Case 8:15-cv JLS-JCG Document 195 Filed 11/08/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:2623 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
Case 8:15-cv JLS-JCG Document 150 Filed 07/25/17 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:2177 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 8:16-cv JLS-JCG Document 31 Filed 08/22/16 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:350 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) (1) SUPPLEMENTAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER; AND (2) REQUEST FOR PREPARATION OF FINAL JUDGMENT

GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund et al v. All West Container Co., Docket No. 2:17-cv (C.D. Cal. Jun 27, 2017), Court Docket

Case LSS Doc 445 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case KG Doc 915 Filed 02/03/17 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 105 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 106

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case Document 3609 Filed in TXSB on 09/14/15 Page 1 of 17

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case KG Doc 553 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 311 Filed: 04/08/19 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:5260

Case 6:10-cv HO Document 31 Filed 12/21/10 Page 1 of 10 Page ID#: 537

Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 86 Filed 08/14/17 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: 1928

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Joyce Walker, et al. v. Life Insurance Company of the Southwest et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION DISTRIBUTION PLAN

smb Doc Filed 03/29/19 Entered 03/29/19 11:06:14 Main Document Pg 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

J S - 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CASE NO. CV JST (FMOx) GLOBAL DÉCOR, INC. and THOMAS H. WOLF.

Case 2:14-cv SJO-FFM Document 281 Filed 07/19/18 Page 1 of 32 Page ID #:4897

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. Case No. 8:08-CV-1465-T-33TBM ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT Eastern District of California. Honorable Ronald H. Sargis Chief Bankruptcy Judge Sacramento, California

Case 4:11-cv RC-ALM Document 333 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 6904

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 3231 Filed 05/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv DN Document 19 Filed 03/27/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

CURRENT APPLICATION: Fees Requested: $ (September 1, 2002-December 18, 2002) Expenses Requested: $

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Terry Guerrero. PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STAY THE CASE (Doc. 23)

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 179 Filed 03/05/19 Page 1 of 8

alg Doc 17 Filed 03/06/13 Entered 03/06/13 10:17:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 6

Case 4:15-cv CVE-PJC Document 32 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/31/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL. Not Present. Not Present

mew Doc 2153 Filed 01/16/18 Entered 01/16/18 21:09:41 Main Document Pg 1 of 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: CIV-ALTONAGA/Turnoff

mg Doc 597 Filed 05/11/16 Entered 05/11/16 15:27:15 Main Document Pg 1 of 6

Case 3:16-cv WHO Document Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 7

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF ALABAMA CIVIL DIVISION BIRMINGHAM DIFFERENTIAL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN ADOPTED 1990, REVISED 2008

Case 2:08-cv GAF-RC Document 57 Filed 12/01/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAGE DEDUCTION Instructions for Creditors Read 735 ILCS 5/ et seq Illinois State Statues

Case 5:12-cv EJD Document 1134 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee

Case 4:11-cv Document 102 Filed in TXSD on 09/11/12 Page 1 of 8

Ellen Matheson. PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STAY THE CASE (Doc. 100)

Case 3:18-cv CWR-FKB Document 58 Filed 11/20/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 9:15-cv JIC Document 75 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Baker & Hostetler, L.L.P. ("B&H" or "Applicant"), files its First and Final Application

CITY ATTORNEY MODEL RETAINER AGREEMENT. By and Between THE CITY OF ******* and **************

Plaintiff United States of America ( plaintiff ) commenced this action seeking payment for the indebtedness of

Case 1:13-bk Doc 62 Filed 10/22/14 Entered 10/22/14 12:30:00 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

United States District Court

Case 1:08-cv RDB Document 83 Filed 10/20/2009 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case Doc 334 Filed 01/20/17 Entered 01/20/17 16:47:13 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 11

Case 4:11-cv Document 41 Filed in TXSD on 11/14/11 Page 1 of 15

Case 4:16-cv JSW Document 32 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case KJC Doc 108 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11

Case 2:08-cv JLL-CCC Document 46 Filed 10/23/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN BAY CITY

Case 3:17-cv RS Document 380 Filed 04/19/18 Page 1 of 5

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 3:16-cv EMC Document 382 Filed 07/24/18 Page 1 of 7

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:08-cv MHP Document 41 Filed 04/15/2009 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CV-HURLEY/HOPKINS ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Case 2:10-cv RLH -PAL Document 29 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES GENERAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 17 Filed 05/15/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 499

O r SAL. a C (Ei[EDON' CM I. BY u 4 AUG 2007 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Proceedings :

Longmont United Hosp v. St. Barnabas Corp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants. Plaintiff, Defendants.

Aspen Am. Ins. Co. v 310 Apt. Corp NY Slip Op 32566(U) April 18, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017 Judge: Kathryn

Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 10 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: LTS Doc#:1806 Filed:11/15/17 Entered:11/15/17 21:06:01 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 23

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on September 10, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. in 28 Courtroom 1 of the above-entitled Court, located at 350 West 1st Street,

Case: , 08/14/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 46-1, Page 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Charles Edward Lincoln, pro se 603 Elmwood Place, Suite #6 Austin, Texas Tel:

Case LSS Doc 322 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:15-cv JAK-AJW Document 26 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:233

Transcription:

Case 8:15-cv-01329-JLS-JCG Document 195 Filed 11/08/18 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:2623 Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Terry Guerrero Deputy Clerk ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: Not Present N/A Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT: Not Present PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER (1) GRANTING RECEIVER S TENTH INTERIM APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT OF FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES; AND (2) GRANTING GENERAL COUNSEL S TENTH INTERIM APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT OF FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES (Docs. 188, 189) Before the Court are two Interim Fee Applications filed by Krista Freitag, the court-appointed Receiver, and Allen Matkins, her general counsel. (Freitag App., Doc. 188; Matkins App., Doc. 189.) The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. R. 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing on these Applications scheduled for November 9, 2018, at 10:30 a.m. is removed from the calendar. For the reasons provided below, the Court GRANTS both Applications. The Court s prior orders have addressed in detail the factual background of this case and the legal standard governing fee applications for a receivership. (See Docs. 95, 115, 129, 137, 150, 157, 167.) Accordingly, the Court proceeds directly to its discussion of the instant Applications. I. RECEIVER S TENTH INTERIM APPLICATION Freitag s Application, which covers the period from April 1, 2018, through June 30, 2018, seeks interim approval of $10,201.05 in fees and $402.50 in expenses. (Freitag 1

Case 8:15-cv-01329-JLS-JCG Document 195 Filed 11/08/18 Page 2 of 6 Page ID #:2624 App. at 1.) Freitag seeks an order from the Court authorizing payment on an interim basis of 80 percent or $8,160.84 of her fees, and 100 percent of her expenses. (Id.) The 20 percent holdback would be recoverable at the conclusion of the receivership. (Id.) The Receiver s work during this application period falls into the following six broad categories: (1) general receivership (7 percent of requested fees), (2) asset investigation and recovery (10 percent of requested fees), (3) reporting (15 percent of requested fees), (4) operations and asset sales (43 percent of requested fees), (5) claims and distributions (18 percent of requested fees), and (6) employment/fees (7 percent of requested fees). (Id. at 3.) As in the last fee period, the first three categories involve comparatively small expenses. First, the Receiver s general receivership duties involved income tax matters, agency requests, and website updates. (Id. at 4.) The Receiver s total fees for this category, $695.25, are minimal and comport with the Receiver s continued assessment that her work in this category is largely non-recurring and will likely reflect minimal time on a go-forward basis. (Id.) Second, total fees related to the Receiver s asset investigation and recovery work related to Pensioner research and collection efforts amount to $1,000.80. (Id.) Third, the Receiver s reporting work, totaling $1569.15, focused on preparing the Ninth Interim Report. (Id.) The Receiver s work in operations and asset sales accounted for $4,370.85. Although this represents 43 percent of fees requested this fee period, this category of work decreased by approximately 44 percent from the Ninth Application Period. Her work in this category consisted primarily of monthly Pensioner payment collections, analysis of pensioner accounts,... account clean-up and other operational matters. (Id. at 4.) Overall, the Receiver describes her work in this category as consistent and crucially important. (Id. at 4-5.) After a sharp increase in the previous fee period related to the preparation and execution of the second interim distribution payments to Investors, the Receiver s work related to claims and distributions fell over 85 percent this fee period, totaling $1,881.45 in fees. (Id. at 5.) This decrease was expected, as the Receiver had largely completed the distribution and used this fee period to complete some remaining work related to that distribution and respond to resulting inquiries from Pensioners and Investors regarding 2

Case 8:15-cv-01329-JLS-JCG Document 195 Filed 11/08/18 Page 3 of 6 Page ID #:2625 the status of their investments or debts. (Id. at 5.) The Receiver anticipates that inquiries will generally continue to decrease over time. (Id.) The Receiver continues to use appropriate template responses, posted answers to Frequently Asked Questions, and associates who bill at lesser rates as the first line of correspondence. (Id.) The last category, employment and fees, covers the Receiver s time spent preparing the Ninth Interim Fee Application. (Id. at 6.) Total fees in this category amounted to $683.55 and remain steady compared to the previous fee period. (Id.) In support of her application, Freitag submits a chart detailing the hours billed and her expenses. (See Receiver s Timesheets, Ex. A to Freitag App., Doc. 188 at 9-14.) A review of this chart shows that four practitioners with billing rates ranging from $112.50 to $265.50 performed work during this fee period. These rates are consistent with the rates proposed by Freitag in her application to serve as receiver and reflect a ten percent discount on Freitag s regular billing rate. (E3 Receiver Credentials, Ex. A to Stip., Doc. 57-2 at 2.) Accordingly, this chart appears consistent with Freitag s representation that she anticipate[s] a blended hourly billing rate of less than $225[.] (Id.) Separately, Freitag seeks to recover expenses totaling $402.50. (Freitag App. at 6.) The majority of these expenses relate to postage expenses associated with the second interim distribution payments, website updates and postage expenses associated with collections and Investor and Pensioner communications. (Id. at 6; see also Receiver s Timesheets at 14.) The Court finds that the requested fees are reasonable and adequately supported. Based on the Application and the evidence submitted in support thereof, the Court concludes that Freitag s Application is reasonable, and the Court ORDERS payment of 80 percent of Freitag s receivership fees, $8,160.84, and 100 percent of her requested expenses, $402.50. II. COUNSEL S TENTH INTERIM APPLICATION Matkins Application, which also covers the period from April 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018, seeks interim approval of $30,197.70 in fees and $407.10 in expenses. (Matkins App. at 1.) Like Freitag, Matkins requests an order authorizing interim 3

Case 8:15-cv-01329-JLS-JCG Document 195 Filed 11/08/18 Page 4 of 6 Page ID #:2626 payment of 80 percent or $24,158.16 of the firm s fees and 100 percent of its expenses. (Id.) The firm s fees fall into the following six categories of work: (1) asset investigation (18 percent), (2) reporting (13 percent), (3) claims and distributions (1 percent), (4) third party recoveries (62 percent), and (5) employment/fees (5 percent). (Id. at 2.) Asset investigation covers the firm s work representing the Receiver s interests in 35 contracts where the Pensioner has entered bankruptcy and 11 contracts where the receivership entities have obtained default judgments or settlements. (Id. at 3.) During this period, Matkins continued monitoring the bankruptcy cases for status and payments to the Receivership Entities. (Id.) The firm s work involved reviewing case dockets and key filings, preparing and filing necessary proofs of claim, communicating with counsel for the bankruptcy trustees, filing motions for approval of settlements, updating the Receiver on recovery strategies, and updating the log that tracks the status of bankruptcy cases. (Id.) In the last several Application periods, Matkins has written off time billed for time-intensive work by partner Yale Kim to reduce his effective hourly rate related to work in this category. (Id.) These write-offs were to satisfy the Court s expectation that such time-intensive work would be done by an associate or at a lower rate (Id. (citing Order, Doc. 129 at 7).) Matkins notes, however, that the number of affected cases has dwindled to the point that related work is no longer time-intensive only ten hours were spent in this category this fee period and requests to bill Mr. Kim at his full rate. The Court finds the requested rates and total fees, amounting to $5,541.75, fair and reasonable under the circumstances. (Id. at 3.) Counsel s reporting work consisted of preparing the Ninth Interim Report, which includes a detailed description of the Receiver s activities during the first quarter of 2018. (Id. at 4.) Additionally, at the Court s instruction, counsel prepared an estimated timeline 4

Case 8:15-cv-01329-JLS-JCG Document 195 Filed 11/08/18 Page 5 of 6 Page ID #:2627 to conclude the receivership and related application to seal. (See Docs. 175-179.) Total expenses for this category amount to $4,069.80. (Matkins App. at 4.) The firm s work in the third category, claims and distributions, focused on responding to inquiries from Investors, Pensioners, and their counsel concerning their claims. (Id.) Counsel s fees for this category total $267.75. (Id.) The fees for the third-party recoveries category total $18,658.35. (Id. at 5.) This primarily covers the firm s work on a defaulted pensioner collection action. (Id. at 4.) Matkins assisted with efforts to settle the action, but the pensioner would not agree to settle. Thus, the Receiver had to file a motion for summary judgment, which Matkins assisted in preparing. (Id.) On June 4, 2018, the Receiver and Matkins participated in a mediation with the pensioner, which led to ensuing settlement discussions and, ultimately, a settlement. (Id.) An associate performed more than half of the work in this category at a discounted rate of $306.00. (Id. at 5.) Work under the final fee category, employment/fees, consisted of preparing the Ninth Interim Fee Applications. (Id.) Counsel s total fees for this category amount to $1,660.05 and remain steady compared to the previous fee period. (Id.) In support of this Application, Matkins has submitted detailed billing records organized by the category of work performed. (Gen. Counsel Timesheets, Ex. A to Matkins App., Doc. 189 at 9-27.) These billing records indicate that three attorneys performed work on this case during the instant fee period with hourly billing rates between $306.00 and $562.50. (See id. at 14, 25.) Additionally, the billing chart provides an itemized accounting of the $407.10 in expenses for which the firm seeks reimbursement. (Id. at 12-14.) These expenses are primarily comprised of messenger fees, duplication costs and postage. (See id.; Matkins App. at 5.) The Court finds the fees and expenses described by Matkins fair and reasonable and ORDERS immediate payment of 80 percent of the firm s requested fees, which is $24,158.16, and 100 percent of the firm s expenses, $407.10. 5

Case 8:15-cv-01329-JLS-JCG Document 195 Filed 11/08/18 Page 6 of 6 Page ID #:2628 III. CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above, the Court GRANTS both Freitag s and Matkins Applications. The Court ORDERS immediate payment of 80 percent or $8,160.84 of Freitag s fees, and 100 percent of her expenses. Further, the Court ORDERS immediate payment of 80 percent or $24,158.16 of Matkins fees and 100 percent of the firm s expenses. The 20 percent holdback of each applicant s fees will be recoverable, with the Court s approval, upon the conclusion of the receivership. Initials of Preparer: tg 6