Case 6:10-cr AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION

Similar documents
In The Supreme Court of the United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE

FEDERAL STATUTES. 10 USC 921 Article Larceny and wrongful appropriation

Case 3:16-cr BR Document 671 Filed 06/10/16 Page 1 of 16

Case 3:16-cr BR Document 135 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 3:17-cr JO Document 1 Filed 06/20/17 Page 1 of 5

1031 S. Monument Rd Portland Oregon

Case 1:14-cr MLW Document 1 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 14

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment controls open burning. A smoke permit is required in most circumstances.

Wildfire Management Funding: Background, Issues, and FY2018 Appropriations

Obstruction of Justice: An Abridged Overview of Related Federal Criminal Laws

Case 3:16-mj Document 47 Filed 02/02/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 4:14-cr HLM-WEJ Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION INTRODUCTION. A. Background

Case 1:11-cr JDB Document 6 Filed 03/03/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Holding a Criminal Term

religious movement that effectively ruled Afghanistan from the mid-1990s until the United States1 military intervention in

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

Case 1:12-cr JCC Document 11 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 22

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 10 -

SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS - ARTICLE III. OPEN BURNING

CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT PARKS AND RESERVATIONS. Title 13 Chapter 9 State Forest Fire Service

Case 0:13-cr KAM Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2014 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:17-cr PLM ECF No. 15 filed 11/21/17 PageID.22 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Title 4 Criminal Code Chapter 4 Offenses Involving Property

1. From at least in or about June 2006, up to and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. The SPECIAL JULY 2013 GRAND JURY charges:

Harney County Cooperative Weed Management Area Memorandum of Understanding

HINDERING APPREHENSION OR PROSECUTION FOR TERRORISM (N.J.S.A. 2C:38-4)

Case 4:17-cr MSD-LRL Document 89 Filed 03/14/18 Page 1 of 27 PageID# 1321

Case 6:08-cr CJS Document 76 Filed 05/07/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. For the Western District of New York

Case 1:15-cr JCC Document 1 Filed 03/19/15 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

Case 1:15-cr DPW Document 1 Filed 09/29/15 Page 1 of 8

Chapter 10 The Criminal Law and Business. Below is a table that highlights the differences between civil law and criminal law:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRlCT OF LOUISIANA

Case 3:17-cr JLS Document 1 Filed 04/26/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF falifornia

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF PROHIBITED ACTS

TITLE 35. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD, AND FORESTRY CHAPTER 48. WILDLIFE SERVICES

NC General Statutes - Chapter 106 Article 75 1

Case 2:17-cr PLM ECF No. 54 filed 12/05/17 PageID.113 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:09-cr RJL Document 4 Filed 07/23/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NC General Statutes - Chapter 106 Article 75 1

Department of Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Case 6:13-cr AA Document 1 Filed 10/07/13 Page 1 of 11 Page ID#: 1. Case 1:06-cr REB Document 12 Filed 09/30/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:19-cr RGD-RJK Document 3 Filed 02/07/19 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Section 11 Impossibility Relying only on your own intuitions of justice, what liability and punishment, if any, does John Henry Ivy deserve?

Case 1:07-cr JR Document 2 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Holding a Criminal Term

Case 2:12-cr CM-JPO Document 1 Filed 01/25/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (KANSAS CITY DOCKET)

Case 1:18-mj DAR Document 1-1 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Mag. No.

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 1232 Filed 04/02/15 Page 1 of 47 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Forfeiture INDICTMENT

(a) All motions shall be accompanied by a memorandum in support of the relief sought in the motion. The memorandum shall

Birch Run Community Park Rules and Regulations

(2) MAP. The term Map means the map entitled Proposed Pine Forest Wilderness Area and dated October 28, 2013.

IN THE DISTMCT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES For the Western District of New York

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT ONE I. THE ENTERPRISE

HOUSE BILL 508. E4, L2 7lr2649 A BILL ENTITLED. Prince George s County Fire and Explosive Investigators Authority PG

Case 3:13-cr KI Document 51 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#: 141

Case 2:12-cv LDG-GWF Document 1 Filed 05/14/12 Page 1 of 11

YUROK TRIBE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ORDINANCE

INDICTMENT PAGE 2 OF 24

HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL, INC. (6), with the advice and consent of Michael

WikiLeaks Document Release

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. October 2013 Grand Jury. CR No. 18R c INTRODUCTORY ALLEGATIONS

EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT 1 (Conspiracy) THE DEFENDANTS

Case 1:17-cr NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 102

documented and communicated to the respective Agencies' incident command systems and firstline supervisors as soon as possible.

SEALED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND-ODESSA DIVISION

COLORADO BRAND LAWS COLORADO REVISED STATUTES TITLE 35. AGRICULTURE III--LIVESTOCK ARTICLE 43. BRANDING AND HERDING

COUNT ONE (Racketeering Conspiracy) The Enterprise. 1. At all times relevant to this Indictment, DANIEL

Case 1:05-cr PAS Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2005 Page 1 of 8 SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT

DOYON, LIMITED SHAREHOLDER NON-COMMERCIAL SEASONAL USE PERMIT GUIDELINES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:17-cv HE Document 1 Filed 08/03/17 Page 1 of 11

THE WILD FREE-ROAMING HORSE AND BURRO ACT OF 1971

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 5:12-cv KES Document 27 Filed 10/22/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 316 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO GRAND JURY [YYYY] The [Day, i.e. 12th] Day of [Month, Year] Plaintiff.

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 43 1

x : : : : : : : : : : x COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Commit Bribery) The United States Attorney charges:

COMMITTEE REPORTS. 106th Congress, 2d Session. Senate Report S. Rpt. 479 GREAT SAND DUNES NATIONAL PARK ACT OF 2000

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OFHCALIFORNIA. June 2008 Grand Jury ) Case No. '10 CR W ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) (1),

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr KD-N-1.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA GOVERNMENT S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY SESSION

***** amended THIS AMENDED SECTION IS EFFECTIVE APRIL 3, 2013 *****

Case 2:15-cr DN-DBP Document 1 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 7

At all times relevant to this indictment, unless otherwise

THERON ANTHONY FINNEY OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. January 16, 2009 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Case 3:17-cr JO Document 37 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15

RSA 644:1, I (a) Engaging in a Riot

COQUILLE TRIBAL ORDINANCE Chapter 652 Trespass Ordinance

Colorado Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAlVIA * * AMENDED NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

SUMMIT COUNTY OPEN SPACE REGULATIONS

Question 2. With what crimes, if any, could Al be charged and what defenses, if any, could he assert? Discuss.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 6:10-CR-60066-HO SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT v. [18 U.S.C. 2, 844(1)(1) and (2), STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND and 844(h)(I), 844(i), 844(m), 844(0),1361, DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND JR., ISI2(b)(3)] I. INTRODUCTION Defendants. THE GRAND JURY CHARGES: COUNT 1 CONSPIRACY During all times relevant to this count, Defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. his wife and their son, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND, owned and operated Hammond Ranches, Inc. (HRI), a cattle ranch near the eastern Oregon community of Diamond. Defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. was President ofhri and defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND was and lived on the ranch with his parents. HRI owned private grazing land and leased other private and public lands. HRI purchased a permit which authorized HRI cattle to graze on property owned and possessed by the United States, and the United States Department of the Interior's (DOl), Bureau of Land Management (BLM) located in the Burns District. SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 1

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 2 of 19 During all times relevant to this count, the Burns District BLM had a prescribed burn program which used fire for habitat improvement, ecosystem restoration and maintenance, and reduction of hazardous fuels. Private owners' participation in the program was voluntary. Many private landowners had prescribed burn plan agreements with the Burns District BLM to cooperatively control the conversion of shrub and grasslands to juniper woodland on private and public lands in the Steens Mountain area. Bums District BLM would not conduct a prescribed burn unless the burn plan complied with the National Environmental Policy Act, supported the Burns District BLM Resource Management Plan, accounted for the safety ofthe public and firefighters, and containment offire to the areas identified for treatment. BLM paid most of the cost of preparing and implementing a prescribed burn agreement. When BLM conducted a prescribed burn, it assumed all liability for the burning. During all times relevant to this count, the Burns District BLM did not have a prescribed burn plan agreement with HRI and defendants STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND and DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. II. OBJECTS OF THE CONSPIRACY Beginning at a date unknown to the grand jury but no later than September 9, 1999, and continuing through August 24, 2006, in the District of Oregon, defendants STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND and DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. and other persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury, knowingly and willfully combined, conspired and agreed to commit the following offenses against the United States: SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 2

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 3 of 19 1. by means offire(s), intentionally and maliciously damage and destroy, or attempt to damage and destroy, vehicles and real or personal property, in whole or in part, owned or possessed by, or leased to, the United States or any department or agency thereof; and as a result of such conduct, directly and proximately created a substantial risk of injury to people including but not limited to BLM employees and firefighters Chad Rott, Lisa Megargee, Lance Okeson and Joe Glascock, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 844(f)(1) and (2), and 844(n); 2. by use of fire(s), commit a felony which may be prosecuted in a court ofthe United States, to wit: the willful damage and depredation or attempted damage and depredation in excess of$l,ooo, against property owned and possessed by the United States or any department or agency thereof, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 844(h)(1), 844(m) and 1361; and 3. by means offire(s), intentionally and maliciously damage and destroy, or attempt to damage and destroy, real or personal property used in interstate commerce or in any activity affecting interstate commerce, in violation oftitle 18, United States Code, Sections 844(i) and 844(n). III. MANNER AND MEANS OF THE CONSPIRACY The objects of the conspiracy were to be accomplished in the following manner by the defendants and others at various times during the course of the conspiracy: SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 3

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 4 of 19 1. Without a prescribed burn plan agreement with the BLM, the defendants and others at the defendants' direction, started and set fires on or near real and personal property owned and possessed by the United States and its departments and agencies; 2. Without providing prior notification and receiving authorization from private landowner or persons engaged in activities affecting interstate commerce, the defendants and others at the defendants' direction, started and set fires on or near real and personal property used in interstate commerce and in activities affecting interstate commerce; 3. The defendants conducted aerial surveillance of sites on United States property that they targeted to illegally burn, and burned; 4. The defendants and others traveled over United States property to the sites they targeted to illegally burn, and burned; 5. The defendants and others started and set fire to vegetation at or near sites they targeted to illegally burn; 6. The defendants and others at the defendants' direction, used fire to willfully and maliciously damage and destroy, and attempt to damage and destroy, vehicles and other real and personal property owned and possessed by the United States and its departments and agencies; 7. The defendants and others at the defendants' direction, used fire to maliciously damage and destroy, and attempt to damage and destroy, vehicles and other real and personal property used in interstate commerce and in activities affecting interstate commerce; 8. The defendants started and used fire to oppose, impede, interfere, threaten and intimidate BLM employees and firefighters while they were employed in, engaged in, or SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 4

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 5 of 19 perfonning their official duties of suppressing fires burning on property owned by the United States and its departments and agencies; and, 9. The defendants obliterated, destroyed or secreted evidence of their criminal activities. IV. OVERT ACTS In order to carry out the objects of the conspiracy, defendants and others committed various overt acts within Harney County in the District oforegon and elsewhere, including but not limited to the following: 1999 1. On or about September 9, 1999, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND made a telephone call to BLM Burns Interagency Communication Center (BICC) and infonned a BLM employee of his intentions to burn on HRI lands in and near the Fir Creek and Bridge Creek area of Harney County, Oregon. 2. On or about September 9,1999, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND started a fire on HRI property which burned onto and caused damage and destruction to property owned and possessed by the United States, the DOl and BLM located in the Bridge Creek Wilderness Study Area now known as the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area. 3. On or about October 28, 1999, defendants STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND and DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. met with BLM District Manager Thomas Dyer and were infonned that in the future, fires set by them on HRI property which were allowed to burn onto SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT PageS

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 6 of 19 property ofthe United States without having a prescribed burn plan agreement with the BLM, would be treated as a fire trespass and would result in legal action. 2001 4. On or about Sunday, September 30,2001, defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. contacted Gordon Choate, a hunting guide hired by Dennis Nelson, a resident of Utah, for his son Dustin Nelson, a resident of Utah, on property owned and possessed by the United States, the DOl and BLM located in the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area in Harney County, Oregon. 5. On or about September 30, 2001, defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND JR., asked Gordon Choate where his camp was located. 6. On or about September 30,2001, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND was on property owned and possessed by the United States, the DOl and BLM near Bridge Creek Road when he shot into a group of deer. 7. On or about September 30, 2001, after several deer were shot, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND attempted to hide from the view of Gordon Choate, Dennis and Dustin Nelson. 8. On or about September 30,2001, at approximately 10:00 am, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND, in the presence of defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR., handed out matches to persons known to the grand jury and directed them to use the matches to start and set multiple fires on the HRI,s "schoolhouse section" of property near property owned and possessed by the United States, the DOl and BLM. SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 6

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 7 of 19 9. On or about September 30,2001, defendants STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND and DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR., and had others known and unknown to the grand jury, started and set fires which damaged and destroyed property owned and possessed by the United States, the DOl and BLM located approximately eight to ten miles east offrenchglen, Oregon, near or in the Hardie-Hammond grazing allotment, within the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area, in Harney County, Oregon. 10. On or about September 30,2001, approximately two hours after defendants STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND, DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. and others at the defendants' direction had started and set fires near property owned and possessed by the United States, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND made a telephone call to the BLM BICC dispatcher, asking ifthere was a reason he could not do a controlled burn, and when advised there was not, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND informed the dispatcher that there might be something eight to ten miles east of Frenchglen, Oregon. 11. On or about September 30, 2001, several hours after defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND had called the BLM BICC dispatcher, defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. flew his Piper Super Cub aircraft above Gordon Choate's camp, located near Bridge Creek Road. 2005 12. On or about August 23, 2005, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND denied permission for BLM fire suppression personnel and equipment to cross Hammond private property to gain access to fires that were burning on property owned and possessed by the United States. SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 7

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 8 of 19 13. On or between August 23, 2005 and August 30, 2005, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND started a fire on property near or along the fence line which burned onto private property owned by William, "Bill," Otley of Diamond Ranches, Inc.. 14. On or about August 30,2005, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND made a telephone call to BLM employee Karla Bird to inform her that he did not want so much as a firefighter's footprint on HRI property. 2006 15. In July or August 2006, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND met with Harney County Sheriff David Glerup to ask ifhe could file a complaint against BLM firefighters ifhe caught them trespassing on HRI land. 16. On or about August 4, 2006, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND made a telephone call to BLM employee Karla Bird to inform her that the BLM's scheduled prescribed burn of public land leased to HRI was not soon enough to suit him. 17. On or about August 17,2006, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND informed BLM employee Joe Glascock the next time there was dry lightning in the Bridge Creek area not to be surprised if there was a fire. 18. On or about August 22, 2006, after the fires caused the previous day by lightning were inactive, defendants STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND and DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. were moving cattle in and near the burned area of Lower Bridge Creek, property owned and possessed by the United States. SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 8

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 9 of 19 19. On or about August 22,2006, at approximately 10:30 am, defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. told BLM employee Joe Glascock that it was too bad the fire wasn't bigger. 20. On or about August 22, 2006, at approximately 11 :00 am, defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. started and set multiple fires on property owned and possessed by the United States, the DOl, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and BLM in the Lower Bridge Creek area, near the area burned by the fires ignited by lighting on August 21, 2006, within the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge and Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area, in Harney County, Oregon. 21. On or about August 22, 2006, defendants STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND and DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. started and set fires which damaged more than $1,000 of real and personal property located in the Lower Bridge Creek area that was owned and possessed by the United States, the DOl, USFWS and BLM located in the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge and the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area, in Harney County, Oregon. 22. On or about August 22, 2006, at approximately 8:00 pm, with defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND as his passenger, defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. flew his Piper Super Cub aircraft above BLM employees and firefighters, Lance Okeson and Joe Glascock, near Antelope Reservoir. 23. On or about August 22, 2006, without notifying BLM employees and firefighters, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND started and set a fire or fires near Krumbo Butte, which burned property owned by the United States, the DOl, USFWS and BLM, near where SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 9

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 10 of 19 BLM employees and firefighters including but not limited to Brett Dunten and Ryan Hussey, were involved in fire suppression activities. 24. On or about August 22, 2006, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND started and set a fire or fires, which damaged more than $1,000 of real and personal property owned and possessed by the United States, the DOl, USFWS and BLM located near Krumbo Butte in the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge and the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area, in Harney County, Oregon. 25. On or about August 23, 2006, defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. and defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND started, ignited and set a series of fires behind and in front of BLM employees and firefighters Chad Rott and Lisa Megargee on or near Bridge Creek Road, property owned and possessed by the United States, the DOl and BLM. 26. On or about August 23,2006, at approximately 9:00 am, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND with defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. as his passenger, drove his pickup truck off of Bridge Creek Road, up a hillside and around a BLM fire engine and BLM employees and firefighters Chad Rott and Lisa Megargee. 27. On or about August 23,2006, after driving around BLM employees and firefighters Chad Rott and Lisa Megargee, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND stopped the pickup truck he was driving to allow defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. to get out ofthe pickup truck so he could start a series offires along or near Bridge Creek Road. 28. On or about August 23, 2006, at approximately 10:00 am, without providing prior notification to BLM employees and firefighters, Chad Rott and Lisa Megargee, defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. started, ignited and set multiple fires along or near the SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 10

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 11 of 19 Bridge Creek Road, property owned and possessed by the United States, the DOl and BLM, located in Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area, in Harney County, Oregon. 29. On or about August 23, 2006, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND with defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. no longer a passenger, drove a pickup truck to the south end of Bridge Creek Road and met BLM employees and firefighters Lance Okeson and Joe Glascock, and when Lance Okeson informed him that he needed to notify BLM what he was doing because he could kill someone, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND told Lance Okeson that maybe you guys had just better clear out. 30. On or about August 23, 2006, at approximately 10:20 am, defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. started a fire in grass and vegetation near or beneath a juniper tree, then began walking west toward Bridge Creek Road. 31. On or about August 23, 2006, as defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. was walking west across Bridge Creek Road, he did not stop after being told to do so by BLM employee and firefighter, Lance Okeson. 32. On or about August 23, 2006, as defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. crossed Bridge Creek Road, he left a boot print impression in the soft soil. 33. On or about August 23,2006, when defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. was confronted by BLM employees and firefighters Lance Okeson and Joe Glascock, he attempted to persuade them not to alert law enforcement officers. SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 11

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 12 of 19 34. On or about August 23,2006, shortly after defendant DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. was allowed to leave, he started fires behind BLM employees and firefighters Lance Okeson and Joe Glascock. 35. On or about August 23, 2006, defendants STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND and DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. started and set fires which damaged and destroyed more than $1,000 of real and personal property owned and possessed by the United States, the DOl and BLM located in the Bridge Creek Road area ofthe Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area in Harney County, Oregon. 36. On or about August 23, 2006, without prior notification and authorization from William "Bill" Otley or his agent, defendants STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND and DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. started and set fires on the east side of Bridge Creek Road which damaged or destroyed real and personal property owned by William "Bill" Otley of Diamond Ranches, Inc., which was being used in interstate commerce or in an activity affecting interstate commerce. 37. On or about August 24, 2006, defendants STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND and DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. obliterated and destroyed evidence ofthe boot print DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. had made in the soft soil of Bridge Creek Road on August 23, 2006. 38. On or about August 24, 2006, at the Frenchglen Hotel, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND threatened BLM employee and firefighter Joe Glascock by stating in effect that ifhe wanted to be a part of the community, he would make this go away, and if not, then defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND would claim Joe Glascock, and not defendants SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 12

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 13 of 19 STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND and DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. actually ignited the fires. All ofthe above conduct violated Title 18, United States Code, Sections 844(m) and 844 (n). COUNT 2 USE OF FIRE TO DAMAGE AND DESTROY PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES (2001 Hardie-Hammond Arson) On or about September 30, 2001, in the District of Oregon, defendants STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND, DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. and aided and abetted by other persons known and unknown to the grand jury, did intentionally and maliciously damage and destroy, or attempt to damage and destroy, by means of fire, real and personal property owned and possessed by the United States, or any department or agency thereof, to wit: the United States Department ofinterior and Bureau ofland Management, located in Harney County, within and near the Hardie-Hammond grazing allotment in the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area; All in violation oftitle 18, United States Code, Sections 2 and 844(t)(1). COUNT 3 USE OF FIRE TO DAMAGE AND DESTROY PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES (2006 Lower Bridge Creek Arson) On or about August 22, 2006, in the District of Oregon, defendants STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND and DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. did intentionally and maliciously damage and destroy, or attempt to damage and destroy, by means offire, real and personal SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 13

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 14 of 19 I I property owned and possessed by the United States or any department or agency thereof, to wit: the United States Department ofinterior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and Bureau of Land Management, located in Harney County, within and near the Lower Bridge Creek area in the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge and the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area; All in violation oftitle 18, United States Code, Sections 2 and 844(f)(1). COUNT 4 USING FIRE TO CAUSE MORE THAN $1,000 OF DAMAGE AND DEPREDATION AGAINST PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES (2006 Lower Bridge Creek Arson) On or about August 22, 2006, in the District of Oregon, defendants STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND and DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. intentionally used fire to commit a felony which may be prosecuted in a court ofthe United States, to wit: the willful damage and depredation, or attempted damage and depredation in excess of $1,000, against property owned and possessed by the United States, or any department or agency thereof, to wit: the United States Department ofinterior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and Bureau of Land Management, located in Harney County, within and near the Lower Bridge Creek area in the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge and the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area; All in violation oftitle 18, United States Code, Sections 2, 844(h)(1) and 1361. SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 14

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 15 of 19 COUNTS USE OF FIRE TO DAMAGE AND DESTROY PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES (2006 Krumbo Butte Arson) On or about August 22, 2006, in the District of Oregon, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND did intentionally and maliciously damage and destroy, or attempt to damage and destroy, by means of fire, real and personal property owned and possessed by the United States or any department or agency thereof, to wit: the United States Department of Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and Bureau of Land Management, located in Harney County, within and near Krumbo Butte in the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge and the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area; All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2 and 844(0(1). COUNT 6 USE OF FIRE TO CAUSE MORE THAN $1,000 OF DAMAGE AND DEPREDATION AGAINST PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES (2006 Krumbo Butte Arson) On or about August 22,2006, in the District of Oregon, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND intentionally used fire to commit a felony which may be prosecuted in a court of the United States, to wit: the willful damage and depredation, or attempted damage and depredation in excess of$i,ooo, against property owned and possessed by the United States, or any department or agency thereof, to wit: the United States Department ofinterior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and Bureau of Land Management, located in Harney County, within SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page IS

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 16 of 19 and near Krumbo Butte in the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge and the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area; All in violation oftitle 18, United States Code, Sections 2, 844(h)(1) and 1361. COUNT 7 USE OF FIRE TO DAMAGE AND DESTROY PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES AND CREATING A SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF INJURY TO ANY PERSON (2006 Grandad Arson) On or about August 23, 2006, in the District oforegon, defendants STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND and DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. did intentionally and maliciously damage and destroy, or attempt to damage and destroy, by means offire, real and personal property owned and possessed by the United States, or any department or agency thereof, to wit: the United States Department ofinterior, Bureau ofland Management, located in Harney County, along and near Bridge Creek Road in the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area; and as a result of such conduct, directly and proximately created a substantial risk ofinjury to one or more persons including but not limited to BLM employees and firefighters, Chad Rott, Lisa Megargee, Lance Okeson and Joe Glascock; All in violation oftitle 18, United States Code, Sections 2, 844(f)(1) and (2). SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 16

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 17 of 19 COUNTS USE OF FIRE TO CAUSE MORE THAN $1,000 OF DAMAGE AND DEPREDATION AGAINST PROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES (2006 Grandad Arson) On or about August 23, 2006, in the District of Oregon, defendants STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND and DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR. intentionally used fire to commit a felony which may be prosecuted in a court ofthe United States, to wit: the willful damage and depredation, or attempted damage and depredation in excess of$i,ooo, against property owned and possessed by the United States, or any department or agency thereof, to wit: the United States Department ofinterior, Bureau ofland Management, located in Harney County, along and near Bridge Creek Road in the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area; All in violation oftitle 18, United States Code, Sections 2, 844(h)(I) and 1361. COUNT 9 TAMPERING WITH A WITNESS (Frenchglen Hotel) On or about August 24, 2006, at the Frenchglen Hotel in Harney County, District of Oregon, defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND did knowingly use intimidation and threats, and attempted to corruptly persuade BLM employee and firefighter Joe Glascock, by stating to him words to the effect: This could get ugly and could be a sticky situation. You know management cycles through here all the time. I know that you want to be part ofthis community. Ifyou want to stay SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 17

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 18 of 19 here, you will make this go away. IfI go down, I'm taking you with me. * * * You lighted those fires, not me; and, when defendant STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND made such statement, he had the intent to hinder, delay, and prevent BLM employee and firefighter Joe Glascock's communication to a federal law enforcement officer, information related to the commission or possible commission of the federal offenses committed by defendants STEVEN DWIGHT HAMMOND and DWIGHT LINCOLN HAMMOND, JR., to-wit: the intentional and malicious damaging and destruction, or attempt to damage and destroy, by means offire, property owned and possessed by the United States, or any department or agency thereof, to wit: the United States Department ofinterior, Bureau of Land Management, and directly and proximately creating by such conduct a substantial risk of injury to one or more persons, including but not limited to BLM employees and firefighters Chad Rott, Lisa Megargee, Lance Okeson and Joe Glascock; SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 18

Case 6:10-cr-60066-AA Document 104 Filed 05/17/12 Page 19 of 19 All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 844(f)(1) and (2) and 1512(b )(3). Dated this 16th day of May 2012. A TRUE BILL. Presented by: S. AMANDA MARSHALL United States Attorney District of Oregon lsi Grand Jury Foreperson GRAND JURY FOREPERSON lsi Frank R. Papagni. Jr. FRANK R. PAP AGNI, JR. Assistant United States Attorney SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Page 19