UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 4:04-cv RAS Document 41 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. District of Oregon. Plaintiff(s), vs. Case No: 6:07-CV-6149-HO. Defendant(s). Civil Case Assignment Order

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION. v. Civil Action No. 3:10 cv 00071

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:16-cv JAK-AS Document 29 Filed 10/15/16 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:190

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. District of Oregon. Plaintiff(s) vs. Case No: 3:09-CV-642-HU. Defendant(s). Civil Case Assignment Order

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8

CLEFL1 >' SO. DtT. OF IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GENERAL ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

COMMERCIAL DIVISION PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ORDER PURSUANT TO PART 202 OF THE UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT KINGS COUNTY

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:18-cv KOB Document 49 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:13-cv WYD-MEH Document 28 Filed 02/20/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:13-cv MSK-MJW Document 3 Filed 05/17/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 31 Filed 03/03/16 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

In The United States District Court For The Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division. Answer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE

LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT. [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana]

Case3:12-cv VC Document88 Filed06/09/15 Page1 of 2

Case 5:16-cv CAR Document 19 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv JD Document 11 Filed 08/03/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Plaintiff, Case No. 2:09-CV Hon. Marianne O.

Case 6:01-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION MARY LOU BENNEK, Derivatively on ) Behalf of THE HOME DEPOT, INC.

FORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Filing an Answer to the Complaint or Moving to Dismiss under Rule 12

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Cislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF (****) Case No. The Discovery Status Conference came before Discovery Referee on.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 3:07-cv BZ Document 49 Filed 03/12/2008 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. MDL No SCHEDULING ORDER NO. 2

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

Case 3:05-cv Document 22 Filed 06/09/2006 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

COMPLEX BUSINESS LITIGATION DIVISION PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

Court Administration. Case Management Plan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:06-cv PAG Document 6 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #1

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT Title 3. Civil Rules Division 8. Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 1. General Provisions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNIFORM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Civil No. 1:13-CV-1211 vs. GLS/TWD Andrew Cuomo, et al.

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Case 2:16-cv JAD-VCF Document 29 Filed 06/28/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. JOINT RULE 26(f) PRETRIAL REPORT vs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv600-HSO-LRA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv RCL Document 89 Filed 10/29/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv DN-BCW Document 111 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

CASE MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL OAKLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT BUSINESS COURT CASES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv TSC Document 113 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

RULES OF PRACTICE OF THE FRANKLIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS GENERAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 150 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 7

14 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT DIVISION GENERAL CIVIL RULES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

1:12-cv TLL-CEB Doc # 16 Filed 01/29/13 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 83 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

THE COURTS. Title 249 PHILADELPHIA RULES

CIVIL DIVISION I PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 1:10-cv SS Document 465 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL CASES. Lorna G. Schofield United States District Judge

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN

JOINT RULE 16(b)/26(f) REPORT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 5:12-cv FPS-JES Document 117 Filed 05/15/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1973

Case 5:09-cv JLV Document 28 Filed 05/15/09 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case: 4:15-cv JAR Doc. #: 27 Filed: 08/19/16 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: 80

Docket Number: SHOVEL TRANSFER & STORAGE, INC. William G. Merchant, Esquire CLOSED VS.

Transcription:

Case 1:06-cv-02284-PAG Document 28 Filed 10/04/2006 11/14/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CARRIE HARKLESS, CASE NO.: 1:06CV2284 JUDGE PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN Plaintiff (s vs. NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE J. KENNETH BLACKWELL, et al., Defendant (s. All counsel and/or parties will take notice that the above-entitled action has been set for a Case Management Conference ( CMC on NOVEMBER 17, 2006 at 8:45 a.m. before Judge Patricia A. Gaughan. United States District Court Local Rule Section 16.1 will apply to this case. The conference will be held by telephone with the court initiating the call. Except in government collection cases and actions by unrepresented prisoners, the parties shall meet prior to the CMC to discuss the case and prepare the proposed discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 (f. The parties shall, at or within 10 days after the meeting and without awaiting a discovery request, provide the basic information to the other parties specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 (a (1 (initial disclosures. A Report of Parties Planning Meeting (see attached form, shall be filed with the Court at least three working days before the CMC. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 (d, a party may not seek formal discovery from any source before the parties have met and conferred.

Case 1:06-cv-02284-PAG Document 28 Filed 10/04/2006 11/14/2006 Page 2 of 5 Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, initial disclosures, discovery depositions, interrogatories, requests for documents, request for admissions, and answers and responses thereto shall not be filed with the Clerk s Office, except that discovery materials may be filed as evidence in support of a motion or for use at trial. It is the responsibility of counsel for the plaintiff (s to verify that a copy of this Order has been received by counsel for defendant (s or, if no counsel has entered an appearance for defendant (s, has been received by defendant(s. Any questions or concerns regarding the case management conference should be directed to Mary Doubrava at (216 357-7210. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/patricia A. Gaughan PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-02284-PAG Document 28 Filed 10/04/2006 11/14/2006 Page 3 of 5 ATTACHMENT 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHER DISTRICT OF OHIO CARRIE HARKLESS, CASE NO.: 1:06CV2284 Plaintiff(s, JUDGE PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN vs. REPORT OR PARTIES PLANNING J. KENNETH BLACKWELL, et al., MEETING UNDER FED. R. CIV. 26 (f AND L.R. 16.3 (b Defendant (s. 1. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 (f and L.R. 16.3 (b, a meeting was held on, 200, and was attended by: Counsel for plaintiff (s Counsel for plaintiff (s Counsel for defendant(s Counsel for defendant(s 2. The parties: have exchanged the pre-discovery disclosures required by Rule 26 (a (1 and the Court s prior order; will exchange such disclosures by, 200 have not been required to make initial disclosures.

Case 1:06-cv-02284-PAG Document 28 Filed 10/04/2006 11/14/2006 Page 4 of 5 3. The parties recommend the following track: Expedited Standard Complex Administrative Mass Tort 4. This case is/ is not suitable for Electronic Case Filing (ECF. 5. This case is suitable for Early Neutral Evaluation/Mediation/ Arbitration (Circle One Case is not suitable for ADR at this time but may be after discovery. Case is not suitable for ADR at any time. 6. The parties do/ do not consent to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S. C. 636 (c. 7. Recommended Discovery Plan: a Describe the subjects on which discovery is to be sought and the nature and extent of discovery. b Non-Expert discovery cut-off date: c Plaintiff s expert report due date: Defendant s expert report due date: Expert discovery cut-off date: 8. Recommended cut-off date for amending the pleadings and/or adding additional parties:

Case 1:06-cv-02284-PAG Document 28 Filed 10/04/2006 11/14/2006 Page 5 of 5 9. Recommended dispositive motion date: 10. Recommended date for a Status Conference: 11. Other matters for the attention of the Court: Attorney for Plaintiff (s Attorney for Plaintiff (s Attorney for Plaintiff (s Attorney for Defendant(s Attorney for Defendant(s Attorney for Defendant(s