Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

Similar documents
Appendix A. Humboldt County Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Membership Roster Humboldt County AB 109 Implementation Progress Report

Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction

Department of Corrections

Overcrowding Alternatives

For Informational Purposes (916) July 15, 2011

Santa Clara County, California Baseline and Alternative Jail Population Projections Report

Criminal Justice Realignment:

IC Chapter 6. Release From Imprisonment and Credit Time

The New Mexico Picture: Who & How Many are Incarcerated?

Section 1 - Are You Eligible?

The Justice System Judicial Branch, Adult Corrections, and Youth Corrections

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0094. Sponsored by: Joint Judiciary Interim Committee A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to criminal justice; amending provisions

Correctional Population Forecasts

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN

Chester County Swift Alternative Violation Enforcement Supervision SAVE

AB 109 and Prop 47 County Public Planning

the following definitions shall apply:

City and County of San Francisco. Office of the Controller City Services Auditor. City Services Benchmarking Report: Jail Population

IC Chapter 6. Parole and Discharge of Delinquent Offenders

Ventura County Probation Agency. Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiatives and Pretrial Services

CSG JUSTICE CENTER MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVIEW

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

Raise the Age Presentation: 2017 NYSAC Fall Seminar. September 21, 2017

COUNTY OF ORANGE. PRETRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT PAPER PILOT STUDY 1 RESULTS SUMMARY (Pretrial Supervision Meeting)

Alameda County Probation Department A Look into Probation Monthly Statistical Report January 2012

List of Tables and Appendices

Adult Prison and Parole Population Projections Juvenile Detention, Commitment, and Parole Population Projections

OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM. Laura Lothman Lambert Director, Juvenile Division

Supports community re-entry

Assembly Bill No. 25 Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

The True Cost of Justice in Marion County

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2018

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2017

Arkansas Parole Board Manual SOS Rule Number 158 Stricken Language New Language 3 - RELEASE REVOCATION

Sentencing in Colorado

December 2, 2013 _January 6, 2014_ Andrew A. Pallito, Commissioner Date Signed Date Effective

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 522

Arkansas Current Incarceration Crisis

FELONY SENTENCING AFTER REALIGNMENT

Adult and Juvenile Correctional Populations Forecasts

Probation and Parole in the United States, 2015

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL - FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA D064633

Application for the Northampton County Treatment Continuum Alternative to Prison (TCAP)

ABOUT GRASSROOTS LEADERSHIP

Determining Eligibility for Expungements & Penal Code 17(B) Reductions. Expungements and Prop 47 Clinic Training Training Module 1

COUNTY OF OTTAWA CIRCUIT COURT PROBATION AND PAROLE 2016 YEAR END REPORT. Administrative Offices: Grand Haven, Holland, Hudsonville

Types of Programs Fall Conference. Dispute Resolution Center (DRC)

California Code of Regulations, Title 15, Division 3, Adult Institutions, Programs and Parole

AN ACT BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA:

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 85 1

The changes will affect three populations of youth differently depending upon their status on the day the bill was enacted on Oct.

Male Initial Custody Assessment Procedures

CENTER ON JUVENILE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Adult Prison and Parole Population Projections Juvenile Commitment and Parole Population Projections

APPLICABLE STATUES. Determinate sentence transfer hearings are governed by the following statutes:

Pre-PC 1368 Competency Assessments. Sonoma Superior Court

2012 Judicial Conference. Swift and Sure Sanctions Pilot Program (SSSP)

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY RESPONSE TO HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 62 TWENTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE, 2002

Parole Release and. Revocation Project ASSOCIATION OF PAROLING AUTHORITIES INTERNATIONAL ANNUAL TRAINING CONFERENCE MAY 17, 2016

POLICY AND OPERATING PROCEDURE SUPERSEDES: 03/29/2006

Corrections Division Policy and Procedure Manual Mendocino County Sheriff's Office

MECKLENBURG COUNTY PRETRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT & PRAXIS. Instruction Manual

The Revised Interstate Compact for Juveniles (ICJ) Guide. What is the purpose of the Revised Interstate Compact for Juveniles (ICJ)?

Seek, Test, Treat and Retain for Criminal Justice Populations: Data Harmonization Measure

Florida Senate CS for SB 522. By the Committee on Children, Families, and Elder Affairs; and Senators Grimsley and Detert

SB 618 Eligibility. County of San Diego

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ASSEMBLY, No th LEGISLATURE

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

Sentencing Chronic Offenders

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

NEW ORLEANS PRETRIAL SERVICES OVERVIEW

Determinate Sentencing: Time Served December 30, 2015

Assembly Bill No. 510 Select Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

SUPERIOR AND DISTRICT COURT DIVISIONS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

Legislative Recommendation Status

Probation Parole. the United States, 1998

The State of Sentencing 2011

County Parole Board Report of the San Francisco Civil Grand Jury SUMMARY The Civil Grand Jury (CGJ) reviewed the County Parole Board, a

REVISOR XX/BR

A Profile of Women Released Into Cook County Communities from Jail and Prison

County of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney

Reducing Prison Overcrowding in California

MEDICAL PAROLE I. ELIGIBILITY

Office Of The District Attorney

ORDER MODIFYING SENTENCE

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Prepared for the Broward Sheriff s Office Department of Community Control. September Prepared by:

PAROLE AND PROBATION VIOLATIONS

County Detention: Proposed Mental Health Facility & Immigration Enforcement Policies Fact Sheet

Introduction to Sentencing and Corrections

THE IMPACT OF CALIFORNIA PRISON REALIGNMENT ON THE YUBA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session

EL DORADO COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT

Jurisdiction Profile: Alabama

RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PARTNERSHIP EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AGENDA

TEXAS COMMISSION ON JAIL STANDARDS

Summit County Pre Trial Services

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0042. Sponsored by: Joint Judiciary Interim Committee A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to criminal procedure and sentencing;

HOUSE BILL 86 (EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 30, 2011): PROVISIONS DIRECTLY IMPACTING

Transcription:

DRAFT Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership Public Safety Realignment Plan AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Act Monthly and Year-to-Date Statistical Monitoring Report July 2012 Prepared by: Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Committee

SACRAMENTO COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PARTNERSHIP AB 109 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGHMENT ACT MONTHLY STATISTICS Month SECTION A: Number, Custody Days, and Average Daily Population (ADP) of AB 109 Inmates Incarcerated in the Sacramento County Jail System for the Month of 2012. Year Sacramento County Jail AB 109 Inmates, Custody Days and Average Daily Population (ADP) AB 109 Inmates AB AB 109 Inmate Custody Days # % ADP % County Jail Pre-Revocation Pre-Revocation Prison ("N3") Inmates (xx.x%) County Jail Prison ("N3") Pre-Revocation Post-Revocation Flash Incarceration xx,xxx xx,xxx xx.x% xx.x% County County Jail Jail Prison Prison Inmates Inmates ("N3") ("N3") (28.1%) (xx.x%) AB 109 Average Daily Inmate Population (ADP) Pre-Revocation xx,xxx Post-Revocation xx.x% Post Revocation xx,xxx Revocation Inmates (xx.x%) xx.x% Inmates (xx.x%) Flash Incarceration Flash Flash Incarceration Incarceration Inmates xxx xx.x% xx,xx TOTAL x,xxx 100.0% TOTAL x,xxx 100.0% Current Month Jail AB 109 Inmate Incarceration Trends Number Percent Number Percent 1. Number of AB 109 Inmates: County Jail Prison ( N3 ) Inmates Pre-Revocation Inmates Post-Revocation Inmates Flash Incarceration Inmates 2. AB 109 Jail Inmate Custody Days: County Jail Prison ( N3 ) Inmates Pre-Revocation Inmates Post-Revocation Inmates Flash Incarceration Inmates Sacramento Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Act 1

Current Month AB 109 Jail Inmate Incarceration Trends (continued) ADP Percent ADP Percent 3. AB 109 Average Daily Inmate Population (ADP): County Jail Prison ( N3 ) Inmates Pre-Revocation Inmates Post-Revocation Inmates Flash Incarceration Inmates Total Jail System Inmate Average Daily Population ( ADP): AB 109 Inmates All Other Inmates CDCR Projected AB 109 Inmate ADP (at full implementation): County Jail Prison ( N3 ) Inmates 895 81.1% Revocation Inmates (State Parole and Probation Violations) 208 18.9% TOTAL 1,103 100% SECTION B: Penal Code (PC) Section 1170(h): County Jail Prison ( N3 ) Convicted and Sentenced Offenders Current Month AB 109 Offenders Sentenced to Local Custody Number Percent Number Percent County Jail Prison ( N3 ) Offenders: 4. Number of PC 1170(h)(1) offenders (non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenders) sentenced to the county jail with mandatory probation supervision 5. Number of PC 1170(h)(1) offenders (non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenders) sentenced to the county jail only (without mandatory probation supervision) 6. Number of PC 1170(h)(1) offenders (non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenders) sentenced only to mandatory probation supervision Monthly Average and Yearly Total Number of Projected CDCR County Jail Prison ( N3 ) Inmates 42 per month 505 per year Length of AB 109 Court Sentences: 7. Aggregate Superior Court sentence breakdown (jail and mandatory probation supervision) Average Aggregate Superior Court sentence xx months xx months Low Aggregate Superior Court sentence xx months xx months High Aggregate Superior Court sentence xx months xx months Sacramento Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Act 2

Current Month AB 109 Offenders Sentenced to Local Custody (continued) Number Percent Number Percent 8. Aggregate Superior Court sentence breakdown (jail and mandatory probation supervision): Range (Months) 0 16 months 17 36 months 37 48 months 49 60 months Over 60 months 9. County Jail Prison Only Superior Court Sentence Breakdown: Average County Jail Prison Only Superior Court Sentence xx months xx months Low County Jail Prison Only Superior Court Sentence xx months xx months High County Jail Prison Only Superior Court Sentence xx months xx months Range (Months) 0 (None) 1 16 months 17 36 months 37 48 months 49 60 months Over 60 months 10. Mandatory Probation Supervision Only Superior Court Sentence Breakdown: Average Low High Mandatory Probation Supervision only Superior Court sentence Mandatory Probation Supervision only Superior Court sentence Mandatory Probation Supervision only Superior Court sentence xx months xx months xx months xx months xx months xx months Range (Months) 0 (None) 1 16 months 17 36 months 37 48 months 49 60 months Over 60 months SECTION C: County Jail Prison ( N3 ) Inmate Demographic and Offense Characteristics Current Month Demographic and Offense Characteristics ( N3 ) Number Percent Number Percent 11. Gender: Male Female Sacramento Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Act 3

Current Month Demographic and Offense Characteristics ( N3 ) (continued) Number Percent Number Percent 12. Age: 18-20 21-24 25-44 45-64 65 & Over 13. Ethnicity: White Black/African American Hispanic American Indian Other Race 14. Residency: Sacramento City Citrus Heights Elk Grove Rancho Cordova Folsom Galt Sacramento County Transient Out-of-County/Other Average Age xx years xx years 15. Commitment Offense: Violence Sex Crimes Weapons Property Drugs/Alcohol Other Crimes SECTION D: State Parolees, Post-Release Community Supervision (PRCS), and Penal Code Section 1170(h) Inmates Booked into the County Jail System State Parolees, PRCS, & PC Section 1170(h) Inmates Booked into County Jail System Current Month Number Percent Number Percent State Parolees Penal Code Section 3056: 16. Number of individuals booked on a PC 3056 parole violation only. Includes state parole violators booked during the reporting month, pursuant to PC 3056(a). Does not include those violators who have been booked on a new offense. 17. Number of parole violators serving jail time as a result of revocation hearing. Includes revoked state parole violators serving time as a result of a parole revocation hearing. Does not include those who are in custody on new offenses in addition to the violation. Sacramento Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Act 4

State Parolees, PRCS, & PC Section 1170(h) Inmates Booked into County Jail System (continued) Current Month Number Percent Number Percent State Parolees Penal Code Section 3056: 18. Number of parole violators booked with new local charges. 19, Number of parole violators serving a local sentence. CDCR projected average monthly and yearly total number of parolees incarcerated in the county jail. 34 per month 405 per year Post-Release Community Supervision (PCRS): 20. Number of PRCS offenders booked during the month. Does not include violators who have been booked on a new offense. 21. Number of PRCS offenders booked on a PC 3454(c) flash incarceration only. Includes PCRS offenders booked for a flash incarceration, pursuant to PC 3454(c). 22. Number of PRCS offenders serving jail time as a result of a revocation hearing disposition. 23. Number of PRCS offenders booked with a new local charge(s). Penal Code Section 1170(h): (Sheriff s Alternative Custody Program) 24. Number of offenders released to a Sheriff s alternative custody program. Includes PC 1170(h) offenders who were placed into alternative programs such as Electronic Monitoring, GPS, or Work Furlough, etc. 25. Number of offenders in a Sheriff s alternative custody program returned to custody. Includes PC 1170(h) offenders previously in an alternative program who have violated either probation, a condition of the program, or committed a new criminal offense. SECTION E: RECAP: County Jail Prison ( N3 ) and Parole Revocation Monthly Referral and Supervision Caseload Trends Month 2012 to Month 2012 Recap of County Jail Prison ( N3 ), and Parole Revocation Monthly Referral and Supervision Caseload Trends Month 2012 to Month 2012 Number Monthly Average Percent (%) 1. County Jail Prison ( N3 Non-Violent, Non-Serious and Non-Sex Offenders): xxx xxx 100.0% Number of Offenders Sentenced to County Jail Only xxx xxx xx.x% Number of Offenders Sentenced to Jail and Mandatory Supervision xxx xxx xx.x% Number of Offenders Sentenced to Mandatory Supervision Only xxx xxx xx.x% Total xxx xxx 100% Sacramento Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Act 5

Current Average Daily Jail Population (ADP) Average Aggregate County Jail Sentence xxx xx.x months 2. State Parole Violators: Parolee Returned to Custody Pending Revocation Hearing xxx xxx xx.x% Parolee Revocations xxx xxx xx.x Total xxx xxx 100.0% Average Daily Jail Population (ADP) Average Length of Jail Incarceration (ALS) xxx xxx days SECTION F: Number, Risk Assessment Score, and Supervision Levels For Post-Release Community Supervision (PRCS) Offenders Handled Through the Sacramento Probation Department Current Month Post-Release Community Supervision (PRCS) Offenders Number Percent Number Percent Probation Department AB 109 Intake Unit: 26. Total number of CDCR pre-release PRCS packets received by the Probation Department. 100% 100% 27. Number of inappropriate or unacceptable PRCS packets referred/transferred out to other jurisdictions by Probation Department. 28. Number of PRCS packets with special conditions of supervision established by the Probation Department for reporting PRCS offenders. 29. Total number of PRCS offenders accepted for supervision and required to report and be processed by the Probation Department s AB 109 Intake Unit. 100% 100% Monthly Average number of PRCS offenders required to report for Probation Department AB 109 assessment and processing. CDCR projected average monthly and yearly total number of PRCS offenders released to the Probation Department. xx per month 63 per month 1,993 per year 30. Number of PRCS offenders released from state prison, accepted for county supervision and processed by Probation AB 109 Intake Unit. 31. Number of PRCS offenders who absconded or failed to appear and a warrant was issued by the Probation Department. (This only includes PC 3455 warrants and excludes all other types of warrants.) 32. Failure to Appear (FTA) warrant status: Active Warrant Warrant Served Warrant Recalled by Probation Sacramento Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Act 6

Post-Release Community Supervision (PRCS) Offenders (continued) Current Month Number Percent Number Percent Static Risk Assessment Profile (Washington State instrument): 33. Risk Assessment Score: Low Risk Moderate Risk High Drug Risk High Property/Violent Risk High Violence Risk PRCS Supervision Levels and Caseload Assignment: 34. Number of PRCS offenders supervised under GPS status which utilizes an active, passive, or hybrid global positioning system for monitoring and may also include, but is not limited to, contact in the community (i.e., at work, home, as well as in the office setting). 35. Number of PRCS offenders on community supervision status which includes, but is not limited to, contact in the community (i.e., work, school, program setting, home as well as office setting). 36. Number of PRCS offenders on active office supervision status with contact occurring in probation field supervision office. 37. Number of PRCS offenders on Kiosk supervision status which consists of initial visit with Probation Officer and then Kiosk reporting. 38. Number of PRCS offenders on administrative supervision status. Case is not assigned to a Probation Officer and there is no active office or community supervision. 39. Number of PRCS offenders on administrative supervision status. Individuals are unavailable for supervision due to custody status, an active warrant, prison/out-of-state, interstate compact, etc. 40. Community Supervision Caseload Assignment: High-risk Intensive Field Supervision Unit (2) Specialized Supervision Caseload (Sex & Gang Offenders SUB-TOTAL Adult Day Reporting Center (ADRC) Administrative Reporting GPS Reporting Unit Monitoring or Kiosk Reporting Sacramento Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Act 7

SECTION G: Post-Release Community Supervision (PRCS) Offender Demographic and Offense Characteristics Current Month Demographic and Offense Characteristics (PRCS) Number Percent Number Percent 41. Gender: Male Female 42. Age: 18-20 21-24 25-44 45-64 65 & Over 43. Ethnicity: White Black/African American Hispanic American Indian Other Race 44. Residency: Sacramento City Citrus Heights Elk Grove Rancho Cordova Folsom Galt Sacramento County Transient Out-of-County/Other Average Age xx years xx years 45. Commitment Offense: Violence Sex Crimes Weapons Property Drugs/Alcohol Other Crimes SECTION H: Number of PRCS Warrants Issued While Offender is Supervised and Revocation Hearings Requested by the Probation Department Current Month PRCS Supervision Warrants Issued and Revocation Hearings Number Percent Number Percent 46. Number of PRCS offenders who FTA d, absconded, or violated supervision conditions and Probation issued a warrant while offender was being supervised by the Probation Department. 100% 100% Sacramento Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Act 8

PRCS Supervision Warrants Issued and Revocation Hearings (continued) Current Month Number Percent Number Percent 47. Number of Revocation Hearings requested by Probation Department. 100% 100% 48. Revocation Hearing dispositions: Supervision reinstated with jail custody time Other disposition Length of jail sentence: 1 30 days 31 60 days 61 120 days 121 180 days 181+ Days Average Length of Revocation Jail Sentence (ALS) xxx days xxx days SECTION I: Number of PRCS Offenders Who Completed Supervision and Had Their Case Closed For Having No Violations Current Month PRCS Offenders Completing Supervision Without Violations Number Percent Number Percent 49. PRCS closures (6 12 months). Number of PRCS offenders whose case was closed between 181 364 days for having no supervision violations. 50. PRCS closures (1 year). Number of PRCS offenders whose supervision was closed by provision of law at 1 year because they had no supervision violations. 51. PRCS closures (18 plus months). Number of PRCS offenders whose supervision was closed after more than 18 months. TOTAL NUMBER OF PRCS OFFENDERS COMPLETING SUPERVISION 100% 100% SECTION J: Number of County Jail Prison ( N3 ), Parole Revocation, and PRCS Offenders Receiving Mental Health and Other Services While in Custody and Under Community Supervision Current Month AB 109 Mental Health and Other Offender Services Number Percent Number Percent County Jail Prison ( N3 ) and Parole Revocation Inmates: 52. County Jail AB 109 Mental Health services: Number of AB 109 inmates receiving in-patient services Number of AB 109 inmates receiving out-patient services Number of inmates assessed but refused or did not need services Sacramento Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Act 9

Current Month AB 109 Mental Health and Other Offender Services (continued) Number Percent Number Percent Number of AB 109 inmates receiving psychotropic medications 53. County Jail AB 109 other inmate services (Offenders participating in custody programs): Drug/alcohol counseling (treatment/relapse prevention) Domestic violence Anger management Family counseling Literacy education and/or GED preparation Job/vocational training Cognitive behavioral therapy criminal lifestyles 54. County Jail AB 109 offenders receiving reentry planning, assistance, and case management services: Reentry services provided to AB 109 inmates diverted to Sheriff s Home Detention Electric Monitoring jail alternative program Reentry services provided to AB 109 offenders completing Court sentence without mandatory supervision and discharged back to community Reentry services provided to AB 109 offenders completing jail sentence with mandatory probation supervision Post-Release Community Supervision (PRCS Offenders): 55. Probation Department PRCS Offender Services (Offenders participating in the following programs while under community supervision): Mental Health assessment, crisis counseling and case management Substance misuse counseling Domestic violence counseling Life skills and related services Anger management Family counseling Literacy education and/or GED preparation Job/vocational training Cognitive behavioral therapy criminal lifestyles SECTION K: RECAP: Post-Release Community Supervision (PRCS) Offender Monthly Referral and Supervision Caseload Trends Month 2012 to Month 2012 Recap of Post-Release Community Supervision (PRCS) Offender Monthly Referral and Supervision Caseload Trends Month 2012 to Month 2012 1. Post-Release Community Supervision (PRCS) Offenders: Total CDCR Pre-Release Packets Received by Probation Department: x,xxx Sacramento Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Act 10

Total PRCS Offenders Reporting and Processed by Probation AB 109 Intake Unit: x,xxx Number Monthly Average Percent (%) Community Supervision Caseload Assignment High-risk Intensive Field Supervision Unit (2) xxx xx xx.x% Specialized Supervision Caseload (Sex & Gang Offenders) xx xx xx.x% Sub-Total xxx xxx xx.x% Adult Day Reporting Center (ADRC) xxx xx xx.x% Administrative and Other xxx xx xx.x% Total AB 109 PRCS Offenders xxx xxx 100% Active PRCS Community Supervision Population as of the last day of the reporting month xxx Sacramento Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Act 11