Unfit through drink or drugs (drive/ attempt to drive) (Revised 2017)

Similar documents
School non attendance (Revised 2017)

Intimidatory Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

Dangerous Dog. Offences Definitive Guideline

Assault Definitive Guideline

Drug Offences Definitive Guideline

Breach Offences Guideline Consultation 61. Annex C: ANNEX C. Draft guidelines. Breach of a Community Order Criminal Justice Act 2003 (Schedule 8)

Annex C: Draft guidelines

Robbery Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

Annex C: Draft guideline

Breach Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

Terrorism Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

Sexual Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE. Sexual Offences Definitive Guideline

Bladed Articles and Offensive Weapons

Environmental Offences Definitive Guideline

AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON SENTENCING SENTENCING GUIDELINES IN ENGLAND AND WALES

Dangerous Dog Offences Consultation CONSULTATION

Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines

A Sentencing Guideline for Theft Offences within the ECSC

Arson and Criminal Damage Offences Guidelines Consultation CONSULTATION

Public Order Offences Guidelines Consultation CONSULTATION

Fraud, Bribery and Money Laundering Offences Guideline Consultation CONSULTATION

MAGISTRATES COURT SENTENCING GUIDELINES. SENTENCING COUNCIL UPDATE 7 March 2012

Fraud, bribery and money laundering: corporate offenders Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

Civil penalty as an alternative to prosecution under the Housing Act 2004

FEDERAL HIGH COURT (CORRUPTION AND OTHER RELATED OFFENCES) SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND PRACTICE DIRECTION,

Sentencing Act Examinable excerpts of PART 1 PRELIMINARY. 1 Purposes

New guidelines for sentencing of Health & Safety offences and Corporate Manslaughter

Final Stage Resource Assessment: Summary offences in the Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines (MCSG)

EDITORIAL NOTE: NO SUPPRESSION APPLIED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT TAURANGA CRI [2016] NZDC NEW ZEALAND POLICE Prosecutor

Assessing the impact of the Sentencing Council s Environmental offences definitive guideline

Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines

S G C. Reduction in Sentence. for a Guilty Plea. Definitive Guideline. Sentencing Guidelines Council

VOLUNTARY REGISTER OF DRIVING INSTRUCTORS GOVERNING POLICY

Causing death by driving, England and Wales (2015) 1,

FINAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT: FAILING TO SURRENDER TO BAIL

S G C. Dangerous Offenders. Sentencing Guidelines Council. Guide for Sentencers and Practitioners

ROAD SAFETY ACT 2006: IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTIONS 20 & 21

Pleading guilty. The Law in Victoria. The Court Process. Your guide to. Sentencing. in a criminal matter. defence lawyers

Aggravating factors APPENDIX 2. Summary

S G C. Sexual Offences Act Definitive Guideline. Sentencing Guidelines Council

The Code. for Crown Prosecutors

Imposition of Community and Custodial Sentences Definitive Guideline

ENFORCEMENT POLICY PRIVATE SECTOR HOUSING

Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines

& O FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY COURTS (SENTENCING GUIDELINES) PRACTICE DIRECTION, 2016

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATION ON ARSON AND CRIMINAL DAMAGE DRAFT SENTENCING GUIDELINE

Guideline Judgments Case Compendium - Update 2: June 2006 CASE NAME AND REFERENCE

Indicative Sanctions Guidance

Nursing and Midwifery Council:

Consultation Stage Resource Assessment: Arson and Criminal Damage Offences

Spent or Unspent? This document should be considered a guide to the position in England and Wales only.

Guidance for decision makers on the impact of criminal convictions and cautions

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 92

Allegation and Findings of Fact That being registered under the Medical Act 1983 (as amended):

2004 No (N.I. 15) NORTHERN IRELAND. The Criminal Justice (No. 2) (Northern Ireland) Order 2004

ADULT COURT PRONOUNCEMENT CARDS

Consultation Guideline

Indicative Sanctions Guidance

Overarching Principles Sentencing Youths

KARL MURRAY BROWN Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Ellen France, MacKenzie and Mallon JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT REASONS OF THE COURT

*Please note that this translation is missing the following amendments to the Act: JUVENILE COURTS ACT. (Official Gazette no. 111/1997) PART ONE

Consultation Stage Resource Assessment: Manslaughter 1 INTRODUCTION

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Standard Minimum Sentencing) Act 2002 No 90

EUI Working Group on International Criminal Law Meeting of on Issues of Sentencing in International Criminal Law

Scenario 1: domestic burglary (Theft Act 1968 (section 9))

Sentencing Council Consultation on the Robbery Guideline

HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, AD 2014 (Criminal Jurisdiction) INDICTMENT NO C82/05

Dispelling Myths About Section 10 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act (NSW) 1999

Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines

Breach Offences Guideline. Response to consultation

PUBLISHED FOR CONSULTATION ONLY. Consultation Guideline

Indicative Sanctions Guidance Note

Criminal Law: Implications after road death or injury

Law Society response to the Sentencing Council Consultation on a Draft Bladed Articles and Offensive Weapons Guideline

IN THE CENTRAL LONDON COUNTY COURT. Before: DISTRICT JUDGE BROOKS. - and -

Sentencing Youths Overarching Principles and Offence-Specific Guidelines for Sexual Offences and Robbery Consultation

1990 CHAPTER S HER MAJESTY, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan, enacts as follows:

Frequently Asked Questions

Title IOSH NATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH CONFERENCE 2016 SENTENCING GUIDELINES IMPACT ON CORPORATE HEALTH AND SAFETY OFFENCES

Assessing the impact and implementation of the Sentencing Council s Theft Offences Definitive Guideline

IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT PAPAKURA CRI [2016] NZDC NEW ZEALAND POLICE Prosecutor. CAMERON JASON PANTON Defendant

ASSAULTS ON EMERGENCY WORKERS (OFFENCES) BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES

COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA

Sentencing and the Correctional System. Chapter 11

IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT AUCKLAND CRI [2017] NZDC THE QUEEN TULUA DANIEL TANOAI (AKA) ARETA MARK TANOAI

Appellant. JOHN DAVID WRIGHT Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

Criminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme Standards of competence for the accreditation of solicitors representing clients in the magistrates court

S G C. Assault and other offences against the person. Definitive Guideline. Sentencing Guidelines Council

Section 132 report (Coroners and Justice Act 2009): Resource Impact of the Government s proposals on Suspended Sentence Orders

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI [2014] NZHC CHANTELL PENE NGATIKAI Appellant

Policy and Matrix for the use of Civil Penalties

Good decision making: Fitness to practise hearings and sanctions guidance

Recruitment of Ex Offenders Policy

Guidelines for making a Victim Impact Statement

CUSTOMARY RECONCILIATION IN SENTENCING FOR SEXUAL OFFENCES IN VANUATU

Guidance for the Practice Committees including Indicative Sanctions Guidance

Criminal Convictions. AAT is a registered charity. No

SELF-DECLARATION FORM FOR A CHILD CARE POSITION

Transcription:

Unfit through drink or drugs (drive/ attempt to drive) (Revised 2017) Road Traffic Act 1988, s.4(1) Effective from: 24 April 2017 Triable only summarily: Maximum: Unlimited fine and/or 6 months Offence range: Band B fine 26 weeks custody Step 1 Determining the offence category The Court should determine the offence category using the table below. Category 1 Category 2 harm Category 3 Higher culpability and greater harm Higher culpability and lesser harm or lower culpability and greater Lower culpability and lesser harm The court should determine the offender s culpability and the harm caused with reference only to the factors below. Where an offence does not fall squarely into a category, individual factors may require a degree of weighting before making an overall assessment and determining the appropriate offence category.

CULPABILITY demonstrated by one or more of the following: Factors indicating higher culpability Driving LGV, HGV or PSV etc. Driving for hire or reward Factors indicating lower culpability All other cases HARM demonstrated by one or more of the following: Factors indicating greater harm High level of impairment Factors indicating lesser harm All other cases Step 2 Starting point and category range Having determined the category at step one, the court should use the appropriate starting point to reach a sentence within the category range in the table below. Must endorse and disqualify for at least 12 months Must disqualify for at least 2 years if offender has had two or more disqualifications for periods of 56 days or more in preceding 3 years refer to the disqualification guidance and consult your legal adviser for further guidance Must disqualify for at least 3 years if offender has been convicted of a relevant offence in preceding 10 years consult your legal adviser for further guidance Extend disqualification if imposing immediate custody If there is a delay in sentencing after conviction, consider interim disqualification.

The starting point applies to all offenders irrespective of plea or previous convictions. Level of seriousness Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Starting point Range Disqualification 12 weeks custody Medium level Band C fine High level 26 weeks custody Low level High level Band B fine Low level 29 36 months (Extend if imposing immediate custody) Disqual. 2 nd offence in 10 years 36 60 months (Extend if imposing immediate custody 17 28 months 36 52 months 12 16 months 36 40 months Note: when considering the guidance regarding the length of disqualification in the case of a second offence, the period to be imposed in any individual case will depend on an assessment of all the relevant circumstances, including the length of time since the earlier ban was imposed and the gravity of the current offence but disqualification must be for at least three years. The court should then consider further adjustment for any aggravating or mitigating factors. The following is a non exhaustive list of additional factual elements providing the context of the offence and factors relating to the offender. Identify whether any combination of these, or other relevant factors, should result in an upward or downward adjustment from the sentence arrived at so far.

Factors increasing seriousness Statutory aggravating factors: Previous convictions, having regard to a) the nature of the offence to which the conviction relates and its relevance to the current offence; and b) the time that has elapsed since the conviction Offence committed whilst on bail Other aggravating factors: Failure to comply with current court s Offence committed on licence or post sentence supervision Poor road or weather conditions Evidence of unacceptable standard of driving Involved in accident Carrying passengers High level of traffic or pedestrians in the vicinity Factors reducing seriousness or reflecting personal mitigation No previous convictions or no relevant/recent convictions Remorse Good character and/or exemplary conduct Serious medical condition requiring urgent, intensive or long term treatment Age and/or lack of maturity where it affects the responsibility of the offender Mental dis or learning disability Sole or primary carer for dependent relatives

Step 3 Consider any factors which indicate a reduction, such as assistance to the prosecution The court should take into account sections 73 and 74 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (assistance by defendants: reduction or review of sentence) and any other rule of law by virtue of which an offender may receive a discounted sentence in consequence of assistance given (or offered) to the prosecutor or investigator. Step 4 Reduction for guilty pleas The court should take account of any potential reduction for a guilty plea in accordance with section 144 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and the Guilty Plea guideline. Step 5 Totality principle If sentencing an offender for more than one offence, or where the offender is already serving a sentence, consider whether the total sentence is just and proportionate to the overall offending behaviour in accordance with the Offences Taken into Consideration and Totality guideline. Step 6 Compensation and ancillary s In all cases, the court should consider whether to make compensation and/or other ancillary s including offering a drink/drive rehabilitation course, deprivation, and /or forfeiture or suspension of personal liquor licence. Step 7 Reasons Section 174 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 imposes a duty to give reasons for, and explain the effect of, the sentence. Step 8 Consideration for time spent on bail The court must consider whether to give credit for time spent on bail in accordance with section 240A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.