No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. DAVID JACOBS; GARY HINDES, Appellants,

Similar documents
[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

Case 1:13-cv RCL Document 77 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:13-cv RCL Document 89 Filed 10/29/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 15, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:15-cv GMS Document 35 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 934 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED Nos (L), (con.), (con.), (con.)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case4:10-cv CW Document205 Filed11/02/12 Page1 of 6

Case 1:13-cv MMS Document 218 Filed 08/03/15 Page 1 of 7 Redacted Version IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Case 1:13-cv MMS Document 54 Filed 06/18/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Case 1:16-cv GMS Document 31 Filed 09/23/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1005 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Counsel for Plaintiff-Appellant

Case: 7:15-cv ART-EBA Doc #: 40 Filed: 04/08/16 Page: 1 of 2 - Page ID#: 1167

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:13-mc RCL Document 66 Filed 01/10/18 Page 1 of 58 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/05/2018

United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room St. Louis, Missouri 63102

Case 1:14-cv MMS Document 28 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS. Case No C

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case MDL No Document 21 Filed 04/06/16 Page 1 of 22 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: Document: 16 Filed: 12/02/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Filed: December 02, 2016

Leave to file reply brief of up to 10,500 words.

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:16-cv RNS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2016 Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

In The United States Court of Appeals For the Third Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

UNOPOSSED PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT S AMENDED MOTION FOR COURT S APPROVAL TO ELECTRONIC FILE CASE DOCUMENTS VIA CM/ECF SYSTEM 1

JOINT MOTION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26(b) and 10th Cir. R. 27.5, the parties jointly

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room St. Louis, Missouri 63102

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (1:15-cv GBL-MSN)

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION

No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case 1:16-cv RNS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2016 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:13-cv MMS Document 53 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 15. No C (Judge Sweeney) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Case No.: DD. v. District Court Case No.: 1:16-cv RNS

Case 1:15-cv GMS Document 71 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 2190 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, CHARLES D.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD APRIL 12, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff-Appellee,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

[NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:13-mc RCL Document 78 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CLASS ACTION

Case No. 3D Case No. 3D (consolidated under Case No. 3D ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFREY ALEXANDER STERLING, and JAMES RISEN,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Motion to Certify under 28 U.S.C.

Case 1:13-mc RCL Document 92 Filed 11/19/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CASE NOS , -1307, -1309, -1310, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO TRANSFER AND HOLD CASES IN ABEYANCE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2014 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Case No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT. ULTRAMERCIAL, LLC and ULTRAMERCIAL, INC., and WILDTANGENT, INC.

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOTCONNECTAFRICA TRUST,

Case 1:16-cv GMS Document 22 Filed 09/01/16 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 881 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT CITIZEN CENTER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

Case: Document: 16 Filed: 04/23/2012 Pages: 6. Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Nos , ,

United States Court of Appeals For the Third Circuit

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES ex rel. ADAMS, et al., AURORA LOAN SERVICES, INC., et al.

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON NOVEMBER 8, 2018] No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:13-cv MMS Document 77 Filed 10/04/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 85 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:13-mc RCL Document 91 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 179 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellee, Defendants-Appellants.

[ORAL ARGUMENT NOT SCHEDULED] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT : : : : MOTION TO GOVERN

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No AARON C. BORING and CHRISTINE BORING, husband and wife respectively, Appellants,

Transcription:

Case: 17-3794 Document: 003112873294 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/12/2018 No. 17-3794 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT DAVID JACOBS; GARY HINDES, Appellants, v. FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, IN ITS CAPACITY AS CONSERVATOR OF THE FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION AND THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellants. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware No. 15-cv-00708 Gregory M. Sleet, U.S. District Judge UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEES BRIEFS Appellees the Federal Housing Finance Agency ( FHFA ), the Federal National Mortgage Association ( Fannie Mae ), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ( Freddie Mac ), and the U.S. Department of the Treasury ( Treasury ) (together, Appellees ) hereby respectfully seek a 28-day extension

Case: 17-3794 Document: 003112873294 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/12/2018 of time until April 26, 2018 to file their briefs in the above-referenced appeal. In support of this motion, Appellees state as follows: 1. Undersigned counsel has conferred with counsel for Appellants in this appeal, and counsel for Appellants do not oppose this request for a 28-day extension of time. 2. The Court docketed this appeal on December 22, 2017. 3. On January 18, 2018, the Court ordered that (1) Appellants file their brief and joint appendix on or before February 27, 2018; (2) Appellees file their brief within 30 days of service of Appellants brief; and (3) Appellants file their reply brief within 14 days of service of Appellees brief. 4. On February 27, 2018, the Appellants filed their brief and joint appendix. 5. FHFA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac anticipate filing a single, joint consolidated brief. Treasury anticipates filing its own brief. 6. Appellees briefs are due March 29, 2018. A 28-day extension of time would make the Appellees briefs due on April 26, 2018. Appellees have not sought any prior extensions of time and do not anticipate seeking any additional extensions of time.

Case: 17-3794 Document: 003112873294 Page: 3 Date Filed: 03/12/2018 7. FHFA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac are represented by three separate law firms. Preparing a single joint consolidated brief will necessitate coordination among each of the firms and their clients. 8. Treasury is represented by the U.S. Department of Justice. Its brief therefore will require several levels of review. And Treasury and the other Appellees will also need to coordinate their drafting to ensure a minimum of overlap between the two briefs. 9. Appellees and their counsel have several other deadlines and obligations near the time of the current March 29, 2018 deadline. For example: a. On March 15, 2018, the attorneys responsible for Treasury s brief in this matter have an oral argument in the Ninth Circuit. See United States v. King Mountain, No. 16-35956 (9th Cir.). b. On March 23, 2018, FHFA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac have a reply in support of their motion to dismiss due in three Third Amendment actions in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. See In re Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement Class Action Litigation, No. 1:13-mc-1288 (D.D.C.); Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. FHFA, No. 1:13-cv-1053 (D.D.C.); Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. Fannie Mae, No. 1:13-cv-1439 (D.D.C.). c. On March 26, 2018, FHFA, Fannie Mae, and Treasury have a motion to dismiss due in another Third Amendment action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. See Voacolo v. Fannie Mae, No. 3:17-cv-5667 (D.N.J.). d. On March 27, 2018, FHFA and Fannie Mae have a brief due in a Second Circuit appeal. See Smulley v. FHFA, No. 17-2666 (2d Cir.).

Case: 17-3794 Document: 003112873294 Page: 4 Date Filed: 03/12/2018 e. On April 3, 2018, the attorneys responsible for Treasury s brief in this matter have a brief due in a Ninth Circuit case. See Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. U.S. Dep t of Homeland Sec., No. 18-15068 (9th Cir.). f. On April 4, 2018, FHFA and Freddie Mac have a brief due in a Ninth Circuit appeal. See Kielty v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, No. 17-16913 (9th Cir.). 10. A 28-day extension of time in this appeal will allow Appellees to stagger the filing deadline in this appeal with the filing deadlines and oral argument in the above-cited actions, and will allow time for the necessary coordination among all clients and attorneys involved. 11. Under these circumstances, Appellees respectfully submit that a 28- day extension of time is reasonable and warranted by good cause. CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above, Appellees respectfully request that this Court grant a 28-day extension of time until April 26, 2018 for the filing of Appellees briefs.

Case: 17-3794 Document: 003112873294 Page: 5 Date Filed: 03/12/2018 Respectfully submitted, Dated: March 12, 2018 /s/ Howard N. Cayne Howard N. Cayne Asim Varma David B. Bergman Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP 601 Massachusetts Avenue Washington, DC 20001 (202) 942-5000 Howard.Cayne@apks.com Asim.Varma@apks.com David.Bergman@apks.com Attorneys for Defendant-Appellee Federal Housing Finance Agency Michael Joseph Ciatti King & Spalding LLP 1700 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, DC 20006 (202) 626-5508 (202) 626-3737 mciatti@kslaw.com gmrodriguez@kslaw.com Attorneys for Defendant-Appellee Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Robert J. Stearn, Jr. Robert C. Maddox Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. 920 North King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 651-7700 stearn@rlf.com maddox@rlf.com Attorneys for Defendants-Appellees Federal Housing Finance Agency, Federal National Mortgage Association, and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Meaghan VerGow O Melveny & Meyers LLP 1625 Eye Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 383-5300 jkilduff@omm.com mwalsh@omm.com Attorneys for Defendant-Appellee Federal National Mortgage Association Gerard J. Sinzdak Abby C. Wright Civil Division, Appellate Staff U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20530 Attorneys for Defendant-Appellee United States Department of the Treasury

Case: 17-3794 Document: 003112873294 Page: 6 Date Filed: 03/12/2018 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify the following: 1. I am a member of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; 2. This filing has been prepared in a proportionally spaced typeface using Microsoft Word 2010 in 14-point Times New Roman font; 3. This document has been scanned for viruses using Microsoft System Center Endpoint Protection (Antimalware Client Version 4.10.209.0 & Engine Version 1.1.14600.4) and is free from viruses; and 4. On March 12, 2018, I caused the foregoing to be electronically filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF System, which will send notice of such filing to all registered users. Dated: March 12, 2018 /s/ Howard N. Cayne Howard N. Cayne Counsel for Defendant-Appellee Federal Housing Finance Agency