Russia's G8 presidency: With an ambitious agenda, can Moscow deliver?

Similar documents
Much ado about nothing: The Rio+20 conference

Republic of Argentina G20 Presidency.

G8 A critical presentation

Russia and the EU s need for each other

Trade Theory and Economic Globalization

European Parliament recommendation to the Council of 12 March 2009 on an EU-Mexico Strategic Partnership (2008/2289(INI))

The EU-Mediterranean Neighbourhood: Implications for Research

II BRIC Summit - Joint Statement April 16, 2010

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

GGI Commentary June 2015

2018 Canada G7 Summit Calendar and Agenda (last updated on April 9, 2018)

Priorities of the Portuguese Presidency of the EU Council (July December 2007)

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 14 May /12 DEVGEN 110 ACP 66 FIN 306 RELEX 390

Joint Statement of the 22 nd EU-ASEAN Ministerial Meeting Brussels, Belgium, 21 January 2019

Bringing EU Trade Policy Up to Date 23 June 2015

ASIA-PACIFIC PARLIAMENTARY FORUM (APPF) RESOLUTION APPF24/RES.17 ECONOMY, TRADE AND REGIONAL VALUE CHAINS

CONFERENCE ON DISARMAMENT

The Relevance of Democracy, Human Rights, Civic Liberties and Social Justice for the G20 Process

Emerging players in Africa: Brussels, 28 March 2011 What's in it for Africa-Europe relations? Meeting Report April

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Chairman s Statement of the East Asia Summit (EAS) Ha Noi, Viet Nam, 30 October 2010

The EU and the special ten : deepening or widening Strategic Partnerships?

International Relations GS SCORE. Indian Foreign Relations development under PM Modi

Council conclusions on counter-terrorism

Chair s Statement 1. Strengthening Partnership for Peace and Sustainable Development

The WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement: reducing bureaucracy at the border

Quaker Peace & Legislation Committee

Question/Categories. Notes: Total may not become 100% due to rounding off

Sanya Declaration, Sanya, Hainan, China, 14 April 2011

CHILE NORTH AMERICA. Egypt, Israel, Oman, Saudi Arabia and UAE. Barge service: Russia Federation, South Korea and Taiwan. USA East Coast and Panama

EU-Brazil Summit Lisbon, 4 July Joint Statement

Continuous shared learning and improvement of nuclear safety and regulatory organisations through the OECD/NEA

WORKSHOP TOWARDS A FREE TRADE AGREEMENT WITH JAPAN? ANNEX I. Dr JÜRGEN MATTHES. Cologne Institute for Economic Research.

The EU in a world of rising powers

European Neighbourhood Policy

Thirteenth United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice

Joint Communiqué: European Union Central Asia Foreign Ministers' Meeting, Brussels, 23 November 2018

THE LISBON TREATY AND EU SPORTS POLICY

The Lisbon Agenda and the External Action of the European Union

P7_TA-PROV(2012)0017 EU foreign policy towards the BRICS and other emerging powers

Madrid Statement on ASEM Interfaith Dialogue

GLOBALIZATION 4.0 The Human Experience. Presented to the World Economic Forum by SAP + Qualtrics

Modalities for the intergovernmental negotiations of the global compact for safe, orderly and regular migration (A/RES/71/280).

Draft Conclusions. Inter-Parliamentary Conference for the Common Foreign and Security Policy and the Common Security and Defence Policy

Twelfth United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice

ENP Package, Country Progress Report Armenia

15580/16 EB/dk 1 DGD 1C

Africa-EU Civil Society Forum Declaration Tunis, 12 July 2017

CANADIAN W20 ROUND TABLE MEETING OF JULY 6, The Canadian W20 Round Table discussions that took place in Ottawa on July 6, 2016 revolved around:

Overview of JODI Gas Milestones and Beta Test Launch

Republic of Korea-EU Summit, Seoul, 23 May 2009 JOINT PRESS STATEMENT

2017 Update to Leaders on Progress Towards the G20 Remittance Target

MEXICAN PRESIDENCY OF THE G20

NATIONAL ROMA PLATFORM

Preparatory Seminar to the EU-CELAC Summit of June 2015 Egmont Palace, 14 th April 2015

ABC. The Pacific Alliance

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 May 2014 (OR. fr) 9738/14 AL 4 OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS

INTRODUCTION EB434 ENTERPRISE + GOVERNANCE

Delegations will find attached Council conclusions on the EU strategy for Central Asia as adopted by the Council on 19 June 2017.

RESOLUTION. Euronest Parliamentary Assembly Assemblée parlementaire Euronest Parlamentarische Versammlung Euronest Парламентская Aссамблея Евронест

Chairman s Statement of the 4 th East Asia Summit Cha-am Hua Hin, Thailand, 25 October 2009

COUNTRIES INTANGIBLE WEALTH, A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN GLOBALISATION?

International cooperation in health research

CHAPTER I: SIZE AND GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE POPULATION

Highlights of the Philippines Chairmanship of ASEAN in 2017

THE 14 TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASIA PACIFIC PARLIAMENTARY FORUM (APPF) January 2006, Jakarta Indonesia JOINT COMMUNIQUÉ

EU-EGYPT PARTNERSHIP PRIORITIES

THE EUROPEAN PROJECT: CELEBRATING 60 YEARS

How the world views Britain 2017

Involvement or Restraint? A representative survey on German attitudes to foreign policy commissioned by Körber Foundation

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. The European Union and Latin America: Global Players in Partnership {SEC(2009) 1227}

WORLDWIDE DISTRIBUTION OF PRIVATE FINANCIAL ASSETS

8th UNION FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN TRADE MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE. Brussels, 9 December Conclusions

Implementation of the EU Directive and its potential generalisation worldwide. Speaking Points

Steering Group Meeting. Conclusions

Friends and Foes in Trump s America: Canada tops Americans list of allies

Overview. Main Findings. The Global Weighted Average has also been steady in the last quarter, and is now recorded at 6.62 percent.

The current and future status of women s rights

7 th Baltic Sea States Summit

EC Communication on A credible enlargement perspective for and enhanced EU engagement with the Western Balkans COM (2018) 65

Russian Federation. OECD average. Portugal. United States. Estonia. New Zealand. Slovak Republic. Latvia. Poland

ASEAN 2015: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

WORKING DOCUMENT. EN United in diversity EN

Tentative yearly voluntary calendar of HRC thematic resolutions MARCH JUNE SEPTEMBER

Council of the European Union Brussels, 9 December 2014 (OR. en)

European & External Relations committee International Engagement inquiry Scotch Whisky Association response January 2015

ST/SG/AC.10/40. Secretariat. United Nations

Annotations to the provisional agenda, including organization of work

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

May 2018 IPSOS VIEWS. What Worries the World. Michael Clemence

Council of the European Union Brussels, 15 December 2015 (OR. en)

REGIONS OF THE WORLD

DECLARATION ON SECURITY AND CO-OPERATION IN THE MEDITERRANEAN

Talking Points Senior Officials Segment Geneva Conference on Preventing Violent Extremism: The Way Forward

8799/17 1 DPG LIMITE EN

THE BRICS HANDOVER REPORT:

Working Together as a Global Company

Essential Understandings

partnership Creating a cooperative

Transcription:

DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT BRIEFING Russia's G8 presidency: With an ambitious agenda, can deliver? Abstract In January 2014, the Russian Federation took over the G8 presidency from the United Kingdom, and with it the responsibility for shaping the year s political agenda and for organising this year's G8 summit, to be held on 4-5 June 2014 in Sochi. A latecomer to the G8 (having become a member in 1997), Russia has assertively pursued its foreign policy interests within the group. The current Russian presidency has decided on a range of priorities, largely corresponding to s own current policy interests and to the priorities of Russia s previous, 2006 G8 presidency. This year s foci include the fight against drug trafficking and terrorism, conflict resolution, disaster management and health security. While Russia has said it supports enhancing the parliamentary dimension of the G8, this year's annual speakers' meeting has again been scheduled after the summit itself on 5-7 September 2014 (in ) which means the speakers' meeting will take place too late to feed recommendations and insights into the summit itself. While the G8 has been accused of elitism and of failing to fully implement its summits' commitments, the group remains an important platform for its members to discuss and often find common positions on key foreign policy issues. DG EXPO/B/PolDep/Note/2014_44 February 2014 PE 522.324 EN

Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies This Briefing is an initiative of the Policy Department, DG EXPO AUTHOR: Wanda TROSZCZYNSKA-VAN GENDEREN Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union Policy Department WIB 06 M 093 rue Wiertz 60 B-1047 Brussels Editorial Assistant: Simona IACOBLEV CONTACT: Feedback of all kinds is welcome. Please write to: wanda.troszczynska@europarl.europa.eu. To obtain paper copies, please send a request by e-mail to: poldep-expo@europarl.europa.eu. PUBLICATION: English-language manuscript completed on 11 February 2014. European Union, 2014 Printed in Belgium This Briefing is available on the intranet site of the Directorate-General for External Policies, in the Regions and countries or Policy Areas section. DISCLAIMER: Any opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation, except for commercial purposes, are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and provided the publisher is given prior notice and supplied with a copy of the publication. 2

Russia's G8 presidency: With an ambitious agenda, can deliver? Table of contents 1. The Russian presidency of the G8 4 2. Members and organisation of the group 5 3. The parliamentary dimension of the G8 6 4. The EU in the G8 6 5. The global view of the G8 7 Annex I: Key events during the Russia's G8 Presidency 8 Annex II: CV of the Russian G8 Sherpa Alexei KVASOV 10 3

Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies 1. The Russian presidency of the G8 In 2014, the Russian Federation assumed the annual presidency of the Group of Eight world economic powers the G8. The role will allow Russia to set the political agenda for discussions to be held throughout the year. A latecomer to the group (having joined the G8 in 1997), the Russian Federation has in the past used the G8 as a platform to pursue its national interests, often presenting a dissenting voice during discussions of key foreign policy issues. Some observers have also accused Russia of eroding the G8's coherence. In the run-up to the EU-Russia summit, which took place in on 28 January 2014, the Russian G8 sherpa (the personal representative of the government in charge of preparing the G8 summit), Alexei Kvasov, confirmed the role of the G8 and the Russia's Presidency in this club this year. The core objectives of the Russia's G8 presidency will include: The Russian Federation has presented a strong, often dissenting, voice within the G8. (1) cooperation in the fight against drugs, (2) the fight against terrorism, (3) the resolution of conflicts, (4) the global management of natural and man-made disaster risks and (5) global health security (including emerging infections and food safety) 1. This list of five priorities differs from those of the United Kingdom's 2013 G8 presidency, which advanced a three-tiered agenda focussed on 'three T's': trade, tax compliance and transparency. Russia s list largely corresponds to current issues in Russia's own policy agenda (shaped in part by the December 2013 terrorist attack in Volgograd and by continued uncertainties about terrorist threats during the Sochi Olympic Games). Russia s list of priority topics also overlaps with those it pursued during its previous G8 presidency, in 2006: international action to fight terrorism and regional conflict settlement. According to statements by Russia s G8 sherpa, one 2014 priority will be to maximise the socioeconomic effect of the group's initiatives and decisions, including in the area of international security. In this regard, the sherpa underscored the need for investment, conditions for better employment, and innovative business models and activities 2. While this must be further fleshed out, the Russian presidency is also expected to continue the discussions from its 2013 G20 presidency (judged successful by many in moving key debates forward), as well as those related to the World Trade Organisation's (WTO) 2013 summit in Bali fighting economic protectionism, protecting investments and reducing barriers to trade. A number of other issues have been highlighted: financial crimes, migration and international development assistance, promoting data openness, enhancing the effectiveness of the state through openness, promoting openness for prosperity and improving the quality of life. These themes also relate to the priorities of the UK's previous G8 1 Russian G8 Presidency's official website, http://en.g8russia.ru/. 2 Ibid. 4

Russia's G8 presidency: With an ambitious agenda, can deliver? presidency. The need to adapt the global fight against drug trafficking, one of Russia s five core objectives, relates to s stated desire for the G8 to focus on 'new threats'. Russia has pointed to the limits of current approaches to drug trafficking, particularly in Latin America 3, and has disagreed with those who advocate a less law enforcement-driven approach. This debate was held during this year's World Economic Forum in Davos. The issue of global terrorism is also expected to be linked to the issue of the civil war in Syria; the Russian G8 presidency has emphasised the threat posed by the religious and ideological radicalisation of the Syrian opposition, which it considers a major impediment to the country s emergence from the conflict. In sum, the long list of the Russian G8 presidency s priorities appears designed to reconcile Russia s geostrategic interests with the legacy of its previous presidency, while aiming to strike a chord with its G8 partners. Time will tell whether the presidency will be able to deliver on this ambitious agenda. The G8 summit is scheduled to take place on 4-5 June 2014 in Sochi. 2. Members and organisation of the group The eight country members of the G8 are Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. In addition, the European Union is a full member of the G8 and is represented at the group's summits by the President of the European Commission and, since the entry into force of Lisbon Treaty, by the President of the European Council. But because the Union is a sui generis member, the group is still called the 'G8', and the EU can neither assume the presidency of G8 nor host its summits. The group started as the G6 in 1975, with Canada joining in 1976 and Russia in 1997. Before the inclusion of Russia, the impetus for creating the group stemmed from a desire to create a flexible and operational platform to allow like-minded leaders of the world's most advanced nations to meet in relatively informal settings, to discuss pressing global problems and deal with crises. Since then, G8 summits have featured discussions on a wide range of topics, ranging from crisis management to peace and security, economic governance, development, public health issues and climate change. In addition to the group's annual summits hosted by the member state assuming the rotating G8 presidency that year a number of meetings and events are held throughout the year, including agency-level meetings of public officials and high-ranking ministerial meetings. The sherpas assume responsibility for organising meetings and providing political direction. The G8 presidency establishes the venue and political priorities for the summits, fixes the calendar and oversees the group s administrative operations. In recent years, these summits have often been held outside capital cities, often in quite secluded locations, largely due to security concerns. 3 There is no common position on this in Latin America. 5

Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies 3. The parliamentary dimension of the G8 While the Russian presidency has emphasised the importance of the G8 s parliamentary dimension, the speakers' meeting has again been scheduled after the summit not an ideal sequence for the speakers. The Parliamentary dimension of G8 has been developing over the years, in the form of annual meetings of speakers from the parliaments of the G8 member states. The European Parliament has sent a high-level representative to these meetings usually the EP President or a vice president. The EP has pushed to upgrade the role of parliaments in the G8 context over the years, proposing to align the agendas of speakers' meetings more closely with the priority topics discussed during the summits. The EP has also advocated scheduling the speakers' meetings prior to the summit, to better feed the speakers insights into the summit s discussions. The Russian G8 presidency has expressed its commitment to boosting the parliamentary dimension of the G8. Russian President Vladimir Putin has stressed the importance of the parliamentary, civil society and youth preparatory 'tracks' of G8 (known as the 'Parliamentary 8', 'Civil 8' and 'Youth 8') as consultative bodies supporting and providing ideas to the presidency. Yet the programme of the 'Parliamentary 8' does not yet appear as well developed as these of the 'Civil 8' and 'Youth 8', which are well described on the official website of the Russian G8 presidency. Various Russian and international civil society organisations have closely followed the progress of the 'Civil 8' track of the current Russian presidency. During Russia s previous presidency, in 2006, several consultative events did occur, but some NGOs subsequently complained that their input was not reflected in the final communiqué. Significantly, the Russian G8 presidency has scheduled its speakers' meeting for 5-7 September in, well after the June Sochi summit a schedule that detracts from the speakers meeting potential impact. 4. The EU in the G8 The EU and G8 play a mutually supporting role, although the EU has yet to assert itself strongly as a G8 actor. The EU's role within the G8 is a delicate one: the Union represents those EU Member States who are not members of the G8, while seeking a common line among the EU members of the group. The EU is still searching for ways to assert itself more strongly at the G8. Studies have suggested that the EU and the G8 have yet to develop a common policy on key issues, and particularly on matters of peace and security 4. On the other hand, the EU and G8 positions on the protection of human rights, democracy, development and the fight against poverty and corruption are very close 5. The EU could certainly enhance its role and 4 Marina Larionova and Mark Rakhmangulov, 'Key Concepts for Exploring the Role of the European Union in the G8' in Marina Larionova (ed.) The European Union in the G8: Promoting Consensus and Concerted Actions for Global Public Goods. 5 Larionova and Rakhmangulov. 6

5. The global view of the G8 Russia's G8 presidency: With an ambitious agenda, can deliver? effectiveness within the G8; it could do more to represent the EU Member States not present at the table, as well as to liaise more closely with those EU Member States who are G8 members. In conclusion, the G8 may serve as a platform for the EU to upgrade its status as a global actor. G8 decisions an d commitments also have an important trickle-down effect on EU policy, which has been visible in a number of areas, such as development and climate. While the G8 has been criticised in the past for its elitist character and lack of effectiveness, it has also served as a consensus-building platform on issues ranging from crisis management to sustainable development. The impact and effectiveness of the G8 has often been debated in recent years, with critical voices pointing to the elitist character of the platform, accused of not reflecting new geostrategic realities (such as rising powers). The group is also criticised for the poor implementation of the commitments made during its summits. Nevertheless, recent summits have demonstrated the added value of the G8 as a platform working for consensus on topics including crisis management and sustainable development. While the admission of Russia to the G8 in 1997 may have eroded the cohesiveness of the group, it also facilitated high-level political dialogue on key foreign policy issues. The results of these discussions have been mixed. However, given recent events in the EU's eastern and southern neighbourhoods, pursuing dialogue with Russia on these issues appears more important than ever. The fact that will hold the group s presidency a role that usually implies an effort to build consensus suggests that June summit in Sochi may be productive. The G8 has also been discussed in relation to the Group of 20 6. For the moment, there is no formal arrangement between the two regarding their 'division of labour'. The G8 focuses predominantly, if not exclusively, on non-economic issues, tackling a range of topics, including peace and security, development, climate, crisis management and public health. The G8 provides the EU an opportunity to assert its foreign policy positions on a global stage, forcing the Union to develop a suitable modus operandi in conjunction with participating Member States. In turn, the platform offers the European Parliament an opportunity to push for its own voice to be heard on key issues, as well as to advocate the parliamentary dimension of global governance. 6 G20 membership comprises Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States and the European Union, represented by the President of the European Council, accompanied by the European Central Bank. 7

Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies Annex I: Key events during the Russia's G8 presidency 27-28 January Foreign Affairs Sous-Sherpas (FASS) Meeting 28-29 January Political Directors Meeting 1-28 February 1st Sherpas' Meeting 12 February 1st Accountability Working Group Meeting 13 February 1st G8 Health Experts' Group Meeting 25 February 1st Ministerial Preparatory Meeting on Countering the World Drug Problem 26-27 February 1st Nuclear Safety and Security Working Group Meeting 27-28 February 1st Food Security Working Group Meeting 18-19 March 2nd Accountability Working Group Meeting 25 March 1-30 April 1-30 April 2rd Ministerial Preparatory Meeting on Countering the World Drug Problem Meeting of G8 Science Ministers and National Academies of Science Presidents Meeting of the G8 Deputy Ministers of Science and Deputy Presidents of National Science Academies 1-30 April 3rd Sherpas Meeting 1-30 April Business 8 Summit Kaliningrad St. Petersburg 7-8 April 2nd G8 Health Experts' Group Meeting 11 April 1st Finance Ministers Meeting Washington 17-18 April 2nd Food Security Working Group Meeting 22-23 April 3rd Accountability Working Group Meeting 23 April - 24March Development Ministers' Deputies Meeting 24 April 3rd Ministerial Preparatory Meeting on Countering the World Drug Problem 24-25 April Global University Summit 28-29 April 2nd Nuclear Safety and Security Working Group Meeting Saint Petersburg 1-31 May 1st Deauville Partnership Transition Fund's Meeting Egypt 1-31 May 1st Leadership Council Meeting of the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition Africa 12-13 May IV Eastern Europe and Central Asia AIDS Conference 12-13 May Youth 8 Summit (Y8 Russia 2014) 14-16 May Civil 8 Summit, including Meeting on Open Government 15 May Ministerial Meeting on Countering the World Drug Problem 8

Russia's G8 presidency: With an ambitious agenda, can deliver? 15-16 May Development Ministers' Meeting 20-21 May 3rd G8 Health Experts' Group Meeting Geneva 28 May Finance Sous-Sherpas Meeting G8. Accountability Report s Presentation 1-30 June 4th Sherpas Meeting Sochi 5 June G8 Leaders' Summit Sochi 130 September G8 Parliament Speakers' Meeting 130 September 30 Sept. - 1 October 2nd Leadership Council Meeting of the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition International Workshop Insurance of Civil Liability for Inflicting Possible Damage when Operating Hazardous Production Facilities New York Sochi 1-31 October 2nd Deauville Partnership Transition Fund's Meeting 1-31 October Conference on Development Agenda with Deauville Partnership countries' participation 10 October 2nd Finance Ministers Meeting Washington 27-28 October 3rd Nuclear Safety and Security Working Group Meeting 29-31 October International Workshop Lessons Learned from the IAEA Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) 1-30 November 5th Sherpas Meeting Russia 19-21 November International Workshop on Regulatory Control on Nuclear Legacy Sites and Radioactive Waste Management 9

Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies Annex II: CV of the Russian G8 Sherpa Alexei KVASOV Alexei G. KVASOV was appointed Russian Sherpa of the G8 by the Executive Order of the President of the Russian Federation on 25 June 25 2012. Background 2012 Deputy Chief of Presidential Experts Directorate, Russian G8 Sherpa, Executive Office of the President of the Russian Federation 2011-2012 Aide to the First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation (Igor Shuvalov) 2011 Aide to the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance of the Russian Federation on international development, economic and financial issues (Aleksei Kudrin) 2002-2010 Executive Director for the Russian Federation, The World Bank Group 2000-2002 Deputy Director, North American Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation 1996-2000 Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Chile 1991-96 First Deputy Director; Chief of Economic Division; North-American Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation 1978-90 Director for Research and Planning; Senior Researcher; Assistant Researcher; Postgraduate, Institute of the USA and Canada Studies, Academy of Sciences of the USSR Education 2005 Executive Education Program, J.F.Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University (Boston, MA, USA) 1984 Ph.D. (Economics), Institute of the USA and Canada Studies, Academy of Sciences of the USSR 1978 M.A. (Economics) Cum laude, State University 10