IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 07/18/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 5 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Case No.

Case 1:16-cv EGS Document 14 Filed 07/12/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiff,

Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 07/06/12 Page 1of6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Nos , ,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/19/18 Page 2 of 10

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/23/18 Page 2 of Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(e) and 5 U.S.C.

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA PLAINTIFF'S EXPEDITED MOTION FOR REHEARING

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/08/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 06/25/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/17/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/19/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

cij;'l~jl NO~ AC..

Case 1:14-cv RLW Document 1 Filed 01/13/14 Page 1 of 6 COMPLAINT

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/29/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2013 Page 1 of 17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION ) STUDIES, ) 1629 K Street, NW, Suite 600, ) Washington, DC 20

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Introduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMPLAINT

Case 1:15-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/20/2015 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:17-cv RC Document 8 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 05/06/16 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/23/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. Introduction

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:19-cv PKC Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

Case 1:04-cv HHK Document 48 Filed 02/14/2006 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/19/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

rdd Doc 79 Filed 06/13/17 Entered 06/13/17 09:06:30 Main Document Pg 1 of 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT. 1. This is an action for direct patent infringement of United States Letters Patent Nos.

Courthouse News Service

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY. No.

4:14-cv MAG-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 04/03/14 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/20/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 1:12-cv BAH Document 8-1 Filed 07/24/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:10-cv FLW-DEA Document 48 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 1147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/21/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv M Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 10 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Transcription:

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FREEDOM WATCH, INC. 2775 NW 49th Ave, Suite 205-345 Ocala, Fl 34483, v. Plaintiff, THE HONORABLE BARACK OBAMA President of the United States of America The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20006 as De Facto Chairman of the Defendant Advisory Committee, Civil Action No. 5:13-CV-26-OC-22PRC THE HONORABLE JOSEPH R. BIDEN Vice President of the United States and Chairman of the OBAMA GUN CONTROL TASK FORCE, Old Executive Office Building Washington, DC 20501, OBAMA GUN CONTROL TASK FORCE c/o Eisenhower Executive Office Building Washington, D.C. 20501, JOHN AND JANE DOE NOS. 1-99, Certain Unknown Non-Federal Employees, and/or Members of the Obama Gun Control Task Force, Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Freedom Watch, Inc., hereby files this complaint for compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2 ( FACA ). As grounds therefore, Plaintiff alleges as follows: 1

JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1346(a)(2) (United States as defendant), and 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B) (FOIA). 2. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B). PARTIES 3. Plaintiff conducts business and has a presence in Ocala, Florida. Plaintiff requested certain documents pursuant to the FACA and FOIA and intends to disseminate the requested information and documents to its supporters and benefactors, government officials, appropriate news media, and to the American public at large. 4. Defendant Obama Gun Control Task Force ( OGCTF ) is an agency and entity of the United States Government. Defendant OGCTF was created by President Barack H. Obama and is headed by Vice President Joseph R. Biden to develop proposals for gun control legislation. 5. Defendant Barack H. Obama ( Obama ) is the President of the United States. Defendant Obama formed the Obama Gun Control Task Force. 6. Defendant Joseph R. Biden is the Vice President of the United States and has been appointed the chairman of the Gun Control Task Force by President Obama. 7. John and Jane Does Nos. 1-99 are currently unknown, non-federal employees who are members of the OGCTF. 2

STATEMENT OF FACTS 8. After the tragic Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting of December 14, 2012 President Obama established and directed the OGCTF on December 19, 2012, with the goal of gathering information and advising the president on matters related to possible gun control legislation and the use of executive orders to limit and infringe gun ownership rights under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. 9. By designating this newly formed task force, which is a presidential advisory committee, de jure and/or de facto, Defendant Obama has made the meetings subject to the provisions of FACA. 10. Pursuant to FACA, an advisory committee must publish within the Federal Registry notice of any meeting fifteen days prior to that meeting, and the meetings must be made open to members of the public who seek access pursuant to FACA, as Plaintiff did herein. 11. The first meeting of the OGCTF was held on December 20, 2012 a single day after its creation, without the required notice requirements having been met being posted in the Federal Registry. 12. It has been widely reported and disclosed by the national media that non-federal employees, including lobbyists from the video game industry, Walmart, and other private lobbyists (John and Jane Does 1-99), fully participated in non-public meetings of the OGCTF as if they were members of the OGCTF, and, in fact, were members of the OGCTF. 13. On January 7, 2013, Plaintiff served a letter to President Obama, pursuant to the provisions the FACA, 5 U.S.C. 552 and App.2, requesting copies of all minutes and 3

final decision documents of OGCTF meetings from the inception of OGCTF to the present. See January 7, 2013 Letter to The Hon. Barack Obama, attached as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein by reference. Plaintiff also sought to attend all future meetings of the OGCTF pursuant to the FACA, and asked to be provided with future meeting schedules and contact information so that representatives of Plaintiff could attend these meetings. 14. Plaintiff also requested all minutes and documents from the OGCTF. 15. The OGCTF has failed to produce any and all documents that are required under FACA. COUNT I (Violation of the Federal Advisory Committee Act) 16. Plaintiff incorporates by paragraphs 1-16 as if fully set forth herein. 17. The OGCTF is a federal advisory committee as defined under the FACA, 5 U.S.C. App.2, and as such is required to comply with all provisions of that law, including, but not limited to, filing a charter, allowing interested persons--such as Plaintiff--to attend and have input at meetings of the OGCTF, producing documents and other things and having open meetings in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. 552, et. seq, publishing notice of all future meetings in the Federal Register, and having a board that is fairly balanced in terms of the points of view represented. 18. Plaintiff has made a request to the OGCTF that representatives of Plaintiff be allowed to attend and participate in meetings of the OGCTF, that they be given copies of certain OGCTF documents, and the OGCTF appoint at least one person with a different point of view, among other matters. See Exhibit 1. 4

19. Defendant OGCTF has thus far failed and refused to accede to Plaintiff s request by providing the requisite 15 days notice and allowing Plaintiff access to and participation at the meetings. 20. The failure of Defendants to comply with the FACA has harmed Plaintiff in that Plaintiff has as one of its primary functions the monitoring and safeguarding of the public trust and interest. The activities of the Defendants in this case have thus far deprived Plaintiff of its right, granted by the FACA, to participate in meetings held by the OGCTF, to have advance notice of those meetings, and to have a voice in the affairs of the OGCTF on behalf of the American people. The acts of Defendants have thus frustrated Plaintiff s ability to effectively carry out its purpose of promoting and protecting justice and social welfare, including, among other things, preventing abuse and violation of the public trust and interest by federal officers, officials, employees, agents, and/or persons acting in concert with them. 21. As an interested party and a representative of the public, Plaintiff has been and continues to be damaged by the operations of the OGCTF. Public confidence in the integrity of the Presidency and the Executive Branch as a whole has been and will be harmed by the appearance that the President and the Obama Administration as a whole are under the influence of, or are promising favors to, a select few special interests but not the American people as a whole. Members of Defendant OGCTF also gain influence or favor with the executive branch to the detriment of others who do not participate in the OGCTF. 5

22. Plaintiff and the American people which it represents will continue to suffer permanent and irreparable injury unless operation of the OGCTF is brought into compliance with the provisions of the FACA. COUNT II (Violation of the Freedom of Information Act Provisions Incorporated Into FACA) 23. Plaintiff incorporates by paragraphs 1-22 as if fully set forth herein. 24. On January 7, 2013 Plaintiff delivered to Defendants a letter which requested all minutes and other documents and records produced out of the OGCTF. 25. Defendants have failed and refused to comply with Plaintiff s request. 26. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(C) and 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(E)(ii)(I), Plaintiff shall be deemed to have exhausted its administrative remedies with respect to its request to Defendant. 27. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3), Plaintiff has a right of access to the information and documents and records requested in its FOIA request, and Defendants have no legal basis for refusing to disclose this information and these documents and records to Plaintiff. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays: I. that Defendant OGCTF be found in violation of the FACA and that Defendants be enjoined, pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, from holding meetings while it continues to be in violation of the FACA; II. that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1361 and other applicable laws, a writ of mandamus issue compelling Defendant OGCTF to comply with the FACA; 6

III. that the court issue an order enjoining the Obama Gun Control Task Force from conducting any more meetings; IV. that the court issue an order that this Task Force be shut down immediately as it is illegally in violation of FACA laws; V. that this court enjoin the issuance and implementation of the recommendations of the Gun Control Task Force, and the executive orders and other executive actions that were issued and put into effect thereafter as a result of these recommendations which were issued on or about January 16, 2013; VI. that this court issue an order demanding that any and all requested documents and records from the OGCTF be produced immediately to Plaintiff and thus the American people; VII. VIII. that Plaintiff be awarded the attorneys fees and costs of bringing this suit; any and all other relief the Court deems just or proper. Respectfully submitted, FREEDOM WATCH, INC. /s/ Larry Klayman Larry Klayman, Esq. Florida Bar No. 246220 2775 NW 49th Ave, Suite 205-345 Ocala, FL 34483 (310) - 595-0800 leklayman@gmail.com Attorney for Plaintiff 7

Exhibit 1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 30th day of January, 2013 a true and correct copy of the foregoing Amended Complaint (Civil Action Number 5:13-CV-26-OC-22PRC) was submitted electronically to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida and served upon the following: Via U.S. Mail: THE HONORABLE BARACK OBAMA President of the United States of America The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20006 THE HONORABLE JOSEPH R. BIDEN Vice President of the United States and Chairman of the OBAMA GUN CONTROL TASK FORCE, Old Executive Office Building Washington, DC 20501, OBAMA GUN CONTROL TASK FORCE c/o Eisenhower Executive Office Building Washington, D.C. 20501, Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Larry Klayman Larry Klayman, Esq. Florida Bar No. 246220 2775 NW 49th Ave, Suite 205-345 Ocala, FL 34483 (310) - 595-0800 leklayman@gmail.com Attorney for Plaintiff