PART I: STUDYING JURORS

Similar documents
Dr. SunWolf s Jury Markers: Points Where Injustice Occurs

MOCK TRIAL PROCEDURE

Primacy, Recency, and the Opening Statement

Using Storytelling Techniques to Craft a Persuasive Legal Story

PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS. CACI No. 100

EFFECTIVE VOIR DIRE, OPENING, AND CLOSING ARGUMENT FROM A PROPERTY OWNER S AND CONDEMNOR S PERSPECTIVE

How to Win your case During Jury Selection. By Ty Hyderally, Esq. Hyderally & Associates, P.C. November 7, 2017

WRITING FOR TRIALS 1

Litigation Unveiled Click to edit Master title style

Pages , Looking Back

GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to

The jury panel is selected by lot from all the names of registered voters or from persons having a valid driver s license.

STUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER SIX

Supporting Immigrants Mental Health & Wellness in these Times. Presented by: Cathi Tillman, LSW Corinne Guest, LSW

JURY SELECTION AFTER CORTEZ

"Tell-Tale Heart" Mock Trial

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

Effective Management of Civil Cases

Agenda Setting, Framing, & Advocacy

Directions: Match the following words with their corresponding definitions. Place the letter of the correct definition on the line provided.

American Government Jury Duty

VOIR DIRE RECENT CASES AND SOME THOUGHTS. By Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. and Megan E. Coleman, Esq.

Casa de Esperanza. The National Network. Advocacy Today Identifying and Meeting Survivors Needs

HANDBOOK FOR TRIAL JURORS SERVING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS

A Two-Process Approach to Persuasion. The Petty and Cacioppo model calls these two routes central and peripheral.

MODEL JURY SELECTION QUESTIONS

Not in Our Name! Massage Therapists Against Sex Trafficking. Action Items & Powerful Tools for Ending Sexual Exploitation 2012

SS.7.C.3.3 and SS.7.C.3.8 Judicial Branch: Article III

DIRECT EXAMINATION. Robert E. Harrington Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A.

Psychology and Law. I. How are jurors influenced by witnesses, the defendant, and the judge? A. How are jurors influenced by eyewitness testimony?

The Art of Judging Within a Judges' Panel

JURY SELECTION AFTER CORTEZ

Argued September 27, 2017 Decided. Before Judges Alvarez, Nugent, and Geiger.

Hung Juries: Are They a Problem?

The Art of Advocacy: Trial Persuasion in a Polarized World

* * * * * * * * Members of the Jury Panel [or Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury Panel]:

STORYTELLING FOR THE DEFENSE. Merrie Jo Pitera, Ph.D. & Barbara Hillmer, Ph.D.

Prosecutor Trial Preparation: Preparing the Victim of Human Trafficking to Testify

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ANDREW SANTIAGO. Argued: November 4, 2009 Opinion Issued: March 10, 2010

Confronting the Immigration Bias in Jury Selection

Four Lethal, and Preventable, Defense Mistakes in Civil Litigation

By Aaron B. Maduff Maduff, Medina, & Maduff One East Wacker Dr., 21 st Floor Chicago, Illinois

JURY INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION-CRIMINAL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

STIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS State v. Manny Rayfield Curr County Circuit Court Case No State of New Maine

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No P. versus

Chapter 3 Dispute Resolution

2:16-cv EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20

Children s Commission

The Politics of Emotional Confrontation in New Democracies: The Impact of Economic

PRESENTED BY: Sponsored by:

JUDGE DENISE POSSE LINDBERG STOCK CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Index. Belief in a just world, 149 Bench trial, , 257 agreement with jury decisions, Benevolent gestures, , 168

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1. Members of the jury, the instructions I gave at the. instructions I gave you earlier, as well as those I give

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT FIVE JUDGE COLLEEN K. STERNE. Departmental Requirements and Procedures

THE OPENING STATEMENT - THE PREVIEW TO VICTORY OR THE BEGINNING OF DEFEAT? THE CLOSING ARGUMENT IN AN EMPLOYMENT CASE - HOW TO FINALIZE THE VICTORY

CAUSE NO CHARGE OF THE COURT

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

Some Friendly, Random Advice On Federal Court Advocacy The Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge

Oral Decisions. The Why and How of. for Trial Court Judges. Why We re Here. The National Judicial College

Mock Trial: People of the World v. the Mongols

Introduction How Jurors are Selected Qualifications Exemptions. Your Role As A Juror Sequence of a Trial Petit and Grand Juries

Course Court Systems and Practices. Unit VII Courtroom Professionalism and Personnel

By: Stan V. Smith, Ph.D.

Session 4: Implementation of Informally Negotiated Agreements or Settlements

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS - LAW DIVISION. v. No.: COMPLAINT AT LAW

NO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

HANDBOOK FOR JURORS: A Concise Summary

PRESERVING THE RECORD AND MAKING OBJECTIONS AT TRIAL: A Win-Win Proposition for Client and Lawyer

COURT IN SESSION TEACHER PACK CONTEMPORARY COURTROOM WORKSHOP CYBERBULLYING

Case 1:17-cv WYD-SKC Document 150 Filed 02/19/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 32 JURY INSTRUCTIONS

Examination of witnesses

Dynamic Opening Statements How to Establish Credibility and Persuade From the Beginning

DEPARTMENT 34. Michael Paul Linfield. Telephone: (213)

Alpena County. Version 1.0 JURY DUTY HANDBOOK

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DOMINICK STANIN, SR. Argued: November 9, 2017 Opinion Issued: March 30, 2018

HOW A CRIMINAL CASE PROCEEDS IN FLORIDA

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

Instruction, Note (Civ) RULES GOVERNING JUROR CONDUCT DURING TRIAL

2015 Annual Convention. Best Practices for Busy Attorneys: Litigation

Part I Preparing Yourself for Trial

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: April 5, No. A-1-CA STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

Guns don t just go off

RESPONDING TO CHALLENGERS Conflict, change and leadership

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,505 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CHRISTOPHER BOOTHBY, Appellant.

Second, you must not be influenced by sympathy, passion or prejudice in favor of any party or against any of the parties.

Bureau of Refugee and Immigrant Assistance (BRIA) New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance

JURY SPEECHES. Michael Meehan Advocate Black Chambers

Closing Argument Practice Tips

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION GOVERNMENT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS

RECENT THIRD CIRCUIT AND SUPREME COURT CASES

Fall, Criminal Litigation 9/4/17. Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal. How Do We Get A Case?

Court s in Session: Jury Trials for Clerks OBJECTIVES. About having a Jury Trial? Texas Municipal Courts Education Center.

GUN CONTROL 1. Gun Control: Genre Analysis of a You Tube video and an online article. Angel Reyes. University of Texas at El Paso

The People vs. Onion

FRCP 30(b)(6) Notice or subpoena directed to entity to require designation of witness to testify on its behalf.

Trial Academy Voir Dire: The Rejection Process

Impeachment by omission. Impeachment for inconsistent statement. The Evidence Dance. Opening Statement Tip Twice

Using Demonstrative Evidence In Employment Trials

Transcription:

TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables and Figures Foreword 10 Practical Features of this Book PROLOGUE PART I: STUDYING JURORS Chapter 1 KNOWING JURORS 1-1. Three Jury Epiphanies. 1-2. The Mystery of Jury Deliberations 1-3. The Problems of Jury Research 1-3(a). The Effects of Deliberating 1-3(b). Criticism of Jury Research Designs. PART II: THE BIO-PHYSIOLOGY OF A JUROR S BRAIN: One Juror, Many Minds: How Consciousness Really Works Chapter 2 THE MIND IS A CRAZY QUILT 2-1. The Crowd Living in a Juror s Mind 2-2. How a Juror Becomes Aware of a Fact. 2-2(a). Brain Facts/Mind Facts 2-2(b). Mind Spinning 2-3. Juror Listening and Attention Errors 2-3(a). Cognitive Busyness 2-3(b). Juror Listening Errors 2-3(c). Divided Attention 2-4. Biological Basis for Attention Chapter 3 TRIALS ARE IN THE BRAINS OF THE BEHOLDERS 3-1. The Influence of Color Perception 3-2. Remembering and Forgetting. 3-2(a). Raw Sensory Memory 3-2(b). Short-term Working Memory 3-2(c). Long-term Retrievable Memory 3-2(d). Homo narrans 3-2(e). Person Memory 3-2(f). The Generation Effect 3-2(g). The Self-Reference Effect 3-2(h). Memory Stress 3-2(i). Flashbulb Memory 3-2(j). Never-Happened Memory 3-2(k). Memory After Forty 3-2(l). Memory Talk i

PRACTICAL JURY DYNAMICS Chapter 4 RIGHT MIND/LEFT MIND? HOW OUR BRAIN S HEMISPHERES REALLY FUNCTION 4-1. Right Mind/Left Mind. 4-2. Regions of the Brain That Process Language Chapter 5 FROM JUROR-COGNITION TO JUROR-EMOTION 5-1. The Purpose of Emotions in Human Survival 5-2. Physiology of Jurors Emotions When They Judge Other People s Behaviors 5-3. How Emotional Arousal Impacts Juror Thinking about Other People 5-4. The Vividness Effect: Sensual Persuasion 5-4(a). Picture Superiority 5-4(b). Word Vividness. 5-4(c). Persuade the Juror s Body 5-4(d). The Vividness of Toys 5-5. The Velcro Effect 5-6. The Effects of Juror Mood on Juror Reasoning 5-6(a). Mood and Memory 5-6(b). Mood and Decision Making Style 5-7. Deliberating Under the Influence of Stress 5-8. The Effect of Stress on Citizens Selected for Jury Duty 5-9. Anxiety: A Traveling Companion of Juror Stress 5-10. The Effect of Sleep Debt on Juror Competency PART III: THE SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF A JUROR S PERCEPTIONS: The Trial Lawyers Offer versus The Trial Jurors Experience Chapter 6 FROM A FOCUS ON SELLING TOWARDS A FOCUS ON BUYING 6-1. Information Anxiety 6-1(a). The Trial Practitioner s Anxiety Checklist 6-1(b). The Unavoidable Selectivity of Perception 6-1(c). Ten Sources of Evidence-Anxiety for Jurors 6-1(d). Information Hat Racks 6-2. Creating Empty Spaces as Evidence 6-3. Toxic Language 6-3(a). Sentence Structures Affect Juror Comprehension 6-3(b). Negative Words 6-3(c). The Framing Effect 6-3(d). Toxic Court Words Chapter 7 HOW THE JUROR S BRAIN TALKS TO ITSELF DURING TRIAL 7-1. Mental Filters and Misperceptions ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS 7-2. Social Perception: What a Juror Sees Is What You Get. 7-3. Mental Short-Cuts a Juror Uses in Perception 7-4. The Influence of Juror Categories and Schemas Chapter 8 A JUROR S SOCIAL THINKING: HOW A JUROR MAKES SENSE OF THE BEHAVIORS OF OTHER PEOPLE 8-1. Social Thinking and Juror Decision Making 8-2. Juror Attributions 8-3. The Effect of Novel Events 8-4. Fundamental Attribution Error 8-5. False Consensus Error 8-6. False Uniqueness Error 8-7. Attributions of Blame 8-8. Locus of Control 8-9. Cracked Perceptual Lenses 8-10. A Practical Approach to Gaining Access to Juror Attitudes 8-10(a). Model for Measuring Strength and Extremity of Juror Attitude on Specific Trial Issues 8-10(b). Voir Dire Question Formats that Elicit Juror Attitude Chapter 9 THE DILEMMA OF A JUROR S UN-THINKING TASK 9-1. Intrusive Thoughts 9-2. Controlled Un-Believing 9-3. A Juror s Cognitive Load 9-4. The Bad Experience Closet 9-4(a). Set that Experience Aside! Where Do Jurors Put It? 9-4(b). Prejudice 9-4(b)(1). Activating Prejudice 9-4(b)(2). The Impossibility of Setting Prejudice Aside 9-5. The Set-it-Aside Agenda PART IV: THE EFFECTS OF GROUP DYNAMICS ON A JUROR S VOTE: The Deliberation Myth Chapter 10 THE WORK OF JURY WORK: WHEN INDIVIDUAL JURORS BECOME A GROUP 10-1. The Faulty Norms of Jury Deliberations 10-2. Changing the Way Jurors Deliberate 10-2(a). Strange Rules Jurors Create During Deliberations. 10-2(b). The Geography of Seating Positions 10-2(c). Why Some Jurors End Up More Equal than Others 10-2(d). Deadlock Phobia 10-2(d)(1). Dynamite! 10-2(e). Five O Clock Verdicts 10-2(f). The Voting-Structure Effect 10-2(g). What Counts as Evidence? iii

10-2(h). The Toxic Agenda Effect. PRACTICAL JURY DYNAMICS 10-2(i). From List-Makers to Dialogue-Lovers 10-2(j). Group Memory: Memory Chaos 10-2(j)(1). Jointly Reconstructing the Past 10-2(j)(2). Social Memory Contamination Chapter 11 SOCIAL VERDICTS (THE RELATIONAL SIDE OF JURY DECISION-MAKING) 11-1. Symbolic Convergence Theory: Groups and Fantasies 11-2. Social Opinions 11-3. Social Cliques 11-4. Primary Tension and Secondary Tension: What Blocks the Jury s Task? 11-5. Mars and Venus Deliberate Gender in the Jury Room 11-6. Salads, Stews, and Surprising Effects of Juror Diversity Chapter 12 EMOTIONAL 12-1. Emotional Persuasion. 12-2. Laughing on the Road to a Verdict 12-3. Effects of Emotion on Juror Mood 12-4. Emotional Argument 12-5. Angry Argument: All People Are Afraid of the Anger of Others 12-6. Emotional Pollution. 12-7. Groupmood Chapter 13 THE SHADOW SIDE OF JURY DECISION MAKING 13-1. Grouphate 13-2. Social Loafing 13-3. Missing in Action! Jurors Who Disappear in the Jury Room 13-4. Toxic Jurors 13-5. Seizing Speaking Turns 13-6. What Really Happens When One Juror Leaves the Room 13-7. Improperly Speculating 13-8. Ignoring Misconduct of Fellow Jurors 13-9. The Shadow Side of Jury Leadership 13-9(a). The First Act of Inequality 13-9(b). Mutiny! Functional Leadership for All 13-10. The Consensus Disease Chapter 14 DECISIONAL REGRET IN THE JURY ROOM 14-1. Juror Overconfidence 14-1(a). Natural Bases of Juror Decision Biases 14-2. Counterfactual Thinking: Changing the Facts 14-3. Woulda/Coulda/Shoulda Minefields 14-4. Why Deliberations Are a Set-Up for Woulda/Coulda/Shoulda Thinking iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS 14-5. A Storied Theory of Jury Deliberations 14-6. Regret Contagion, GroupRegret, and Decisional Avoidance 14-7. Story Plugs Chapter 15 STORY-THINKING AND FANTASIES DURING 15-1. The Storymaking-Mind of a Juror 15-2. Story Battles in Deliberation. 15-3. Opening the Jury Room s Door: Making Sense of the Story Battles 15-4. Storytelling Functions in Deliberations. 15-5. When Fantasies Collide: Symbolic Convergence Theory and Jury Decision Making. 15-6. Story Strategies for Attorneys 15-6(a). Storying Opening Statements 15-6(b). Storying Closing Arguments 15-6(c). Story Prompting Chapter 16 JURY-JOINING 16-1. Collaborative Dialogues: How to Discuss What Matters Most 16-2. Non-Question Voir Dire 16-3. Collaborating on Solutions 16-4. Collaborative Challenges for Cause 16-4(a). General Legal Principals 16-4(b). Juror Signals of Challengability 16-4(c). Template for Walking with a Juror on the Challenge-for-Cause Trail 16.5. Collaborative Closing Arguments Chapter 17 OPENING WINDOWS TO THE BLACK BOX OF JURY 17-1. Curing Ignorance about Jurors Rights 17-2. Reasons Jurors Think They Shouldn t Communicate with the Judge 17-3. Gaining An Ear to the Jury Wall 17-4. Why Jurors Protect Bad Jurors 17-5. Toxic Bailiffs: The Virus Every Jury Is Exposed To PART V: TRIAL CULTURE Moving (Persuasively) Towards Mindful Advocacy Chapter 18 THINKING UPSIDE DOWN 18-1. When Jurors Rebut Your Closing. 18-2. Playing Attention with the Final Act of Jurying Chapter 19 PAYING ATTENTION TO THE COMPLEX CULTURE OF TRIALS 19-1. Enculturation: How Jurors Get Sucked Into a Strange System 19-2. Twenty Stressful Realities of a Juror s Experience v

PRACTICAL JURY DYNAMICS Chapter 20 REDUCING TOXIC TRIAL STRESS 20-1. Avoiding The Helper s Pit. 20-2. Empathy-Driven versus Distress-Driven Advocacy 20-3. Ever Aftering, in Practical Ways 20-3(a). The Janus Effect Resources and Tools Browse the Stacks Endcap Gratitudes Who Is the Author? Endnotes Index vi

LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES TABLES Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 METHODS USED IN JURY RESEARCH RESEARCH ON COMMUNICATION DURING JURY EMOTIONS THAT AFFECT JUROR BEHAVIORS OR PERCEPTIONS EXAMPLES OF IMAGINING-INSERTING-INVITING STORYTELLING DURING EXAMPLES OF SEVEN STORY TYPES JURORS TOLD IN DELIB- ERATION COMMUNICATION INTERVENTIONS TO CREATE COLLABORATIVE JURY CONVERSATIONS FIGURES Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 MODEL OF A JUROR S INDIVIDUAL PSYCHO-SOCIAL NOISES THAT TRIAL EVIDENCE MUST PASS THROUGH IN ORDER TO BE PERCEIVED MODEL OF CONCEPTS RELEVANT TO THE STUDY OF EMOTIONAL COMMUNICATION DURING JURY THE EMERGENCE OF ANXIETY DURING JURY DECISION MAKING EFFECT OF DECISIONAL REGRET ON JURY VERDICTS MODEL OF SEVEN STORY TYPES SHARED DURING JURY MODEL OF LEGALLY RELEVANT TOPICS FOR JURY DISCUSSION DURING DELIBERATIVE ARGUMENT STORIED DELIBERATION MODEL vii