IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No COWBOY ATHLETICS INCORPORATED; T. BOONE PICKENS,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF HIDALGO COUNTY TEXAS, INCORPORATED;

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 12/29/2014, ID: , DktEntry: 20-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 07/03/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 12-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 04/24/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 23-1, Page 1 of 2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

FIFTH CIRCUIT PRACTICE

OFFICE OF THE CLERK B

Case: , 08/14/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 46-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Case: , 12/15/2015, ID: , DktEntry: 51-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 10/18/2016, ID: , DktEntry: 57-1, Page 1 of 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PlainSite. Legal Document

CHAPTER 27. FEES AND COSTS IN APPELLATE COURTS AND ON APPEAL FEES COSTS

RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Distinctions with a Difference: A Comparison of Federal and State Court Appeals

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: /16/2014 ID: DktEntry: 37-1 Page: 1 of 4 (1 of 9) NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 05/19/2016, ID: , DktEntry: 33-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 03/23/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 38-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 08/16/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 28-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT DEFEENDANT-APPELLEE S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

F I L E D October 25, 2012

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Gen

Case: Document: Filed: 09/04/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Filed: September 04, 2012

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cv TCB.

United States Court of Appeals FIFTH CIRCUIT OFFICE OF THE CLERK TEL S. MAESTRI PLACE NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130

Anatomy of an Appeal By Michelle May O Neil

Case: , 04/17/2019, ID: , DktEntry: 37-1, Page 1 of 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Office of the Clerk. After Opening a Case Pro Se Appellants (revised December 2012)

Case: , 03/16/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 46-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: Document: Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/19/2016 courts often face, but that we have not yet confronted: when a district court refe

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Proposed Changes to the Rules of Practice. Federal Circuit Rule 1

Case: , 02/19/2016, ID: , DktEntry: 54-1, Page 1 of 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 2:09-cv CAS-MAN Document 107 Filed 05/07/10 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:1464 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA

Seminole Appellate Court Rules of Appellate Procedure

PRO SE GUIDE CHILD WELFARE APPEAL PROCEDURES

Case: , 07/31/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 60-1, Page 1 of 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 09/05/2013 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Plaintiffs-Appellants, Docket Nos (L), 445(Con) DECLARATION OF SARAH S. NORMAND. SARAH S. NORMAND, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1746, declares as

Case: Document: 20 Filed: 09/11/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Filed: September 11, 2014

FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS CLERK OF COURT UPDATE AGENDA

Case: , 01/08/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 55-1, Page 1 of 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments Page 1

Case: , 08/27/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 126-1, Page 1 of 4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal

Case: , 02/14/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 73-1, Page 1 of 6 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PRELIMINARY DRAFT OF Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate, Bankruptcy, Civil, and Criminal Procedure

Case: , 04/25/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 61-1, Page 1 of 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SECOND CIRCUIT APPEALS

Ý»æ ïîóëëîèì ðîñïîñîðïì Üæ èçéêïìé ܵ Û² æ ìíóï Ð ¹»æ ï ±º ê øï ±º ïï NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Rules of the Court of Appeals of Virginia (not including forms)

F I L E D August 19, 2013

Case , Document 57-1, 03/29/2016, , Page1 of 3 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER

The Court Refuses to Honor my Notice of Appeal! What do I do now!?! 1

PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

Case: /20/2014 ID: DktEntry: 56-1 Page: 1 of 4 (1 of 13) NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case: , 07/23/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 39-1, Page 1 of 6 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

RULES OF CIVIL APPELLATE PROCEDURE. Tribal Council Resolution

TO BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

Third Circuit Civil Appeals: Oral Argument, Disposition, and Rehearing

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv UU.

Antonello Boldrini v. Martin Wilson

VIRGIN ISLANDS SUPREME COURT RULES (as amended November 2, 2011)

Case: , 01/02/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 43-1, Page 1 of 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Lower Tribunal No. 2D ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION BASED ON ALLEGED CONFLICT OF DECISIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cv WLS

United States Court of Appeals

RULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS (Revised effective January 1, 2011)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SCA Hygiene (Aukerman Laches): Court Grants En Banc Review

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Gen

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (L) (8:17-cv TDC)

Case: , 04/30/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 58-1, Page 1 of 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SEVENTH CIRCUIT BRIEF FILING CHECKLIST

Case 0:11-md JIC Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2012 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. Office of the Clerk. December 2012 (Last Revised: December 2013)

Case: , 09/19/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 40-1, Page 1 of 6 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals For the Fourth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Third Circuit Civil Appeals: Motions

Transcription:

Case: 14-30958 Document: 00513004474 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/14/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 14-30958 April 14, 2015 REID ZEISING; DIXIE RESTAURANT GROUP, L.L.C., v. Plaintiffs - Appellants MICHAEL A. SHELTON; SHELTON RESTAURANT GROUP, L.L.C., Defendants - Appellees Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:12-CV-2614 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The judgment of the district court is affirmed because an enforceable oral contract was not mutually agreed upon by these parties. The acquisition, purchase and terms, of the 29 Popeye s restaurants, how they would be operated and what if any consideration and role Zeising would contribute, was left wide open. At best, it could be said only that they agreed to agree, but that is not an enforceable contract under Louisiana or Georgia law. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 14-30958 Document: 00513004474 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/14/2015 No. 14-30958 See McNeely v. Town of Vidalia, 102 So. 422, 423 (La. 1924); Moss v. Moss, 463 S.E.2d 9 (Ga. 1995). Likewise, Shelton did not have a contract with Dixie, nor did he owe it a fiduciary duty. Ga. Code 14-11-304(a). AFFIRMED. 2

Case: 14-30958 Document: 00513004483 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/14/2015 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT BILL OF COSTS NOTE: The Bill of Costs is due in this office within 14 days from the date of the TH opinion, See FED. R. APP. P. & 5 CIR. R. 39. Untimely bills of costs must be accompanied by a separate motion to file out of time, which the court may deny. v. No. The Clerk is requested to tax the following costs against: COSTS TAXABLE UNDER th Fed. R. App. P. & 5 Cir. R. 39 REQUESTED ALLOWED (If different from amount requested) No. of Copies Pages Per Copy Cost per Page* Total Cost No. of Documents Pages per Document Cost per Page* Total Cost Docket Fee ($500.00) Appendix or Record Excerpts Appellant s Brief Appellee s Brief Appellant s Reply Brief Other: Total $ Costs are taxed in the amount of $ Costs are hereby taxed in the amount of $ this day of,. State of County of LYLE W.CAYCE, CLERK By Deputy Clerk I, do hereby swear under penalty of perjury that the services for which fees have been charged were incurred in this action and that the services for which fees have been charged were actually and necessarily performed. A copy of this Bill of Costs was this day mailed to opposing counsel, with postage fully prepaid thereon. This day of,. *SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RULES GOVERNING TAXATION OF COSTS (Signature) Attorney for

Case: 14-30958 Document: 00513004483 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/14/2015 FIFTH CIRCUIT RULE 39 39.1 Taxable Rates. The cost of reproducing necessary copies of the brief, appendices, or record excerpts shall be taxed at a rate not higher than $0.15 per page, including cover, TH index, and internal pages, for any for of reproduction costs. The cost of the binding required by 5 CIR. R. 32.2.3that mandates that briefs must lie reasonably flat when open shall be a taxable cost but not limited to the foregoing rate. This rate is intended to approximate the current cost of the most economical acceptable method of reproduction generally available; and the clerk shall, at reasonable intervals, examine and review it to reflect current rates. Taxable costs will be authorized for up to 15 copies for a brief and 10 copies of an appendix or record excerpts, unless the clerk gives advance approval for additional copies. 39.2 Nonrecovery of Mailing and Commercial Delivery Service Costs. Mailing and commercial delivery fees incurred in transmitting briefs are not recoverable as taxable costs. TH 39.3 Time for Filing Bills of Costs. The clerk must receive bills of costs and any objections within the times set forth in FED. R. APP. P. 39(D). See 5 CIR. R. 26.1. FED. R. APP. P. 39. COSTS (a) Against Whom Assessed. The following rules apply unless the law provides or the court orders otherwise; (1) if an appeal is dismissed, costs are taxed against the appellant, unless the parties agree otherwise; (2) if a judgment is affirmed, costs are taxed against the appellant; (3) if a judgment is reversed, costs are taxed against the appellee; (4) if a judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part, modified, or vacated, costs are taxed only as the court orders. (b) Costs For and Against the United States. Costs for or against the United States, its agency or officer will be assessed under Rule 39(a) only if authorized by law. ) Costs of Copies Each court of appeals must, by local rule, fix the maximum rate for taxing the cost of producing necessary copies of a brief or appendix, or copies of records authorized by rule 30(f). The rate must not exceed that generally charged for such work in the area where the clerk s office is located and should encourage economical methods of copying. (d) Bill of costs: Objections; Insertion in Mandate. (1) A party who wants costs taxed must within 14 days after entry of judgment file with the circuit clerk, with proof of service, an itemized and verified bill of costs. (2) Objections must be filed within 14 days after service of the bill of costs, unless the court extends the time. (3) The clerk must prepare and certify an itemized statement of costs for insertion in the mandate, but issuance of the mandate must not be delayed for taxing costs. If the mandate issues before costs are finally determined, the district clerk must upon the circuit clerk s request add the statement of costs, or any amendment of it, to the mandate. (e) Costs of Appeal Taxable in the District Court. The following costs on appeal are taxable in the district court for the benefit of the party entitled to costs under this rule: (1) the preparation and transmission of the record; (2) the reporter s transcript, if needed to determine the appeal; (3) premiums paid for a supersedeas bond or other bond to preserve rights pending appeal; and (4) the fee for filing the notice of appeal.

Case: 14-30958 Document: 00513004484 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/14/2015 LYLE W. CAYCE CLERK United States Court of Appeals FIFTH CIRCUIT OFFICE OF THE CLERK TEL. 504-310-7700 600 S. MAESTRI PLACE NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130 April 14, 2015 MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES LISTED BELOW Regarding: Fifth Circuit Statement on Petitions for Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc No. 14-30958 Reid Zeising v. Michael Shelton USDC No. 1:12-CV-2614 --------------------------------------------------- Enclosed is a copy of the court's decision. The court has entered judgment under FED R. APP. P. 36. (However, the opinion may yet contain typographical or printing errors which are subject to correction.) FED R. APP. P. 39 through 41, and 5TH Cir. R.s 35, 39, and 41 govern costs, rehearings, and mandates. 5TH Cir. R.s 35 and 40 require you to attach to your petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc an unmarked copy of the court's opinion or order. Please read carefully the Internal Operating Procedures (IOP's) following FED R. APP. P. 40 and 5 TH CIR. R. 35 for a discussion of when a rehearing may be appropriate, the legal standards applied and sanctions which may be imposed if you make a nonmeritorious petition for rehearing en banc. Direct Criminal Appeals. 5 TH CIR. R. 41 provides that a motion for a stay of mandate under FED R. APP. P. 41 will not be granted simply upon request. The petition must set forth good cause for a stay or clearly demonstrate that a substantial question will be presented to the Supreme Court. Otherwise, this court may deny the motion and issue the mandate immediately. Pro Se Cases. If you were unsuccessful in the district court and/or on appeal, and are considering filing a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, you do not need to file a motion for stay of mandate under FED R. APP. P. 41. The issuance of the mandate does not affect the time, or your right, to file with the Supreme Court. The judgment entered provides that plaintiffs-appellants pay to defendants-appellees the costs on appeal.

Case: 14-30958 Document: 00513004484 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/14/2015 Sincerely, LYLE W. CAYCE, Clerk Enclosure(s) Mr. Bradley Loy Drell Ms. Deborah Elaine Lamb Mr. John M. Parker Jr. Mr. Fredrick R. Tulley Mr. Charles S. Weems III Mr. L. Matt Wilson By: Joseph M. Armato, Deputy Clerk