Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant.

Similar documents
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

EEOC and Quianna M. Knowles v. Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc.

EEOC v. Preferred Labor LLC, d/b/a Preferred People Staffing

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Foodscience Corporation

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E CONSENT DECREE

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

EEOC v. Altec Industries

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Lutheran Social Services of Southern California, Defendant.

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

UNITED STA1ES DISTRICT COURT EAS1ERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No. 06 CV 2697 (ARR)(RER) CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Houston Area Sheet Metal Joint Apprenticeship Committee, Defendant.

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

EEOC v. Michoacan Seafood Group. LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CV-W-2-ECF

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation

EEOC and Thornton, et al, v. University of Phoenix, Inc. and Apollo Group, Inc.

EEOC v. PVNF, L.L.C., d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors and Big Valley Auto

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, and The Heil Company, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

IllY _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) CIVIL NO. COO-16S1 Z 10 COJ\.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

United States of America v. City of Alma, Georgia and Bacon County, Georgia

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

EEOC v. Cleveland Construction, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. United Airlines, Inc., Defendant.

Case 2:01-cv DLG Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

EEOC v. Eastern Engineered Wood Products, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Equal Employment Opportunity ) Commission, ) Case No.: CV PHX-DAE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tri-Spur Investment Company, Inc., dba Sbarro's Italian Eatery

EEOC v. KCD Construction, Inc.

Transcription:

Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR ADAAA Case Repository Labor and Employment Law Program 8-11-2006 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant. Judge Shira A. Scheindlin Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/adaaa Thank you for downloading this resource, provided by the ILR School's Labor and Employment Law Program. Please help support our student research fellowship program with a gift to the Legal Repositories! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Labor and Employment Law Program at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in ADAAA Case Repository by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact hlmdigital@cornell.edu.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant. Keywords Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Peter Servidio, Labranche & Co Inc., 05-CV-8304(SAS), Consent decree / Settlement, Disparate Treatment, Hostile Work Environment, Retaliation, Termination, Other mental impairment disability, Service, Employment Law, ADAAA This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/adaaa/180

,,..,., lwv*> J^m*^#*«* lf *'W*&'^l*ty\,*«#.»»* JvH*,***'* 1 ' UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -X EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY: COMMISSION, : and : PETER SERVIDIO : Plaintiffs, : UZIJK, 3UIN fiat ] ^ 3 P f e DOCUMEN-f r 11. ELECTRON^ u-iir ppd if 200s r D0C #: 'ffl_ i. _ J DATE FILED: 'V/;r/77^ * "*- 1 'J».&iMt---tur t 7rrtiI''^^TCil -'.-' SW^-B ^rw^^,; *«.w,i»(*.-, ««,»*» *<-*' < ~*;.. %*JI*»*«»*-*' Civil Action. No. 05-CV-8304(SAS) v. LABRANCHE & CO., INC. CONSENT DECREE Defendant. -X This action was initiated on September 27, 2005 by Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (hereinafter the "EEOC"), an agency of the United States Government, alleging that LaBranche & Co Inc. (hereinafter "LaBranche") discriminated against claimant Peter Servidio ("Servidio") in violation of Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 by engaging in harassment toward him on the basis of his disability, retaliating against him and constructively discharging him from his employment. The Complaint alleges that LaBranche created a hostile work environment for Servidio on the basis of his mental disability by permitting him to be subjected to frequent, hostile comments about his disability by his supervisors and co-workers. The Complaint also alleges that LaBranche retaliated against Servidio after he complained of the harassment by threatening to ruin his career and constructively discharging him from his employment. LaBranche denies that Mr. Servidio was subjected to a hostile work environment during his employment. LaBranche further denies that it retaliated against NY! :\] 397153\O9\TYlTt»!.DOC\57500.0013

Mr. Servidio or subjected him to constructive discharge after Mr. Servidio complained about alleged harassment. EEOC and LaBranche (hereinafter "the parties") desire to settle this action, and therefore do hereby stipulate and consent to the entry of this Decree as final and binding between the signatories hereto, and their successors or assigns. The parties have agreed that this Decree may be entered into without Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law having been made and entered by the Court. In consideration of the mutual promises of each party to this Decree, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows, the Court finds appropriate, and it is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. This Decree resolves all issues raised in EEOC Charge Number 160-2004- 01358 and in EEOC's Complaint in this case. 2. The parties agree and the Court finds that this Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action and of the parties, that venue is proper, and that all administrative prerequisites have been met. No party shall contest the validity of this Decree, or the jurisdiction of the federal district court to enforce this Decree and its terms. 3. This Decree is being issued with the consent of the parties and does not constitute an adjudication or finding by this Court on the merits of the allegations of the Complaint. NY1:\1397!53\09\TY1T09!.DOC57500.0013 2

4. Nothing in this Decree shall be construed to preclude the EEOC from enforcing this Decree in the event that LaBranche fails to perform the promises and representations contained herein. 5. LaBranche, its managers, officers, agents, successors, and assigns, are enjoined from discrimination against any employee because of that individual's disability, harassment of any employee because of his or her status as a disabled employee, or retaliation against any employee because of her or his assertion of rights under the ADA. LaBranche and its agents further are enjoined from retaliation against any individual who has participated in this matter in any way. A. PAYMENT 6. Within ten (10) business days of the Court's entry of this Consent Decree, LaBranche shall make payment to Servidio in the total amount of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000), payment to be made in the manner specified in the Settlement Agreement between plaintiff-intervenor Peter Servidio and LaBranche entered into concurrently with the parties' execution of this Consent Decree. 7. LaBranche shall send copies of the checks comprising the payment described in Paragraph 6 above (and applicable 1099s) to Michael Ranis, New York District Office of the EEOC, 33 Whitehall Street, 5th Floor, New York, New York 10004, at the time it sends same to Servidio. NY I :\1397153\09\TY 1T09!.D0O57500.0013 3

B. NOTICE AND POSTING 8. Within ten (10) business days of the Court's entry of this Consent Decree, LaBranche shall post a copy of a remedial notice, printed on LaBranche letterhead and signed by its Executive Vice President, Alfred Hayward, in conspicuous places where employee notices are posted. A copy of the remedial notice is attached hereto as Exhibit A. C WRITTEN POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 9. Upon the Court's entry of this Consent Decree, LaBranche will adopt the modifications to its written policies and procedures prohibiting employment discrimination, including disability discrimination, harassment and discrimination on the basis of race, national origin, and religion, and retaliation, which are attached as Exhibit B. 10. Upon the Court's entry of this Consent Decree, LaBranche will adopt the modifications to its written complaint procedures for employees who believe that they have been discriminated against, harassed, or retaliated against, which are attached as Exhibit B. As part of these complaint procedures, employees of LaBranche will be able to report incidents of discrimination, harassment or retaliation to their supervisor or manager at LaBranche, to LaBranche's Human Resources Manager, or to a toll-free number for reporting incidents of discrimination, harassment or retaliation. In addition, as part of these complaint procedures, it shall be the duty of any LaBranche manager to promptly report any allegations of or suspected incidents of discrimination, harassment or retaliation to the LaBranche Human Resources Office. NYIA!397I53\09\TY1T09!.DOC\57500.0013 4

11. Upon the Court's entry of this Consent Decree, LaBranche will continue to maintain a toll-free telephone number for reporting incidents of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation. During the hours of 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, the toll-free telephone number will enable employees to report incidents of discrimination, harassment or retaliation to personnel who are trained to investigate such incidents. During all other hours, this telephone line will have an outgoing recorded message containing information about the complaint reporting procedure and a listing of staffed hours, and will accept recorded messages and complaints. 12. Upon the Court's entry of this Consent Decree, LaBranche will adopt the modifications to its written procedures for the investigation and handling of reported allegations of or suspected incidents of discrimination, harassment or retaliation, and a disciplinary policy for employees who engage in discriminatory, harassing or retaliatory behavior; such procedures and policy are attached as Exhibit C. 13. Defendant has distributed a copy of the written policies and procedures described in paragraphs 9, 10, and 12 above to all employees, and defendant agrees to distribute copies of these written policies and procedures to all future employees at or near the time of commencement of their employment. D. TRAINING 14. LaBranche shall provide no fewer than two hours training in Federal laws prohibiting discrimination in employment for all employees, including all management and supervisory employees at LaBranche. The training shall include disability discrimination and harassment as a topic, but will also consist of anti-discrimination training about other areas of prohibited discrimination, including discrimination on the NY1:\1397I53\09\TYIT09!.DOC>57500.0013 5

basis of race, sex, national origin, and religion, harassment in general, and retaliation. LaBranche shall provide the curriculum for the training to the EEOC at least 30 days prior to the day upon which the training is given, and such curriculum must meet the approval of the EEOC. The seminar will be conducted no later than six months after the entry of this Consent Decree and must be repeated again for the same group of employees no later than two years after the seminar is provided. 15. In addition to attending the training set forth in Paragraph 14 above, all LaBranche Managing Directors, Floor Captains, Post Managers and Supervising Trading Assistants shall be required to attend a training program, no less than two hours in duration, regarding harassment on the basis of disability, as well as on the bases of sex, race, national origin and religion. The training will be developed by an outside consultant and employ role plays, examples of discriminatory attitudes and positions, and sensitivity training, with the consultation of defendant's counsel and the EEOC. The training shall discuss the importance of maintaining respect for other individuals even when working in a stressful environment, such as the trading floor. The training should include topics regarding disability harassment, such as unwelcome remarks, making employees uncomfortable with remarks about their disabilities, and harassment on the basis of disability. It should define what makes comments "unwelcome," and how that is determined by the person being addressed, and not by the speaker making the comment. The training should also include a discussion of stereotyped assumptions regarding disabled individuals and how to treat such individuals. LaBranche shall provide the curriculum for the training to the EEOC at least 30 days prior to the day upon which the training is given, and such curriculum must meet the approval of the EEOC. The training will be conducted no later than six months after the entry of this Consent Decree, and NY 1 :\ 1397153 W-.TY 1T09!. DOC\S 7500.0013 6

must be repeated again for the same group of employees no later than two years after the training occurs. 16. LaBranche will train all Human Resource personnel, all in-house legal counsel, and its Regulatory Officer, on how to conduct investigations of complaints of discrimination and harassment, including harassment on the basis of disability. This training, no less than two hours in duration, will emphasize how to conduct such an investigation without permitting retaliation against the complainant. LaBranche shall provide the curriculum for the training to the EEOC at least 30 days prior to the day upon which the training is given, and such curriculum must meet the approval of the EEOC. The training is to be completed no later than six months after the entry of this Decree, and must be repeated again for the same group of employees no later than two years after the training occurs. E. MONITORING AND REPORTING 17. The EEOC has the right to monitor and review compliance with this Consent Decree. Accordingly: 18. Within (60) sixty days of the Court's entry of this Consent Decree, LaBranche shall appoint an Equal Employment Office Coordinator who shall be responsible for investigating discrimination complaints. That officer is responsible for fully investigating any such complaints about discrimination on the basis of disability, race, national origin, sex, and religion, and assuring that such is done in a manner that does not retaliate against the individual who made the complaint in the first place. Within (30) thirty days of the Court's entry of this Consent Decree, LaBranche shall NY1:\I397153V09\TYIT09!.DOC\S7500.0013 7

provide the name of its proposed Equal Employment Office Coordinator, and the curriculum vitae and any other information regarding that individual's experience, to the EEOC. The individual proposed must meet the approval of the EEOC. 19. Every six (6) months for the duration of this Decree, LaBranche shall provide periodic reports to EEOC regarding any complaints by employees about discrimination on the basis of disability, whether those complaints are made orally or in writing. If LaBranche receives a complaint in writing, it is to include and attach that written complaint as part of the report to the EEOC. 20. Within ten (10) business days of the completion of each training session referenced in *[fl] 14-16 above, LaBranche shall provide EEOC sign-in sheets showing who attended the training(s), the job title of each such individual, and indicate the subject matter of the training and its beginning and ending time. 21. In addition to the monitoring provisions set forth elsewhere in this Decree, EEOC may monitor compliance during the duration of this Decree by inspection of defendant's premises, records, and interviews with employees at reasonable times, and upon reasonable advance notice. Upon five days' notice by the EEOC, defendant will make available for inspection and copying any records requested by EEOC, facilities sought to be inspected by EEOC, and employees. NYl:\i397I53WTYlTO9!.DOC\5750O,OO13 8

F. OTHER 22. The EEOC and LaBranche agree to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs in connection with this case. 23. This Decree will remain in effect until three years from the date of entry. JUDGE SfflRA A. SqftfclNDLIN u.sb.j. 4 k&<g$.%\ij y 2006 APPROVED IN FORM AND CONTENT; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION.-\ I i.-l/ Vi ] Hvy'b c4 ^ ' \"^ ELIZABETH GROSSMAN Regional Attorney / JUDY KEENAN Supervisory Trial Attorney j KY1;\B97153\09\TYIT09!.DOC\57500.0013

'/ (*- c* <-*~^ ''~ Michael B. Ranis Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION New York District Office 33 Whitehall Street New York, NY 10004 (212)336-3701 JEFFREY KLEIN, Esq, Attorney for Defendant LABRANCHE & CO INC. WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 (212)310-8000 ALFRED HAYWARD Executive Vice President LABRANCHE & CO INC. One Exchange Plaza New York, New York 10006 NY l:\1397153w\ty1t09ldoc\57500.0013 10

Michael B. Ranis Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION New York District Office 33 Whitehall Street New York, NY 10004 (212)336-3701 ytfl JEFFREY KLEIN, Esq. Attorney for Defendant LABRANCHE & CO INC. WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 (212)310-8000 ALFRED HAYWARD Executive Vice President LABRANCHE & CO INC. One Exchange PI aza New York, New York 10006 NY 1 Al 397153\09\TY 1T09!.DOC\57500.00I3 10

Aug. 8. 2008 5:22PM RITZ.CARLTON EXEC No.5357 P. 2 AU8. 8.2006 5:16PM NO, 2/1 P. 3 Michael B. Ranis Trial Attapey EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION New York District Office 33 "Whitehall Street New York, NY 10004 (212)336-3701 JEFFREY KLEIN, Esq. Attorney for Defendant LABRANCHE & CO INC. WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 (212)310-8000 ALF$EDHAYWJ Executive Vice President LABRANCHE & CO ETC. One Exchange Plaza New York, New York 10006 HYl:\13971»W9\TYIT!»1JX)aS7S0O.OO13 PoMJiuoH TiiBo A lie ft R'l^PU 10