ORU l;~]i ^i^totestodhhfw^

Similar documents
USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/23/2015 Page 1 of Constitution Avenue,

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

\{."--, Under Section 307 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(b), Section 706 of

NITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS RECEIVEHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT PETITION FOR REVIEW

ORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 Z015 ) ) ) ) ) ) PETITION FOR ) REVIEW ) ) ) No DEC FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 10/23/2015. DISTRICT OF COWMBAaijh 1

FOR DISTRIGT OF COLUMBIA 9fHE UNITED STATES COURT OF URAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION; BASIN ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE; EAST

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCLED^^SSSmi^

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ReCEIVED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU CLERK

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petition for Review

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APP: AJllS--~---- PETITION FOR REVIEW. and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 15( a), the Mozilla Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

18 105G. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT Oi, FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMB &!IPANIC MEDIA COALITION, Petitioner CASE NO. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 07/19/2011 Page 1 of 8 [NOT SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT] No

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Petitioner v. CHANBOND, LLC Patent Owner

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN NO ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN NO

B t NA L. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAl. wr FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU] f FOR DITRIT Q QCLJMHA ILtUIt

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, No and Consolidated Cases

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2011 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 03/24/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2)

July 1, Dear Administrator Nason:

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD DECEMBER 10, 2013 DECIDED APRIL 15, 2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 15, 2010] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

PETITION FOR REVIEW. Pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Circuit

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 19, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR MAY 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case , Document 1-1, 04/21/2017, , Page1 of 2

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON APRIL 15, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Defendants-Appellees.

CLERK RECEIVED. JTW OR UiSThICT ØF OL tikbta. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRC1 lit ETSY, INC., Petitioner

Case 2:15-cv JCC Document 28 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

USCA Case # Document # Filed: 09/09/2014 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT MOTION TO INTERVENE IN PETITION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

No ORAL ARGUMENT HELD JUNE 1, 2015 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED: OCTOBER 17, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS AND. January 23, 2008

PETITION FOR REVIEW. Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 402(a), 28 U.S.C. 2342(1) and 2344, and Federal

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendant.

Case 1:16-cv JDB Document 33 Filed 12/28/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 218 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 4

[ORAL ARGUMENT HELD APRIL 12, 2016] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

In the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., BRIEF OF FIVE U.S. SENATORS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS

GOVERNOR AG LEGISLATURE PUC DEQ

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2 AND 3, 2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD SEPTEMBER 27, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Nos , ,

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, et al.,

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 2:16-cv NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

BEFl~~~~~:~~'; i~~~~~~~~~~d E(~ O(~t: TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:14-cv JPB Document 50 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 267

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT OPENING BRIEF OF NON-STATE PETITIONERS AND INTERVENOR-PETITIONER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Noah Joshua Phillips Rohit Chopra Rebecca Kelly Slaughter Christine S.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. v. ) NOTICE OF ERRATA TO PETITION FOR REVIEW

FAA Docket No UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ASSOCIATE ADMINSTRATOR FOR AIRPORTS

Case No , consolidated with No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO TRANSFER AND HOLD CASES IN ABEYANCE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Transcription:

S I A USCA Case #16-1447 Document #1653071 Filed: 12/27/2016 Page 1 of 6 ^^^[ITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL^ THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRClM w&nw ORU l;~]i ^i^totestodhhfw^ FOR'DTSTRCTOFCOLUIVIBIACIRCUIT CLERK COALITION SIASTS AND SUPPLIERS Petitioner, V. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and GINA MCCARTHY, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,,16-144? No. Respondents. PETITION FOR REVIEW Pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Section 307(b of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(b, the Racing Enthusiasts and Suppliers Coalition hereby petitions the Court for review of the nationally applicable final action of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration entitled Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Mediumand Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles Phase 2; Final Rule, 81 Fed. Reg. 73,478 (Oct. 25, 2016, codified at 40 C.F.R Parts 9, 22, 85, 86, 600, 1033, 1036, 1037, 1039,1042,1043,1065, 1066, 1068 and 49 C.F.R. Parts 523, 534, 535, and 538.

USCA Case #16-1447 Document #1653071 Filed: 12/27/2016 Page 2 of 6 A copy of the final rule is attached to this petition. Respectfully submitted, SHANNON S. BROOME 575 Market St. Suite 3700 San Francisco, CA 94105 (415975-3718 sbroome(%hunton.com CHARLES H. KNAUSS 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20037 (202419-2003 cknauss(%hunton.com Counsel for the Racing Enthusiasts and Suppliers Coalition Dated: December 27, 2016

USCA Case #16-1447 Document #1653071 Filed: 12/27/2016 Page 3 of 6 F^^^^^WWCTT res'sict'cfcoujniaiactcurr irosimm??rmrmomulw UNITED STXTESTOURT OF APPEALS T] OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT RACING ENTHUSIASTS AND SUPPLIERS COALITION V. Petitioner, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and GINA MCCARTHY, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents. RULE 26.1 STATEMENT - nm %^ if Uiftl V.J'^ CLERK No. 16-1447 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and D.C. Circuit Rule 26.1, Petitioner makes the following Disclosure: The Racing Enthusiasts and Suppliers Coalition is a trade association within the meaning ofd.c. Circuit Rule 26.1. As relevant to this litigation, the Racing Enthusiasts and Suppliers Coalition's purpose is to participate collectively in rulemaking and litigation that arises from administrative proceedings under the Clean Air Act and in associated administrative proceedings before EPA that affect the interests of its members. The Racing Enthusiasts and Suppliers Coalition has not issued shares or debt securities to the public and has no parent company,

USCA Case #16-1447 Document #1653071 Filed: 12/27/2016 Page 4 of 6 subsidiary or affiliate that has issued such shares or debt securities. No publiclyheld company has a 10% (percent or greater ownership interest in the Racing Enthusiasts and Suppliers Coalition. Respectfully submitted, SHANNON S. BROOME 575 Market St. Suite 3700 San Francisco, CA 94105 (415975-3718 sbroome(%hunton.com CHARLES H. KNAUSS 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20037 (202419-2003 cknauss(%hunton.com Counsel for the Racing Enthusiasts and Suppliers Coalition Dated: December 27, 2016

USCA Case #16-1447 Document #1653071 Filed: 12/27/2016 Page 5 of 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT RACING ENTHUSIASTS AND SUPPLIERS COALITION Petitioner, No. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and GINA MCCARTHY, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency^ Respondents. _ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to Rule 25(d of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, I hereby certify that the foregoing Petition for Review and Rule 26.1 Statement have been served by United States first-class mail this 27th day of December 2016., upon each of the following: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION GINA MCCARTHY AGENCY Administrator Office of General Counsel, 2310A U.S. Environmental Protection 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Agency Washington, DC 20460 Office of the Administrator, 1101 A 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460

USCA Case #16-1447 Document #1653071 Filed: 12/27/2016 Page 6 of 6 LORETTA E. LYNCH U.S. Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530 m^j-f^.fijiz. Richard M. Pavlak

2024 © lawsdocbox.com Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Feedback