The above recitals are all true and correct.

Similar documents
RESOLUTION NUMBER 4673

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 18

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3414

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1255

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3402

RESOLUTION NUMBER 2757

RESOLUTION NO /0001/62863v1

ORDINANCE NO. _496 ROAD NAMING AND ADDRESSING SYSTEM ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, California Government Code Section provides, in pertinent

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1312

TITLE 9 CHAPTER 9A UNIFORM STREET NAMING AND ADDRESS NUMBERING SYSTEM

BILL NO. 093 A BILL ORDINANCE NO. 88-~/II

RESOLUTION NO. A. Pursuant to the Public Streets, Highways and Service Easements

REZONING (MAP AMENDMENT) Pre-Application Meeting

City of Calistoga Staff Report

TO: CITY COUNCIL Date: May 5, 2008 FROM:

TITLE 14 ZONING AND LAND USE CONTROL

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1279

ORDINANCE NO The City Council of the City of Moreno Valley does hereby ordain as follows:

RESOLUTION NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS:

VACATION REQUEST - VAC- E Council File No East Boulevard and South Park Avenue (portion surrounding Island Lot D)

ORDINANCE NO C.S.

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE NO

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4797

Henderson County, Texas

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO)

ORDINANCE NO. N.C. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO CONCERNING THE MAINTENANCE SIDEWALKS

Variance Application Village of Channahon Development Department

RESOLUTION NO

Attachment 2. Planning Commission Resolution No Recommending a Zone Text Amendment

Parcel ID Number(s): PROPORTIONATE SHARE AGREEMENT FOR <PROJECT NAME> <NAME OF ROADWAY>

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. November 27, 2018

PETITION FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION NON-CONTIGUOUS LAND

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Perris City Council wishes to remove the bond requirement from the application process; and

ORDINANCE NO

TOWN OF DURHAM ADDRESSING ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE TO AMEND ZONING MAP AT 40 NORTH DAISY AVENUE

CITY OF NEW MEADOWS ORDINANCE NO

Montcalm County Address Ordinance

RESOLUTION NO

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Appendix A: Draft Billboard Ordinance

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4010

P.C. RESOLUTION NO

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA

ORDINANCE NO DRAFT

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1082

ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code by amending the zoning map.

ORDINANCE NO. 553 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SEVERAL CHAPTERS OF

ORDINANCE NO Findings. The City Council hereby finds and declares the following:

AN ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE FOR THE ASSIGNMENT OF NAMES TO STREETS AND ROAD IN COUNTY AND THE POSTING OF STREET SIGNS AND BUILDING NUMBERS

City of Palo Alto (ID # 7425) City Council Staff Report

Ordinance Fact Sheet

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, on JANUARY 15, 2008 the City of Long Beach did by ordinance number

CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ORDINANCE NO. 2645

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO

WHEREAS, after proper notice and public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended City Council approval of Conditional Use Permit 10-04; and

ORDINANCE NO

RESOLUTIONNO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pleasant Hill

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION. John Montgomery, Director (949)

ORDINANCE NO

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

Public Hearing Published 11/16/2017 First Reading 12/07/2017 Public Hearing 12/07/2017 Adopted 12/21/2017 ORDINANCE NO.

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 09/05/2017 AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Orange Countywide Oversight Board

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT. (Date of Subdivision Map Recordation: )

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS AMENDING ARTICLE 28 CHAPTER 3 TO TITLE 9 OF THE LOS BANOS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO SIGNS

CITY OF DELAND FLORIDA REQUEST FOR COMMISSION ACTION MAY Attachments for Acres X Ordinance. Approved by.

City of Hemet PLANNING DIVISION 445 E. Florida Avenue, Hemet, CA (951)

ORDINANCE NO. O

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE BOROUGH OF CHAMBERSBURG CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 204, PARADES AND PUBLIC GATHERINGS

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Yucaipa supports the full participation of all residents in electing Members of the City Council; and

ORDINANCE NO The Town Council of the Town of Yucca Valley, California, does ordain as follows:

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Alameda ordains as follows: SECTION I

BOUNDARY COMMISSION St. Louis County, Missouri RULES

WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of Brentwood, Missouri, and its residents to join and participate in Show Me PACE.

CITY OF WARRENVILLE DU PAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO ORDINANCE APPROVING PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT (JUSTIN MASON 29W602 BUTTERFIELD ROAD)

City of Los Alamitos

APPLICATION FOR INTERPRETATION

On April 6, 2015, the City Council introduced on first reading Ordinance No

URGENCY ORDINANCE NO O13

CITY OF PORT ST LUCIE

COMMISSIONERS OF OXFORD. Ordinance No. 1801

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Jon Maginot, City Clerk/Assistant to the City Manager

SECTION I GENERAL PROVISIONS

Jeremy Craig, Interim Assistant City Manager/Director of Finance & IT

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, on January 27, 1986, the City Council of the City of Pasadena,

EXHIBIT 1. IN RE: Vacation of a [Portion of] street, a public street located in the City of Chillicothe, Missouri. PETITION FOR VACATION

Growth Management Act, RCW A et seq., for the City of Des. the greatest extent practicable, and ORDINANCE NO. 1476

ORDINANCE NO

Development Review Templates for Savings Clause Compliance 24 V.S.A Chapter , 4462 and 4464 May, 2005

Special Meeting/Public Hearing Board of Trustees Coast Community College District. Date: Tuesday, October 3, 2017

in Sections et seq. of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; herein the State Fireworks Law")

Right-of-Way Vacation Policy and Procedures Prepared by Kevin Cowper, Assistant City Manager May 13, 2008 Updated May 21, 2014

CITY OF KENT, OHIO ZONING CODE CHAPTER 1111 ZONING AMENDMENTS Page CHAPTER 1111 ZONING AMENDMENTS

SCC NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY CODE RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF SHOPPING CARTS

Transcription:

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1109 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 02-0217 TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 19.63 REGARDING STREET NAME SUFFIXES 1997; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Zoning Ordinance in November WHEREAS, the Planning Commission requested initiation of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to amend Chapter 19.63 regarding Street Naming Requirements; and WHEREAS, on December 4, 2002, the Planning Commission conducted a legally noticed public hearing on the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and considered testimony and materials in the staff report and accompanying document and exhibits; and recommended approval the City Council; and, WHEREAS, on January 14, 2002, the City Council conducted a legally noticed public hearing on the proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and considered testimony and materials in the staff report and accompanying document and exhibits; and, Act; and, occurred; FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City has complied with the California Environmental Quality WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites for the adoption of this Ordinance have NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS Section 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. Section 2. The City Council has reviewed and considered the proposed project and determined that there is no possibility that the proposed Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance will have a significant adverse effect on the environment, and therefore is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Section 3. The City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan objectives, policies, and programs.

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1109 Page 2 B. The project will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare. C. The proposed project will not result in a significant adverse effect on the environment. Section 4. Approval. Chapter 19.63 (Street Naming Requirements) of the Perris Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to read in its entirety as stated in Exhibit A, a copy of which is attached hereto. Section 5. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be published and posted pursuant to the provisions of law in this regard, and this Ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its final passage. Attachments: Exhibit A: Amended Chapter 19.63 of the Zoning Ordinance

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1109 Page 3 ADOPTED, SIGNED and APPROVED this 28 th day of January, 2003. Mayor, Daryl R. Busch ATTEST: City Clerk, Margaret Rey

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1109 Page 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF PERRIS ) I, Margaret Rey, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance Number 1109, introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Perris held on the 14 th day of January, 2003, was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28 th day of January, 2003, and that it was so adopted by the following called vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Yarbrough, Landers, Motte, Rogers, Busch City Clerk, Margaret Rey

CHAPTER 19.63 STREET NAMING REQUIREMENTS 19.63.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT 19.63.020 AUTHORITY 19.63.030 REQUIRED REVIEW 19.63.040 FINDINGS 19.63.050 TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL 19.63.060 CONFORMANCE WITH LAW 19.63.070 APPLICATION PROCESSING 19.63.080 FILING FEES 19.63.090 EXPIRATION 19.63.010 PURPOSE AND INTENT The City Council finds that street naming review is required for public and private streets to protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City and to provide the development of a greater sense of place for all citizens within the City. 19.63.020 AUTHORITY The Planning Commission shall be empowered to approve, conditionally approve or deny street-naming proposals subject to the findings stated in this Chapter. 19.63.030 REQUIRED REVIEW No building permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued before a street name proposal has been approved. Accordingly, no person shall commence any new use or intensify any existing use until a street name proposal has been approved. 19.63.040 FINDINGS As a condition of granting street name approval, the Planning Commission shall find that the following exists: A. Choice of Names Names chosen are related to the scale and location of a project.

1. Objectives: Names should be pleasant sounding, appropriate, easy to read (so that the public, and children in particular, can handle the name in an emergency situation), and should add to pride of home ownership. 2. Categories: Large developments are to use a single, significant category of names to assist in location of streets. Small subdivisions should use the same category as the surrounding or adjacent area, which helps to establish neighborhood identification. 3. Unacceptable Street Names: Unacceptable street names shall include numerical names (1 st, 2 nd, etc.); alphabetical letter (A, B, C, etc.); surnames of living persons (pioneer families, etc., excluded); frivolous, complicated or undesirable names as determined by the Planning Commission; unconventional spelling and compound names (use sparingly and not on short streets). B. Suffixes are: Unnecessary affixes are to be avoided. Terms that may be utilized 1. East, West, North, and South, indicating direction. 2. Street suffixes shall be applied, based upon discretion of the Planning Commission, in conformance with the definitions shown below. Suffix Spanish Variation Description Avenue Avenida A roadway or thoroughfare that is contiguous and not limited to a single subdivision Boulevard A roadway or thoroughfare with a landscaped median that is contiguous and not limited to a single subdivision Circle Circulo A horseshoe or crescent shaped street that begins and ends on a major street Court Corte A permanently dead-end street or cul-desac not longer than 660 feet in length Cove Ensenada A permanently dead-end street or cul-desac not longer than 660 feet in length Drive Carreterra A curvilinear street Gate A short street that provides entrance to a subdivision Lane Calle A minor street within a subdivision Loop Parkway A horseshoe or crescent shaped street that begins and ends on a major street A thoroughfare designated as a collector or arterial with a landscaped median

Place Lugar A permanently dead-end street, cul-de-sac or short through street none of which are longer than 660 feet Road Camino A designated thoroughfare Street A common or default suffix Trail A curvilinear street with a rural connotation Way Via A curvilinear street C. Name Duplication Similar sounding names are considered to be duplicative regardless of spelling. No duplication of names is permitted within the projected service area of a United States Post Office or of local public agencies such as fire and police departments. Where ever possible, the avoidance of duplication should be countywide because of future urbanization. D. Continuity 1. A continuous street, or one proposed to be made continuous, should bear the same name throughout, even though it changes directions. If it is interrupted by a channel, freeway, railroad, etc., and eventual connection is not probable, the segments shall bear different names. Notwithstanding the above, loop or U-shaped streets which require two names to avoid duplication of house numbers may be excepted from the continuity provisions. In these cases, the utilization of an appropriate affix may be allowed. 2. No separate name is to be used for cul-de-sacs that provide street frontage for 3 or less lots or units. The name shall be the same as that of the intersecting street. However, where there is a series of long and short cul-de-sacs, all should have separate names. E. Street Name Signs Street name signs, approved by the Director of Public Works, shall be installed by the subdivider at the intersection of all streets and highways and at such other locations as may be determined to be necessary by the Director of Public Works. 19.63.050 TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL After approval of a tentative and parcel map, the subdivider shall submit a street naming proposal application to the Department of Planning and Community Development of the City. There shall be 10 copies of a map that shall contain the following:

1. A map of the overall tract illustrating street layout and the name proposed for each street. 2. An alphabetical list of the proposal street names, together with 3 alternative names for each name proposed. 19.63.060 CONFORMANCE WITH LAW The Planning Commission or Director of Planning and Community Development shall review the street name proposal application for conformance with the City s General Plan, zoning, applicable specific plan regulations and the criteria in Section 19.13.070. Before an application is accepted and approved as complete, the applicant may be required to clarify, correct or otherwise supplement the information contained in the application. 19.63.070 APPLICATION PROCESSING The Director of the Planning and Community Development Department shall review the proposed street name proposal for duplication of names, and for overall compliance with this Chapter. Upon completing the review, the Director of Planning and Community Development or his/her designee may distribute the proposal to the County Transportation Department for review and comment. Distribution shall also be made to the City s Engineering, Public Works, and Police Department for review and comment. Upon receipt of comments or recommendations from the County Road and Survey Department and any reviewing City Department, the City s Planning and Community Development Department shall prepare a report which incorporates any responses, and shall forward the proposal to the Planning Commission for consideration. 19.63.080 FILING FEES A fee assessed by the County Transportation Department in connection with review of street naming proposals, pursuant to the application processing section, shall accompany the application for a street naming proposal review. The fees assessed by the County Transportation Department and fees assessed for processing of street name applications may be set and adjusted by resolution of the City Council. 19.63.090 EXPIRATION Street name proposals shall expire 2 years after the date of initial approval by the Planning Commission. The submittal of revisions to a street name proposal shall not extend the expiration date specified in this Chapter.