BEFORE THE MUNICIPAL BOARD OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Gerald J. Isaacs Robert W. Johnson Thomas J. Simmons Gerald Tiedeman Rosemary Ahmann

Similar documents
BEFORE THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Robert 'l Johnson Thomas R. Byrne Edward L. Henry Leo B. Gambrino Keith H.

NC General Statutes - Chapter 153A Article 16 1

CITY OF NEW MEADOWS ORDINANCE NO

July 5, 2011 RESOLUTION NO : APPROVAL OF COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS

CHAPTER 442A SANITARY DISTRICTS

AGENDA MEMORANDUM. Executive Summary

SALT LAKE COUNTY ORDINANCE. Ordinance No. Date, 2015 MOUNTAINOUS PLANNING DISTRICT AND PLANNING COMMISSION

ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE COUNTY BOARD. Office of the County Auditor/Treasurer of Kandiyohi County, Willmar, Minnesota.

Municipal Annexation, Incorporation and Other Boundary Changes

ORDINANCE NO (2011)

Municipal Annexation, Incorporation and Other Boundary Changes

CHAPTER 7 ANNEXATION Chapter Outline

PETITION FOR ANNEXATION THE VILLAGE BOARD AND VILLAGE CLERK OF THE VILLAGE OF WADSWORTH, LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS.

ORDINANCE NO. 103, FOURTH SERIES

PETITION FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION NON-CONTIGUOUS LAND

BOUNDARY COMMISSION St. Louis County, Missouri RULES

AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SPECIAL USE IN THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE, COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS

M E M O R A N D U M. 10 S. Higgins County rezoning and annexation

ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE COUNTY BOARD. Office of the County Auditor/Treasurer of Kandiyohi County, Willmar, Minnesota.

AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 1086

MINOR SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT IN JOHNSON COUNTY:

Kent Studebaker, Mayor Members of the City Council. Paul Espe, Associate Planner. Ordinance Annexing Property at 5022 Upper Drive (AN )

This day there came on for hearing and determination by the Board of Supervisors

PETITION FOR ANNEXATION

Registered number of application.. Date complete application received.. Receipt No. dated. $...fee submitted

ARKANSAS ANNEXATION LAW DRAFT #4 (1/1/2013) Subchapter 1 General Provisions [Reserved]

ELKHART COUNTY PLAN COMMISSION Rules of Procedure

St. Louis City Ordinance 63154

Washington County King City Urban Planning Area Agreement

CHAPTER House Bill No. 1603

CHAPTER 18 SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL PART 1 PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM

Chantilly Highlands Homes Association Articles of Incorporation

ORDINANCE NO

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. J. R. No A J O I N T R E S O L U T I O N

CITY OF WARRENVILLE DU PAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO ORDINANCE APPROVING PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT (JUSTIN MASON 29W602 BUTTERFIELD ROAD)

HOUSE BILL No AN ACT concerning city-county consolidation; authorizing the consolidation of the city of Wichita and Sedgwick county.

NC General Statutes - Chapter 160A Article 23 1

SECTION 9. FEEDLOT REGULATIONS

ANNEXATION 28E AGREEMENT

WORTHINGTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, AUGUST 28, 2017

ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 411 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS LEVY RESOLUTION NO. 965

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No

FIRST AMENDMENT TO CITY PLACE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

CHAPTER Council Substitute for House Bill No. 1315

CITY OF GIG HARBOR RESOLUTION NO. 479

Elena Lewis 457 Raphael Avenue. WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule Unit by virtue of the Illinois Constitution of 1970; and,

ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 411 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS LEVY RESOLUTION NO. 1029

HENRY COUNTY PRIVATE SEWAGE DISPOSAL ORDINANCE

LEGISLATION creating the SHELBY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION of SHELBY COUNTY, ALABAMA

HOUSTON TOWNSHIP c/o John Beckman, Chairman 6584 State 76 Houston, MN 55943

acknowledged by each person or entity having an interest in the territory proposed for

ORDINANCE NO E AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO THE CITY OF FISHERS, HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA

PETITION FOR ANNEXATION

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors hereby ordains: Section 1. Adoption.

Expedited Type 2 Annexations: Petitions By All Property Owners With or Without Consent of Municipality & Township(s)

Town of Lyons, Colorado Board of Trustees BOT Agenda Cover Sheet Agenda Item No: VIII-1, 2 & 3 Meeting Date: May 15, 2017

STARK COUNTY PRIVATE SEWAGE DISPOSAL ORDINANCE

CHAPTER House Bill No. 1555

STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

Municipal Annexation Procedure in West Virginia

SCHOOL BOARD BALLOT ISSUES. The School Board of the Chillicothe R-II School District may place issues on the ballot as needed or as required by law.

Chapter 503 Zoning Administration

BYLAWS ARK-TEX COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ARTICLE 1. Name and Organization

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT:

ORDINANCE # Adopted by County Board Action on April 23, COUNTY OF ANOKA Anoka County, Minnesota AMENDING SEWAGE TREATMENT ORDINANCE #80-1

NORTHSHORE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 417 KING AND SNOHOMISH COUNTIES, WASHINGTON RENEWAL EDUCATIONAL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS LEVY RESOLUTION NO.

2.2 This AGREEMENT applies to all annexations that are approved after the effective date of this AGREEMENT.

Regional Wastewater Treatment: Sanitary Districts and Cooperative Agreements

CITY OF SHELBYVILLE ANNEXATION PACKET SHELBYVILLE PLAN COMMISSION 44 WEST WASHINGTON STREET SHELBYVILLE, INDIANA OFFICE

ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE COUNTY BOARD. Office of the County Auditor/Treasurer of Kandiyohi County, Willmar, Minnesota.

Code of Ala *** Current through the end of the 2015 Regular Session and First Special Session (Acts 2015, No. 15-

TITLE 14 ZONING AND LAND USE CONTROL

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

PROTECTION AREA. Agriculture Protection Area Advisory Board. Utah County AGRICULTURE PROTECTION AREA

ARTICLE 15 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE AND ENFORCEMENT

Kennedy & Graven, Minneapolis, Minnesota City of Pine Island Staff NOTICE TO USER. This volume contains all City ordinances in effect EXCEPT.

O R D I N A N C E NO. 63. AN ORDINANCE calling and providing for the holding of a. special election in Subdistrict Number Two of the River des Peres

INSTRUCTIONS VACATION REQUEST

PRE-ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

Chapter 12 BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS

ORDINANCE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNTY BOARD OF DEKALB COUNTY, ILLINOIS, as follows:

AGENDA REQUEST AGENDA ITEM NO: IV.B.5. Consent Agenda No. 2. July 21, 2014 BY City Attorney Robert Fournier City Attorney Fournier SUBJECT:

LAKE HOLIDAY BY-LAWS

Resolution of the County Board of Kankakee County, Illinois

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

ONTARIO REGULATION 197/96 CONSENT APPLICATIONS

ORDINANCE F. WHEREAS, the petition bears the signature of all applicable parties; and

REZONING PROCESS REZONING PROCESS: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT POLICY STATEMENT

CHARTER OF THE CITY OF MT. HEALTHY, OHIO ARTICLE I INCORPORATION, POWERS, AND FORM OF GOVERNMENT

PRIVATE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS

BOUNDARY AGREEMENT VILLAGE OF WINDSOR TOWN OF VIENNA RECITALS

FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP YORK COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO

MUNICIPAL ANNEXATIONS

CHAPTER 212 TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON,

CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE NO. New Series

Joint Resolution between Citv of Gilbert and the Town of Fayal i;c] :, r. For Orderly Annexation pursuant to Minn. Stat.

COUNTY VOLUNTARY AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT & ENHANCED VOLUNTARY AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT ORDINANCE ( Draft) ARTICLE I TITLE

Transcription:

A-3155 Rochester BEFORE THE MUNICIPAL BOARD OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA Gerald J. Isaacs Robert W. Johnson Thomas J. Simmons Gerald Tiedeman Rosemary Ahmann Chairman Vice Chairman Member Ex-Officio Member Ex-Officio Member IN THE MATTER OF THE RESOLUTION ) FOR ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN LAND ) TO THE CITY OF ROCHESTER ) FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER The above-entitled matter came on for hearing before the Minnesota Municipal Board pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 414, as amended, on November 21, 1977, at Rochester, Minnesota. The hearing was conducted by William A. Neiman, Executive Secretary, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 414.01, Subd. 12. ex-officio member of the Board. Also in attendance was Gerald Tiedeman, The City of Rochester appeared by and through Gerald Swanson, and the Township of Rochester appeared by and through Franklin Michaels. were received. Testimony was heard and records and exhibits After due and careful consideration of all evidence, together with all records, files and proceedings, the Minnesota Municipal Board hereby makes and files the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. On May 19, 1977, a resolution of the annexing municipality was received by the Minnesota Municipal Board requesting the Board to order annexation of the area hereinafter described. This resolution contained all the information required by statute including a description of the territory subject to annexation which is as follows: Block 4, Highland Addition, including that portion of the abutting street right-of-way measured from the centerline thereof on the north, east, south, and west sides of said Block; according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Olmsted County, Minnesota. 2. Due, timely and adequate legal notice of the hearing was published, served and filed.

-2-3. Geographic Features a. The area subject to annexation is unincorporated and abuts the City of Rochester. b. The total area of the City of Rochester is 16.75 square miles. The total area of the territory subject to annexat i 0 n is 7. 57 acres and 2. 32 acres devoted to public street and alley right of way. c. The perimeter of the a rea to be annexed is bordered by a small percentage by the municipality. d. The natural terrain of the area, including general topography, major watersheds, soil conditions, rivers, lakes and major bluffs is as follows: flat land. 4. Population Data a. The City of Rochester 1) Past population growth: 1970-53,766 generally developed, 2) Present population: 1977-59,317 {estimated) 3) Projected population: 2,000-85,130 b. The area subject to annexation 1) Past population growth: slow growth 2) Present population: 20 3) Projected population: some growth possible 5. Development Issues a. What, if any, are the plans for the development of the prop~rty proposed for annexation and/or the annexing municipality, including development projected by the state planning agency? City of Rochester Land Use Plan is consistent with present use and will be applied for any future development. b. What land use controls are presently being employed. 1) In the City of Rochester: a. Zoning - Yes b. Subdivision regulations - Yes c. Housing and building codes - Yes 2) In the area to be annexed: a. Zoning - Olmsted County

-3- b. Subdivision regulationsc- Olmsted County c. Rousing and building codes - Olmsted County c. Land use of the following types is occurring in the area subject to annexation: a) Residential - Yes b) Industrial - No c) Commercial - Yes d) Institutional - Yes d. What will be the effect, if any, of the annexation on adjacent communities? 6. Governmental Services None. a. Presently, the Township of Rochester provides the area subject to annexation with the following services: 1) Water - No 5) Street Improvements - Yes 2) Sewer - No 6) Street Maintenance - Yes 3) Fire Protection - By 7) Recreational - Unknown contract with city. 4) Police Protection - No b. Presently, the City of Rochester provides its citizens with the following services: 1 ) Water - Yes 5) Street Improvements - Yes 2) Sewer - Yes 6) Street Maintenance - Yes 3) Fire Protection - Yes 7) Recreational - Yes 4) Police Protection - Yes c. Presently, the City of Rochester provides the area subject to annexation with the following services: 1 ) Water - Yes, to 5) Street Improvements - No part of the area. 6) Street Maintenance - No 2) Sewer - Yes, to part of the area. 7) Recreational - Yes 3) Fire Protection - By contract with township. 4) Police Protection - No d. Plans to extend municipal services to the area subject to annexation include the following: all services, including utilities, can be extended soon after annexation. Several property owners have requested said services.

-4- e. There are existing or potential pollution problems which are: Wells have become polluted by septic tanks. 7. Fiscal Data a. In the City of Rochester, the mill rate as of 1977 is 105.25 and the bonded indebtedness as of 1977 is $6,885,000. b. In the area subject to annexation, the assessed valuation as of 1977 is $154,317. c. Will the annexation have any effect upon area school districts? No. 8. Is annexation to the City of Rochester the best alternative. a. Could governmental services be better provided for by incorporation of the are~ subject to annexation? No. b. Could governmental services be better provided for by consolidation or annexation of the area with an adjacent municipality other than Rochester? No. c. Could Rochester Township provide the services required? No. d. Can Rochester Township continue to function without the area subject to annexation, and, if not, could it be incorporated separately or combined with some other governmental unit? Yes, the township was not opposed to the proposal. 9. A majority of property owners in the area to be annexed have petitioned the Minnesota Municipal Board supporting annexation. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The Minnesota Municipal Board duly acquired and now has jurisdiction of the within proceeding. 2. The area subject to annexation is now or is about to become urban or suburban in character. 3. Municipal government is required to protect the public health, safety, and welfare in the area subject to annexation. 4. The best interest of the City of Rochester and the area subject to annexation will be furthered by annexation. 5. The remainder of the Township of Rochester can carry on the functions of government without undue hardship.

- 5-6. There is a reasonable relationship between the increase in revenue for the City of Rochester and the value of benefits conferred upon the area subject to annexation. 7. Annexation of all or a part of the property to an adjacent municipality would not better serve the interests of the residents who reside in the area subject to annexation. 8. This annexation proceeding has not been initiated by a petition of a majority of property owners but has subsequently been supported by petition by a majority; therefore, this Minnesota Municipal Board order is not subject to an annexation election. 9. An order should be issued by the Minnesota Municipal Board annexing the area described herein. 0 R D E R IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: That the property described herein situated in the County of Olmsted, State of Minnesota, be and the same is hereby annexed to the City of Rochester, Minnesota, the same as if it had been originally made a part thereof: Block 4, Highland Addition, including that portion of the abutting street right-of-way measured from the centerline thereof on the north, east, south and west sides of said Block, according to th; plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Olmsted County, Minnesota. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: That the population of the City of Rochester has increased by 20 persons to 59,337 persons for a 11 purposes until the next Federal Census. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: That the population of the Town of Rochester has decreased by 20 persons to 4,286 persons for all purposes until the next Federal Census. Dated this 13th day of December, 1978 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOARD Suite 165 Metro Square St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 ~f{h Executive Secretary