Case 3:14-cv B Document 8-2 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 24 PageID 68 EXHIBIT B

Similar documents
Case 3:14-cv L Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Case 3:18-cv BAJ-RLB Document 1 08/17/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 4:14-cv RAS Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

case 4:12-cv RLM-APR document 10 filed 02/27/12 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Case 9:17-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 6:17-cv JA-GJK Document 1 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2018 Page 1 of 8

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv WTL-MJD Document 1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 8:17-cv RAL-TGW Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. -v- Civil No. 3:12-cv-4176

DC CAUSE NO. CDK REALTY ADVISORS, LP IN THE DISTRICT COURT. v. DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Case 3:12-cv M Document 6 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 18

Case 8:19-cv SCB-JSS Document 2 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 7 PageID 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA DIVISION

Case 4:18-cv O Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/12/18 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:1

thejasminebrand.com SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS, INC., thejasminebrand.com

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT AND INVALIDITY

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND TEMPORARY INJUNCTION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14

Case 6:12-cv Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CAUSE NO. INTERNATIONAL CENTER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DEVELOPMENT, IX, LTD., VS DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. Defendant JUDICIAL DISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-3055

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv L Document 25 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 171

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/17/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

Case 3:10-cv P-BN Document 76 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID 995

Case 5:10-cv C Document 1 Filed 07/28/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 8:19-cv SDM-AAS Document 1 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Case: 4:17-cv AGF Doc. #: 1 Filed: 01/23/17 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 12/10/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 3:14-cv MMH-MCR Document 33 Filed 02/16/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID 171

Case: 3:18-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/16/18 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 3:12-cv L-BH Document 43 Filed 04/29/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID 611

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:16-cv GMG Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

Case 2:09-cv CE Document 1 Filed 12/22/09 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:15-cv A Document 1 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

3:14-cv JFA Date Filed 10/03/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:14-cv SPL Document 25 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

Case 1:18-cv PGG Document 1 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 18 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 105

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/17/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-50

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/27/16 Page 1 of 15

Case 2:18-cv SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:17-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Filing # E-Filed 04/10/ :26:28 AM

Case 3:17-cv M Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/14/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv BEN-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/19/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 3

Case 3:07-cv WHA Document 6 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 1 of 59

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT, OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-2689-N ORDER

NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING

Case 3:10-cv HEH Document 1 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Case 0:18-cv DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/18/2018 Page 1 of 33

Case 3:16-cv LB Document 1 Filed 06/11/16 Page 1 of 14

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 07/10/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 104

Transcription:

Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 24 PageID 68 EXHIBIT B

Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 Filed 03/11/14 Page 2 of 24 PageID 69

Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 Filed 03/11/14 Page 3 of 24 PageID 70

Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 Filed 03/11/14 Page 4 of 24 PageID 71 EXHIBIT B-1

Case Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-21 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 51 of 24 8 PageID 172 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION BALBOA CAPITAL CORPORATION Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No.: WCS LENDING LLC, Defendant. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Balboa Capital Corporation ( Balboa ), files this Original Complaint against WCS Lending LLC ( Defendant ), and alleges as follows: I. PARTIES 1. Balboa is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California. Balboa s principal place of business is located in Irvine, California. Balboa is authorized to conduct business in the State of Texas. As a corporation, Balboa s citizenship is determined by its state of formation and the location of its main office. Accordingly, Balboa is a citizen of California. Balboa has standing and capacity to file this suit in this Court. 2. Defendant is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Florida. Defendant is authorized to conduct business in the State of Texas. Defendant s only members are Eric Wallberg ( Wallberg ) and Carlos Cepeda ( Cepeda ). 1 Wallberg and Cepeda are individuals. As individuals, Wallberg s and Cepeda s respective citizenship is determined by the location of their domicile. According to Defendant s Texas Franchise Tax Public 1 The citizenship of a limited liability company is determined by the citizenship of all of its members. Harvey v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co., 542 F.3d 1077, 1080 (5th Cir. 2008). 468647.1 PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - PAGE - 1

Case Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-21 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 62 of 24 8 PageID 273 Information Report, filed with the Texas Secretary of State on or about April 11, 2013, Wallberg and Cepeda are domiciled in the State of Florida. Accordingly, Defendant is a citizen of Florida. Defendant is a proper defendant in this action and is being sued in its correct capacity as a limited liability company. Defendant may be served with process through its registered agent, National Registered Agents, Inc. ( Agent ) at 1999 Bryan Street, Suite 900, Dallas, Texas 75201-3136. Alternatively, Defendant may be served with process through its Agent at 1614 Sidney Baker Street, Kerrville, Texas 78028. II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332(a)(1) because the amount in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between citizens of different States. 4. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because Defendant is subject to jurisdiction under the Texas Long-Arm Statute, TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. 17.042(1) (Vernon 2008), and the exercise of such jurisdiction is consistent with due process under the United States Constitution. 5. Venue is proper before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2) and (3). III. CAUSE OF ACTION BREACH OF CONTRACT LEASE OBLIGATIONS 6. Balboa adopts and re-alleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 5, as if fully set forth herein. 7. On or about January 31, 2013, Defendant executed and delivered to Balboa, as successor-in-interest to VAR Resources LLC (f/k/a VAR Resources, Inc.), that certain Master 468647.1 PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - PAGE - 2

Case Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-21 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 73 of 24 8 PageID 374 Lease Agreement (the Lease ). A true and correct copy of the Lease is attached hereto as Exhibit No. 1 and by reference made a part hereof for all purposes. 8. Under the terms of the Lease, Balboa delivered to Defendant certain equipment for use in connection with Defendant s business operations. In exchange for the use of such equipment, Defendant promised to pay Balboa certain sums more specifically identified under the terms of the Lease. 9. Balboa is the current owner and holder of the Lease and all other related documents. Balboa is entitled to recover all monies due and owing under the Lease. Balboa is entitled to possession of the unreturned equipment delivered to Defendant under the Lease. 10. Defendant has defaulted on its obligations under the terms of the Lease. 11. Despite demand having been made, Defendant has failed and refused, and continues to fail and refuse, to: (a) pay the amounts due and owing to Balboa under the terms of the Lease and (b) return Balboa s equipment delivered to Defendant under the terms of the Lease. A true and correct copy of the demand letter served by Balboa on Defendant is attached hereto as Exhibit No. 2 and by reference made a part hereof for all purposes. 12. After all just and lawful offsets and credits have been allowed, there is a balance due and owing under the terms of the Lease through January 14, 2014 in the amount of $81,613.26, with interest continuing to accrue at the rate of $21.47 per diem from and including January 15, 2014 until the date judgment is entered. 13. Under the terms of the Lease and Section 38.001 et seq. of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Balboa is entitled to recovery of its reasonable attorneys fees for the prosecution of this collection action. 468647.1 PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - PAGE - 3

Case Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-21 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 84 of 24 8 PageID 475 14. Balboa is also entitled to recover post-judgment interest on the entire amount of the judgment from the date judgment is entered until the date judgment is paid at the highest rate under applicable law. 15. All conditions precedent to Balboa s recovery in this action have occurred or been performed. IV. CAUSE OF ACTION BREACH OF CONTRACT RETURN OF EQUIPMENT 16. Balboa adopts and re-alleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 15, as if fully set forth herein. 17. The Lease is a valid, enforceable contract. 18. Balboa is a proper party to sue for Defendant s breach of the Lease because Balboa is the damaged party under the Lease as a direct result of Defendant s breach. 19. Balboa fully performed its obligations under the Lease by delivering the requested equipment to Defendant. 20. Defendant has breached its obligations under the Lease by failing to return such equipment to Balboa upon notice and demand therefor following Defendant s payment default. 21. Defendant s failure to return such equipment has caused Balboa to incur economic damages. 22. Under the terms of the Lease and Section 38.001 et seq. of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Balboa is entitled to recovery of its reasonable attorneys fees for the prosecution of this action. 468647.1 PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - PAGE - 4

Case Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-21 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 95 of 24 8 PageID 576 23. Balboa is also entitled to recover post-judgment interest on the entire amount of the judgment from the date judgment is entered until the date judgment is paid at the highest rate under applicable law. 24. All conditions precedent to Balboa s recovery in this action have occurred or been performed. V. CAUSE OF ACTION REQUEST FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT 25. Balboa adopts and re-alleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 24, as if fully set forth herein. 26. Balboa petitions the Court under 28 U.S.C. 2201, 2202 and Rule 57 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for a declaration of the parties rights, duties, and legal relations under the Lease. Specifically, Balboa seeks a declaration from the Court that Balboa is entitled to immediate physical possession of all equipment and other tangible and intangible property delivered to Defendant by Balboa under the terms of the Lease ( Equipment ), and that Defendant is obligated to immediately return the Equipment to the physical possession of Balboa under the terms of the Lease. Balboa holds legal title to, and is the record owner of, the Equipment. 27. A judicial declaration of the parties rights under the Lease is necessary because Defendant has failed and refused, and continues to fail and refuse, to return the Equipment to Balboa after notice and demand for the same. Consequently, a real and justiciable controversy exists regarding the party entitled to immediate physical possession of the Equipment. The terms of the Lease are clear in this regard. A declaration from this Court interpreting the terms of the Lease will resolve the present controversy. 468647.1 PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - PAGE - 5

Case Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-21 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 10 6 of 824 PageID 6 77 28. Under Section 12 and Section 13 of the Lease, after notice of default under the Lease, Defendant is required to return the Equipment to Balboa pursuant to Balboa s instructions. As describe above, Defendant has defaulted under its payment obligations under the Lease. Despite receiving notice of such default and demand for return of the Equipment, Defendant has failed and refused, and continues to fail and refuse, to return the Equipment to Balboa. 29. As a result of Defendant s refusal to return the Equipment, Balboa s initiation of this lawsuit and related litigation is unavoidable. The legal relations of the parties under the Lease establishes beyond contestation Balboa s right to immediate physical possession of the Equipment. Unless this controversy is herein determined, Balboa will be deprived of its rights under the Lease in this dispute. As such, a determination of the parties rights and obligations under the Lease is necessary for Balboa to protect its interests in the Equipment. 30. Balboa has found it necessary to retain the law firm of McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC to institute and prosecute this action. Balboa is entitled to recover its reasonable, necessary, equitable and just legal fees under 28 U.S.C. 2202 and pursuant to the terms of the Lease. have occurred. 31. All conditions precedent to the bringing of this action have been performed or VI. REQUEST FOR RELIEF For the above reasons, Balboa respectfully requests the Court that the Defendant be summoned to appear and answer herein, and that upon final trial of this action have judgment against the Defendant for the following: 468647.1 PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - PAGE - 6

Case Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-21 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 11 7 of 824 PageID 7 78 (a) the unpaid balance under the Lease, including past due lease payments, present value of remaining lease payments, and all charges due and owing under the terms of the Lease through January 14, 2014 in the amount of $81,613.26, with interest continuing to accrue at the rate of $21.47 per diem from and including January 15, 2014 until the date judgment is entered; (b) Balboa s actual damages incurred as a direct result of Defendant s failure to return the Equipment in compliance with the terms of the Lease; (c) a declaration that Balboa is entitled to immediate physical possession of the Equipment, and Defendant is obligated to immediately return the Equipment to the physical possession of Balboa; (d) (e) Balboa s reasonable and necessary legal fees; post-judgment interest on the entire amount of the judgment from the date judgment is entered until the date judgment is paid at the highest rate under applicable law; (f) (g) all costs of court; and all other relief to which Balboa is entitled. 468647.1 PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - PAGE - 7

Case Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-21 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 12 8 of 824 PageID 8 79 Respectfully submitted this 14th day of January, 2014. s/ Thomas C. Scannell STEVEN T. HOLMES State Bar No. 00794918 THOMAS SCANNELL State Bar No. 24070559 MCGLINCHEY STAFFORD, PLLC 2711 N. Haskell Avenue, Suite 2750, LB 25 Dallas, Texas 75204 Telephone: (214) 445-2445 Facsimile: (214) 445-2450 E-mail: sholmes@mcglinchey.com tscannell@mcglinchey.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 468647.1 PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - PAGE - 8

Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 1-1 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 131 of 24 6 PageID 980

Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 1-1 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 14 2 of 624 PageID 1081

Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 1-1 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 15 3 of 624 PageID 1182

Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 1-1 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 16 4 of 624 PageID 1283

Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 1-1 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 17 5 of 624 PageID 1384

Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 1-1 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 18 6 of 624 PageID 1485

Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 1-2 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 19 1 of 24 PageID 1586

Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 1-2 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 20 2 of 24 PageID 1687

Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 1-3 Filed 03/11/14 01/14/14 Page 211 of 124 PageID 1788 (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.) BALBOA CAPITAL CORPORATION WCS LENDING LLC (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) Orange County, CA Palm Beach County, FL (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC 2711 N. Haskell Avenue, Suite 2750, LB 38, Dallas, Texas 75204 214-445-2420 (Place an X in One Box Only) (If Known) (Place an X in One Box for Plaintiff) (For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant) (U.S. Government Not a Party) or and (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) (Place an X in One Box Only) (Place an X in One Box Only) (specify) (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity) 28U.S.C. 1332(a)(1) Breach of Contract 81,613.26 (See instructions): 01/14/2014 /s/ Thomas C. Scannell, Esq.

Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-2 Filed 03/11/14 Page 22 of 24 PageID 89 EXHIBIT B-2

Case Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-25 Filed 03/11/14 01/24/14 Page 23 1 of of 224 PageID 2490

Case Case 3:14-cv-00108-B Document 8-25 Filed 03/11/14 01/24/14 Page 242 of of 224 PageID 2591