Case 3:16-cv EMC Document 311 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 7

Similar documents
Case: 1:12-cv CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 1 of 8. PageID #: 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.

Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 222 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Case 1:03-cv LJM-TAB Document 745 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 8174

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ingles Markets, Inc. Doc. 6 Case 1:06-cv LHT-DLH Document 6 Filed 04/28/2006 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:18-cv AJN Document 6 Filed 09/29/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 71 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:18-cv L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 2:15-cv GMN-PAL Document 62 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:15-cv JMS-MJD Document 177 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 891

Case 1:05-cv MSK -CBS Document 843 Filed 01/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7

Case 3:11-cv JBA Document 200 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : 01 Civ (BSJ) Plaintiff, : : : v. : PARTIAL FINAL : JUDGMENT AND

Case 1:12-cv Document 2-1 Filed 12/20/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 3:09-cv N Document 5 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 7 ORIGINAL

Case 2:09-cv JP Document Filed 11/29/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 543

Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

USDCSDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#:,---.- DATE FILED: 1 / j {2.~> is

Case 4:15-cv DLH-CSM Document 5 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 11

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 8-1 Filed: 09/06/17 Page 397 of 420 PageID #:481

Case 1:11-cv RJS Document 267 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:09-cv N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 U.S. DISTRICT COURT :NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FILED ---'-----,

Case 3:18-cv M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084

Case 3:16-cv EMC Document 382 Filed 07/24/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:16-cv EMC Document Filed 06/29/18 Page 1 of 4

Case 1:08-cv RJL Document 3 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 1 of 38

15 USC 80b-3. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Case 1:10-cv RJL Document 3-1 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Sec. 9 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

muia'aiena ED) wnrn 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Sec. 202(a)(1)(C). Disclosure of Negative Risk Determinations about Financial Company.

Case 1:18-cv RWZ Document 53-1 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:15-cv BAH Document 1 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. CONSENT OF DEFENDANT SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No.

CFTC Adopts Final Anti-Manipulation and Anti-Fraud Rules & Begins Final Rulemaking Phase Implementing Dodd-Frank

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 72 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/11/16 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.: Plaintiff, Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALAN GRABISCH, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,

Case 2:10-cv PA -PJW Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:10

Case 3:16-cv PK Document 2 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CASE No.: COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 830-X-6 EXEMPT SECURITIES AND EXEMPT TRANSACTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

8:11-cv LSC -TDT Doc # 8 Filed: 08/16/11 Page 1 of 23 - Page ID # 16

Ninth Circuit Establishes Pleading Requirements for Alleging Scheme Liability Under 10(b) and Rule 10b-5(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case 1:19-cv DLC Document 1 Filed 01/03/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

) ) WHEREAS, in connection with the investigation, the Division has determined that

EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT 1 (Conspiracy) THE DEFENDANTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.:

Case 1:18-cv TNM Document 14 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 20

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/13/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case No. upon information and belief, except as to those allegations concerning Plaintiff, which are

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/29/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRA-ORDINARY. PART (II) OF SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (ii) PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA NOTIFICATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. -Civ- Case No. Defendants, ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

3. USAT is a provider of cashless, micro-transactions an

- 1 - Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:18-cv CM Document 6 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, I COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS.

11? "76WiA, y01\v7-aikt ' DAVID DE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. Plaintiff, : :

High Court Extends Reach Of Securities Fraud Rule 10b-5

Case 2:11-cv BSJ Document 358 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH I.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants

ALI-ABA Course of Study Regulation D Offerings and Private Placements

Case 4:18-cv HSG Document 1 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

A Short Guide to the Prosecution of Market Manipulation in the Energy Industry: CFTC, FERC, and FTC

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

C V CLASS ACTION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 58 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016 EXHIBIT 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA. Case No. Jury Trial Demanded

Case3:14-cv Document1 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. Case No.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

) NJ Holdings, LLC (d/b/a Coast to Coast ) Business Funding), Nickolas Godfrey, )

EBERHARD SCHONEBURG, ) SECURITIES LAWS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

US legal and regulatory developments Prohibition on energy market manipulation

Case Number: CIV-MARTINEZ-GOODMAN DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS YOUR YELLOW PAGES. INC., CITY PAGES. INC..

ROYAL BANK OF CANADA SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED UNDERWRITING AGREEMENT

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1

Transcription:

Case :-cv-0-emc Document Filed 0// Page of JINA L. CHOI (N.Y. Bar No. ) JOHN S. YUN (Cal. Bar No. 0) yunj@sec.gov MARC D. KATZ (Cal. Bar No. ) katzma@sec.gov JESSICA W. CHAN (Cal. Bar No. ) chanjes@sec.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA Telephone: () 0-00 Facsimile: () 0-0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, JOHN V. BIVONA; SADDLE RIVER ADVISORS, LLC; SRA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC; FRANK GREGORY MAZZOLA, Defendants, and SRA I LLC; SRA II LLC; SRA III LLC; FELIX INVESTMENTS, LLC; MICHELE J. MAZZOLA; ANNE BIVONA; CLEAR SAILING GROUP IV LLC; CLEAR SAILING GROUP V LLC, Relief Defendants. Case No. :-cv-0-emc [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANT SADDLE RIVER ADVISORS, LLC Final Judgment Civ. :-cv-0-emc

Case :-cv-0-emc Document Filed 0// Page of The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Saddle River Advisors, LLC, ( SRA or Defendant ) having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section (b) of the Securities Exchange Act of (the Exchange Act ) [ U.S.C. j(b)] and Rule b- promulgated thereunder [ C.F.R. 0.b-], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (b) (c) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section of the Securities Act of (the Final Judgment Civ. :-cv-0-emc

Case :-cv-0-emc Document Filed 0// Page of Securities Act ) [ U.S.C. q] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section of the Securities Act [ U.S.C. e] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption: (b) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise; or Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of Final Judgment Civ. :-cv-0-emc

Case :-cv-0-emc Document Filed 0// Page of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination under Section of the Securities Act [ U.S.C. h]. IV. restrained and enjoined from, violating Sections (), () and () of the Investment Advisers Act of 0, U.S.C. 0b-(), () & (), and Rule ()- thereunder, C.F.R..()-, by, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce (b) employing any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud any client or prospective client; engaging in any transaction, practice or course of business which operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or prospective client; (c) engaging in any act, practice, or course of business which is fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative; or (d) while acting as an investment adviser to a pooled investment vehicle:. making any untrue statement of a material fact or omitting to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, to any investor or prospective investor in the pooled investment vehicle; or. otherwise engaging in any act, practice, or course of business that is fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative with respect to any investor or prospective investor in the pooled investment vehicle. Final Judgment Civ. :-cv-0-emc

Case :-cv-0-emc Document Filed 0// Page of V. restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly violating Section (f) of the Advisers Act [ U.S.C. 0b-(f)] by, while acting as an investment adviser, permitting any person as to whom an order issued by the Commission suspending or barring that person from being associated with an investment adviser to become, or remain, a person associated with it without the consent of the Commission if Defendant knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known, of the bar or suspension order. VI. restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly violating Section of the Exchange Act [ U.S.C. o] by, while acting as a broker or dealer, effecting transactions in and inducing and attempting to induce the purchase or sale of securities when they are not registered with the Commission as a broker or dealer or associated with an entity registered with the Commission as a broker or dealer. Final Judgment Civ. :-cv-0-emc

Case :-cv-0-emc Document Filed 0// Page of VII. restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly soliciting any person or entity to purchase or sell any security or security-based swap. VIII. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $,0,, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint. This disgorgement obligation shall be joint and several with Defendant SRA Management Associates, LLC, and Relief Defendants SRA I, LLC, SRA II, LLC, SRA III, LLC, Clear Sailing Group IV, LLC, and Clear Sailing Group V, LLC. Defendant shall satisfy this obligation by paying $,0,, within thirty calendar days from the entry of this Final Judgment, by check, United States Postal money order, or electronic payment, to the Receiver, Sherwood Partners, Inc. The Receiver shall hold the disgorgement amounts in a separately identified account, pending further orders by the Court. Defendant shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and case identifying information to the Commission s counsel in this action. By making this payment, Defendant relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part of the funds shall be returned to Defendant. The Commission may enforce the Court s judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment interest by moving for civil contempt (and/or through other collection procedures authorized by law) Final Judgment Civ. :-cv-0-emc

Case :-cv-0-emc Document Filed 0// Page of at any time after thirty days following entry of this Final Judgment. Defendant shall pay post judgment interest on any delinquent amounts pursuant to U.S.C.. IX. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. X. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated:, // JUDGE EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Court IT IS SO ORDERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Judge Edward M. Chen Final Judgment Civ. :-cv-0-emc