Case 1:16-cr BB Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2017 Page 1 of 7

Similar documents
Case 1:18-cr MGC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2018 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Section 1B1.2(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines.

The Office of the United States A torney for the Southern District of Florida (hereinafter

Case 0:17-cr BB Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO URT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 9:16-cr RLR Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2017 Page 1 of 8 UM TED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:10-cr FDW Document 3 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 7

violate the Anti-kickback Statute, Title 42, United States Code, Section 1320a-7b(b), w lich makes

1. The defendant understands her rights as follows:

States Department of Justice, Cdminal Division, Fraud Section (colectively, <ethis Office'l and

Case 2:12-cr JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110

Case 1:09-mj JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn

Case 2:12-cr AWA-TEM Document 51 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THI

Case 2:14-cr JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 62

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 1:12-cr DMM Document 119 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2012 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

AGREEMENT ON FILM CO- PRODUCTIONS BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLI C OF SOUTH AFRI CA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE I TALI AN REPUBLI C

5 CRWIINAL NO. H

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Southern District of Florida Miami Division

involved in the transaction, full restitution, a special

Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16

Case 1:18-cr LM Document 2 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 2:15-cr JLL Document 5 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 27. U.S. Department of Justice. United Slates Attorney District ofpieu Jersey

3.1 ARTICLE AMENDMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 3:16-cr BR Document 588 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:17-cr MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19

FlLED RECEIVED. Case 2:09-cr ROS Document 152 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 8 ~LODGED COPY NOV Ct.ERK US DISTRICT COURT DISTR CT OF A.

FILED DEC Q--IL. DecemberJ, 2008

Re: United States v. Alfonso Portillo, 09 Cr (RPP)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

United States District Court

Case 2:13-cr CLS-HGD Document 6 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 18 AMENDED PLEA AGREEMENT. The Government and defendant, RUTH GAYLE CUNNINGHAM hereby

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 2:15-cr FMO Document 52 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:295

NON- PRECEDENTI AL DECI SI ON - SEE SUPERI OR COURT I.O.P Appellee No. 676 WDA 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. No. CR

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. ) No. 3:17-cr TMB ) ) ) ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Background. The Defendant. 1. From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017,

Case 3:17-cr RBL Document 8 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 FILED. LDOOED,RECEIVED JUL

United States v. Biocompatibles, Inc. Criminal Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, No

UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT EASTERN DI STRI CT OF MI SSOURI EASTERN DI VI SI ON

8:15-cr JFB-FG3 Doc # 7 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 7 - Page ID # 19

CR-COHN/SELTZER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 2:18-cr JPS Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 16 Document 3

case 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) v. ) No CR-W-FJG. Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

AT SEA TILE. The United States of America, by and through John McKay, United States Attorney 16

LIMITED OFFICIAL USE

Two of the Information charges the defendant with conspiring to travel in foreign

Case 2:15-cr KM Document 154 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 996

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Attorney, and the defendant, Kurt W. Donsbach, with the advice and

Case 1:13-cr DLG Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2013 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Eastern Division

Case 8:15-cr JLS Document 59 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:300 United States District Court Central District of California

Case 2:17-cr JAK Document 25 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:80

United States Attorney District of Connecticut. February 20, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PLEA AGREEMENT THOMAS QUINN

WEsfMN ~~~f ~~C,.i'/D.~sAs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

3:09-cr MJP Date Filed 04/15/09 Entry Number 5 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

L iechtenstein L aw G azette (L iechtensteinisches L andesgesetzblatt)

Case 1:15-cr RJD Document 8 Filed 11/23/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 39. WHEREAS, on or about November 21, 2015, SERGIO JADUE (the "defendant"),

Case 6:10-cr WEB Document 52 Filed 01/27/11 Page 1 of 12

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT.,Esq.

Case 3:11-cr DRD Document 22 Filed 03/15/11 Page 1 of 14

Case 8:09-cr CJC Document 54 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:143

Case &:11 cr JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12. INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO: 5:12-CV-818

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

SOUTHEIWDISTQIGT 17 - F 0 FLORIDA or 2R-sc0u

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

Case 3:15-cr RNC Document 6 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 9. U.S. Department of Judtite. United States Attorn 5 i,ì,iíì I I

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Origin. What Every Notary Should Know. Richard Alexander Gwinnett County Clerk of Superior Court. L aw re n c e v ille, G A Ju n e 2 0,

Follow this and additional works at:

Attorneys for the United States UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:16-cr Document #: 77 Filed: 05/15/18 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:227

Transcription:

Case 1:16-cr-20803-BB Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2017 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-20803-Cm BB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VS. MARJAN CABY, Defendant. / PLEA AGREEMENT The United States A tom ey's Office for the Southern District of Florida (this Oftk e'l and M ARJAN CABY (hereinafter refered to as the Eçdefendant') enter into the following agreement: 1. The defendant agrees to plead guilty to the fo low ing count of the indictm ent; Count 1, which charges the defendant with ccmspiracy to (1) export goods f'rom the United States to Syria w ithout a license, in violation of Title 50, United States C ode, Sections 1701-1706, and Title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, Pal4 746.9/),. (2) export goods from the United States io Specially Designated National SYRIAN AR AB M RLINES without a license, in violation of Title 50, United States Code, Sections 1701-1706, and Title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, Pa14 594.204; and (3) defraud the United States government by interfering with and obstructing a lawful governm ent function by deceit, craft, trickery, and dishonest l eans, a1l in violation of Title 18, U nited States Code, Section 371. This O ffice agrees to seek dism issal of the rem aining counts in the indictm ent, as to this defendant, aher sentencing. The parties agree to jointly recommend that the Court, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. j 3553($, should impose a sentence that is below the advisory guideline range based

Case 1:16-cr-20803-BB Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2017 Page 2 of 7 on the parties' compliance with the mutual promises herein. Speciticaly, the parties will recomm end that the Court impose a sentence of 12 m onths and-a-day of imprisonm ent. The defendant understands and acknow ledges that the Court is under no obligation to im pose a sentence that is below the advisory guidelines range. The defendant is aw are that the sentence wil be imposed by the Court after considering the advisory Federal Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements (hereinafter tesentencing Guidelines'). The defendant acknowledges and understands that the Court wil compute an advisory sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines and that the applicable guidelines will be determ ined by the Court relying in part on the results of a pre-sentence investigation by the Court's probation office, which investigation wil comm ence after the gtlilty plea has been entered. The defendant is also aware that, under certain circtlm stances, the Court m ay depart from the advisory sentencing guideline range that it has computed, and m ay raise or lower that advisory sentence tmder the Sentencing Guidelines. The defendant is ftzrther aware and understands that the Court is required to consider the advisory guideline range detennined under the Sentencing Guidelines, but is not bound to impose a sentence within that advisory range; the Court is pennited to tailor the ultim ate sentence in light of other statutory concerns, and such sentence m ay be either m ore severe or less severe than the Sentencing Guidelines' advisory range. Knowing these facts, the defendant understands and acknowledges that the Court has the authority to impose any sentence within and up to the statutory m axim um authorized by law for the offense identitied in paragraph 1 and that the defendant m ay not withdraw the plea solely as a result of the sentence im posed. 4. The defendant also understands and acknowledges that the Court m ay impose a statutory maximum term of imprisonment of up to five (5) years, followed by a term of supervised 2

Case 1:16-cr-20803-BB Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2017 Page 3 of 7 release of up to 3 years. In addition to a tenn of imprisonm ent and supervised release, the Court m ay im pose a fine of up to $250,000. The defendant further understand and acknowledges that, in addition to any sentence imposed under paragraph 4 of this agreement, a special assessm ent in the am ount of $100 wil be imposed. This O ffice agtees that it w il recom m end at sentencing that the Court reduce by tw o levels the sentencing guideline level applicable to the defendant's ofense, pursuant to Section 3E1.1(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines, based upon the defendant's recognition and affirmative and tim ely acceptance of personal responsibility. lf at the tim e of sentencing the defendant's offense level is determined to be 16 or greater, this Office wil file a m otion requesting an additional one level decrease plzrsuant to Section 3E1.1(b) of the Sentencing Guidelines, stating that the defendant has assisted authorities in the investigation or prosecution of the defendant's own m isconduct by tim ely notifying authorities of the defendant's intention to enter a plea of guilty, thereby perm iting the governm ent to avoid preparing for trial and permiting the government and the Court to alocate their resources efficiently. This Oftk e, however, wil not be required to make this motion or this recommendation if the defendant: (1) fails or refuses to make a 111, accurate and com plete disclosure to the probation office of the circum stances surrounding the relevant offense conduct; (2) is found to have misrepresented fads to the government prior to entering into this plea agreement; or (3) commits any misconduct after entering into this plea agreem ent, including but not lim ited to com m itting a state or federal offense, violating any term of release, or m aking false statem ents or m isrepresentations to any governm ental entity or oftk ial. The defendant is aw are that the sentence has not yet been detennined by the Court. The defendant also is aware that any estim ate of the probable sentencing range or sentence that the 3

Case 1:16-cr-20803-BB Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2017 Page 4 of 7 defendant m ay receive, w hether that estim ate com es from the defendant's attorney, this Oftk e, or the probation office, is a prediction, not a promise, and is not binding on this Oft-ice, the probation office or the Court. The defendant understands further that any recom m endation that this Office m akes to the Court as to sentencing, whether pursuant to this agreem ent or othem ise, is not binding on the Court and the Court m ay disregard the recomm endation in its entirety. The defendant understands and acknowledges, as previously acknowledged in paragraph 3 above, that the defendant m ay not withdraw the plea based upon the Court's decision not to accept a sentencing recommendation made by the defendant, this Oftke, or a recommendation made jointly by the defendant and this O ftice. 8. The defendant is aware that Title 18, United States Code, Section 3742 and Title 28, United States Code, Section 1291 afford the defendant the right to appeal the sentence imposed in this case. Acknowledging this, in exchange for the tmdertakings m ade by the United States in this plea agreem ent, the defendant hereby waives al1 rights conferred by Sections 3742 and 1291 to appeal any sentence im posed, including any restitm ion order, or to appeal the m anner in which the sentence was imposed, tmless the sentence exceeds the maximum perm ited by statute or is the result of an upward departure and/or an upward variance from the advisory guideline range that the Court establishes at sentencing. The defendant further understands that nothing in this agreement shal affect the government's right and/or duty to appeal as set forth in Title 18, United States Code, Section 37421) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 1291. However, if the United States appeals the defendant's sentence pursuant to Sections 3742419 and 1291, the defendant shal be released from the above waiver of appelate rights. By signing this agreem ent, the defendant acknowledges that the defendant has discussed the appeal waiver set forth in this agreem ent w ith the defendant's atom ey.

Case 1:16-cr-20803-BB Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2017 Page 5 of 7 The defendant agrees to forfeit to the United States, voluntarily and im m ediately, al rights, title, and interest to any property, real and personal, which constitute or are derived from proceeds traceable to the com mission of the conspiracy to set forth in Count 1 of the indictm ent, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 98 1(a)(1)(C), as made applicable by Title 28, United States Code, Section, 2461(c), and the procedures set forth at Title 21, United States Code, Section 853. To the extent that such property is no longer within the possession or control of the defendant, the defendant agrees that the United States may seek substitute property within the meaning 21 U.S.C. j 853 to satisfy the forfeiture moneyjudgment. 10. The defendant knowingly and voluntarily agrees to waive any claim or defense under the Eighth Am endm ent to the United States Constitution, including any claim of excessive fine or penalty with respect to any forfeited property. ln addition, the defendant agrees to waive any applicable time limits for administrative orjudicial forfeiture proceedings brought against any forfeited property, and any appeal of the forfeited property. The defendant also agrees to assist this Oftk e in all proceedings, adm inistrative or judicial, involving forfeiture to the United States of any property, including substitute property, regardless of its natlzre, form, or location. The assistance shal include: identifying any property subject to forfeitlre, providing testimony before a federal grand jury or in an administrative or judicial proceeding, consenting to the entry of an order enjoining the transfer or encumbrance of such property, and transferring such property to the United States by delivering to this O fice, upon this Office's request, any necessary and appropriate docum entation, including consents to forfeiture and quit claim deeds, to deliver good and m arketable title to such property. 12. The defendant knowingly and voluntarily agrees and understands that forfeiture of the Property agreed upon herein shal not be treated as satisfaction (either partial or 1 1) of any 5

Case 1:16-cr-20803-BB Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2017 Page 6 of 7 assessm ent, fine, restitution, cost of imprisonm ent, or any other penalty that the Court may impose upon the defendant in addition to the forfeiture. 13. Defendant recognizes that pleading guilty m ay have consequences w ith respect to the defendant's imm igration status if the defendant is not a natlzral-born citizen of the United States. Under federal law, a broad range of crim es are rem ovable offenses, including the offense to which defendant is pleading guilty. Indeed, because defendant is pleading g'uilty to conspiracy to violate the International Econom ic Em ergency Powers Act, removal is presumptively m andatory. In addition, under certain circum stances, denatlzralization m ay also be a consequence of pleading guilty to a crim e. R em oval, denaturalization, and other im m igration consequences are the subject of a separate proceeding, however, and defendant understands that no one, including the defendant's attorney or the Court, can predict to a certainty the effed of the defendant's conviction on the defendant's immigration status. Defendant nevertheless affinns that the defendant wants to plead guilty regardless of any imm igration consequences that the defendant's plea may entail, even if the consequence is the defendant's denaturalization and autom atic rem oval from the United States.

Case 1:16-cr-20803-BB Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2017 Page 7 of 7 14. This is the entire agreement and understanding between this Office and the defendant. There are no other agreem ents, prom ises, representations, or understandings. BBNJAMm G.GREENBERG ACTW G UNITED STATES ATTORNEY oate: /J -3-1 Y By: @' RICARDO A. DEL TORO AS TA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Io 5 Date: ' I oate, loj 5 / 2/1+ By2 By: SAB INA P LISI ATTORN R DEFENDANT MARJAN CABY DEFFN DANT