Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/19/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv IMK Document 250 Filed 08/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 2905 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:12-cv SLR Document 18 Filed 08/27/12 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:10-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/05/10 Page 1 of 20

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:09-cv JJF Document 36 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:09-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/13/2009 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:18-cv LPS Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 87 PageID #: 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 218 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:15-cv WHW-CLW Document 1 Filed 04/10/15 Page 1 of 81 PageID: 1

Case 3:18-cv FLW-LHG Document 1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 25 PageID: 1

Case 1:16-cv RBK-JS Document 1 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:15-cv MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 38 PageID: 1

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:16-cv MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Attorneys for Defendants Watson Laboratories, Inc. and Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Case 1:15-cv LPS Document 118 Filed 05/10/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 2856 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv WHW -MCA Document 7 Filed 09/12/11 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 57

Case 2:15-cv WHW-CLW Document 1 Filed 08/31/15 Page 1 of 145 PageID: 1

Case 3:12-cv PGS-LHG Document 1 Filed 06/25/12 Page 1 of 41 PageID: 1

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/22/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv SLR-SRF Document 61 Filed 05/22/15 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: 634 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:10-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/25/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:15-cv RMB-JS Document 1 Filed 10/09/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:12-cv WHW-MCA Document 10 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 20 PageID: 141

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:11-cv EGS Document 10 Filed 04/25/12 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 3:10-cv JAP -TJB Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 1

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/21/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:09-cv DMC-MF Document 17 Filed 04/20/2009 Page 1 of 28 : :

Case 6:18-cv ADA Document 26 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:17-cv-6236 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv RGA Document 10 Filed 01/13/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 47

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 1:15-cv RGA Document 48 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 486 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 20 Filed: 04/11/11 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:217

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/06/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:99-mc Document 689 Filed 12/01/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Transcription:

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE FRESENIUS KABI USA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. MAIA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant. C.A. No. COMPLAINT Plaintiff Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC ( Fresenius Kabi, by its undersigned attorneys, for its complaint against Maia Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ( Maia, hereby alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35, United States Code, in response to the submission of an Abbreviated New Drug Application ( ANDA with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA, seeking approval to manufacture and sell a generic version of levothyroxine sodium powder for injection prior to the expiration of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,006,289 ( the 289 Patent, 9,168,238 ( the 238 Patent and 9,168,239 ( the 239 Patent. THE PARTIES 2. Plaintiff Fresenius Kabi is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware, having its corporate headquarters at Three Corporate Drive, Lake Zurich, Illinois 60047. 3. On information and belief, Maia Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware, having its corporate headquarters at 707

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 2 of 17 PageID #: 2 State Road, Suite 104, Princeton, NJ 08540. On information and belief, Maia Inc. manufactures and/or distributes numerous generic drugs for sale and use throughout the United States, including in this judicial district. Upon information and belief, Maia Inc. also prepares and/or aids in the preparation and submission of Abbreviated New Drug Applications ( ANDA to the FDA. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. This action for patent infringement arises under 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq. generally and 35 U.S.C. 271 specifically. 5. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1338(a, 2201, and 2202. 6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Maia by virtue of the fact that it is a Delaware corporation and has systematic contacts with the State of Delaware. Personal jurisdiction over Maia is also proper because, upon information and belief, Maia, directly or through its affiliates and agents, develops, formulates, manufactures, markets, and sells pharmaceutical drug products, including generic drug products, throughout the United States and in this judicial district. Further, upon information and belief, Maia has committed, aided, abetted, induced, contributed to, and/or participated in the commission of, a tortious act of patent infringement that has led to foreseeable harm and injury to Plaintiff in Delaware. Upon information and belief, Maia has purposefully conducted and continues to conduct business in Delaware, and, as a result, Delaware is a likely destination of Maia s generic products. 7. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400(b. -2-

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 3 of 17 PageID #: 3 THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT 8. The 289 Patent, entitled Levothyroxine Formulations, was duly and legally issued on April 14, 2015, naming Zhi-Qiang Jiang, Arunya Usayapant, and George Monen as the inventors. A true and correct copy of the 289 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 9. The 238 Patent, entitled Levothyroxine Formulations, was duly and legally issued on October 27, 2015, naming Zhi-Qiang Jiang, Arunya Usayapant, and George Monen as the inventors. A true and correct copy of the 238 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 10. The 239 Patent, entitled Levothyroxine Formulations, was duly and legally issued on October 27, 2015, naming Zhi-Qiang Jiang, Arunya Usayapant, and George Monen as the inventors. A true and correct copy of the 239 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 11. Plaintiff Fresenius Kabi is the assignee and lawfully owns all rights, title, and interest in the 289 Patent, the 238 Patent, and the 239 Patent ( the patents-in-suit, including the right to sue and to recover for past infringement thereof. 12. The FDA issues a publication entitled Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (the Orange Book. 13. Fresenius Kabi is the holder of New Drug Application ( NDA No. 202231 for Levothyroxine Sodium, which the FDA approved on June 24, 2011. In accordance with 21 U.S.C. 355(b(1, the 289 Patent, the 238 Patent, and the 239 Patent are each listed in the Orange Book in connection with approved NDA No. 202231, as patents with respect to which a claim of patent infringement could reasonably be asserted if a person not licensed by the owner engaged in the manufacture, use, or sale of Fresenius Kabi s NDA drug product. 14. Fresenius Kabi currently sells in the United States Levothyroxine Sodium. According to the Orange Book, the 289 Patent is currently not due to expire until October 3, -3-

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 4 of 17 PageID #: 4 2032; the 238 Patent is currently not due to expire until August 29, 2032; and the 239 Patent is also currently not due to expire until August 29, 2032. MAIA S ANDA NO. 208749 15. On information and belief, Maia submitted ANDA No. 208749 to the FDA under 505(j of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j, seeking FDA approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, importation, offer for sale, or sale of generic 100 mcg/vial, 200 mcg/vial, and 500 mcg/vial levothyroxine sodium for injection (the ANDA Products. 16. On information and belief, ANDA No. 208749 contains a Paragraph IV certification that the 289 Patent, the 238 Patent, and the 239 Patent are invalid, unenforceable, and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use, or sale of the drug product described by Maia s ANDA No. 208749. 17. On information and belief, Maia is the owner of ANDA No. 208749. 18. On information and belief, if ANDA No. 208749 is approved by the FDA before the expiration of the 289 Patent, the 238 Patent, and/or the 239 Patent, Maia will begin manufacturing, using, importing, offering for sale, and/or selling the ANDA Products, despite the patents. 19. On information and belief, if ANDA No. 208749 is approved by the FDA, Maia will begin marketing the ANDA Products for treatment of myxedema coma, and doctors and patients will use the ANDA Products for the indications marketed by Maia. 20. Pursuant to FDA regulation 21 C.F.R. 314.94, in order to secure FDA approval, the ANDA Products dosage strengths must have the same strength as one of the approved dosages for Fresenius Kabi s NDA levothyroxine sodium products ( the NDA products. In addition, the ANDA Products must be bioequivalent to the NDA products. -4-

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 5 of 17 PageID #: 5 21. Fresenius Kabi received a letter ( the Notice Letter, purporting to be a Notice of Certification for ANDA No. 208749 under Section 505(j(2(B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. 355(j(2(B, and 21 CFR 314.95(c. The Paragraph IV certifications alleged that the claims of the 289 Patent, the 238 Patent, and the 239 Patent are invalid, unenforceable, and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use, or sale of the ANDA Products. 22. On information and belief, ANDA No. 208749 seeks approval of a generic levothyroxine product that is the same, or substantially the same, as Fresenius Kabi s commercially marketed and approved Levothyroxine Sodium product. 23. On information and belief, Maia was aware of the 289 Patent, the 238 Patent, and the 239 Patent when ANDA No. 208749 was submitted to the FDA, containing the abovedescribed Paragraph IV certifications concerning the patents-in-suit. COUNT I: INFRINGEMENT OF THE 289 PATENT ANDA SUBMISSION 24. Fresenius Kabi incorporates and realleges paragraphs 1-23 above. 25. The submission of ANDA No. 208749, including a Paragraph IV certification regarding the 289 Patent, was an act of infringement by Maia of one or more claims of the 289 Patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(e(2. 26. On information and belief, the use of the ANDA Products in accordance with and as directed by the instructions contained in the proposed package insert of Maia s ANDA No. 208749 is covered by one or more claims of the 289 Patent. 27. On information and belief, Maia s commercial importation, manufacture, use, sale, and/or offer for sale of the ANDA Products before the expiration of the 289 Patent would infringe, contribute to the infringement of, and/or induce the infringement of one or more claims of the 289 Patent. -5-

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 6 of 17 PageID #: 6 28. On information and belief, the use of Maia s ANDA Products in accordance with and as directed by Maia s proposed labeling will infringe one or more claims of the 289 Patent. 29. On information and belief, by seeking approval to distribute the ANDA Products with their proposed labeling, Maia intends to cause others, specifically, for example, medical professionals and patients, to perform acts that Maia knows will infringe one or more claims of the 289 Patent. 30. On information and belief, unless enjoined by this Court, Maia plans and intends to, and will, actively induce infringement of one or more claims of the 289 Patent immediately following approval of ANDA No. 208749. 31. On information and belief, unless enjoined by this Court, Maia plans and intends to, and will, contribute to the infringement of one or more claims of the 289 Patent immediately following approval of ANDA No. 208749. 32. On information and belief, Maia knows that its ANDA No. 208749 and its proposed labeling are especially made or adapted for use in infringing one or more claims of the 289 Patent, and that the Maia ANDA Products and their proposed labeling are not suitable for any noninfringing use. 33. On information and belief, Maia s actions through the licensing, manufacture, use, import, offer for sale, and/or sale a generic levothyroxine sodium product pursuant to ANDA No. 208749 will directly infringe, contributorily infringe, and/or induce infringement of at least one claim of the 289 patent. 34. On information and belief, Maia has been aware of the existence of the 289 Patent since before the submission of ANDA No. 208749. -6-

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 7 of 17 PageID #: 7 35. On information and belief, Maia has no reasonable basis for believing that its ANDA Products will not infringe one or more valid claims of the 289 Patent and no reasonable basis for believing that the infringed claims are invalid. Maia posited no theory of noninfringement in its Notice Letter concerning the 289 Patent. 36. This case is exceptional, as that term is used in 35 U.S.C. 285. 37. On information and belief, unless enjoined by this Court, Maia plans and intends to engage in the manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, marketing, distribution, and/or importation of the ANDA Products with their proposed labeling immediately following approval of ANDA No. 208749 and before the expiration of the 289 Patent. 38. The acts of infringement by Maia set forth above will cause Fresenius Kabi irreparable harm for which it has no adequate remedy at law, and those acts will continue unless enjoined by this Court. 39. Fresenius Kabi is entitled to the relief provided by 35 U.S.C. 271(e(4, including, inter alia, an order of this Court that the FDA set the effective date of approval for Maia s ANDA No. 208749 to be a date which is not any earlier than the expiration date of the 289 Patent, including any extensions of that date. COUNT II: INFRINGEMENT OF THE 289 PATENT DECLARATORY JUDGMENT 40. Fresenius Kabi incorporates and realleges paragraphs 1-39 above. 41. Fresenius Kabi brings claims arising under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. 2201 and 2202. 42. There is an actual case or controversy such that the Court may entertain Fresenius Kabi s request for declaratory relief consistent with Article III of the United States Constitution, and this actual case or controversy requires a declaration of rights by this Court. -7-

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 8 of 17 PageID #: 8 43. Maia has made, and will continue to make, substantial preparation in the United States to manufacture, use, offer to sell, sell, and/or import Maia s generic levothyroxine sodium product before the expiration of the 289 patent, including Maia s filing of ANDA No. 208749. 44. On information and belief, any commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, and/or importation of Maia s generic levothyroxine sodium product by Maia will directly infringe, contributorily infringe, and/or induce infringement of at least one claim of the 289 patent. 45. As a result of the foregoing facts, there is a real, substantial, and continuing justiciable controversy between Fresenius Kabi and Maia as to liability for the infringement of the 289 patent claims. Maia s actions have created for Fresenius Kabi a reasonable apprehension of irreparable harm and loss resulting from Maia s threatened imminent actions. 46. Fresenius Kabi is entitled to declaratory judgment that Maia s future commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, and/or import of Maia s generic levothyroxine sodium product will constitute infringement of one or more claims of the 289 patent under one or more provisions of 35 U.S.C. 271, including 271(a, (b, and/or (c. COUNT III: INFRINGEMENT OF THE 238 PATENT ANDA SUBMISSION 47. Fresenius Kabi incorporates and realleges paragraphs 1-46 above. 48. The submission of ANDA No. 208749 including a Paragraph IV certification regarding the 238 Patent was an act of infringement by Maia of one or more claims of the 238 Patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(e(2. 49. On information and belief, the use of ANDA Products in accordance with and as directed by the instructions contained in the proposed package insert of Maia s ANDA No. 208749 is covered by one or more claims of the 238 Patent. -8-

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 9 of 17 PageID #: 9 50. On information and belief, Maia s commercial importation, manufacture, use, sale, and/or offer for sale of the ANDA Products before the expiration of the 238 Patent would infringe, contribute to the infringement of, and/or induce the infringement of one or more claims of the 238 Patent. 51. On information and belief, the use of Maia s ANDA Products in accordance with and as directed by Maia s proposed labeling will infringe one or more claims of the 238 Patent. 52. On information and belief, by seeking approval to distribute the ANDA Products with their proposed labeling, Maia intends to cause others, specifically, for example, medical professionals and patients, to perform acts that Maia knows will infringe one or more claims of the 238 Patent. 53. On information and belief, unless enjoined by this Court, Maia plans and intends to, and will, actively induce infringement of one or more claims of the 238 Patent immediately following approval of ANDA No. 208749. 54. On information and belief, unless enjoined by this Court, Maia plans and intends to, and will, contribute to the infringement of one or more claims of the 238 Patent immediately following approval of ANDA No. 208749. 55. On information and belief, Maia knows that its ANDA No. 208749 and its proposed labeling are especially made or adapted for use in infringing one or more claims of the 238 Patent, and that the Maia ANDA Products and their proposed labeling are not suitable for any noninfringing use. 56. On information and belief, Maia s actions through the licensing, manufacture, use, import, offer for sale, and/or sale a generic levothyroxine sodium product pursuant to -9-

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 10 of 17 PageID #: 10 ANDA No. 208749 will directly infringe, contributorily infringe, and/or induce infringement of at least one claim of the 238 patent. 57. On information and belief, Maia has been aware of the existence of the 238 Patent since before the submission of ANDA No. 208749. 58. On information and belief, Maia has no reasonable basis for believing that its ANDA Products will not infringe one or more valid claims of the 238 Patent and no reasonable basis for believing that the infringed claims are invalid. Maia posited no theory of noninfringement in its Notice Letter concerning the 238 Patent. 59. This case is exceptional, as that term is used in 35 U.S.C. 285. 60. On information and belief, unless enjoined by this Court, Maia plans and intends to engage in the manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, marketing, distribution, and/or importation of the ANDA Products with their proposed labeling immediately following approval of ANDA No. 208749 and before the expiration of the 238 Patent. 61. The acts of infringement by Maia set forth above will cause Fresenius Kabi irreparable harm for which it has no adequate remedy at law, and those acts will continue unless enjoined by this Court. 62. Fresenius Kabi is entitled to the relief provided by 35 U.S.C. 271(e(4, including, inter alia, an order of this Court that the FDA set the effective date of approval for Maia s ANDA No. 208749 to be a date which is not any earlier than the expiration date of the 238 Patent, including any extensions of that date. COUNT IV: INFRINGEMENT OF THE 238 PATENT DECLARATORY JUDGMENT 63. Fresenius Kabi incorporates and realleges paragraphs 1-62 above. 64. Fresenius Kabi brings claims arising under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. 2201 and 2202. -10-

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 11 of 17 PageID #: 11 65. There is an actual case or controversy such that the Court may entertain Fresenius Kabi s request for declaratory relief consistent with Article III of the United States Constitution, and this actual case or controversy requires a declaration of rights by this Court. 66. Maia has made, and will continue to make, substantial preparation in the United States to manufacture, use, offer to sell, sell, and/or import Maia s generic levothyroxine sodium product before the expiration of the 238 patent, including Maia s filing of ANDA No. 208749. 67. On information and belief, any commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, and/or importation of Maia s generic levothyroxine sodium product by Maia will directly infringe, contributorily infringe, and/or induce infringement of at least one claim of the 238 patent. 68. As a result of the foregoing facts, there is a real, substantial, and continuing justiciable controversy between Fresenius Kabi and Maia as to liability for the infringement of the 238 patent claims. Maia s actions have created for Fresenius Kabi a reasonable apprehension of irreparable harm and loss resulting from Maia s threatened imminent actions. 69. Fresenius Kabi is entitled to declaratory judgment that Maia s future commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, and/or import of Maia s generic levothyroxine sodium product will constitute infringement of one or more claims of the 238 patent under one or more provisions of 35 U.S.C. 271, including 271(a, (b, and/or (c. COUNT V: INFRINGEMENT OF THE 239 PATENT ANDA SUBMISSION 70. Fresenius Kabi incorporates and realleges paragraphs 1-69 above. 71. The submission of ANDA No. 208749 including a Paragraph IV certification regarding the 239 Patent was an act of infringement by Maia of one or more claims of the 239 Patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(e(2. -11-

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 12 of 17 PageID #: 12 72. On information and belief, the use of ANDA Products in accordance with and as directed by the instructions contained in the proposed package insert of Maia s ANDA No. 208749 is covered by one or more claims of the 239 Patent. 73. On information and belief, Maia s commercial importation, manufacture, use, sale, and/or offer for sale of the ANDA Products before the expiration of the 239 Patent would infringe, contribute to the infringement of, and/or induce the infringement of one or more claims of the 239 Patent. 74. On information and belief, the use of Maia s ANDA Products in accordance with and as directed by Maia s proposed labeling will infringe one or more claims of the 239 Patent. 75. On information and belief, by seeking approval to distribute the ANDA Products with their proposed labeling, Maia intends to cause others, specifically, for example, medical professionals and patients, to perform acts that Maia knows will infringe one or more claims of the 239 Patent. 76. On information and belief, unless enjoined by this Court, Maia plans and intends to, and will, actively induce infringement of one or more claims of the 239 Patent immediately following approval of ANDA No. 208749. 77. On information and belief, unless enjoined by this Court, Maia plans and intends to, and will, contribute to the infringement of one or more claims of the 239 Patent immediately following approval of ANDA No. 208749. 78. On information and belief, Maia knows that its ANDA No. 208749 and its proposed labeling are especially made or adapted for use in infringing one or more claims of the 239 Patent, and that the Maia ANDA Products and their proposed labeling are not suitable for any noninfringing use. -12-

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 13 of 17 PageID #: 13 79. On information and belief, Maia s actions through the licensing, manufacture, use, import, offer for sale, and/or sale a generic levothyroxine sodium product pursuant to ANDA No. 208749 will directly infringe, contributorily infringe, and/or induce infringement of at least one claim of the 239 patent. 80. On information and belief, Maia has been aware of the existence of the 239 Patent since before the submission of ANDA No. 208749. 81. On information and belief, Maia has no reasonable basis for believing that its ANDA Products will not infringe one or more valid claims of the 239 Patent and no reasonable basis for believing that the infringed claims are invalid. Maia posited no theory of noninfringement in its Notice Letter concerning the 239 Patent. 82. This case is exceptional, as that term is used in 35 U.S.C. 285. 83. On information and belief, unless enjoined by this Court, Maia plans and intends to engage in the manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, marketing, distribution, and/or importation of the ANDA Products with their proposed labeling immediately following approval of ANDA No. 208749 and before the expiration of the 239 Patent. 84. The acts of infringement by Maia set forth above will cause Fresenius Kabi irreparable harm for which it has no adequate remedy at law, and those acts will continue unless enjoined by this Court. 85. Fresenius Kabi is entitled to the relief provided by 35 U.S.C. 271(e(4, including, inter alia, an order of this Court that the FDA set the effective date of approval for Maia s ANDA No. 208749 to be a date which is not any earlier than the expiration date of the 239 Patent, including any extensions of that date. COUNT VI: INFRINGEMENT OF THE 239 PATENT DECLARATORY JUDGMENT 86. Fresenius Kabi incorporates and realleges paragraphs 1-85 above. -13-

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 14 of 17 PageID #: 14 87. Fresenius Kabi brings claims arising under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. 2201 and 2202. 88. There is an actual case or controversy such that the Court may entertain Fresenius Kabi s request for declaratory relief consistent with Article III of the United States Constitution, and this actual case or controversy requires a declaration of rights by this Court. 89. Maia has made, and will continue to make, substantial preparation in the United States to manufacture, use, offer to sell, sell, and/or import Maia s generic levothyroxine sodium product before the expiration of the 239 patent, including Maia s filing of ANDA No. 208749. 90. On information and belief, any commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, and/or importation of Maia s generic levothyroxine sodium product by Maia will directly infringe, contributorily infringe, and/or induce infringement of at least one claim of the 239 patent. 91. As a result of the foregoing facts, there is a real, substantial, and continuing justiciable controversy between Fresenius Kabi and Maia as to liability for the infringement of the 239 patent claims. Maia s actions have created for Fresenius Kabi a reasonable apprehension of irreparable harm and loss resulting from Maia s threatened imminent actions. 92. Fresenius Kabi is entitled to declaratory judgment that Maia s future commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, and/or import of Maia s generic levothyroxine sodium product will constitute infringement of one or more claims of the 239 patent under one or more provisions of 35 U.S.C. 271, including 271(a, (b, and/or (c. RELIEF SOUGHT WHEREFORE, Fresenius Kabi respectfully requests the following relief: A. Judgment in favor of Fresenius Kabi and against Maia; -14-

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 15 of 17 PageID #: 15 B. Judgment that Maia has infringed, literally or by the doctrine of equivalents, each of the 289 Patent, the 238 Patent, and the 239 Patent by the submission of ANDA No. 208749, and that the commercial importation, sale, offer for sale, use, and/or manufacture of the ANDA Products, in the United States, would infringe, induce infringement of, and/or contribute to the infringement of each of the 289 Patent, the 238 Patent, and the 239 Patent; C. Judgment, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(e(4(A and other provisions of 35 U.S.C. 271, that the effective date of approval of ANDA No. 207670 under 505(j of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j, shall be a date not earlier than the latest date of expiration of the 289 Patent, the 238 Patent, or the 239 Patent, plus any additional periods of exclusivity; D. A preliminary and permanent injunction, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271 and 283 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65, enjoining Maia, and its officers, partners, agents, servants, employees, parents, subsidiaries, divisions, affiliate corporations, other related business entities and all other persons acting in concert, participation, or in privity with them, and their successors and assigns, from any commercial manufacture, use, offer to sell, or sale within the United States, or importation into the United States, of any ANDA Products, and any product that is similar to or only colorably different from those products, before the latest date of expiration of any of the 289 Patent, the 238 Patent, and the 239 Patent, and any additional periods of exclusivity; E. A declaration that this is an exceptional case and an award to Fresenius Kabi of its reasonable attorneys fees and expenses, as provided by 35 U.S.C. 271(e(4 and 285; -15-

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 16 of 17 PageID #: 16 F. Damages or other monetary relief, including prejudgment and postjudgment interest, if Maia engages in the commercial manufacture, use, offering to sell, sale, marketing, distribution, or importation of ANDA Products, or any other products that the use of which would infringe the 289 Patent, the 238 Patent, and/or the 239 Patent, or the inducement of or contribution to the foregoing, prior to the expiration of the 289 Patent, the 238 Patent, and the 239 Patent; G. An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on each and every award; H. An award of Fresenius Kabi s taxable costs in bringing and prosecuting this action; and I. Such other and further relief to Fresenius Kabi as this Court may deem just and proper. -16-

Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 17 of 17 PageID #: 17 Dated: April 7, 2016 OF COUNSEL: Imron T. Aly SCHIFF HARDIN LLP 233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 6600 Chicago, Illinois 60606 (312 258-5500 John K. Hsu SCHIFF HARDIN LLP 901 K Street NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20001 Gina M. Bassi Christine W. Feller Ahmed M.T. Riaz SCHIFF HARDIN LLP 666 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1700 New York, NY 10103 Respectfully submitted, FARNAN LLP /s/ Brian E. Farnan Brian E. Farnan (Bar No. 4089 Michael J. Farnan (Bar No. 5165 919 North Market Street, 12th Floor Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Telephone: (302 777-0300 Facsimile: (302 777-0301 bfarnan@farnanlaw.com mfarnan@farnanlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC -17-