Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv TJC-JBT Document 173 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6189

1,=-= := usns son~ 1,.!oocume?~t " LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i!

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

Case 1:10-cv ER-SRF Document 844 Filed 11/19/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

Case 1:12-cv GBD Document 47 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:10-cv ER-SRF Document 825 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

Case 1:14-cv JL Document 193 Filed 07/27/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:12-cv GBD Document 212 Filed 05/10/16 Page 1 of 10

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:11-cv LAK-JCF Document 285 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:14-cv MCE-KJN Document 87 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14

the terms and conditions of the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Certain Defendant s

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IOC SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YOR. This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to this Court's Order Granting

Case 9:14-cv DMM Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2017 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Questions? Call toll-free (888) or visit

Case 7:13-cv NSR-LMS Document 132 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

1:1_ (I f 0 HiIiB} ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

4:12-cv GAD-DRG Doc # Filed 09/21/15 Pg 1 of 82 Pg ID 4165 EXHIBIT 2

JUDGMENT APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING ACTION AGAINST BERNARD EBBERS. On this day of, 2005, a hearing having been held before this Court to

Case 1:04-cv DAB Document 569 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8 SOUTHERN DISTIUCT OF NEW YORK..

Case 1:13-cv WHP Document 571 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

Case 2:15-cv LDD Document 54 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

I ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Case 1:09-cv PAC Document 159 Filed 07/13/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURIAA WESTERN DIVISION

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A SAN JOSE DIVISION

nm OPOREPJYINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-cv RJC

Case 1:14-cv JBW-LB Document 116 Filed 04/05/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: CV-1 199

Case: 1: 1 0-cv Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:569

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AND ORDER. into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, dated March 11, 2016, as amended on June 13,

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document Filed 03/17/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

Case 8:14-cv JSM-CPT Document 313 Filed 12/13/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID 5935

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 82 Filed 12/20/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:14-cv RJS Document 67 Filed 11/03/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 7:15-cv AT-LMS Document 129 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

prejudice on the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document 133 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 5

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CLAIMS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 30 Filed 05/07/12 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv JLL-JAD Document 81 Filed 10/03/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 963

Case 3:13-cv BAS-RBB Document Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT 8

HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 06-cv-377-JL FINAL JUDGMENT

Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:16-cv BCM Document 25-1 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

Case5:10-cv RMW Document207 Filed03/11/14 Page1 of 7

Transcription:

Case 3:14-cv-05628-PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY fl RE COMMVAULT SYSTEMS, inc. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. 14-5628 (PGS)(LHG) JUDGMENT APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT WHEREAS, a consolidated class action is pending in this Court entitled In re Commvault Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation, Master File No. 14-5628 (PGS)(LHG) (the Action ); WHEREAS, (a) Lead Plaintiff Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, on behalf of itself and the Settlement Class (defined below), and (b) defendants Commvault Systems, Inc. ( Commvault ), and N. Robert Hammer and Brian Carolan (collectively, the Individual Defendants, and, together with Commvault, the Defendants ; and together with Lead Plaintiff, the Parties ) have entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated November 30, 2017 (the Stipulation ), that provides for a complete dismissal with prejudice of the Released Plaintiffs Claims on the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation, subject to the approval of this Court (the Settlement ); WHEREAS, unless otherwise defined in this Judgment, the capitalized terms herein shall have the same meaning as they have in the Stipulation; WHEREAS, by Order dated January 22, 2018 (the Preliminary Approval Order ), this Court: (a) preliminarily approved the Settlement; (b) certified the Settlement Class solely for purposes of effectuating the Settlement; (c) ordered that notice of the proposed Settlement be provided to potential Settlement Class Members; (d) provided Settlement Class Members with the

2. Incorporation of Settlement Documents to consider, among other things, (a) whether the terms and conditions of the Settlement are fair, (b) whether a judgment should be entered dismissing the Action with prejudice as against the Settlement; and (e) scheduled a hearing regarding final approval of the Settlement; opportunity either to exclude themselves from the Settlement Class or to object to the proposed WHEREAS, due and adequate notice has been given to the Settlement Class; WHEREAS, the Court conducted a hearing on May 14, 2018 (the Settlement Hearing ) reasonable and adequate to the Settlement Class, and should therefore be approved; and Defendants; and each of the Settlement Class Members. I. Jurisdiction Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action, and Judgment incorporates and makes only, the Action as a class action pursuant to Rules 2 3(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil or otherwise acquired shares of the publicly traded common stock of Commvault during the period 3. Class Certification for Settlement Purposes a part hereof: (a) the Stipulation filed with the Court on December 5. 2017; and (b) the Notice and all matters relating to the Settlement, as well as personal jurisdiction over all of the Parties and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: WHEREAS, the Court having reviewed and considered the Stipulation, all papers filed and proceedings held herein in connection with the Settlement, all oral and written comments received regarding the Settlement, and the record in the Action, and good cause appearing therefor; the Summary Notice, both of which were filed with the Court on April 9, 2018. determinations in the Preliminary Approval Order certifying, for the purposes of the Settlement Procedure on behalf of the Settlement Class consisting of all persons and entities that purchased Court hereby affirms its Case 3:14-cv-05628-PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 2 of 9 PageID: 4284 The 2 This The

The Pursuant Case 3:14-cv-05628-PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 3 of 9 PageID: 4285 beginning on May 7, 2013 through and including April 24. 2014 (the Class Period ), and were allegedly damaged by those purchases or acquisitions and any corrective disclosures. Excluded from the Settlement Class are: (i) Defendants; (ii) the officers, directors, and affiliates of Cornmvault, currently and during the Class Period; (iii) Immediate Family Members of all individual persons excluded in (i) or (ii); (iv) any entity in which any person excluded in (i), (ii) or (iii) has, or had during the Class Period, a controlling interest; (v) Commvault s employee retirement andlor benefit plan(s) and their participants andlor beneficiaries to the extent they purchased or acquired Commvault common stock through any such plan(s); and (vi) the legal representatives, heirs, successors or assigns of any such excluded person. Also excluded from the Settlement Class is the person listed on Exhibit 1 hereto, who is excluded from the Settlement Class pursuant to his request for exclusion. 4. Adequacy of Representation to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for the purposes of the Settlement only, the Court hereby affirms its determinations in the Preliminary Approval Order certifying Lead Plaintiff as Class Representative for the Settlement Class and appointing Lead Counsel as Class Counsel for the Settlement Class. Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel have fairly and adequately represented the Settlement Class both in terms of litigating the Action and for purposes of entering into and implementing the Settlement and have satisfied the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a)(4) and 23(g), respectively. 5. Notice Court finds that the dissemination of the Notice and the publication of the Summary Notice: (a) were implemented in accordance with the Preliminary Approval Order; (b) constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances; (c) constituted notice that was reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise Settlement Class Members of 3

4 reimbursement of Litigation Expenses; (iv) their right to object to any aspect of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation andlor Lead Counsel s motion for attorneys fees and reimbursement of right to appear at the Settlement Hearing; (d) constituted due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all (i) the pendency of the Action; (ii) the effect of the proposed Settlement (including the Releases to be provided thereunder); (iii) Lead Counsel s motion for an award of attorneys fees and Litigation Expenses; (v) their right to exclude themselves from the Settlement Class; and (vi) their persons and entities entitled to receive notice of the proposed Settlement; and (e) satisfied the binding on Defendants, Lead Plaintiff and all other Settlement Class Members (regardless of 7. The Action and all of the claims asserted against Defendants in the Action by Lead 8. Bindin2 Effect The terms of the Stipulation and of this Judgment shall be forever Plaintiff and the other Settlement Class Members are hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Parties in all respects, fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Settlement Class. The Parties are directed to 6. Final Settlement Approval and Dismissal of Claims requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States Constitution (including the Due Process Clause), the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 15 to, and in accordance with, Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court hereby fully and U.S.C. 78u-4, as amended, and all other applicable law and rules. finally approves the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation in all respects (including, without limitation: the amount of the Settlement; the Releases provided for therein; and the dismissal with prejudice of the claims asserted against Defendants in the Action), and finds that the Settlement is, implement, perform, and consummate the Settlement in accordance with the terms and provisions contained in the Stipulation. shall bear their own costs and expenses, except as otherwise expressly provided in the Stipulation. Case 3:14-cv-05628-PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 4 of 9 PageID: 4286 Pursuant

The Case 3:14-cv-05628-PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 5 of 9 PageID: 4287 whether or not any individual Settlement Class Member submits a Claim Form or seeks or obtains a distribution from the Net Settlement Fund), as well as their respective successors and assigns. The person listed on Exhibit 1 hereto is excluded from the Settlement Class pursuant to request and is not bound by the terms of the Stipulation or this Judgment. 9. Releases Releases set forth in paragraphs 5 and 6 of the Stipulation, together with the definitions contained in paragraph 1 of the Stipulation relating thereto, are expressly incorporated herein in all respects. The Releases are effective as of the Effective Date. Accordingly, this Court orders that: (a) Without further action by anyone, and subject to paragraph 10 below, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, Lead Plaintiff and each of the other Settlement Class Members, on behalf of themselves, and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns in their capacities as such, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of law and of this Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved, relinquished, waived, and discharged each and every Released Plaintiffs Claim against Defendants and the other Defendants Releasees, and shall forever be enjoined from prosecuting any or all of the Released Plaintiffs Claims against any of the Defendants Releasees. (b) Without further action by anyone, and subject to paragraph 10 below, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, Defendants, on behalf of themselves, and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns in their capacities as such, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of law and of this Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and threver compromised, settled, released, resolved, relinquished, waived, and discharged each and every Released Defendants Claim against Lead Plaintiff and the other Plaintiffs Releasees, and shall forever he enjoined from prosecuting any or all of the Released Defendants Claims 5

(a) shall be offered against any of the Defendants Releasees as evidence of, or as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions of the Stipulation; I hereto. 10. Notwithstanding paragraphs 9(a) 11. Rule 11 Findings 12. No Admissions this Judgment, the Term Sheet, the Stipulation (whether Court finds and concludes that the Parties and their any action by any of the Parties to enforce or effectuate the terms of the Stipulation or this above, nothing in this Judgment shall bar (b) against any of the Plaintiffs Releasees. This Release shall not apply to the person listed on Exhibit Judgment. Rules of Civil Procedure as to all proceedings herein. respective counsel have complied in all respects with the requirements of Rule 11 of the Federal or not consummated), including the exhibits thereto and the Plan of Allocation contained therein (or any other plan of allocation that maybe approved by the Court), the negotiations leading to the execution of the Term Sheet and the Stipulation, nor any proceedings taken pursuant to or in connection with the Term Sheet, the Stipulation andlor approval of the Settlement (including any arguments proffered in connection therewith): the Defendants Releasees with respect to the truth of any fact alleged by Lead Plaintiff or the construed as, or deemed to be evidence of any presumption, concession, or admission by any of validity of any claim that was or could have been asserted or the deficiency of any defense that has negligence, fault, or other wrongdoing of any kind of any of the Defendants Releasees or in any way referred to for any other reason as against any of the Defendants Releasees, in any arbitration proceeding or civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding, other than such proceedings been or could have been asserted in this Action or in any other litigation, or of any liability, Case 3:14-cv-05628-PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 6 of 9 PageID: 4288 Neither The 6

7 13. Retention of Jurisdiction Plaintiffs Releasees that any of their claims are without merit, that any of the Defendants construed as, or deemed to be evidence of any presumption, concession or admission by any of the Releasees had meritorious defenses, or that damages recoverable under the Complaint would not wrongdoing of any kind, or in any way referred to for any other reason as against any of the proceeding, other than such proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions of the or presumption that the consideration to be given under the Settlement represents the amount Judgment and the Stipulation to effectuate the protections from liability granted hereunder and thereunder or otherwise to enforce the terms of the Settlement. (c) shall be construed against any of the Releasees as an admission, concession, have exceeded the Settlement Amount or with respect to any liability, negligence, fault or Plaintiffs Releasees, in any arbitration proceeding or civil, criminal or administrative action or Stipulation; or which could be or would have been recovered after trial; affecting the finality of this Judgment in any to approve the Plan of Allocation; (e) any motion to approve the Class Distribution Order; and (f) the Settlement Class Members for all matters relating to the Action. provided, however, that the Parties and the Releasees and their respective counsel may refer to this way, this Court retains continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over: (a) the Parties for purposes of disposition of the Settlement Fund; (c) any motion for an award of attorneys fees andlor Litigation Expenses by Lead Counsel in the Action that will be paid from the Settlement Fund; (d) any motion the administration, interpretation, implementation, and enforcement of the Settlement; (b) the (b) shall be offered against any of the Plaintiffs Releasees, as evidence of, or Case 3:14-cv-05628-PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 7 of 9 PageID: 4289 Without

8 Such orders shall in no way affect or delay the finality of this Judgment and shall not affect or amendments or modifications of the Stipulation or any exhibits attached thereto to effectuate the 15. Modification of the Agreement of Settlement delay the Effective Date of the Settlement. further approval from Settlement that: (a) are not materially inconsistent with this Judgment; and (b) do not materially order of the Court, Lead Plaintiff and Defendants may agree to reasonable extensions of time to carry out any provisions of the Settlement. Stipulation or the Effective Date of the Settlement otherwise fails to occur, this Judgment shall be vacated, rendered null and void and be of no further force and effect, except as otherwise provided 16. Termination of Settlement motion of Lead Counsel for an award of attorneys fees and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses. limit the rights of Settlement Class Members in connection with the Settlement. Without further other Settlement Class Members and Defendants, and the Parties shall revert to their respective final judgment in this Action. Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of the Court is expressly directed to immediately enter this positions in the Action as of October 2, 2017, as provided in the Stipulation. Judgment as a final judgment in this Action. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 54(h) of the Federal the Settlement is terminated as provided in the the Court, Lead Plaintiff and Defendants are hereby authorized to agree to and adopt such by the Stipulation, and this Judgment shall be without prejudice to the rights of Lead Plaintiff, the 14. Separate orders shall be entered regarding approval of a plan of allocation and the 17. Entry of Final Judgment is no just reason to delay the entry of this Case 3:14-cv-05628-PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 8 of 9 PageID: 4290 If There Without

Case 3:14-cv-05628-PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 9 of 9 PageID: 4291 SO ORDERED this day of, 2018. #1122493 ML The Honorable Peter G. Sheridan United States District Judge 9