Statement by H.E. Mr. Choe Su Hon Head of the Delegation of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

Similar documents
KIM IL SUNG FOR THE STRENGTHENING OF COOPERATION BETWEEN THE NON-ALIGNED COUNTRIES IN THEIR NEWS SERVICES

STATEMENT MR. KIM JAE HON PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA TO UNESCAP

STATEMENT BY HER ROYAL HIGHNESS PRINCESS HAJAH MASNA SPECIAL ENVOY BRUNEI DARUSSALAM AT THE 59 TH SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY

The Policy for Peace and Prosperity

Chairman of the EAI Board of Trustees / Seoul National University

Vienna, 2-12 May Check against delivery - PERMANENT MISSION OF PORTUGAL VIENNA

Constitution of DPRK post (official translation)

Conflict on the Korean Peninsula: North Korea and the Nuclear Threat Student Readings. North Korean soldiers look south across the DMZ.

KIM IL SUNG. The Life of a Revolutionary Should Begin with Struggle and End with Struggle

On Nationalism FOREIGN LANGUAGES PUBLISHING HOUSE PYONGYANG, KOREA JUCHE 97 (2008)

NORMALIZATION OF U.S.-DPRK RELATIONS

Trust-Building Process on the Korean Peninsula

Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un Makes Policy Speech at First Session of 14th SPA

Statement. H.E. Mr. Rashid Abdullah Al-Noaimi. Minister of Foreign Affairs Head of Delegation of the United Arab Emirates

Nuclear Stability in Asia Strengthening Order in Times of Crises. Session III: North Korea s nuclear program

Statement. H.E. Mr. Ban Ki-moon. Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Republic of Korea. the 59 th Session. of the United Nations General Assembly

Declaration on the Principles Guiding Relations Among the CICA Member States. Almaty, September 14, 1999

SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VlEINAM MISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS 866 UNITED NATIONS PLAZA

Security Council. The situation in the Korean peninsula. Kaan Özdemir & Kardelen Hiçdönmez

The UN Security Council is the custodian of international peace, and security.

Final Statement of the 5th Global Inter-religious Conference on Article 9 of the Japanese Peace Constitution

CHINA POLICY FOR THE NEXT U.S. ADMINISTRATION 183

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [on the report of the First Committee (A/58/462)]

NPT/CONF.2020/PC.II/WP.33

Situation of human rights in the Democratic People s Republic of Korea*

The Korean Nuclear Problem Idealism verse Realism By Dr. C. Kenneth Quinones January 10, 2005

Briefing Memo. Forecasting the Obama Administration s Policy towards North Korea

Brazil, Egypt, Ireland, Mexico, New Zealand and South Africa: draft resolution

NPT/CONF.2020/PC.II/WP.30

Statement on behalf of Hungary. Ms Andrea Beatrix Kádár

-eu. Address by. H.E. Ahmed Aboul - Gheit. Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Arab Republic of Egypt. before

STATEMENT H.E. MR. MUN SONG MO AMBASSADOR EXTRAORDINARY AND PLENIPOTENTIARY OF THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA TO THE KINGDOM OF THAILAND

Firmly Promote the China-U.S. Cooperative Partnership

Brief Report on the Workshop I Held at Nagasaki, Japan on December 7-8, 2012

MONGOLIA PERMANENT MISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS

PRESS STATEMENT. BY THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE 9th ASEAN SUMMIT AND THE 7th ASEAN + 3 SUMMIT BALI, INDONESIA, 7 OCTOBER 2003

ON BEHALF OF THE AFRICAN GROUP AMBASSADOR SAMSON S. [TEGBOJE DEPUTY PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE PERN[ANENT MISSION OF NIGERIA TO THE UNITED NATIONS

STATEMENT BY AMBASSADOR ROGELIO PFIRTER DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF THE

Seoul, May 3, Co-Chairs Report

Address. H.E. Dr. Shin Kak-soo. Acting Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade. of the Republic of Korea. of the United Nations.

A New Kind of Korea. september/ october 2o11. Park Geun-hye. Building Trust Between Seoul and Pyongyang. Volume 9o Number 5

[SE4-GB-3] The Six Party Talks as a Viable Mechanism for Denuclearization

North Korea s Hard-Line Behavior: Background & Response

Policy Memo. DATE: March 16, RE: Realistic Engagement With North Korea

PAKISTAN PERMANENT MISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS

North Korea and the NPT

Adopted by the Security Council at its 6141st meeting, on 12 June 2009

PERMANENT MISSION OF GREECE TO THE UNITED NATIONS

Seoul-Washington Forum

If North Korea will never give up its nukes, what can the U.S. do?

CHAIRMAN S STATEMENT ON THE FOURTH ASEAN DEFENCE MINISTERS MEETING-PLUS (4 TH ADMM-PLUS) MANILA, 24 OCTOBER 2017

THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION JOHN L. THORNTON CHINA CENTER WANG YI DINNER Q&A SESSION. Washington, D.C.

State Counsellor of the Republic of the Union of. New York, 21 September Distinguished Delegates, Ladies and

17 th Republic of Korea-United Nations Joint Conference on Disarmament and Non-proliferation Issues:

East Asia November 13,2017 A peaceful Asia and the Article 9 of Japanese Constitution

STATEMENT BY. H.E. Mr. ANDREJ KISKA PRESIDENT OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC IN THE GENERAL DEBATE OF THE 72^ SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY

Statement. H.E. Dr. Manmohan Singh. Prime Minister of India. at the. General Debate. of the. 68th Session. of the. United Nations General Assembly

IAEA 51 General Conference General Statement by Norway

Preparatory Committee for the 2020 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) - EU Statement

Plenary. Record of the Eleventh Meeting. Held at Headquarters, Vienna,, on Friday, 18 September 2009, at 4.30 p.m.

Implementing the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons: Non-proliferation and regional security

2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non- Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons 3 May 2010

The threat of first strike Is now being used to Justify new kinds of arms races. The probability of climatic catastrophe renders the first strike

STATEMENT H.E. SHEIKH DR. MOHAMMAD SABAH AL SALEM AL SABAH DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE STATE OF KUWAIT BEFORE THE

NORTH KOREA REQUIRES LONG-TERM STRATEGIC RELATIONSHIP WITH THE U.S.

Statement. H. E. Cho Tae-yul. Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs. Republic of Korea. at the. IAEA International Conference on Nuclear Security:

Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen Remarks Prepared for Delivery to Chinese National Defense University Beij ing, China July 13,2000

73 rd Session of the United Nations General Assembly General Debate

Edited by Ashley J. Tellis, Mercy Kuo, and Andrew Marble

This interview of PCI Board Member, Professor Chung-in Moon, appeared in the Korea Times on Thursday, November 01, 2018.

The Honorable Maurice F. Strong. North Korea at the Crossroads Prospects for a Comprehensive Settlement

NORTH KOREAN NUCLEAR NEGOTIATIONS: STRATEGIES AND PROSPECTS FOR SUCCESS

HELEN CLARK. A Better, Fairer, Safer World. New Zealand s Candidate for United Nations Secretary-General

Draft U.N. Security Council Resolution September 26, The Security Council,

The Contemporary Strategic Setting

A GOOD FRAMEWORK FOR A GOOD FUTURE by Jonathan Granoff, President of the Global Security Institute

Joint Press Release Issued at the Conclusion of the First SAARC Summit in Dhaka on 7-8 December 1985

Nuclear doctrine. Civil Society Presentations 2010 NPT Review Conference NAC

Russian-Chinese Joint Declaration on a Multipolar World and the Establishment of a New International

THE 14 TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASIA PACIFIC PARLIAMENTARY FORUM (APPF) January 2006, Jakarta Indonesia JOINT COMMUNIQUÉ

PERMANENT MISSION OF THAILAND TO THE UNITED NATIONS 351 EAST 52 nd STREET NEW YORK, NY TEL (212) FAX (212)

Dr. Sameh Aboul-Enein Budapest, June, 2012

IIC Curriculum Vitae History Objectives Achievements

Research Guide. Security Council. North Korea : the Human Rights and Security Nexus. Vice Chair: LEE See Hyoung. Vice Chair: JEE Jung Keun

Summary of Policy Recommendations

Statement by Denmark. 73rd Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations. General Debate. 28 September 2018

Briefing on Sixth Committee of the United Nations General Assembly 1. History of the Sixth Committee

JOINT STATEMENT OF THE ASEAN-AUSTRALIA SPECIAL SUMMIT: THE SYDNEY DECLARATION. Sydney, Australia, 18 March 2018

Ask an Expert: Dr. Jim Walsh on the North Korean Nuclear Threat

Joint Statement of the 22 nd EU-ASEAN Ministerial Meeting Brussels, Belgium, 21 January 2019

Joint Statement between Japan and the State of Kuwait on Promoting and Expanding Cooperation under the Comprehensive Partnership

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 7 December [on the report of the First Committee (A/70/460)]

epp european people s party

Second Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Science Diplomacy Symposium. High Level Session. [Keynote Speech]

Joint Statement of the Ninth Mekong-Japan Summit

JOINT STATEMENT OF JAPAN AND THE REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA ON THE OCCASION OF THE OFFICIAL WORKING VISIT TO JAPAN BY H.E. MR

France, Germany, Portugal, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America: draft resolution

Press release on the SCO Council of Ministers of Foreign Affairs meeting

CHAPTER 10 Security and Defense Environment of Mongolia in 2015

Statement by. President of the Republic of Latvia

Transcription:

Press Release Please check against delivery Statement by H.E. Mr. Choe Su Hon Head of the Delegation of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea At the General Debate of the fifty-ninth session of the United Nations General Assembly New York, 27 September Juche 93(2004)

On behalf of the delegation of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), I would like, first of all, to congratulate you, Mr.Jean Ping on your election as president of the 59th session of the UN General Assembly and believe that your skilful leadership will bring about fruitful results of the current session. I also appreciate the active efforts exerted by Mr. Kofi Annan, the Secretary-General of the United Nations to ensure the central role of the UN in addressing major international issues. 4 years have passed since the beginning of a new century. However, humankind is still confronted with grave challenges in its efforts to realize the aspiration to build a peaceful and prosperous world. Unilateralism and high-handedness become ever more undisguised giving rise to aggression, arbitrariness and instability in many parts of the world. Consequently, there continues unabated a vicious cycle of the sovereignty and interests of weak and small countries being trampled down for the sake of the exclusive interests of specific countries. Today, the main factor undermining international peace and stability is unilateralism and high-handed acts based on the "logic" of power. The challenge facing the humankind today requires, more urgently than ever before, the UN member States to strengthen their joint efforts in seeking fair international relations based on multilateralism which fully observes universal principles of the respect for sovereignty, equality, territorial integrity and mutual benefits. One of the regions where unilateralism and high-handedness are most rampant is the northeast Asia, to be more specific, the Korean peninsula. 1

On the Korean peninsula, the national division forced by outside forces has been lasting for more than half a century and the danger of war is snowballing owing to the US extreme moves to isolate and stifle the DPRK and threats of preemptive strikes against it. Even at this moment, all kinds of sophisticated war equipment are being deployed in and around the Korean peninsula, targeting the DPRK. The acute political and military situation prevailing in and around the Korean peninsula proves clearly once again how just it is for the DPRK to have built up its strong self-defensive military power to prevent war and ensure peace upholding the Songun policy of the respected General Kim Jong II. The more vicious the moves of the outside forces to isolate and stifle the DPRK, the higher our army and people, firmly united around their leader, are holding the banner of Songun and pushing ahead with their struggle to build a prosperous and powerful state with optimism for the future and devotion to the socialist cause. The Songun policy, the independent policy of the DPRK, serves as a reliable deterrent to secure peace and security not only on the Korean peninsula, but also in the region of the northeast Asia and the rest of the world, for which we feel great pride and self-confidence. The reunification of the country is the prerequisite to achieving a durable peace on the Korean peninsula, and it is our invariable stand to achieve national reunification independently on the basis of the June 15 north-south Joint Declaration. The historic June 15 north-south Joint Declaration represents a declaration of national independence as well as a milestone of reunification indicating the path towards national reconciliation, collaboration and reunification. Various works for national co-prosperity were activated in accordance with the lofty spirit of the Joint Declaration; the connection of railways and roads have proceeded linking up the once-severed-blood vessel of the country; contacts and mutual travels at all levels increased; inter-korean economic cooperation has been guaranteed institutionally. 2

It is regrettable, however, that the abovementioned process of reconciliation and cooperation between the north and south of Korea did not hold out towards a durable peace and reunification, going through twists and turns on the way. It is because the process is unwelcoming for the United States and therefore, it is dead set against the improved relations and on-going cooperation activities at all levels between the north and south of Korea. The United States should no longer hamper the north and south of Korea in their efforts to achieve national reconciliation, collaboration and reunification. No matter how the situation may change in the future, the Government of the DPRK will continue to strive to overcome all the challenges of the anti-reunification forces within and without and open up a broad path to independent reunification of the country through national cooperation under the great proposition of "by our nation itself'. I wish to take this opportunity to clarify once again the principled stand of our Government regarding the nuclear issue between the DPRK and the US. As I already made it clear time and again at this platform, the nuclear issue is the product of the deep-rooted hostile policy on the DPRK pursued by the US for more than half a century. In other words, the DPRK is left with no other option but to possess a nuclear deterrent in the face of the situation in which the present US administration, being accustomed to rejecting our system, has been attempting to eliminate the DPRK by force while designating it as part of an "axis of evil" and a target of preemptive nuclear strikes. Peace is most precious to our people, who have been living for more than half a century with a heartbreaking pain of national division forced by the outside forces and under the constant threat of the world's only super power. 3

Our people aspire after peace more than others, but never beg for peace. The peace that they want to achieve is the one for independent life, not a peace for slaves deprived of freedom. The confrontation on the Korean peninsula today is, in essence, the one between the foreign forces intruding into one's home and the owners struggling to defend it. The nuclear deterrent of the DPRK constitutes a legitimate self-defensive means to counter ever-growing US nuclear threat and aggression against the DPRK and reliably defend sovereignty, peace and security of the country. Denuclearizing the Korean peninsula is our goal, and it is the consistent position of the DPRK to address the nuclear issue between the DPRK and the US peacefully through dialogue and negotiations. If the United States renounces practically its hostile policy on the DPRK including the cessation of nuclear threats, the DPRK also is willing to scrap its nuclear deterrent accordingly. Basing itself on this position, the DPRK government proposed a package solution based on the principle of "word for word" and "action for action" for a peaceful settlement of the nuclear issue, and as the first step to this end, offered such a flexible proposal as the "reward for freeze". In this regard, at the third round of six party talks last June, the countries concerned shared the view on the importance of the both sides adhering to the principles of the "word for word", "action for action" and "corresponding measures for freeze" and reached an agreement. The proposal on the "reward for freeze" provides that the DPRK would freeze all the nuclear weapon-related facilities and the output from their operation on the premise that the US abandons its hostile policy, in particular its assertion on the "complete, verifiable and irreversible dismantlement of our nuclear program" (CVID), and that at the same time, the United States, for its part, would lift its economic sanctions and blockade against the DPRK, de-list the DPRK from the "sponsors of terrorism" and participate in compensation of energy worth the capacity of two million KW. 4

By offering this proposal, we intend to build mutual confidence in the first place and eventually solve the nuclear issue fundamentally through addressing each other's concerns and meeting their respective demands step-by-step on the basis of simultaneous actions under the present situation characterized by the hostile relations of extreme distrust between the two countries. The process of realizing the proposed "reward for freeze" will be the one of confidencebuilding between the DPRK and the US, and this is possible only when the US itself rewards for our freeze. It is natural that there are a start and order in doing anything. From this point of view, our freeze will be the first step towards eventual dismantlement of our nuclear program. Of course, the freeze will be followed by the objective verification. In order to further clarify our will to dismantle the nuclear deterrent, we had intended to include in our freeze no more manufacturing of nuclear weapons, and no test and transfer of them. The US, however, disregarding the common understanding and agreement reached at the third round of six party talks, has been further intensifying its hostile acts against the DPRK in a more undisguised way, even openly announcing that there would be no reward for the freeze and dismantlement of our nuclear facilities. Most recently, the US passed a "bill on human rights in north Korea" and thus fixed it as a law to provide financial and material support for overthrowing our system and force the third countries to do so. The US went so far as to slander and debase the supreme leadership of its dialogue partner. It also forces us to "disarm ourselves" like a defeated nation does, thus attempting to forcibly "dismantle our nuclear program first" and "overthrow our system" through the "CVID". Consequently, the basis of negotiations, which was hardly in the making to resolve the nuclear issue, has been completely destroyed. If the United States has the will to co-exist peacefully with the DPRK by abandoning its hostile policy on the DPRK, the nuclear issue will be resolved properly. 5

With regard to the six party talks, the DPRK is also of the position to continue the talks. Nevertheless, the ever intensifying US hostile policy and the clandestine nuclear related experiments recently revealed in south Korea are constituting big stumbling blocks to the continuation of the talks. The serious situation, whereby the basis of the negotiations has been totally destroyed and furthermore, the secret nuclear related experiments in south Korea have not yet been clarified, makes us unable to participate in the talks aimed at discussing the nuclear weapon program. Therefore, if the six party talks are to be resumed, the basis for the talks demolished by the United States should be properly set up and the truth of the secret nuclear experiments in south Korea clarified completely. Availing myself of this opportunity, I extend my gratitude to the UN member States for their active support to and understanding of our principled stand and hope that they will continue to contribute to the peaceful settlement of the nuclear issue between the DPRK and the US with fair stance. For the UN to fulfill its mission for international peace and security and socio-economic development, it should play a leading role in addressing the major international issues in accordance with the objectives and principles of the UN Charter. To this end, the UN should no longer tolerate unilateralism and high-handedness among others, which constitute a serious violation of the UN Charter and international law at the present time. Disputes should be resolved peacefully through dialogue and negotiations and there is no justification whatsoever for the unilateral use of force such as armed invasion on sovereign states. Next, the UN should be democratized so that all the international issues resolved in common interests of the member states. 6

In this regard, our delegation is of the view that the General Assemble should be empowered to review and approve the resolutions of the Security Council relating to sanctions and the use of force directly affecting international peace and security. The reform of the Security Council should be realized in such a way as to enable it to ensure the full representation and interests of the non-aligned and other developing countries which account for overwhelming majority of the UN member states and contribute to a fair solution to disputes. In addition, practical measures should be taken one after another to actively assist the developing countries in their efforts for sustainable development by strengthening the role of the UN and its affiliated organs in the socio-economic fields. The DPRK Government will, in t he future, too, regard i ndependence, peace and friendship as the main ideal of its foreign policy and further strengthen the friendly and cooperative relations with all the UN member-states that respect sovereignty of our country and actively contribute to the international efforts to establish just, equitable and new world order. Thank you. 7