ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of American Canyon unanimously recommended approval of the proposed ordinance; and

Similar documents
Planning Commission Staff Report Planning Commission Hearing on December 3, 2015 Page 2 of 6 Planning Commission Staff Report Planning Commission Hear

ORDINANCE # NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the City Council of the City of American Canyon as follows:

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

ORDINANCE NO. 08- THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MISSION VIEJO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

NEW BUSINESS Agenda Item No. : 8b CC Mtg. : 7/12/2005

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CHICKEN HEN AND RABBIT PERMITS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL LIMITS

ORDINANCE NO. 730 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALISTOGA AMENDING THE CALISTOGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 8

AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ADDING CHAPTER 6

City of Grass Valley ilw_:. [:] Agenda Action Sheet. Joe C. Heckel, Community Development Direct Thomas Last, Planning Director

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1312

ORDINANCE An Ordinance Amending Chapter 164 of the City of Ithaca Municipal Code

City of Calistoga Staff Report

Appendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance

Rooster Keeping Operations (keeping of 5 or more roosters)

purpose of regulating electronically amplified loud and raucous noise within the City of Santa Ana.

CITY OF HEMET Hemet, California ORDINANCE NO. 1850

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

Laguna Niguel Nuisance Animals

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CASA GRANDE, ARIZONA: Permitting or Encouraging Underage Drinking

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Yolo hereby ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of San Rafael General Plan 2020 contains the following goals and policies:

ORDINANCE NO C.S.

Public hearing to adopt Ordinance 1375 C.S. amending Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Martinez Municipal Code

CITY OF SAGINAW ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCATA AMENDING THE ADMINISTRATION CITATION PROCEDURE OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE

ORDINANCE NO.1376 C.S. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARTINEZ DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

in Sections et seq. of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; herein the State Fireworks Law")

Subject: Amending the Martinez Municipal Code Title 8, Health and Safety, and Title 9, Public Peace, Morals and Welfare

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CONCORD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 66, (OFFENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS), ARTICLE III (CURFEW FOR MINORS)

ORDINANCE NO: AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE, REPAIR, OR DEMOLISH UNSAFE STRUCTURES

AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SPARKS AMENDING TITLE 20 TO INCLUDE STANDARDS FOR URBAN AGRICULTURE AND OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO.

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 18

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION OF CHAPTER ( PARKING AND

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE AMENDING SECTIONS 35-2 AND 35-5 TO CHAPTER 35 OF THE BUTTE COUNTY CODE ENTITLED THE RIGHT TO FARM ORDINANCE.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LA HABRA, CALIFORNIA REPEALING AND REPLACING SECTIONS AND OF CHAPTER 18.

There are no direct fiscal impacts associated with the staff recommendation.

(City Council Series) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA BANNING NON-RECYCLABLE PLASTIC DISPOSABLE FOOD SERVICE CONTAINERS

ORDINANCE NO. O

AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION TO THE EL DORADO COUNTY CODE PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES

RESOLUTION NO

SCC NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF SHOPPING CARTS

Item 8C 1 of 17

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Manteca does ordain as follows:

COUNTY OF DEL NORTE Washington Boulevard Crescent City, California Phone (707) FAX (707)

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Napa, State of California, ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE NO The Board ofsupervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ELDORADO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Perris City Council wishes to remove the bond requirement from the application process; and

ORDINANCE NO. 725 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 725

/ 8 ~Qb ORDINANCE NO.

TRINITY COUNTY. Board Item Request Form Phone

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Perris hereby ordains as follows:

Ordinance No. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS: 1.

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE AMENDING PACIFIC GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9.16 RELATING TO SOLID WASTE COLLECTION

IMPERIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM

SCC NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO TOBACCO RETAILERS

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL

ORDINANCE NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. February 9, 2010

Attachment 2. Planning Commission Resolution No Recommending a Zone Text Amendment

(Published in the Tulsa Daily Commerce & Legal News,, 2011) ORDINANCE NO.

CITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

Chicken Keeping Registration Application City of Eden Prairie

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. 553 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: April 18, City Council. FROM: Regan M. Candelario, City Manager. PRESENTER: Claudia Laughter, City Clerk

1. Adopt an ordinance amending the Santa Ana Municipal Code for additional remedies for Code Enforcement violations.

ORDINANCE NO Town of Rising Sun. Cecil County, Maryland

24 in the manufacture of honey oil where such activity presents grave dangers and adverse health risks 25

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Grover Beach is a General Law city organized pursuant to Article XI of the California Constitution; and

Definitions Permit and Exemptions

AGENDA REPORT. Meeting Date: August 18, Item Number: E 1. To: Honorable Mayor & City Council. From: Laurence S. Wiener, City Attorney

SCC NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County Of Sacramento ordains as follows:

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

Agenda Item A.2 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: June 16, 2009

Gerald L. Hobrecht, City Attorney (Staff Contacts: Gerald Hobrecht (707) and Scott Whitehouse, (707) )

Title 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

BILL NO ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO. 980 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANCASTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 7

Ordinance No. 10- BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS: 1.

This ordinance makes various maintenance revisions to the Vacaville Municipal Code ( VMC or Code ). Briefly, the revisions are as follows:

ORDINANCE NO R

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, State of California, do ordain as follows:

ANN ARBOR CITY APPROVAL NOTICE ORDINANCE NO. ORD ANIMALS (ADDITION OF DUCKS TO THE REFERENCED SECTIONS)

STAFF REPORT JIM COPSEY, CHIEF OF POLICE/ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

ORDINANCE NO. 7,437-N.S. ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 9.92 TO THE BERKELEY MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING OFF-STREET PARKING LOTS

ORDINANCE 474. WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that timely inspections are the most efficient method of minimizing such hazards; and

CITY Of RANCHO SANTA MAR GAR IT A CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

AGENDA BILL. Beaverton City Council Beaverton, Oregon

timely access to information opportunities to address the various legislative bodies prior to decisions being made and easy and timely

Ordinance No. WHEREAS, certain wildlife such as birds and coyotes pose a significant danger to incoming and outgoing flights; and

BRUCE TOWNSHIP MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4673

Transcription:

ORDINANCE 2014- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A NEW MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 6.13 TO PROVIDE NEW REGULATIONS ON THE KEEPING OF ROOSTERS IN THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON WHEREAS, the City of American Canyon does not have any regulations in the municipal code related to the keeping of large quantities of roosters; and WHEREAS, though cockfighting is illegal in all 50 states, it continues in backyards, rural ranches and other places tucked away from law enforcement s eyes. Law enforcement strives to enforce laws that prohibit cockfighting, but as long as large numbers of roosters are permitted on property, jurisdictions without regulations will lure these activities from other places where there is more stringent enforcement of cockfighting laws; and WHEREAS, in an effort to control the incidence of illegal cockfighting in Napa County, the County Sheriff s Department and animal activists supported adoption of an ordinance that will take effect on April 15, 2014 that regulates the keeping of roosters on private property in unincorporated Napa County; and WHEREAS, with the County s rooster keeping ordinance becoming effective on April 15, 2014, there is a risk that large concentrations of roosters no longer permitted in the County will be relocated to American Canyon thereby bringing negative consequences to American Canyon; and WHEREAS, by restricting a single parcel to no more than 4 roosters, the proposed ordinance is not intended to impact American Canyon residents that may have a rooster on their property along with a small quantity of chickens for the benefit of organic, locally grown eggs; and WHEREAS, the proposed ordinance will exempt legitimate local farm-to-food service organizations, such as Future Farmers of America and the 4-H Club from the 4-rooster limitation; and WHEREAS, the proposed Municipal Code Chapter 6.13 would establish regulations for appropriate rooster keeping within the City of American Canyon; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of American Canyon unanimously recommended approval of the proposed ordinance; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council of the City of American Canyon on June 17, 2014 after due notice was given as required by law, at which time oral and documentary evidence was introduced along with the written recommendation of the Community Development Department staff of the City of American Canyon. ATTACHMENT 1

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMERICAN CANYON CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 6.13 AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The adoption of the proposed ordinance is not a project that has the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment and therefore is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In addition, the proposed ordinance amendment is exempt under the definition of Project in Section 15378 (b)(3) in that it concerns general policy and procedure making. SECTION 2. American Canyon Municipal Code Chapter 6.13, Rooster Keeping, is hereby added to the Municipal Code: Chapter 6.13 KEEPING OF ROOSTERS Sections: 6.13.010 Purpose. 6.13.020 Definitions. 6.13.030 Rooster keeping. 6.13.040 Tethering prohibited. 6.13.050 Liability and enforcement. 6.13.010 Purpose. The intent of this chapter is to limit the number of roosters that may be kept on a single legal parcel, to eliminate the potential for public nuisance, illegal cockfighting and the raising of birds to be used for cockfighting, and for the protection of the health and safety of the residents of American Canyon. 6.13.020 Definitions. Unless the context requires otherwise, the definitions in this section shall govern the interpretation of the provisions of this chapter. A. "Agricultural commissioner" means the Napa County agricultural commissioner-sealer of weights and measures, or the agricultural commissioner's designees. B. City means the City of American Canyon C. Cockfighting is the practice of setting two male birds or roosters to fight each other.

D. "Rooster" means any male chicken which has any one of the following characteristics: 1. Six months or older; 2. Has full adult plumage; 3. Capable of crowing. 6.13.030 Rooster keeping. A. The number of roosters that may be raised or kept on any property within the City of American Canyon is limited in accordance with the following schedule: Parcel Size Less than 0.5 acres Maximum # Roosters No (0) Roosters 0.5 acres to 1.5 acres One (1) Rooster Greater than 1.5 acres Four (4) Roosters B. Rooster enclosures shall have a minimum set back from adjacent residences of one hundred & fifty (150) feet. C. This section shall not apply to commercial poultry ranches whose primary commodity is the production of eggs or meat for sale as permitted by the City, public or private schools as registered with the California Department of Education, Future Farmers of America (FFA) or 4-H sponsored projects, or to legitimate poultry hobbyists as approved in writing by the agricultural commissioner. D. Each individual rooster beyond the rooster limitation in subsection (A) above constitutes a separate violation. E. No rooster may kept on property so that it constitutes a nuisance in accordance with Chapter 8.12 of the Municipal Code (Community Noise Ordinance). F. Nothing in the foregoing is to be construed as approving the keeping of any poultry in contravention of any statute, zoning ordinance, or other law. G. At all times, roosters shall be provided: 1. Access to water and shelter from the elements (rain, wind, direct sun, etc.); 2. Sufficient room to spread both wings fully and to be able to turn in a complete circle without any impediment and without touching the side of an enclosure; and

3. Clean and sanitary premises that are kept in good repair. H. The agricultural commissioner shall establish written standards necessary to carry out the intent of this chapter and may condition any approval based on compliance with the written regulations and standards. Failure of any property owner and any person occupying or leasing the property to comply with any of the provisions of this chapter or applicable law, or the regulations and standards of the agricultural commissioner shall constitute good cause for the denial of any approval, either original or renewal, or for its revocation. 6.13.040 Tethering prohibited. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall maintain any rooster by means of a tether attached to an object. Each individual rooster so tethered constitutes a separate violation. 6.13.050 Liability and enforcement. A. Any person who violates any of the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of either an infraction or a misdemeanor. B. In addition to the penalties set forth in subsection (A), violators of this chapter may be subject to a public nuisance abatement action brought under the provisions of Section 9.12 and the civil penalty provisions as provided in subsection (D) of Section 9.12.030 and may also be subject to an unfair competition action brought pursuant to Business and Professions Code Section 17200 et. seq and up to two thousand five hundred dollars civil penalty per violation. C. The civil remedies and penalties provided by this subsection are cumulative to each other. SECTION 3. Severability. If any section, sub-section, subdivision, paragraph, clause or phrase in this Ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections or portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, sub-section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence clause or phrase of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases may be declared invalid or unconstitutional., is for any reason held to in invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 4. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest thereto and shall within fifteen days of its adoption cause a summary of it to be

published in a newspaper and circulated in the City and thereupon and thereafter this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force according to law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of American Canyon on the 15th day of July, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Leon Garcia, Mayor ATTEST: Rebekah Barr, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: William D. Ross, City Attorney