Methodology For Calculating the Proposed DBE Goal for Federal Fiscal Year 2015 Federal Fiscal Year 2017 (FFY15-FFY17)

Similar documents
County-by- County Data

Final Report. Prepared For: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. By: Mark Berkman, Ph.D. Matthew Johnson, Ph.D. Robert Fairlie, Ph.D.

HMO PLANS Anthem Select $ $1, $1,541.23

The California Civic Engagement Project Issue Brief

The California Civic Engagement Project Issue Brief

HUB AND DBE PROGRAMS PEPS Conference. Carlos Balderas Dave Tovar PEPS Conference

1: HOW DID YOUTH VOTER TURNOUT DIFFER FROM THE REST OF THE 2012 ELECTORATE?

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

Three Strikes Analysis: Urban vs. Rur al Counties

Program Review. California Local Agency Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Good Faith Effort Review. June 2014 FINAL REPORT. FHWA California Division

BYLAWS ARTICLE I OFFICES ARTICLE II MEMBERS

THE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2009: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1

25% Percent of General Voters 20% 15% 10%

THE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2007: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1

UNITED STATES COURT INTERPRETER COMPENSATION DATABASE. Chapter 4, Superior Court of California. Compiled by Robert Joe Lee and Francis W.

1. Summary of the FY coordinated claim for Sonoma County Transit Services dated April, 28, 2009 marked Exhibit A and attached hereto;

Legislative Policy Study. Can California County Jails Absorb Low-Level State Prisoners?

Mr. John Mott-Smith Chief, Elections Division Secretary of State th Street, Sixth Floor Sacramento, CA Dear Mr.

State 4-H Council Bylaws Adopted 10/23/2010 R = Required O = Optional

CALIFORNIA S 58 CRIME RATES: REALIGNMENT AND CRIME IN 2012

Title Do Californians Answer the Call to Serve on a Jury? A Report on California Rates of Jury Service Participation May 2015.

RURAL CAUCUS BY-LAWS California Democratic Party State Central Committee

California LEMSA QI Coordinators Committee

VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. CALIFORNIA STATE COUNCIL CONSTITUTION

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. CALIFORNIA STATE COUNCIL CONSTITUTION

Chapter Bylaws (AMENDED MARCH 3, 2017)

PREPARED FOR: Breaking ICE s Hold. Presented by: Angela Chan Senior Staff Attorney and Policy Director Advancing Justice Asian Law Caucus

Constitution of the California State Division International Association for Identification as amended through May 2, 2018 Las Vegas, Nevada

01/19/2018. Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Case3:13-cv SI Document11 Filed03/26/13 Page1 of 17

California Public Defender Websites

CALIFORNIA COUNTY, CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTION OUTCOMES. County Offices and Ballot Measures

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

JUSTICE BY GEOGRAPHY: DO POLITICS INFLUENCE THE PROSECUTION OF YOUTH AS ADULTS?

BOARD OF DIRECTORS CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC RECORDING TRANSACTION NETWORK AUTHORITY (CERTNA) 10:00 AM. San Joaquin County Assessor-Recorder

BENCHMARKING REPORT - VANCOUVER

TABLE OF CONTENTS RECOMMENDATIONS... 6 CONCLUSION... 7

County Structure & Powers

AGENDA. 10:00 a.m. Broder Blvd. Dublin, CA ROLL CALL

SBCAG STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: January 18, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 6

Rules Committee Report Anaheim, California Saturday, October 21, 2017

Final Report Availability and Disparity Study

Inventory of the California Transportation Commission Records. No online items

California State Senators

-- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES NEW ALL COUNTY LETTERS

Agricultural Workers--Collective Bargaining Rights And Secondary Boycott Prohibition

Impact of Realignment on County Jail Populations

THE EFFECTIVENESS AND COST OF SECURED AND UNSECURED PRETRIAL RELEASE IN CALIFORNIA'S LARGE URBAN COUNTIES:

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AMONG

BYLAWS DEPOSITION REPORTERS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA, INC. A California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation

The Cost of Delivering Voter Information: A Case Study of California

PART I Introduction to Civil Litigation for the Paralegal

Frequently Asked Questions Last updated December 7, 2017

California Court Reporters Association Bylaws (Adopted October 4, 2017)

CHAPTER 6: PRIME CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR AVAILABILITY ANALYSIS I. INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 6: PRIME CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR AVAILABILITY ANALYSIS I. INTRODUCTION

Enactment Of Tax Measures By Legislature

Monterey-Salinas Transit QUOTE NO Survey Research Consultant REQUEST FOR QUOTATION SPECIFICATIONS FOR #16-03 SURVEY RESEARCH CONSULTANT

HISTORICAL LOOK AT METRO S SMALL BUSINESS/DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS PROGRAM AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR A DISPARITY STUDY

Appendix A. Humboldt County Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Membership Roster Humboldt County AB 109 Implementation Progress Report

Health Coverage and Care for Undocumented Immigrants

REGIONS SECTION 15 ACSA POLICIES & PROCEDURES

Nevada s Share of Employment and Personal Earnings within the Economic Regions

City and County of San Francisco. Office of the Controller City Services Auditor. City Services Benchmarking Report: Jail Population

California Civic Engagement Project

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES

State Employee Salaries

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. No.

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT

FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS > $10,000

REGIONAL. San Joaquin County Population Projection

Report on Arrests for Driving Under the Influence in California, 1997

DBE Updates Linda Ford, Acting Director, FTA Office of Civil Rights APTA Legal Affairs Conference February 25, 2013

Required Federal Forms

USA WEIGHTLIFTING, INCORPORATED PACIFIC WEIGHTLIFTING ASSOCIATION

COUNTYWIDE RDA OVERSIGHT BOARD SPECIAL DISTRICT APPOINTMENTS

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER S USE DEED OF TRUST WITH ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS

FBI NATIONAL ACADEMY ASSOCIATES, INC., CALIFORNIA CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE BOARD PROTOCOL AND POLICIES

San Francisco Economic Strategy Update: Phase I Findings

APPENDIX H. Success of Businesses in the Dane County Construction Industry

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. April 18, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. California State Association of Counties 1100 K Street, 1st Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814

IS PROPOSITION 47 TO BLAME FOR CALIFORNIA S 2015 INCREASE IN URBAN CRIME?

AGENDA ITEM 9A. MEETING: July 18, 2018

Office of Public Transit Signature of Authorization Form REQUIRED OF ALL APPLICANTS

Final Report. For Development and Revision of Small, Minority & Women Business Enterprise Program

Contents APA CALIFORNIA BYLAWS

CITY OF CULVER CITY 9770 CULVER BOULEVARD, CULVER CITY, CALIFORNIA

Criminal Justice Realignment:

PROTEST INSTRUCTIONS

DRAFT BYLAWS for Caucus Comments of the CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE VETERANS CAUCUS ARTICLE I NAME

CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS DATA ARCHIVE INTRODUCTION

FEDERATION FOR AMERICAN IMMIGRATION REFORM. Sanctuary Policies Across the U.S. January 2017 A Report by FAIR s State and Local Department

1. Program Description

Case4:09-cv CW Document527-1 Filed03/28/13 Page1 of 63 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Federal Workforce Statistics Sources: OPM and OMB

GOVERNMENT CODE CHAPTER HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESSES

BY-LAWS of AIHA-NCS. The organization shall be known as the American Industrial Hygiene Association-Northern California Section (AIHA-NCS).

Marijuana. Use And Possession.

Transcription:

Methodology For Calculating the Proposed DBE Goal for Federal Fiscal Year 2015 Federal Fiscal Year 2017 (FFY15-FFY17) Monterey-Salinas Transit District (MST) is proposing an overall Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goal of 1.5% for U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) assisted contracts in federal fiscal years 2015 2017 (FFY15- FFY17). The FTA requires that any recipient of more than $250,000 in FTA funds annually must have a DBE goal. MST will receive approximately $6.8 million in FTA funding in FFY15. The FTA shifted from a requirement to calculate annually the DBE goal to calculating it every three years. MST complied with the requirement to calculate an annual goal through FFY11 and has shifted to calculating a goal every three years beginning with the FFY12-FFY14 period. This year, Monterey-Salinas Transit is setting the goal for the three-year FFY15-FFY17 period and will submit it to the FTA by 8/1/14. Since MST s future budgets are uncertain at this time due to possible service reductions, fare increases and staffing modifications, due to changes in federal funding support when the current surface transportations act expires on 10/1/14, the type and amount of contracted work may change in the outer years. Staff calculated the three-year DBE goal based upon its known FY15 budget. MST will adjust its DBE goal, if necessary, when future budgets are known or if contracting opportunities increase due to new capita federal funding sources. The Code of Federal Regulations, Title 49 Section 26 (49 CFR 26) describes several methods to calculate a DBE goal. The method staff chose to obtain MST s FFY15- FFY17 goal specifies that a simple percentage of DBE vendors in the contracted types of work be weighted by the proportion of total contract opportunities in that type of work as shown in the overall budget to determine a base goal. The base goal is to be further adjusted, as appropriate, to reflect the recipient s actual experience or other qualifying factors to narrowly tailor the goal to market conditions. The final goal is expressed as both the percentage and the amount of federal dollars in DBE contract opportunities. MST s goal will be reached through race neutral means. MST will not reach its goal through race conscious contract goals. To calculate MST s proposed DBE Goal for FFY15-FFY17, staff used data from MST s FY15 budget, the latest (2008) US Bureau of Census County Business Patterns (CBP) database and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) database of all statewide, certified DBE vendors. Both the CBP and Caltrans DBE vendor database

Page 2 offer vendor groupings according to the type of work they perform as categorized by the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), which provides a two to sixdigit number corresponding to every known type of work performed by businesses in North America. In order to compare data from all three data sources using a common classification, staff identified all of the goods and services that MST typically contracts by a corresponding NAICS code. The following text and tables describe the steps taken to calculate the goal. First, staff examined MST s FY14 Operating and Capital Budget (Budget) to determine the type and amount of contracts which could be awarded from the operating and capital budgets. From an operating budget of $31,318,000, potential contract opportunities equal $6,336,869. There were no contract opportunities in the Capital Budget. The FTA provides an estimated $6,818,950 in operating assistance and no capital funding assistance. The following table shows the calculations for the first step. MST DBE Goal Calculation for FFY15 - FFY17 (FFY15 Goal calculation as basis for three-year goal) Step 1: MST FY15 (A) Operating Budget Contract Opportunities (B) (C) (D) $ Procurement % Procurement in Operating in Operating $ FTA Budget Budget Operating (E) $ FTA Operating Assistance Total in Procurements Assistance (C) * (D ) FY15 Operating Budget $ 31,318,000 $ 6,336,869 (B) / (A) X 100 20% $ 6,818,950 $ 1,363,790 MST's FY15 Capital Budget has no federally-funded contract opportunities. Second, staff identified every piece of potential contract work in the Budget by a corresponding NAICS code. Staff aggregated the types of work into the four broader Procurement Groups of Construction, Transportation, Wholesale and Services identified in the Step 2 table below. The four Procurement Groups derived from all contract opportunities are shown in the following table by dollar amount and percentage of total contract opportunities in each Procurement Group. Step 2. MST s FY15 Operating Budget Contract Opportunities by Procurement Group (5) Procurement Group Construction Transport Wholesale Services Total $ in Group (FY15 Budget) $ 197,000 $ 117,563, $ 3,594,091 $ 2,428,215 $ 6,336,869 % of All Procurements in Group 3.2% 1.8% 56.7% 38.3% 100.00% $ FTA in Group [ % * $ Step 1. (E)] $ 43,641 $ 24,548 $ 773,269 $ 522,332 $ 1,363,790

Page 3 Third, staff determined the market area from which vendors who bid on MST contracts would likely be chosen. Since it is conceivable that a vendor may come from as far north as Sonoma, or as far south as Santa Barbara for the award of a large contract, staff included all of Caltrans Districts 04 and 05 when conducting its DBE calculation. In addition, staff included any DBE vendor in the state that indicated that they perform work in Districts 04 and 05, regardless of the vendor s location. The following fourteen counties fall within Caltrans Districts 04 and 05, creating MST s market area: Alameda County Contra Costa County Marin County Monterey County Napa County San Benito County San Francisco County San Luis Obispo County San Mateo County Santa Barbara County Santa Clara County Santa Cruz County Solano County Sonoma County After determining the market area, staff extracted a count of all vendors in the market area from the County Business Patterns (CBP) database by using the same NAICS code attached to each piece of potential contract work in the MST FY15 Operating Budget. Next, staff performed exactly the same operation on the Caltrans DBE vendor directory to obtain a count of DBE vendors in the MST market area. The count of all vendors, DBE vendors and the percentage DBE vendors by Procurement Group in MST s market area are shown in the following Step 3 table.

Page 4 Step 3. MST s Market Area Firms by NAICS in Procurement Groups Total Firms and Certified DBEs County Construction Transportation Wholesale 2382 485991 221210,323110, 423120,423130, 424120,424720, 8112 Services 522190,5241, 541, 561612, 561720,562112, 621111,8111, 812332 #Firms in NAICS Caltrans District 04 Alameda 671 17 1,492 7,612 9,792 Contra Costa 471 6 734 5,040 6,251 Marin 181 7 260 2,353 2,801 Napa 85 1 106 692 884 San Francisco 377 18 573 7,448 8,416 San Mateo 427 20 743 4,179 5,369 Santa Clara 797 16 1,448 10,822 13,083 Solano 190 6 318 1,047 1,561 Sonoma 393 6 461 2,383 3,243 Caltrans District 05 Monterey 219 0 325 1,448 1,992 San Benito 39 0 33 135 207 San Luis Obispo 210 0 267 1,486 1,963 Santa Barbara 260 4 371 2,201 2,836 Santa Cruz 173 1 210 1,358 1,742 Districts 04 & 05 4,493 102 Certified DBEs 7,341 48,204 60,140 Construction Transport. Wholesale Services #DBEs Market Area NAICs NAICs NAICs NAICs in NAICS District 04 & 05 & Statewide DBEs 155 6 77 824 1,062 Sources: US Bureau of the Census, County Business Patterns, 2008 CA Dept. of Transportation, UCP Directory of DBEs, 5/1/14 %DBE 3.45% 5.88% 1.05% 1.71% 1.77% Fourth, staff used the DBE percentage obtained above for each Procurement Group and multiplied that by the percentage (weight) of the total work to be performed in that Procurement Group as determined in Step 2. This produced the base DBE goal for FFY15-FFY17. Step 4: Monterey-Salinas Transit's FFY15-FFY 17 DBE Goal for FTA Assisted Contracts Weighted Average of DBE Participation by Procurement Group as a Percentage of Total Contracts % DBE Participation and Projected $ FTA in DBE Contract Awards Construction Transport. Wholesale Services NAICs NAICs NAICs NAICs Total % DBEs in Market Area 3.45% 5.88% 1.05% 1.71% 1.77% % Contract $ in Group 3.2% 1.8% 56.7% 38.3% 100.00% Weighted %DBE (% Contracts * %DBE) 0.11% 0.11% 0.60% 0.66% 1.48% FTA Dollars in DBE Contracts $ FTA Assistance $ 43,641 $ 24,548 $ 773,269 $ 522,332 $ 1,363,790 $ FTA in DBE Contracts % DBE * Total $ FTA Assistance 1,505.61 1,443.42 8,119.32 9,245.28 $ 20,314 Sum of (% DBE * % Group in Procurement Budget) for all four Procurement Groups

Page 5 To obtain the final DBE goal using the chosen method prescribed by 49 CFR 26.45, staff examined the actual rate of DBE participation during the last three years relative to the adopted DBE goals to determine if the FFY15-FFY17 base goal needed to be adjusted. Previous DBE goal attainment ranged from 1.5% to 2.4%. MST attained 2.4% DBE participation in FFY12 primarily because of small construction projects with subcontracting opportunities that were awarded for construction. Last year (FFY14), MST had no large construction contracts available to bid and achieved 2% DBE participation. The FFY12% attainment can be considered an outlier, optimistic to current contract opportunities and therefore the need to adjust the base goal down. In the previous years, MST adopted goals ranging from 2.5% to 3%. As noted in the narrative for the first step, MST s FY15 Capital Budget has no contract opportunities, and specifically no large construction projects which would warrant an upward adjustment to the FFY15-FFY17 goal. Capital contracting funds, have been on a consistent decline since 2008. And w ith the calculated rate falling well within the goals of the last three years, staff decided that the calculated goal needed to be adjusted down to 1.5%. If approved by the Board of Directors, MST will establish a DBE goal of 1.5% for FFY15-FFY17. MST s proposed DBE Goal for FFY15-FFY17 and supporting documents for MST s DBE Program are available for public inspection July 1, 2014 through at MST s Administrative Offices, 1 Ryan Ranch Road, Monterey, CA 93940.