysgol Uwchradd Caergybi 1 of 7 Complaints Policy COMPLAINTS POLICY

Complaints in Relation to Child Protection Conferences For parents, carers, children and young people

CONCERNS & COMPLAINTS POLICY. November 2017

BYE LAW 1 INTERPRETATION

ORDINANCE 17 CODE OF STUDENT DISCIPLINE

IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON ORDINANCE D8. THE DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE This Ordinance is made pursuant to Part III of the Appendix to the College s Statutes

Co-operative Academy Trust. Issue Date: September 2012 This Version Agreed on: March 2015 Next Review Date: March 2017

PART I CONSTRUCTION, APPLICATION AND INTERPRETATION PART III DISCIPLINE, DISMISSAL AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE

South Australian Employment Tribunal Bill 2014

VOLUNTARY REGISTER OF DRIVING INSTRUCTORS GOVERNING POLICY

APPENDIX E ARC DISCIPLINARY POLICY

PROCEDURES FOR INVESTIGATIONS BY THE COMPLIANCE OFFICER FOR IPSA. Determined by IPSA under section 9A of the Parliamentary Standards Act 2009

2016 No. 41 POLICE. The Police (Conduct) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016

Cirencester Housing Limited Complaints Policy

Guidance on Complaints and Disciplinary Procedure

Party Political Broadcast, Party Election Broadcast and Referendum Campaign Broadcast Complaints Process February 2012

Complaints Procedure

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE REGULATION 10 DISCIPLINE WITH RESPECT TO STUDENTS

1. BG s Constitution, its Regulations and the various conditions of membership, registration and affiliation together require that:

Our Lady s Catholic Primary School

2014 No JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS AND DISCIPLINE. The Judicial Discipline (Prescribed Procedures) Regulations 2014

ALAT and Bright Tribe Trust Complaints Procedure

LANCASHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL DIRECTORATE FOR CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE

UK ATHLETICS LIMITED ( UKA ) DISCIPLINARY RULES AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

Disciplinary & Dispute Resolution Procedures

WATFORD GRAMMAR SCHOOL FOR GIRLS. School Complaints Procedure

ENGLAND BOXING DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT & DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

DATED DISCIPLINARY RULES AND PROCEDURE AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

Immigration and Asylum Law Advanced Accreditation Scheme

The Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada

The General Teaching Council for Scotland Fitness to Teach Rules 2017 These Rules are available in alternative formats on request

STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES MAY 2009 CM

NORTH TYNESIDE COUNCIL GOVERNOR SERVICES - LAW AND GOVERNANCE. Guidance for Governing Bodies COMPLAINT PROCEDURE

ENGLAND GOLF DISCIPLINARY AND APPEAL REGULATIONS (Including appeals from Clubs and Counties)

PRACTICE REVIEW OF TEACHERS REGULATION

Disciplinary Policy and Procedure

Complaints Policy. Queen Katharine Academy Mountsteven Avenue, Walton, Peterborough PE4 6HX Tel: Fax:

BY-LAW NO. 8 (2010) BY-LAW ESTABLISHING THE COMPLAINT EXAMINATION PROCEDURE FOR STUDENTS OR THEIR PARENTS OR GUARDIANS

COMPLAINTS, OBJECTIONS, DISCIPLINARY AND APPEALS RULES

CLERGY DISCIPLINE MEASURE 2003 as amended by the Clergy Discipline (Amendment) Measure 2013 and the Safeguarding and Clergy Discipline Measure 2016

3 February Monitoring of Complaints against the Merseyside Police and Crime Commissioner September 2014 to January 2015

Ontario Swimming Coaches Committee Disciplinary and Complaints Procedures

Nasdaq Clearing AB. Complaints Management Policy. Date of issue: Policy Owner: Approved by:

I. CMP Disciplinary Policy & Procedures. A. Objectives

9. Roles and responsibilities of Committee members

PSD: COMPLAINTS & MISCONDUCT Policy & Procedures

Rules. 1. Purpose. 2. Complaints Covered. 3. Complaints Not Covered

THE ENGLAND AND WALES CRICKET BOARD CHILD SAFEGUARDING COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EXECUTIVES RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE CERTIFICATION RULES

Schedule Six Discipline Code

ASSOCIATE PROSECUTOR RIGHTS OF AUDIENCE AND LITIGATION CERTIFICATION RULES

IMPORTANT NOTICE (IMMEDIATE RESPONSE REQUIRED)

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD EDITORIAL COMPLAINTS: GUIDANCE on POLICY & PROCESS

River Parishes Transit Authority Complaint Handling Policy

Water Redress Scheme Rules (2017 edition)

COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY POLICY

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE

The City of London Academy (Southwark) Complaints Procedure Policy

At the Council Chamber, Whitehall BY THE LORDS OF HER MAJESTY S MOST HONOURABLE PRIVY COUNCIL

2. Definitions Bullying: the persistent and ongoing ill treatment of a person that victimises, humiliates, undermines or threatens that person.

STRATEGIC RISK COMMITTEE RULES

POLICY & PROCEDURE TO COMBAT BULLYING & HARASSMENT OF TEACHERS INCLUDING PRINCIPALS AND VICE PRINCIPALS IN GRANT AIDED SCHOOLS

CHARLESTOWN ROWING CLUB GRIEVANCE AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE 1. PURPOSE. This Grievance and Disciplinary Procedure is to:

March Getting the best out of the BBC for licence fee payers

Making a Complaint about the West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner

NTSA CUSTOMER COMPLAINT HANDLING PROCEDURE JUNE 2016

Constitution. The Australian National University Postgraduate and Research Students Association Incorporated

DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Constitution of Australian Physiotherapy Association

Code of Complaints & Disciplinary Procedures

Complaints, Comments & Compliments Policy

Transcription:

ICA ASSESSMENT APPEALS PROCEDURE ICAB584

ICA Assessment Appeals Procedure Contents Assessment Appeals Procedure... 2 1. Introduction... 2 2. Scope... 3 3. Grounds for appeal... 3 4. Formal procedure... 4 5. Appeal panel... 5 6. Conclusion of the appeal process... 6 1 GBPRO01003V04 2017 ICA

Assessment Appeals Procedure 1. Introduction 1.1. As a part of its commitment to ensuring the standard and quality of its assessments, ICA has established this procedure to deal with appeals from its candidates. 1.2. The policies and procedures contained herein apply to all registered ICA students irrespective of their mode, level or place of study. 1.3. This procedure sets out the process for handling appeals concerning assessments, awarding and certification. For any complaints or issues related to the programme of study or teaching, candidates should discuss the matter with their training provider. 1.4. This procedure does not cover complaints, mitigation, academic misconduct, or the receipt of any anonymous complaints, which are covered by separate procedures. 1.5. ICA will treat all appeals seriously and will deal with them without recrimination. Where, however, an appeal is shown to be frivolous, vexatious or motivated by malice, disciplinary action may be taken against the complainant. 1.6. This procedure may be used only when there are eligible grounds for doing so (as specified in section 2) and may not be used simply because a candidate is dissatisfied with the outcome of his or her assessment or other decision concerning their academic position or progress. 1.7. An appeal which questions the academic or professional judgement of those charged with the responsibility for assessing a candidate s academic performance or professional competence will not be permitted. 1.8. A candidate may submit an appeal only on his or her own behalf; an appeal submitted by a third party will not be accepted unless accompanied by written authorisation from the candidate. 1.9. A candidate thinking of appealing should discuss the matter with his or her mentor, personal tutor, or other appropriate person in the organisation where they are studying before doing so, in order to better understand the reason for the result or decision against which they wish to appeal. A formal appeal should only be submitted if a candidate remains dissatisfied once informal avenues have been exhausted. 1.10. Any reference in these procedures to named officers should be read also as a reference in each case to a delegated nominee. 2 GBPRO01003V04 2017 ICA

2. Scope 2.1. This procedure may be used by candidates who wish to appeal against a final decision of an assessment board which affects a candidate s academic status or progress, including (but not limited to) the following: a. a decision not to award a qualification on the grounds that: i. the candidate has been unsuccessful in all attempts to complete assessments to the required standard within the respective timeframe ii. a decision has been made by an Assessment Board that the candidate has obtained marks by deception and that the decision of the Board was not to proceed with an award in iii. this case the candidate has not completed all necessary assessments for awarding purposes and administrative staff have not been able to contact the individual concerned after repeated attempts to resolve the matter. b. a decision that the candidate be removed from the course of study on grounds of unsatisfactory progress or failure to meet academic or professional requirements, or arising from unsatisfactory work and attendance c. a requirement that the candidate interrupt his or her studies on grounds of unsatisfactory progress or failure to meet academic or professional requirements d. a requirement that the candidate transfers to a programme offering a qualification of lower rank e. a decision not to allow the candidate to progress from the Advanced Certificate to Diploma or from the Diploma to the Professional Postgraduate 3. Grounds for appeal 3.1. An appeal may be made only on grounds alleging: a) that there exists or existed circumstances affecting the candidate's performance of which, for good reason, the Assessment Board may not have been made aware when the decision was taken and which might have had a material effect on the decision b) that there had been a material administrative error or procedural irregularity in the assessment process or in putting into effect the regulations for the programme of study of such a nature as to cause significant doubt whether the decision might have been different if the error or irregularity had not occurred c) that there is evidence of prejudice or bias or lack of proper assessment on the part of one or more of the examiners 3.2. An appeal which questions the academic or professional judgement of those charged with the responsibility for assessing a candidate s academic performance or professional competence will not be permitted. 3 GBPRO01003V04 2017 ICA

4. Formal procedure 4.1. If a candidate remains dissatisfied with the result or decision once informal avenues have been exhausted and believes there are valid grounds for appeal (as specified in section 2), he/she may invoke the formal appeal procedure. 4.2. A formal appeal may be initiated in writing and submitting it to the ICA Assessment team (icaassessments@int-comp.org).within twenty working days of notification of the result or decision. The candidate should submit with the appeal any documents he or she wishes to be considered in the appeal. 4.3. On receipt of the formal appeal, the ICA will initially consider whether the appeal is made on one or more of the grounds specified in section 2. If this test fails, the candidate will be notified within ten working days of the appeal being received that the appeal is not eligible, with reasons given. There will be no opportunity for the candidate to appeal against this decision within ICA. 4.4. If the appeal is shown to have been made on one or more of the grounds set out in section 2, then the ICA will obtain comments on the appeal from the Course Director, Chief Examiner or other appropriate person and form an Appeals Committee. 4.5. The appeal will then be considered by the Appeal Committee who may make any of the following decisions: i. to allow the appeal and amend the assessment ii. to reject the appeal iii. to refer the appeal to the Examination Committee and Test Board, on the basis that it has raised serious issues that require further investigation and consideration. 4.6. If, at any time during these enquiries, ICA decides, on the basis of the information contained in the appeal, to reconsider the matter about which the appeal has been made and to substitute an alternative outcome, the candidate will be notified accordingly, the appeal procedure will cease and the candidate will be issued with a Completion of Procedures Letter (see paragraph 6.1). 4.7. The ICA, having considered the outcome of the formal appeal, may determine: a) that the appeal does not, after all, have substance, in which event the candidate will be informed of this decision in writing, normally within twenty working days of the appeal having been received. The candidate will be given reasons for the decision. If the candidate believes that their appeal has not been dealt with properly and fairly, he/she has the right to request a review of the handling of their appeal (see paragraph 4.8) 4 GBPRO01003V04 2017 ICA

b) that the appeal has identified relevant matters that were not known to those making the original decision or that there had been procedural or administrative errors which might have affected that decision, in which event the case will be referred back to the original Assessment Board for reconsideration taking into account any new information, or any guidance, from the ICA. The reconvened board will have the power to confirm or alter its original decision. Where the original decision is confirmed, the candidate will be given reasons for that decision. There will be no opportunity for the candidate to appeal against the decision of the reconvened board and the candidate will be issued with a Completion of Procedures Letter (see paragraph 6.1) c) that the appeal has raised serious or complex matters which require further investigation and enquiry, in which event the case will be referred to an Appeal Panel (see section 5). 4.8. Candidates whose appeal has been dismissed by the ICA as being without substance can request a review if they believe that their appeal has not been handled properly or fairly. Requests for review, with reasons given, should be submitted in writing to the ICA within 20 working days of receipt of the letter informing them of the outcome. Letters should be addressed to: The Executive President ICA Wrens Court 52-54 Victoria Road Sutton Coldfield Birmingham B72 1SX. 4.9. The Executive President will review the documents relating to the case in order to determine whether the case has been handled properly and the decision is reasonable in the light of the available evidence. The candidate will be informed of the outcome of the review in writing, normally within twenty working days of the appeal having been received. The candidate will be given reasons for the decision. The decision of the Executive President will be final and the candidate will be issued with a Completion of Procedures Letter (see paragraph 6.1). 5. Appeal panel 5.1. Appeals which are considered by the ICA to raise serious or complex matters that require further investigation and enquiry will be referred to an Appeal Panel. The composition of the Appeal Panel will be as follows: ICA Director of Quality and Standards who will chair the meeting the Chief Examiner for that discipline ICA representative who will minute the meeting member of teaching staff or representative from the Partner Organisation from whom the candidate is registered with. 5 GBPRO01003V04 2017 ICA

5.2. The candidate will be given ten working days notice of the date and time of the Appeal Panel meeting and will be invited to attend the meeting of the Appeal Panel to present his or her case. Where the candidate decides not to attend, the Panel may proceed in his or her absence. 5.3. The candidate may be accompanied at the meeting by a friend. The candidate will be sent copies of all documents to be made available to the Appeal Panel. The Appeal Panel is empowered to call members of staff with knowledge of the case to attend the meeting to give evidence and to correspond with external examiners or others as appropriate. The candidate and the accompanying person will be permitted to speak and to question any persons giving oral evidence to the Panel. 5.4. Having considered the evidence, the Appeal Panel may: a) reject the appeal, in which case the candidate will be given reasons for the decision. If the appeal is rejected, there is no further right of appeal within ICA; b) refer the matter back to the original Assessment Board for reconsideration taking into account the new information or any guidance from the Appeal Panel. The reconvened assessment board will have the power to confirm or alter its original decision. Where the original decision is confirmed, the candidate will be given reasons for that decision. There will be no opportunity within ICA for the candidate to appeal against the decision of the reconvened Assessment Board; c) revoke the original decision of the Assessment Board and, as appropriate, allow the candidate a further opportunity to satisfy the requirements for continuation on the programme or element of the programme; d) revoke the original decision not to award a qualification and to direct that the examiners reconsider their decision for reasons stated; e) direct that further assessment options be made available to the candidate to re-take any component of the assessment function as recommended by the panel. 5.5. The candidate will be informed of the Appeal Panel s decision, with reasons, within 5 working days and will be issued with a Completion of Procedures Letter. 6. Conclusion of the appeal process 6.1. At the conclusion of the appeals procedure, candidates will be issued with a Completion of Procedures Letter. There are no other appeals procedures within ICA beyond those detailed above. 6 GBPRO01003V04 2017 ICA

www.int-comp.org /intcompassoc /IntCompICA /company/international-compliance-association /intcompassoc Head Office Wrens Court 52-54 Victoria Road Sutton Coldfield West Midlands B72 1SX England