Human Rights Council adopts New Important resolution on NHRIs

Similar documents
Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention

Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle

Country pairings for the second cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 412 persons in December 2017, and 166 of these were convicted offenders.

Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle

Country pairings for the second review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

UNHCR, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

REPORT OF THE FOURTH SPECIAL SESSION OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE STATES PARTIES

LIST OF CHINESE EMBASSIES OVERSEAS Extracted from Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People s Republic of China *

World Refugee Survey, 2001

VISA POLICY OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

A/HRC/22/L.13. General Assembly. United Nations

Country pairings for the first cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Montessori Model United Nations - NYC Conference March 2018

Contributions to UNHCR For Budget Year 2014 As at 31 December 2014

Country pairings for the first review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

PROTOCOL RELATING TO AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ARTICLE 45, SIGNED AT MONTREAL ON 14 JUNE parties.

Proposed Indicative Scale of Contributions for 2016 and 2017

Copyright Act - Subsidiary Legislation CHAPTER 311 COPYRIGHT ACT. SUBSIDIARY LEGlSLA non. List o/subsidiary Legislation

Delays in the registration process may mean that the real figure is higher.

Country pairings for the first review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Translation from Norwegian

LIST OF CONTRACTING STATES AND OTHER SIGNATORIES OF THE CONVENTION (as of January 11, 2018)

Figure 2: Range of scores, Global Gender Gap Index and subindexes, 2016

GLOBAL RISKS OF CONCERN TO BUSINESS WEF EXECUTIVE OPINION SURVEY RESULTS SEPTEMBER 2017

A/AC.289/2. General Assembly. United Nations

Regional Scores. African countries Press Freedom Ratings 2001

CAC/COSP/IRG/2018/CRP.9

AUSTRALIA S REFUGEE RESPONSE NOT THE MOST GENEROUS BUT IN TOP 25

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) returned 444 persons in August 2018, and 154 of these were convicted offenders.

Diplomatic Conference to Conclude a Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works by Visually Impaired Persons and Persons with Print Disabilities

2017 BWC Implementation Support Unit staff costs

Collective Intelligence Daudi Were, Project

15. a) Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York, 13 December 2006

NPT/CONF.2020/PC.I/CRP.2

8. b) Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. New York, 6 October 1999

Good Sources of International News on the Internet are: ABC News-

Return of convicted offenders

Human Resources in R&D

TD/B/Inf.222. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Membership of UNCTAD and membership of the Trade and Development Board

Information note by the Secretariat [V O T E D] Additional co-sponsors of draft resolutions/decisions

HUMAN RESOURCES IN R&D

MIGRATION IN SPAIN. "Facebook or face to face? A multicultural exploration of the positive and negative impacts of

The NPIS is responsible for forcibly returning those who are not entitled to stay in Norway.

PISA 2015 in Hong Kong Result Release Figures and Appendices Accompanying Press Release

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 375 persons in March 2018, and 136 of these were convicted offenders.

Status of National Reports received for the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III)

Country Participation

Financing of the United Nations peacekeeping forces in the Middle East: United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon

SEVERANCE PAY POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD

INTERNATIONAL AIR SERVICES TRANSIT AGREEMENT SIGNED AT CHICAGO ON 7 DECEMBER 1944

A/HRC/S-17/2. General Assembly. Report of the Human Rights Council on its seventeenth special session. United Nations

Human Rights Defenders UN Consensus Resolution 2017 Final text as adopted in 3C on 20 November - 76 cosponsors listed

Status of Ratification and Implementation of the Kampala Amendments on the Crime of Aggression Update No. 11 (information as of 21 January 2014) 1

Middle School Level. Middle School Section I

UNIDEM CAMPUS FOR THE SOUTHERN MEDITERRANEAN COUNTRIES

Countries for which a visa is required to enter Colombia

Global Prevalence of Adult Overweight & Obesity by Region

Montessori Model United Nations - NYC Conference February Middle School Level COMMITTEES

2018 Social Progress Index

The Multidimensional Financial Inclusion MIFI 1

Shaping the Future of Transport

VACATION AND OTHER LEAVE POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD

GLOBAL PRESS FREEDOM RANKINGS

31/ Protecting human rights defenders, whether individuals, groups or organs of society, addressing economic, social and cultural rights

Beyond Kyoto Copenhagen Durban 2011

STATUS OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF THE DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCTION, STOCKPILING AND USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS AND ON THEIR DESTRUCTION

Dashboard. Jun 1, May 30, 2011 Comparing to: Site. 79,209 Visits % Bounce Rate. 231,275 Pageviews. 00:03:20 Avg.

Global Variations in Growth Ambitions

FREEDOM OF THE PRESS 2008

UNITED NATIONS FINANCIAL PRESENTATION. UN Cash Position. 18 May 2007 (brought forward) Alicia Barcena Under Secretary-General for Management

Voluntary Scale of Contributions

2017 Social Progress Index

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level

Overview of the status of UNCITRAL Conventions and Model Laws x = ratification, accession or enactment s = signature only

New York, 20 December 2006

World Heritage UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION

Asylum Levels and Trends in Industrialized Countries. First Quarter, 2005

Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime

Programme budget for the biennium

Final Declaration and Measures to Promote the Entry into Force of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty*

The Conference Board Total Economy Database Summary Tables November 2016

APPENDIX 1: MEASURES OF CAPITALISM AND POLITICAL FREEDOM

Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material

RCP membership worldwide

GUIDELINE OF COMMITTEES IN TASHKENT MODEL UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE 2019

SCALE OF ASSESSMENT OF MEMBERS' CONTRIBUTIONS FOR 1994

A Partial Solution. To the Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference

Asia Pacific (19) EMEA (89) Americas (31) Nov

OFFICIAL NAMES OF THE UNITED NATIONS MEMBERSHIP

United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East

ASYLUM IN THE EU Source: Eurostat 4/6/2013, unless otherwise indicated ASYLUM APPLICATIONS IN THE EU27

Personnel. Staffing of the Agency's Secretariat

CCW/MSP/2012/9. Final report. I. Introduction. 30 November Original: English Session Geneva, November 2012

SLOW PACE OF RESETTLEMENT LEAVES WORLD S REFUGEES WITHOUT ANSWERS

The requirements for the different countries may be found on the Bahamas official web page at:

The Henley & Partners - Kochenov GENERAL RANKING

A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Thirty-seventh Session. Rome, 25 June - 2 July Third Report of the Credentials Committee

IMO MANDATORY REPORTS UNDER MARPOL. Analysis and evaluation of deficiency reports and mandatory reports under MARPOL for Note by the Secretariat

Transcription:

Human Rights Council adopts New Important resolution on NHRIs (Geneva, 5 July 2012) The United Nations Human Rights Council (Council), the UN s premier human rights forum, today adopted, by consensus, its second resolution on national human rights institutions (NHRIs).The resolution, which was presented by Australia entitled National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, received broad crossregional support and was co-sponsored by more than 100 States. Introducing the resolution, Australian Ambassador Peter Woolcott, said that the initiative sought to reaffirm the broad and strong recognition of the unique role and valuable work of [NHRIs] in building capacity and promoting and protecting human rights around the world. Ambassador Woolcott expressed his hope that other parts of the UN system would look to the Council as the model for NHRI participation opportunities. He concluded by thanking the ICC and NHRIs from all regions for supporting the resolution s development. Building on its 2011 resolution, which confirmed the Council s support for the establishment and strengthening of effective, independent and pluralistic NHRIs, the 2012 resolution brings new focus to the important contributions that NHRIs make to the UN s work. The Human Rights Council takes a new

fundamental step by recommending to the General Assembly that -the latter main deliberative body explore the feasibility of enabling Paris Principlescompliant NHRIs to participate at its meetings on the same basis that they do at the Council. It also welcomes the UN Secretary-General s support for the strengthening of opportunities for NHRIs to participate at the Council, the human rights treaty bodies and a number of New York-based UN fora, such as the Commission on the Status Women, the Council of States Parties to the Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and the Open-ended Working Group on Ageing. Further, in the resolution, the Council welcomed the growing number of States establishing NHRIs in accordance with the Paris Principles, acknowledged the ICC s important role, and expressed appreciation for the work of the Network of African National Human Rights Institutions, the Network of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights in the Americas, the Asia Pacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions and the European Group of National Human Rights Institutions. ICC Chairperson Dr Mousa Burayzat congratulated the Council on the adoption of the said resolution, describing it as the new high water mark. While recognising the critical importance of NHRIs at the national level, the resolution takes the momentous step of presenting a vision for NHRI participation across the UN s human rights related work. The ICC is committed to this project and supports the concrete steps the UN SecretaryGeneral, the Council, and other UN bodies are collectively taking to strengthen NHRI participation system-wide. The UN Secretary-General will report to the Council in 2013 on steps undertaken to implement the resolution, as well as on the ICC s activities in accrediting NHRIs in compliance with the Paris Principles. Associated documents: 1. Human Rights Council Resolution A/HRC/20/L.15 2. List of co-sponsoring States at action

A/HRC/20/L.15 United Nations General Assembly Distr.: Limited 29 June 2012 Original: English Human Rights Council Twentieth session Agenda item 8 Follow-up and implementation of the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action Albania*, Algeria*, Armenia*, Australia*, Azerbaijan*, Bolivia (Plurinational State of)*, Bosnia and Herzegovina*, Canada*, Colombia*, Costa Rica, Côte d Ivoire*, Croatia*, Czech Republic, Denmark*, Djibouti, Ecuador, Egypt*, Equatorial Guinea*, Finland*, France*, Georgia*, Germany*, Greece*, Guatemala, Hungary, Iceland*, Ireland*, Japan*, Latvia*, Libya, Lithuania*, Luxembourg*, Maldives, Mexico, Montenegro*, Morocco*, Namibia*, New Zealand*, Nigeria, Norway, Palestine*, Peru, Poland, Portugal*, Qatar, Republic of Korea*, Russian Federation, Serbia*, Slovakia*, Slovenia*, Somalia*, Spain, Sudan*, Sweden*, Switzerland, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia*, Timor-Leste*, Tunisia*, Turkey*, Ukraine*, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland*, Uruguay, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)*: draft resolution 20/ National institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights The Human Rights Council, Recalling Human Rights Council resolution 17/9 of 16 June 2011, as well as relevant resolutions of the General Assembly, the most recent of which is resolution 66/169 of 19 December 2011, and those of the Commission on Human Rights concerning national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights, Welcoming the international recognition of the importance of establishing and strengthening independent, pluralistic national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights in accordance with the Principles relating to the Status of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights ( the Paris Principles ), Reaffirming the important role that such national institutions play and will continue to play in promoting and protecting human rights and fundamental freedoms, in strengthening participation and the rule of law, and in developing and enhancing public awareness of those rights and fundamental freedoms, * * Non-Member State of the Human Rights Council.

Recalling the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action adopted by the World Conference on Human Rights on 25 June l993, which reaffirmed the important and constructive role played by national human rights institutions, in particular in their advisory capacity to the competent authorities and their role in preventing and remedying human rights violations in disseminating information on human rights and in education in human rights, Recognizing the important role of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in assisting the development of independent and effective national human rights institutions, in accordance with the Paris Principles, and recognizing also in this regard the potential for strengthened and complementary cooperation among the Office of the High Commissioner, the International Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, regional coordinating committees of national institutions and those national institutions in the promotion and protection of human rights, Noting with interest the twenty-fifth annual meeting of the International Coordinating Committee, held from 20 to 22 March 2012, Welcoming the strengthening in all regions of regional and crossregional cooperation among national human rights institutions, and between national human rights institutions and other regional human rights forums, 1. Welcomes the most recent reports of the Secretary-General submitted to the Human Rights Council on national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights 1 and on the activities of the International Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights in accrediting national institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles;2 2. Reaffirms the importance of the establishment and strengthening of effective, independent and pluralistic national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights, in accordance with the Paris Principles; 3. Recognizes the role of independent national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights in working together with Governments to ensure full respect for human rights at the national level, including by contributing to follow-up actions, as appropriate, to the recommendations resulting from the international human rights mechanisms; 4. Welcomes the increasingly important role of national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights in supporting cooperation between their Governments and the United Nations in the promotion and protection of human rights; 5. Encourages Member States to establish effective, independent and pluralistic national institutions or, where they already exist, to strengthen them for the promotion and protection of all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, as outlined in the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, and to do so in accordance with the Paris Principles; 6. Recognizes that, in accordance with the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, it is the right of each State to choose the framework for national institutions that is best suited to its particular needs at the national level in order to promote human rights in accordance with 1 2 A/HRC/20/9. A/HRC/20/10.

international human rights standards; 7. Welcomes the growing number of Member States establishing or considering the establishment of national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights in accordance with the Paris Principles, and welcomes in particular the growing number of States that have accepted recommendations to establish national human rights institutions through the universal periodic review and, where relevant, by treaty bodies and special procedures; 8. Also welcomes the growing number of national institutions seeking accreditation status through the International Coordinating Committee, and encourages national institutions, including Ombudsman institutions, to seek accreditation status; 9. Further welcomes the important role of the International Coordinating Committee, in close cooperation with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, in assessing conformity with the Paris Principles and in assisting Governments and national institutions, when requested, to strengthen national human rights institutions in accordance with the Paris Principles; 10. Encourages the Secretary-General to continue to give high priority to requests from Member States for assistance in the establishment and strengthening of national human rights institutions in accordance with the Paris Principles; 11. Encourages national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights established by Member States to continue to play an active role in preventing and combating all violations of human rights as enumerated in the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action and relevant international instruments; 12. Recognizes the important role played by national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights in the Human Rights Council, including its universal periodic review mechanism, in both preparation and follow-up, and the special procedures, as well as in the human rights treaty bodies, in accordance with General Assembly resolution 60/251 of 15 March 2006, Human Rights Council resolutions 5/1 and 5/2 of 18 June 2007 and Commission on Human Rights resolution 2005/74 of 20 April 2005; 13. Welcomes the strengthening of opportunities to contribute to the work of the Human Rights Council for national human rights institutions compliant with the Paris Principles, as stipulated by the Council review outcome document adopted by the General Assembly in its resolution 65/281 of 17 June 2011 and Council decision 19/119 of 22 March 2012, and encourages national human rights institutions to make use of these participatory opportunities; 14. Also welcomes the contribution of national human rights institutions to the ongoing treaty body strengthening process, and encourages national human rights institutions to continue to contribute to the process; 15. Further welcomes the recognition by the Secretary-General of the contributions that national human rights institutions compliant with the Paris Principles have made to the work of the Commission on the Status of Women, the Conference of States Parties to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Open-ended Working Group on Ageing, and supports and welcomes the efforts of the Secretary-General to encourage national human rights institutions to continue to interact with

and advocate for independent participation in all relevant United Nations mechanisms in accordance with their respective mandates; 16. Welcomes the endorsement by the General Assembly of the strengthening of opportunities for national human rights institutions compliant with the Paris Principles to contribute to the work of the Human Rights Council in its resolutions 65/281 and 66/169, and recommends that the Assembly explore the feasibility of enabling national human rights institutions compliant with the Paris Principles to participate in the Assembly based on practices and arrangements agreed upon in Assembly resolutions 60/251, Human Rights Council resolutions 5/1 and 5/2, and 16/21 of 25 March 2011, and Commission on Human Rights resolution 2005/74, while ensuring their most effective contribution; 17. Stresses the importance of financial and administrative independence and the stability of national human rights institutions for the promotion and protection of the human rights, and notes with satisfaction the efforts of those Member States that have provided their national institutions with more autonomy and independence, including by giving them an investigative role or enhancing such a role, and encourages other Governments to consider taking similar steps; 18. Commends the high priority given by the Office of the High Commissioner to work with national institutions, including through technical cooperation, and encourages the High Commissioner, in view of the expanded activities relating to national institutions, to ensure that appropriate arrangements are made and budgetary resources provided to continue and further extend activities in support of national human rights institutions, including supporting the work of the International Coordinating Committee and its regional coordinating committees, and invites Governments to contribute additional voluntary funds to that end; 19. Welcomes the efforts made by the High Commissioner to strengthen United Nations system-wide coordination on national human rights institutions, and encourages all United Nations human rights mechanisms, as well as its agencies, funds and programmes, to work within their respective mandates with national human rights institutions; 20. Also welcomes the strengthening of international cooperation among national institutions, including through the International Coordinating Committee, and encourages the Secretary-General to continue to provide the assistance necessary for holding international, regional and cross-regional meetings and conferences of national institutions, including meetings of the International Coordinating Committee, in cooperation with the Office of the High Commissioner; 21. Takes note with interest of the Edinburgh Declaration on Business and Human Rights3 resulting from the tenth International Conference of National Human Rights Institutions from 8 to 10 November 2010, and recalls Human Rights Council resolution 17/9, in which the Council welcomed the important role of national human rights institutions established in accordance with the Paris Principles in relation to business and human rights, 22. Welcomes the strengthening in all regions of regional cooperation among national human rights institutions, and notes with appreciation the continuing work of the Network of African National Human Rights Institutions, the Network of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights in the Americas, the AsiaPacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions and the European 3 A/HRC/17/NI/1, annex.

Group of National Human Rights Institutions; 23. Encourages all States and national human rights institutions to continue to take appropriate steps to promote the exchange of information and experience concerning the establishment and effective operation of national institutions; 24. Requests the Secretary-General to report to the Human Rights Council at its twenty-third session on the implementation of the present resolution; 25. Also requests the Secretary-General to report to the Human Rights Council at its twenty-third session on the activities of the International Coordinating Committee in accrediting national institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles.

Human Rights Council resolution A/HRC/20/L.15 National institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights Co-sponsors at adoption 5 July 2012 Senegal, on behalf of the African Group 1. Albania Algeria (African Group) 2. Armenia 3. Australia 4. Austria 5. Azerbaijan 6. Belgium 7. Bolivia 8. Bosnia and Herzegovina 9. Bulgaria 10. Cambodia 11. Canada 12. Colombia 13. Costa Rica Cote d'ivoire (African Group) 14. Croatia 15. Cyprus 16. Czech Republic 17. Denmark Djibouti (African Group) 18. Ecuador Egypt (African Group) 19. Equitorial Guinea 20. Finland 21. FYROM 22. France 23. Georgia 24. Germany 25. Greece 26. Guatemala 27. Hungary 28. Iceland 29. India 30. Indonesia 31. Iraq 32. Ireland 33. Japan 34. Jordan 35. Latvia 36. Lebanon 37. Libya 38. Lithuania 39. Luxembourg 40. Maldives 41. Malta 42. Mexico 43. Moldova 44. Montenegro Morocco (African Group) Namibia (African Group) 45. New Zealand Nigeria (African Group) 46. Norway 47. Palestine 48. Peru 49. Poland 50. Portugal 51. Qatar 52. ROK 53. Romania 54. Russian Federation 55. Serbia 56. Slovakia 57. Slovenia Somalia (African Group) 58. Spain Sudan (African Group) 59. Sweden 60. Switzerland 61. Thailand 62. Timor Leste Tunisia (African Group) 63. Turkey 64. Ukraine 65. United Kingdom 66. United States of America 67. Uruguay 68. Venezuela