ARKANSAS STATE PLANT BOARD PEST CONTROL ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE REGULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Similar documents
(6) The adulteration or contamination of any pesticide sold in this state. (8) Violations of a stop order issued by the commissioner.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC CASE REFERRAL AND DISPOSITION

PESTICIDE APPLICATOR BUSINESSES. 7: Licensing

COWLITZ TRIBAL GAMING COMMISSION/TRIBAL GAMING AGENCY ENFORCEMENT REGULATON /25/17

Jason Foscolo, Esq. (631) Food Safety Modernization Act Enforcement Prepared by Lauren Handel, Esq.

Electrical Appliances and Materials Safety Act

Building Inspector to be Appointed. Enforcement of Building Code; Authority of Inspector to Enter Buildings. Plans to Accompany Application.

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the Authority contained in the Second Class

ALABAMA BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 540 X 12 QUALIFIED ALABAMA CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE (QACSC)

Title 1. General Provisions

Chapter 5. Code Enforcement

COLES COUNTY FOOD SANITATION ORDINANCE

Assembly Bill No. 32 Committee on Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Mining

ALABAMA BUILDING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 170 X 24 ALABAMA HOME INSPECTORS REGISTRATION PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROSECUTOR S GUIDE TO PESTICIDE & FERTILIZER ENFORCEMENT IN INDIANA

A Bill Regular Session, 2019 HOUSE BILL 1967

THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY PART II THE FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION

Washington County, Minnesota Ordinances

THE FINANCIAL SERVICES ACT 2007

LAW NO. 2003/10 LAW ON ARTIFICIAL FERTILIZERS

Referred to Committee on Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Mining. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing pest control.

Act 17 Trademarks Act 2010

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, State of California, ordains as follows:

The authority for the Department of Public Health to promulgate 105 CMR is found in: M.G.L. c. 111, ' ' 5I, 5N, 5O, and 5P.

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES OFFICE OF PESTICIDE SERVICES

ENERGY EFFICIENCY ACT

ORDINANCE. By Frey. Amending Title 13 of the Minneapolis Code of Ordinances relating to Licenses and Business Regulations.

CHAPTER 3. PAWNEE NATION CANNABIS SATIVA L. FARMING REGULATIONS

[Second Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY 213th LEGISLATURE

Professional Discipline Procedural Handbook

TITLE XXX OCCUPATIONS AND PROFESSIONS

788 Act Nos LAWS OF PENNSYLVANIA,

SECTION DEMERIT POINT VALUES FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE VIOLATIONS HEARINGS SUSPENSIONS REVOCATION PETITION CONSIDERATIONS

THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

Ga Comp. R. & Regs Legal Authority. Ga Comp. R. & Regs Title and Purposes.

Adopted by County Board Action County of Renville Olivia, Minnesota

Arkansas Parole Board Manual SOS Rule Number 158 Stricken Language New Language 3 - RELEASE REVOCATION

Consumer Product Safety Act (Tentative translation)

DEPARTMENT OF ARKANSAS STATE POLICE ARKANSAS CONCEALED HANDGUN CARRY LICENSE RULES

ARTICLE VIII ADMINISTRATION. SECTION 80 GENERAL PROVISIONS Intent and Purpose General Requirements... 2

Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants Bylaws as adopted by membership with February 2018 amendments

Papua New Guinea Consolidated Legislation

Voluntary Licensing Scheme for Agents. Terms and Conditions (February 2010)

OKANOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH FOOD REGULATION REVISED July 27, 2005

International Mutual Funds Act 2008

ALABAMA PRIVATE INVESTIGATION BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 741-X-6 DISCIPLINARY ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

ARLINGTON COUNTY CODE. Chapter 51 HOME IMPROVEMENT

AN ACT MAKING IT A MISDEMEANOR TO ALTER, REMOVE OR CHANGE CERTIFICATION MARKERS APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR

Article 12.0 Violations, Penalties and Enforcement

ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATION

CHAPTER 34 NUISANCES ARTICLE I. - IN GENERAL ARTICLE II. - GENERAL NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROCEDURE

CHAPTER 115: CONTRACTORS LICENSING

LAW ON STANDARDS OF CAMBODIA

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY. LCB File No. R Effective October 24, 2014

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, State of California, ordains that this Ordinance is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

ICE CREAM VENDORS LICENSE

Minnesota Rules of No-Fault Arbitration Procedures

Plant Protection Act 1989

The following is a summary of Senate Bill 915 adapted from information provided by the Oregon Building Codes Division (BCD) and League staff:

AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF THE SURPLUS LINE ASSOCIATION OF ARIZONA

NATIONAL AGENCY FOR FOOD AND DRUG ADMINSTRATION AND CONTROL (NAFDAC)

Ch. 491 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE 67 ARTICLE V. GENERAL PROCEDURES

Mahopac Golf Club. Constitution. Organized July 29th, 1898 Incorporated February 2nd, 1899 (Revisions included through March 18, 2013)

CHAPTER 6 PEDDLERS AND SOLICITORS. Article I. In General. Article II. Licenses. Article I. In General

PRIVATE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM ORDINANCE

Pesticide Control Act Chapter 76, Article 4

SAMOA INTERNATIONAL MUTUAL FUNDS ACT 2008

DESOTO COUNTY, FLORIDA. ORDINANCE No

TITLE III--IMPROVING THE SAFETY OF IMPORTED FOOD

AUSTRIA Utility Model Law

Management Program Part III. Enforcement Ordinances. Revised 2008 Air Quality Ordinance 8/20/08 1 of 6. Part III. Enforcement Ordinances

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2042

LOUISIANA BOLL WEEVIL ERADICATION COMMISSION Title 3 CHAPTER 12. PLANT DISEASES PART I. BOLL WEEVIL ERADICATION LAW

Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Revises provisions related to certain temporary and extended orders for protection.

DESOTO COUNTY, FLORIDA. ORDINANCE No

JOHNSON COUNTY CODE OF REGULATIONS FOR PRIVATE INFILTRATION AND INFLOW 2010 EDITION

PESTICIDES ACT Revised Edition CAP

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR CITIZEN COMPLAINTS REGARDING VIOLATIONS OF STATE ELECTION AND VOTER REGISTRATION LAWS

PROFESSIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE PROCEDURES MANUAL

INTERSTATE COMPACT FOR THE SUPERVISION OF ADULT OFFENDERS PREAMBLE

IBADCC Ethics Disciplinary Procedures

Chapter 42 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION

NFRC Manufacturer License Agreement

Utility Model Law I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

BY-LAWS OF THE LIGHTNING PROTECTION INSTITUTE, INC.

AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF AMOA-NATIONAL DART ASSOCIATION, INC.

BY - LAW S VIRGIN ISLANDS SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ARTICLE I - OFFICES

CHAPTER 4 ENFORCEMENT OF RULES

IC Chapter 1.1. Indiana Occupational Safety and Health Act (IOSHA)

Ordinance No. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS: 1.

PROTOCOL ON ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TO THE ANTARCTIC TREATY

Application for a Food Establishment License to Valid Code of Ordinances Chapter

Small Business Lending Industry Briefing

PAHRUMP TOWN ORDINANCE NO. 35

7112. Authority to execute compact. The Governor of Pennsylvania, on behalf of this State, is hereby authorized to execute a compact in substantially

APPENDIX E ARC DISCIPLINARY POLICY

SECTION VI. APPENDIX BEDFORD-LANDING WATERFRONT HISTORIC DISTRICT ORDINANCE

TRADE MARKS (JERSEY) LAW 2000

CHAPTER 755 Entertainment Device Arcades

BYLAWS SALUKI MASTERS SWIM CLUB ARTICLE I. Name, Affiliation and Offices

Transcription:

FINAL RULE FINAL RULE ARKANSAS STATE PLANT BOARD PEST CONTROL ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE REGULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Statement of Purpose 2 II. Definitions 2 III. Legal Authority 3 IV. s 3 V. Incident Investigation 4 VI. Activation of Response Policy 6 VII. Internal Review 7 VIII. Hearings 7 IX. Right of Appeal 8 APPENDIX A - Matrix 9 1

I. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Pesticides are valuable to Arkansas' agricultural production and the protection of man and his possessions from insects, rodents, weeds, plant diseases, and other pests. It is essential to the public health and welfare that pesticides be used properly to prevent adverse effects on man and the environment. The purpose of the regulation is to provide a fair and consistent mechanism by which compliance with the Arkansas Pest Control Law, as amended, and the regulations written pursuant thereto can be achieved. II. DEFINITIONS As used in this policy: A. Base : The midpoint of a civil penalty range. [Example: The civil penalty range for failure to report structural pest control work (1st level of enforcement) is $200.00 to $400.00. The base penalty is $300.00] B. Case Development Review Panel: An internal committee of staff including: 1. the Plant Industry Division Director or his/her designee, 2. the Agency Assistant Director or his/her designee, and 3. the Agency Director or his/ her designee. The Case Development Review Panel will carefully review all case documentation to insure completeness and to insure that the recommended enforcement action is appropriate. C. Level of : The category by which a violative incident is considered a first, second, third, or fourth offense. For a violation to be considered as a second or subsequent offense, it must be a repeat of a violation for which a previous enforcement action has been taken by the Plant Board. The previous violation/violations must have occurred within the past 3 years. D. Violation: A violative incident which does not involve human health, safety, or endanger the environment; or other incidents of non-compliance which do not create a competitive disadvantage for licensees in full compliance. E. Major Violation: A violative incident which affects human health, safety, or the environment; or other incidents of non-compliance which create a competitive disadvantage over licensees in full compliance; or a history of repetitive violative incidents. 2

* In no case shall the failure to meet minimum treating standards (Act 488 of 1975, Sections III A, III B, III C, and III D), except those which require a termiticide application, be considered a violation and subject to a civil penalty. F. Respondent: A person charged with a violation of the Arkansas Pest Control Law as amended, and the regulations written pursuant thereto. III. LEGAL AUTHORITY A. "Arkansas Pest Control Law" A.C.A. 17-30-101 et. seq. and Regulations. B. "The Arkansas Plant Act" A.C.A. 2-16-203 et. seq. and Regulations. IV. ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS Under the preceding Arkansas Codes, the Plant Board has several options for enforcement action. These are: A. Warning Letter: For minor, 1st level of enforcement violations, the Board or Board Staff will issue a warning letter. The letter will cite the specific violation. The letter will also identify any corrective action that may be needed and notify the respondent that further violations will result in more severe enforcement action. B. Informal Agreement: When a violation has been alleged, the respondent has the option of an informal hearing or a board/committee hearing. The purpose of the informal hearing is to resolve a complaint or incident. A hearing officer will meet jointly with the respondent and Plant Board Staff. The group will seek consensus on an appropriate enforcement action for recommendation to the Board. action based on the Matrix (Appendix A) will include and/or license suspension, revocation, non-renewal, or registration cancellation. The Full Board acts on all recommendations resulting from the informal hearing. C. Board/Committee Hearing: If the respondent chooses to bypass the informal agreement process, or if an agreement can not be reached during the informal hearing, a hearing will be held by the Pest Control Committee of the Board. action will include and/or license suspension, revocation, non-renewal, or registration cancellation. Following the Committee hearing, a written Finding of Fact, Conclusion of Law, and recommendation will be submitted to the Board. The Full Board will act on all recommendations of the Committee. 3

D. Suspension / revocation / non-renewal of a license or registration: The suspension, revocation, or non-renewal of a license by the Board may be in addition to or in conjunction with a civil penalty fine. E. Injunction: The Board may apply for an injunction to any court of competent jurisdiction for violations of the Pest Control Law. The court, upon hearing and for cause, has the option of a temporary or permanent injunction restraining any person from violating any provisions of The Arkansas Pest Control Law and regulations. F. Referral to Prosecuting Attorney: The Plant Board has the option of referring violations of the Pest Control Law to the prosecuting attorney. G. Referral to EPA: The Plant Board will negotiate cases of referral with EPA to determine the appropriate action. H. Referral to Pesticide Division : The pest control section will refer, the operation of faulty or unsafe equipment, and or distribution of adulterated and/or misbranded pesticides cases to the pesticide division of the AR. State Plant Board. V. INCIDENT INVESTIGATION An incident investigation will be initiated when: 9. Routine compliance monitoring indicates a violation has occurred. B. A formal complaint that an alleged volative incident has occurred. (Filing of written form by a complainant). In cases of apparent immediate endangerment to health or the environment, the written notification may be waived and the investigation of the alleged incident will begin immediately). C. Possible human exposure to pesticides is assigned priority status. The processing sequence for an incident investigation is outlined in Figure I. 4

FIGURE I PROCESSING SEQUENCE Complaint Logged ASPB Notify Plant Board Notify Inspector Local Inspector Complaint Form Sent To Inspector Complainant meets with Inspector Inspector conducts Investigation Inspector submits completed report to Section Manager Case Preparation by Section Manager No Violation Violation Found Activation of Response Policy Notification Letter Sent to Defendant and Respondent Report Filed 5

VI. ACTIVATION OF ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE POLICY An apparent violation of law and/or regulation must be documented to initiate an enforcement action. Documentation must conform to the requirements of the Plant Industry Division. The sequence of events within the enforcement response policy is follows: FIGURE II Case Development Panel Review Violation Activation of Response Referral to State Prosecuting Attorney Referral To EPA Case Processed By Section Manager Warning Letter Committee Hearing: Recommendation Informal Agreement Full Board Makes Final Disposition 6

VII. INTERNAL REVIEW The Case Development Panel will carefully review all documentation and records to determine: A. That apparent violation / violations have occurred. B. Whether the apparent violation or violations are and/or Major violations. C. The correct level of enforcement based on the penalty matrix and the documented history of the respondent. Concurrence with the Division=s finding by the Panel must be unanimous before further action can be taken on the case. VIII. HEARINGS The informal hearing officer and/or the appropriate Committee and/or the Full Board will carefully review the documentation and hear cases of alleged violations. Should it be determined a violation(s) has occurred, the severity and level of enforcement of each violation will be determined by the three (3) factors in Section VII; as they are applied to the Matrix (Appendix A). If a violation is determined in this sequence; the following factors will be considered: A. Cooperation of the respondent. B. Other extenuating/mitigating circumstances. The Hearing Officer/Committee/Board may use these factors to accelerate or mitigate enforcement action. When a civil penalty is the preferred action, the base penalty may be increased or decreased based on these factors. The civil penalty will not be more or less than the range for the specific violation listed in Appendix A. The Full Board will take action to determine the final disposition of the case. 7

IX. RIGHT OF APPEAL Any person aggrieved by any action of the Plant Board may obtain a review thereof, by filing in circuit court within 30 days of notice of the action, a written petition praying that the action of the Plant Board be set aside. 8

FINAL RULE FINAL RULE APPENDIX A A PENALTY MATRIX 9

10

PENALTY MATRIX APPENDIX A VIOLATION Violatio n Level 1 st Level of 2 nd Level of 3 rd Level of 4 th Level of t ( Fine-$) t t 1. Failure to secure an applicator license A Major B,C,E,F 200-1000 B,C,E,F 400-1000 B,C,E,F 600-1000 B,C,E,F 800-1000 2. Pesticide recommendations or applications which are inconsistent with any/or all of the following: (A) Labeling (B) Federal or State registrations (C) Federal or State restrictions of the use of a pesticide Major A B,C,G 200-400 B,C B,C,G 200-400 400-600 B,C,D,G 600-800 B,C,D,E,G 800-1000 3. Intentional misrepresentation(s) in any application for a license. 4. Misrepresentations for the purpose of deceiving for defrauding. Major B,C 200-400 B,C 400-600 B,C 600-800 B,C,E 800-1000 Major B,C,D 200-400 B,C,D 400-600 B,C,D 600-800 B,C,D 800-1000 5. Making a false statement with knowledge of its falsity for the purpose of inducing others for act thereon to their damage. Major B,C,D 200-400 B,C,D 400-600 B,C,D 600-800 B,C,D,E ENFORCEMENT ACTION OPTIONS A - Warning letter E - Injunction B - Informal Agreement F- Referral to Prosecuting Attorney C - Board/Committee Hearing G - Referral to EPA D - Suspension/Revocation of License H - Referral to Pesticide Division 800-1000 11

PENALTY MATRIX APPENDIX A (con=t) VIOLATION Violatio n Level 1 st Level of 2 nd Level of 3 rd Level of 4 th Level of t t t t 6. Performing work, with or without compensation, in a classification for which the licensee does not hold a license. 7. Falsification of records or failure to maintain or make available all records required by this Act Major B,C,D,E,F 200-1000 B,C,D,E,F 400-1000 B,C,D,E,F 600-1000 B,C,D,E,F 800-1000 A B,C 200-400 Major B,C 600-800 B,C,E 800-1000 8. Failure of licensee to supply the Board or its authorized representative, upon request with true and accurate information concerning methods and A B,C 200-400 materials used on work performed. Major B,C 600-800 B,C,E 800-1000 9 Failure of licensee to register agents or solicitors, or failure to pay registration inspection or reporting fees due or failure to make reports within the time specified A B,C 200-400 Major B,C 200-400 B,C 400-600 B,C,D 600-800 B,C,D,E 800-1000 ENFORCEMENT ACTION OPTIONS A - Warning letter E - Injunction B - Informal Agreement F - Referral to Prosecuting Attorney C - Board/Committee Hearing G - Referral to EPA D - Suspension/Revocation of License H - Referral to Pesticide Division 12

PENALTY MATRIX APPENDIX A( con=t) VIOLATION Violatio n Level 1 st Level of 2 nd Level of 3 rd Level of 4 th Level of t t t t 10. Failure to report structural pest control work. 11 Failure to correct substandard work. A B,C 100-400 Major B,C,D 200-400 B,C,D 400-600 B,C,D 600-800 B,C,D,E 800-1000 Major B,C,D 200-400 B,C,D 400-600 B,C,D 600-800 B,C,D,E 800-1000 12. Failure of licensee to obtain satisfactory control of the pests or diseases which the licensee engages to control or eradicate as evidenced by A B,C 200-400 repeated inspections by the Board. Major B,C,D 600-800 B,C,D,E 800-1000 13. Conviction of any court of a violation of this chapter or of FIFRA. 14.Operation of faulty or unsafe equipment. 15. Distribution of adulterated and/or misbranded pesticides. Major B,C,D 200-400 B,C,D 400-600 B,C,D,G 600-800 B,C,D,E,G 800-1000 H Major H 200-600 H 400-800 H 600-1000 H 800-1000 H Major H 200-600 H 400-800 H 600-1000 H 800-1000 ENFORCEMENT ACTION OPTIONS A - Warning letter E - Injunction B - Informal Agreement F - Referral to Prosecuting Attorney C - Board/Committee Hearing G -Referral to EPA D - Suspension/Revocation of License H - Referral to Pesticide Division 13