IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOTION OF AMERICAN CABLE ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Case: Document: Filed: 02/23/2011 Page: 1

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Petitioner,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT MOTION OF TELMATE, LLC FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED] Nos , STB No. FD IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Case , Document 1-1, 04/21/2017, , Page1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No ORAL ARGUMENT HELD JUNE 1, 2015 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. No. 5:10-CT-3123-BO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

Tel: (202)

BEFORE THE UNITED STATATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, et al.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

APPENDIX F. NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY APPELLATE PRACTICE FORMS 1. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION CIVIL CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2014 Page 1 of 1

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO TRANSFER AND HOLD CASES IN ABEYANCE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/23/2015 Page 1 of Constitution Avenue,

[ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 15, 2010] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231

DOCKET NO. E-100, SUB 157. NOW COMES NC WARN Inc. ("NC WARN"), by and through undersigned

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 08/28/2018 Page 1 of 15 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2011 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 7, 2014 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Respondents. CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:16-CV-1164-WO-JEP

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFREY ALEXANDER STERLING, and JAMES RISEN,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:16-CV-1164-WO-JEP

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 6:15-cv TC Document 163 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 of 7

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case KRH Doc 1952 Filed 04/05/16 Entered 04/05/16 22:00:50 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. SIERRA CLUB; and VIRGINIA WILDERNESS COMMITTEE,

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON MARCH 31, Case No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

U.S. District Court Eastern District of Tennessee (Chattanooga) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:03-cv-01005

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 106 Filed: 07/10/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1318

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Motion to Certify under 28 U.S.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No Plaintiffs-Appellees,

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. DAVID JACOBS; GARY HINDES, Appellants,

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ReCEIVED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU CLERK

Case 1:99-cv PLF Document 6223 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case , Document 912, 03/29/2018, , Page1 of 6

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Petitioner v. CHANBOND, LLC Patent Owner

Transcription:

Case: 15-3291 Document: 25 Filed: 07/28/2015 Page: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT STATE OF TENNESSEE vs. Petitioner, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondents STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA vs. Petitioner, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondents No. 15-3291 No. 15-3555 JOINT MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES AND MODIFY THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE Pursuant to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 26(b and 27(a and Rule 26(a of the Rules of this Court, Petitioners The State of Tennessee and The State of North Carolina, Respondent the Federal Communications Commission, and Intervenors The National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, The Independent Telephone and Telecommunications Alliance, The Electric Power Board of Chattanooga, Tennessee, and The City of Wilson, North Carolina jointly 1

Case: 15-3291 Document: 25 Filed: 07/28/2015 Page: 2 and respectfully move that (1 the Court consolidate these two cases, and (2 modify the briefing schedule set forth in the briefing letters issue by the Clerk of the Court on July 20, 2015. The United States consents to this motion. (1 Consolidation The parties respectfully submit that the consolidation of these two cases will preserve the Court s resources and allow for more efficient briefing and argument of the issues. These cases petition for review of a single FCC Order which preempted laws in both Tennessee and North Carolina. See City of Wilson, North Carolina Petition for Preemption of North Carolina General Statute Sections 160A-340 et seq.; The Electric Power Board of Chattanooga, Tennessee Petition for Preemption of a Portion of Tennessee Code Annotated Section 7-52-60, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 15-25 (Mar. 12, 2015. There is considerable overlap in the issues to be decided, including the FCC s authority to preempt under the federal statute in question and the relevance of precedent. The movants agree that consolidating the cases will be more efficient than proceeding separately, allowing the parties and Court to address these overlapping issues once. (2 Briefing Schedule The parties also jointly state that good cause exists to modify the briefing schedule. The cases present novel questions of constitutional, statutory, and administrative law, as well as an extensive record and 2

Case: 15-3291 Document: 25 Filed: 07/28/2015 Page: 3 lengthy administrative Order. To adequately address these issues, the parties respectfully move for a modest extension of the briefing schedule as follows: Petitioners opening briefs separate briefs for NC and TN, 14,000 words each Opening briefs for Intervenors in support of Petitioners 14,000 words each Respondents brief one brief for Respondents, 28,000 words Briefs of Intervenors in support of Respondents one brief of 28,000 words or two briefs, 14,000 words each Petitioners reply briefs separate briefs from NC and TN, 7,000 words each Reply briefs of Intervenors in support of Petitioners 7,000 words each September 18, 2015 September 18, 2015 November 5, 2015 November 5, 2015 November 23, 2015 November 23, 2015 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, counsel for the Petitioners, Respondent the FCC, and Intervenors respectfully request that the Court grant this motion to consolidate these cases and modify the briefing schedule as set out above. 3

Case: 15-3291 Document: 25 Filed: 07/28/2015 Page: 4 July 28, 2015 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Matthew J. Dunne Matthew J. Dunne Counsel Richard K. Welch Deputy Associate General Counsel Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 (202 418-1740 Counsel for the Federal Communications Commission /s/ James Bradford Ramsay James Bradford Ramsay National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners 1101 Vermont Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20005 (202 898-2207 Counsel for the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners /s/ Joshua Turner Joshua Turner Megan Leef Brown Wiley Rein 1776 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 (202 719-4807 Counsel for the State of Tennessee /s/ John Foster Maddrey John Foster Maddrey Solicitor General, North Carolina N.C. Department of Justice P.O. Box 629 Raleigh, NC 27602-0000 (919 716-6900 Counsel for the State of North Carolina [Signatures continued on next page] /s/ Genevieve Morelli Genevieve Morelli ITTA 1101 Vermont Avenue, N.W. Suite 501 Washington, DC 20005 202-898-1519 Counsel for the Independent Telephone and Telecommunications Alliance 4

Case: 15-3291 Document: 25 Filed: 07/28/2015 Page: 5 /s/ Frederick Hitchcock Frederick Hitchcock Tom Greenholtz Chambliss, Bahner & Stophel 605 Chestnut Street Suite 1700 Chattanooga, TN 37450 (423 756-3000 Kathryn S. King 10 West M. L. King Boulevard P.O. Box 18225 Chattanooga, TN 37422 (423 648-1322 Counsel for the Electric Power Board of Chattanooga, Tennessee /s/ James Baller James Baller Sean A. Stokes Ashley M. Stelfox Baller Herbst Stokes & Lide, PC 2014 P Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20036-5923 (202 833-1144 /s/ James Baller James Baller Sean A. Stokes Ashley M. Stelfox Baller Herbst Stokes & Lide, PC 2014 P Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20036-5923 (202 833-1144 James P. Cauley III Gabriel Du Sablon Cauley Pridgen, P.A. 2500 Nash Street N Suite C PO Drawer 2367 Wilson, NC 27894-2367 (252 291-3848 Counsel for the City of Wilson, North Carolina Of Counsel for the Electric Power Board of Chattanooga, Tennessee 5

Case: 15-3291 Document: 25 Filed: 07/28/2015 Page: 6 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, Petitioner, v. No. 15-3291 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Matthew J. Dunne, hereby certify that on July 28, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing Joint Motion to Consolidate Cases and Modify the Briefing Schedule with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit by using the CM/ECF system. Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF system. Joshua S. Turner Megan L. Brown Wiley Rein, LLP 1776 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Counsel for: State of TN Tom Greenholtz Frederick Hitchcock Chambliss Bahner & Stophel 605 Chestnut Street Suite 1700 Chattanooga, TN 37450 Counsel for: Electric Power Bd. Of Chattanooga Scott A. Westrich Kristen C. Limarzi Robert B. Nicholson U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Appellate Staff 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Room 3224 Washington, D.C. 20530 Counsel for: USA James Bradford Ramsay National Ass n of Regulatory Utility Commissioners 1101 Vermont Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Counsel for: NARUC

Case: 15-3291 Document: 25 Filed: 07/28/2015 Page: 7 James Baller Baller Hebst 2014 P Street, N.W. Suite 202 Washington, D.C. 20036 Counsel for: City of Wilson, NC /s/ Matthew J. Dunne