Appeals Modernization

Similar documents
VA Appeals Today and Tomorrow

VETERANS LAW: YEAR IN REVIEW. Gregg Maxon Law Office of Richard G. Maxon

Chapter 7: The VA Claims Process

Overview of the Appeal Process for Veterans Claims

Overview of the Appeal Process for Veterans Claims

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Board of Veterans' Appeals Washington DC January 2000

Statement for the Record

NOTICE OF DISAGREEMENT NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAL

TITLES II AND XVI: EFFECT OF THE DECISION IN LUCIA V. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) ON CASES PENDING AT THE

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Phoenix VA Regional Office

VA Benefits, Applications, and Appeals

Missing Transmittal Sheets / Changes As of 08/12/2014 6/18/13 3/26/13 2/29/12 2/13/12 9/27/11

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Schedule for Rating Disabilities Mental Disorders and Definition of Psychosis for

Case 3:15-cv JST Document 79-1 Filed 11/08/16 Page 1 of 83. Exhibit 1

Rules of Practice for Protests and Appeals Regarding Eligibility for Inclusion in the U.S.

The Department of Veterans Affairs Obligations Toward Claimants: Analysis of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000

914 CHARLES MORRIS CT. SE WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DC SECTION II - MAKING A FOIA REQUEST

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided April 17, 2009)

In the Supreme Court of the United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals

OBJECTION TO REFEREE S RECOMMENDED ORDER

Not published UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS. Before HAGEL, Judge. O R D E R

Post-Grant Patent Practice: Review & Reexamination Course Syllabus

SECTION I - BASIC INFORMATION REGARDING REPORT. 250 Makalapa Drive Pearl Harbor HI (808)

BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, DC 20420

CHAPTER 13 MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES REVISED APRIL 2016

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided March 23, 2006 )

SECTION I - BASIC INFORMATION REGARDING REPORT

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS BAR ASSOCIATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before KASOLD, Chief Judge, and HAGEL, MOORMAN, LANCE, DAVIS, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, DC 20420

No ANNETTE CARMICHAEL, Individually, and as Guardian for KEITH CARMICHAEL, an incapacitated adult, Petitioners, V.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Office of the Clerk. After Opening a Case Pro Se Appellants (revised December 2012)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided May 9, 2013)

Case 2:05-cv DDP-RZ Document 132 Filed 10/12/10 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:337

Ensuring Program Uniformity at the Hearing and Appeals Council Levels of the Administrative

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided May 16, 2014)

Veterans Affairs: The U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Judicial Review of VA Decision Making

Frequently Asked Questions about the Asylum Clock Class Action Settlement

BRUSH ARBOR HOME CONSTRUCTION, LLC OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE STEPHEN R. McCULLOUGH February 21, 2019 ANDREA ALEXANDER, ET AL.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

U.S. Law and Legal Research

Appeals to the Third District Court of Appeal of Florida. Information for Persons Who Do Not Have a Lawyer

New Patent Application Rules Set to Take Effect November 1, 2007

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

In The Supreme Court of the United States

HEARINGS HELD BY TABLE OF CONTENTS. 700 Objective Subpart A Fair Hearings for Applicants and Recipients of Public Assistance Programs

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO ALACHUA COUNTY DRUG COURT

Procedures Further Implementing the Annual Limitation on Suspension of. AGENCY: Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice.

NOS , , , , , , , , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Case 1:16-cv JDB Document 56 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Case 0:08-cv KAM Document 221 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Office of the General Counsel Washington DC APR n

Angel Santos v. Clyde Gainey

Designated for publication UNITED STATES COURT OF VETERANS APPEALS. v. VA File No

Zaranska v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Something Old, Something New: The Partial Final Judgment Rule

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS N O On Remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2012 BASIC SKILLS IN VERMONT PRACTICE & PROCEDURE. Environmental Regulation & Court Practice

NOTICE OF DISAGREEMENT AND REQUEST FOR APPELLATE REVIEW

File Name: 16b0002n.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals

New Hampshire Employment Security Appeal Tribunal. Erika Randmere Administrator

Case3:15-cv JST Document36 Filed07/17/15 Page1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Privacy Act of 1974, as Amended; Computer Matching Program (Social Security

United States Court of Appeals

Bid Protests. David T. Ralston, Jr. Frank S. Murray. October 2008

Criminal Case Initiation Change Order

Document (1) User Name: Andrea Jamison Date and Time: Tuesday, September 26, :41:00 AM CST Job Number:

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before PIETSCH, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION

No IN THE. CYAN, INC., et al., Petitioners, BEAVER COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, et al., Respondents.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Complaints of Sexual Misconduct Against Students

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Norfolk Division FINAL MEMORANDUM

{2} The parties were married on July 24, They have one minor child (Child).

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D02-608

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 0:17-cv WPD.

ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2008 FED App. 0019P (6th Cir.) File Name: 08b0019p.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: June 27, NO. 34,008 5 ZUNI PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT #89,

Apokarina v. Atty Gen USA

DONALD L. DINGESS, APPELLANT, AND MARCELLUS S. HARTMAN, APPELLANT, v. R. JAMES NICHOLSON, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Presented to The Ohio State Bar Association. May 23, 2012

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION

United States Merit Systems Protection Board

CIVIL DISTRICT COURT RULES 17A JUDICIAL DISTRICT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cv DAB. versus. No.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 625 Indiana Avenue N.W., Suite 900 Washington, D.C

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Citizenship and Immigration Services Administrative Appeals Office

Blue Ribbon Commission

America Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

H.R. 3715, the Final Farewell Act of 2015

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

Transcription:

VA Appeals Modernization November 2018 Donnie R. Hachey, Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans Appeals 1

The Appellate Landscape 2

Department Organization * The Board reports directly to the Office of the Secretary. 3

Overview Mission The Board s mission is to conduct hearings and decide appeals properly before the Board in a timely manner. See 38 United States Code (U.S.C.) 7101(a). Background All questions in a matter under which 38 U.S.C. 511(a) is subject to decision by the Secretary shall be subject to one review on appeal to the Secretary. Final decisions on such appeals are made by the Board. 4

Problem: Complex Current Appeal Process The current VA appeal process, set in law, is complex, non-linear, and unlike other standard appeals processes across Federal agencies and judicial systems. Too long No defined endpoint or timeframe. On average, Veterans are waiting 3 years for a resolution on their appeals. For those appeals that were decided by the Board of Veterans Appeals in FY2016, on average, Veterans waited at least 7 years from filing their NOD until the Board decision issued that year. Too complex Process is hard to understand, contains too many steps, and difficult to explain to Veterans. Splits jurisdiction between VBA and the Board accountability does not rest with one appellate body. Also creates inherent competition for resources within VBA to process both claims and appeals. Features an open record and ongoing duty to assist Continuous evidence gathering and readjudication prolongs the ability to reach a final decision. 5

Problem: Growth of Pending Appeals 500,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 The number of pending appeals has grown 350% from 100,000 in FY2001 to 450,000 in FY2017. 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 - FY2017 FY2016 FY2015 FY2014 FY2013 FY2012 FY2011 FY2010 FY2009 FY2008 FY2007 FY2006 FY2005 FY2004 FY2003 FY2002 FY2001 6

Problem: VA Appeal Process Today 7

Solution: Appeals Modernization Act On August 23, 2017, the Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017 was signed into law. The new law takes effect in February 2019. The law creates a new decision review process, which features three lanes: o Higher-Level Review An entirely new review of the claim by an experienced adjudicator o Supplemental Claim An opportunity to submit additional evidence o Appeal Review by the Board of Veterans Appeals 8

New Decision Review Process Veterans Benefits Administration Board of Veterans Appeals The Claim (Establishes Effective Date) Duty to assist VBA Decision (Improved Notice) Choice and Control Higher-Level Review Same Evidence 125-Day Avg. Goal Duty to assist Supplemental Claim New Evidence 125-Day Avg. Goal Appeal (NOD) 3 Options 365-Day Avg. Direct Docket Goal No SOC or VA Form 9 120 Days Except for appeals to the Court, all filing deadlines are one year. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 9

New Process: Three Lanes VBA VBA Board Supplemental Claim Lane Higher-Level Review Lane Appeal Lane VA will readjudicate a claim if new and relevant evidence is presented or identified with a supplemental claim (open record) VA will assist in gathering new and relevant evidence (duty to assist). Effective date for benefits always protected (submitted within 1 year of decision) More experienced VA employee takes a second look at the same evidence (closed record and no duty to assist) Option for a one-time telephonic informal conference with the higher-level reviewer to discuss the error in the prior decision De novo review with full difference of opinion authority Duty to assist errors returned to lower-level for correction (quality feedback) Direct docket: Closed record and 365-day average processing time goal Evidence only docket: Additional evidence submitted within 90 days following NOD Hearing docket: Board hearing and additional evidence submitted within 90 days following hearing 10

Which VBA lane to choose? Under Appeals Modernization beginning February 2019 Supplemental Claim Higher Level Review When to choose If your claim needs new evidence. If you don t need new evidence, but think a mistake was made. What will happen VA will help you gather the evidence. A new decision will be made looking at the new evidence. A higher-trained VBA employee will review your claim and make a new decision. No new evidence will be added. How long 125 days (on average) 125 days (on average) 11

Which Board docket to choose? Choose the Board if you have a legal argument to make before a Veterans Law Judge. Direct Evidence Hearing When to choose If you think a mistake was made. If you have new evidence you want a Judge to consider. If you want a hearing before a Judge. What will happen The Judge will review the same record and make a decision. No new evidence will be added. You will have 90 days from your NOD to submit any new evidence. The Judge will make a decision considering the evidence you provided. You will be placed on a list for a hearing before a Judge by videoconference (or in DC). After your hearing you will have 90 days to submit new evidence. The Judge will make decision considering the hearing and the evidence you provided. How long 365 days (on average) Over 365 days Based on availability. Currently the Board has 95 Judges. There are 78,000 Veterans waiting for hearings. 12

Dual Systems The AMA remakes the VA appeals process, and will be the only framework going forward. VA will operate both systems in the transition. VA will receive new legacy appeals through February 2020 Veterans receiving a Rating Decision prior to implementation in February 2019 have one year to file a legacy NOD Other sources: Pending inventory Remands from the Board, Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, and Federal Circuit 13

New Process: Overview Multiple options for Veterans/representatives o Use one lane at a time for a claimed issue o Choosing one lane does not prevent the Veteran/representative from choosing a different lane after a decision o No limits to the number of times a Veteran may pursue a claimed issue in any of the lanes Protected effective date for benefits For Veterans pursuing the same claimed issue in any of the lanes within one year Duty to assist and open record In the Supplemental Claim Lane only, not the Higher-Level Review or Appeal Lanes Higher-Level Review De novo review with full difference of opinion authority; replaces current DRO review process 14

New Process: Benefits New process provides: Understandable decision review system Multiple review options instead of one Improved notice about the reasons for VA s decision and available decision review options Early resolution of disagreements Each lane with a clearly defined start/end point Higher-Level Review and Appeal lanes provide quality feedback to VBA VBA as claims agency, Board as appeals agency Efficient use of VA s and representatives resources for long-term savings and improved service for Veterans 15

Rapid Appeals Modernization Program The Rapid Appeals Modernization Program (RAMP) began on November 1, 2017 and allows eligible Veterans with pending appeals the option to have their decisions reviewed in the new Higher-Level Review or Supplemental Claim lanes As of April 2, 2018 any Veteran that meets the eligibility criteria below may participate in RAMP (no invitation required) Participation is voluntary and Veterans are encouraged to opt in Veterans must have an active disability compensation appeal in one of the following appeal stages: o NOD o Form 9 o Certified to the Board (not activated) o Remand 16

RAMP vs AMA Opt-In Window Under RAMP Veterans can opt in at any of the following stages: o NOD o Form 9 o Certified to the Board (not activated) o Remand After full implementation in February 2019, Veterans with pending legacy appeals can only opt in at the following stages: o SOC o SSOC 17

RAMP Quick Stats - National Legacy Appeals Converted 65,342 RAMP Lane Choices HLR 61% Supp 39% NOD to Opt-in Days (Avg.) 746 Days Average Days to Complete 111 Days Retroactive Benefits Awarded $ 91,414,215 Claim Grant Rate Total 27% HLR 27% Supp 29% * All data shown as of October 15, 2018 18

Board Role in RAMP The Board began adjudicating RAMP appeals on October 1st Once Veterans receive a decision under the RAMP supplemental claim or higherlevel review lanes, they have the option of appealing to the Board. The Board holds RAMP appeals in a queue in the order in which they were received. o As of October 16, 2018, the Board has received 487 appeals (NODs) of RAMP decisions. Starting October 1st, the Board began adjudicating the first of these appeals in a phased implementation to test processes and technology. o The Board s phased approach to RAMP allows the Board to identify and address potential issues and risks relating to implementation of the new framework, while continuing to deliver decisions to legacy appellants at historic levels. 19

RAMP Selection Form 20

Board Dockets FY 19 Priority to Advanced on the Docket on all dockets. Board Priorities Legacy appeals Legacy appeals with hearings* AMA Direct Lane (365 average processing goal) AMA Evidence AMA Hearings* ** *Hearing requests may result in a multi-year delay in Board adjudication. Approximately 78,000 Veterans are waiting for a hearing with one of the 95 VLJs. ** Hearings for appeals of RAMP decisions will not be scheduled until after February 2019 21

Useful Links Board s webpage: https://www.bva.va.gov/ VBA s AMA information: https://www.benefits.va.gov/benefits/appeals.asp Vets.gov appeals status tracker: https://www.vets.gov/?next=%2ftrack-claims Reports to Congress on the status of implementation of AMA: https://benefits.va.gov/benefits/appealsreports.asp 22