Regulatory dialogue between Russia and the EU The political and economic context

Similar documents
"The Enlargement of the EU: Impact on the EU-Russia bilateral cooperation"

Report of the XXVI negotiation round on the trade part of the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement. Brussels, October 2016

Vademecum on European Standardisation

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FOUR COMMON SPACES ECONOMIC SPACE

FRAMEWORK FOR ADVANCING TRANSATLANTIC ECONOMIC INTEGRATION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

REPORT OF THE SEVENTH ROUND OF NEGOTIATIONS (29 September 3 October 2014)

Joint Report on the EU-Canada Scoping Exercise March 5, 2009

3 July 2003 EU TRADE POLICY ON TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE A NEW PUSH FOR THE REMOVAL OF TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE GLOBALLY.

Presented at the Closing Plenary Session on 11 September 2006

CHAPTER 6 TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE

Chapter 7. Technical Barriers to Trade. For the purposes of this Chapter, the definitions of Annex 1 of the TBT Agreement shall apply.

TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE

CHAPTER FOUR TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE

UNICE COMMENTS ON NON-TARIFF BARRIERS TO TRADE: TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE

EU-RUSSIA COMMON SPACES PROGRESS REPORT 2012

CHAPTER 6 TECHNICAL REGULATIONS, STANDARDS AND CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES. Article 1: Definitions

Hungarian-Ukrainian economic relations

On Georgia, Russia s failure to comply fully with the agreements of 12 August and 8 September 2008 remained an issue of concern.

EU-UKRAINE Deep and Comprehensive Free-trade Area. New Opportunities for Europe. Dr. Ricardo Giucci Berlin Economics/German Advisory Group Ukraine

Report of the 15 th EU-Japan FTA/EPA negotiating round Brussels, 29 February - 4 March 2016

Multilateral Trading System in 2013 The Current State of Affairs & Expectations for the Short Term Bipul Chatterjee

The Twelfth Round of Negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)

Presentation by Economy Under Review - Russia

Chapter Seven. Technical Barriers to Trade


Manufacturing in Mexico

2 EU exports to Indonesia Malaysia and Thailand across

WTO TBT Agreement: A tool for businesses to reduce regulatory barriers

Perspective on India - Germany Trade Relations and the way forward

Canada European Union Trade Negotiations 7. Technical Barriers to Trade and Regulatory Cooperation

AN EU PERSPECTIVE ON THE ROLE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE IN THE US-EU TTIP NEGOTIATIONS

Presentation on TPP & TTIP Background and Implications. by Dr V.S. SESHADRI at Centre for WTO Studies New Delhi 3 March 2014

TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE CHAPTER

Kazakhstan s membership of the Eurasian Customs Union: Implications for trade and WTO accession

Review of implementation of OSCE commitments in the EED focusing on Integration, Trade and Transport

Overview of the WTO TBT Agreement. Diane C. Thompson Principal Standards Advisor Standards Alliance. Lusaka, Zambia November 30, 2016

Vietnam and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)

Industrial Exports: Opportunities and Challenges

Request for Public Comments on the EU-US High Level Working Group on Jobs and Growth

RELATIONS BETWEEN THE EU AND TUNISIA

Brussels, September 2016

Executive Summary of the Report of the Track Two Study Group on Comprehensive Economic Partnership in East Asia (CEPEA)

EU statement on Doha negotiations at the WTO Trade Negotiations Committee in Geneva

Virginia Cram-Martos Director Economic Cooperation and Trade Division 4 March 2016.

MEETING OF APEC MINISTERS RESPONSIBLE FOR TRADE. Puerto Vallarta, Mexico May 2002 STATEMENT OF THE CHAIR

Ex-ante study of the EU- Australia and EU-New Zealand trade and investment agreements Executive Summary

8th UNION FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN TRADE MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE. Brussels, 9 December Conclusions

THE FIFTH MEETING OF THE BRICS TRADE MINISTERS MOSCOW, 7 JULY 2015 JOINT COMMUNIQUE

Country Update. Manufactured products exports: Technical Barriers to Trade faced by exporters from Vietnam VIET NAM. Provided by

PARTNER COUNTRY QUESTIONNAIRE

CRS Report for Congress

AFRICAN GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY ACT

COMPROMISE AMENDMENTS 1-15

Standards in Trade Facilitation

THE CONFEDERATION OF INDUSTRY OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC

VIETNAM'S FTA AND IMPLICATION OF PARTICIPATING IN THE TPP

Glossary. account where we post news about TTIP. requiring all US. judges a disputed issue outside a court

Economic Relations between Mexico and Japan in the Asia-Pacific Era. June 11, 2015 Hiroyuki Ishige Chairman and CEO

Trade policy developments

Article 1 General principles and objectives

CHAPTER 6 TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE. enhance joint cooperation between the Parties.

ENHANCEMENT OF THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT IN THE SOUTHERN MEDITERRANEAN. National Seminar for Lebanon 9 and 10 October 2014

Overview on the implementation of the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement

For a Modern Trade Policy Against Protectionism. DIHK-Position on International Trade Policy

Meeting of APEC Ministers Responsible for Trade Sapporo, Japan 5-6 June Statement of the Chair

European Standardization System. Cinzia Missiroli CEN/CENELEC Programme Manager Port of Spain, 04 April 2011

REMARKS BY AMBASSADOR SUSAN SCHWAB THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

ALBANIA. Overview of Regulatory and Procedural reforms to alleviate barriers to trade

of the one part, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, of the other part,

Korea-U.S. Economic Cooperation

CRS Report for Congress

The Role of EU Trade Policy in Enhancing the Competitiveness of European Industry

Confederation of Industry

Implications of the EU-US TTIP: The largest bilateral trade agreement in history

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe

What Flanders can gain from TTIP and EU Trade Policy in general?

Growth, Investment and Trade Challenges: India and Japan

EU Ukraine Association Agreement Quick Guide to the Association Agreement

Fact Sheet Gender Implications of the European Union - Ukraine Trade Relations

Comments on: Richard Baldwin, The Great Convergence

Stakeholder meeting on non-tariff measures applied on Thai exports and imports

Proliferation of FTAs in East Asia

Twinning Project SR 13 IB EC 01

The Competitiveness Institute 9 th Annual Global Conference, Lyon. BSR InnoNet Baltic Sea Region Innovation Network

TERMS OF REFERENCE DEVELOP A SADC TRADE DEVELOPMENT AND TRADE PROMOTION FRAMEWORK. November 2017

Europe and Russia on the eve of the 21st century

Response to the EC consultation on the future direction of EU trade policy. 28 July 2010

ASIA-PACIFIC PARLIAMENTARY FORUM (APPF) RESOLUTION APPF24/RES.17 ECONOMY, TRADE AND REGIONAL VALUE CHAINS

SADC TRADE RELATED FACILITY (TRF)

THE BRICS HANDOVER REPORT:

GEORGIA S EXPERIENCES POLICY RELATIONS WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION ON DEVELOPING TRADE AND TRADE. Merab Kakulia. Eastern Partnership: Actual State

CHAPTER 8 TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE

The Parties agreed to adopt the above Decision at later stage by written procedure.

China and India:Convergence and Divergence

EU exports to Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand

Landscape of the European Chemical Industry 2018

Bringing EU Trade Policy Up to Date 23 June 2015

The Role of Standards and Quality Infrastructure in Trade Facilitation

Can Russia Compete? Enhancing Productivity and Innovation in a Globalizing World. Raj M. Desai The Brookings Institution

Trade facilitation and Export Helpdesk. Fabio FABBI, DG TRADE A3

Transcription:

EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 1 Regulatory dialogue between Russia and the EU The political and economic context Nick Burge Relations with Russia and CIS countries International Unit DG Enterprise and Industry European Commission

Economic context (1) EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 2 Some economic indicators: Russia is the 3rd largest EU trade partner after the USA and China. The EU is Russia's main trading partner, accounting for 56,5 % of its overall trade. EU- Russia trade is still growing: + 9,1% in 2007 and strong growth so far in 2008. Total EU-Russia trade was 232 billion in 2007 (compared to 130 billion in 2004). Total trade in first 7 months of 2008 was 128,8 billion: + 36,5bn compared to first 7 months of 2007. EU exports to Russia are diversified: e.g. machinery and transport equipment (39%), chemicals (13%), manufactured goods (11%), food and live animals (6%). Russian exports to EU are mainly energy/mineral fuels (65,7%). Trade in services is also increasing: +28% in EU exports and +7% in RU exports in 2007 (mainly in transportation and travel sector) Bilateral investment is also impressive: 80% of all FDI in Russia is from the EU; and 80% of all Russian foreign investment is into the EU.

Economic context (2) EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 3 Conclusions Notwithstanding the current global financial crisis and political situation Growing economic interdependence between Russia and EU Still huge potential for more trade and investment growth Both sides can benefit from closer economic integration through removal of trade obstacles and adoption of shared rules and standards

Structures for economic relations (1) EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 4 EU-Russia economic relations - structures WTO Obligations to comply with Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement (TBT) TBT is basis for Russian and EU legislation on technical regulations and standards Accession process has already helped to drive reform in Russia and promoted cooperation between EU and Russia on non-tariff barriers Possible future agreement on trade and investments? Would be TBT + Should contain significant non-tariff elements (i.e. regulatory convergence) New EU-Russia Agreement: Regulatory cooperation between EU and Russia will be an essential element Likely to be comprehensive and ambitious: covering all industrial sectors But all this is in the future what about today?

Structures for economic relations (2) EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 5 The main practical framework for current EU-Russia economic cooperation is the Common Economic Space (CES) Roadmap May 2005 Aims: Open and integrated market between EU and Russia; Put in place conditions to increase opportunities for businesses on both sides Promotion of trade and investment and enhance competitiveness of Russian and EU economies Strengthen economic cooperation Methodology: regular formal dialogues 16 government-to-government dialogues now established including a Regulatory Dialogue and a Dialogue on Industrial and Enterprise Policy Future: New EU-Russia Agreement will take forward CES aims (as minimum) Likely to continue and develop structure of dialogues i.e. Regulatory cooperation between EU and Russia expected to remain a long term feature of relationship

Regulatory and Industrial Policy dialogues EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 6 Regulatory and Industrial Policy dialogues Established Dec 2005: Minister Khristenko and VP Verheugen Objectives (summary): Achieve more compatibility between Russian and EU technical regulations, standards and conformity assessment procedures, including convergence where possible; Enhance transparency of regulatory activity; Promote the use of international standards; Improve regulatory and administrative environment for businesses to enhance competitiveness. Parties involved: European Commission (DG Enterprise and Industry) and RF Ministry of Industry and Trade Other interested Ministries and parts of the European Commission Business (Russian and EU) Other interested parties (standardisation bodies, technical institutes)

Regulatory and Industrial Policy dialogues EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 7 12 sectoral subgroups established Regulatory Dialogue subgroups Automotive Industry Textiles ICT, Radio and Telecom Pharmaceuticals Conformity Assessment and Standardisation Forest-based Industries Construction Products Machinery and Electrical Equipment Industrial Dialogue subgroups Automotive Industry Textiles Industry Mining and Metals Chemicals Industry SMEs and Enterprise Policy Aerospace Industry

Regulatory and Industrial Policy dialogues EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 8 Methodology: Meetings 2-3 times a year Work on basis of agreed work programme Business fully involved in subgroups Plenary meetings twice a year (next in Moscow Oct 23/24) Regular reports to political sponsors and EU-RU Summits Comments: First time such regulatory cooperation attempted between EU and Russia Exchange of information and regular contact positive in itself Cannot expect every sector to deliver same level of results or work at same speed Medium to long term process

Regulatory and Industrial Policy dialogues EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 9 Important that dialogues lead to concrete outputs Therefore agreed that: Dialogues would support Russia s programme of reform of its technical regulations and standards: subgroups to be consulted on draft legislation Each subgroup to identify the 2 or 3 most important issues to resolve in their sector and make joint recommendations for their resolution These recommendations to be reviewed by VP Verheugen and Minister Khristenko

Regulatory dialogue EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 10 Construction subgroup Not originally foreseen in Common Economic Space roadmap A mistake: this is a vitally important sector for EU and Russia Pressure from EU and Russian business through EU-RU Industrialists Round Table to establish a dialogue on construction Led to agreement by both sides to establish a new subgroup in 2007 Would cover technical regulations and standards on construction products as well as Eurocodes Problems on Russian side to appoint a co-chair Important that there is full commitment by relevant Russian authorities to dialogue Hope this workshop will raise profile of this issue again and encourage work to begin

Next steps (1) EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 11 Workshop on Conformity Assessment and Standardisation, Moscow 16-17 June 2008, Conclusions: The various EU and Russian partners confirmed their desire to seek greater convergence of their respective systems of technical regulations, standards and conformity assessment in order to reduce technical barriers to trade. The ongoing reform of the Russian system should aim to align with the EU system as far as possible. Major differences in EU and Russian approaches to technical regulations and standards: Voluntary or mandatory use of standards Conformity assessment by certification or by supplier declaration of conformity supported by market surveillance These different approaches require different administrative and institutional structures to implement and manage the legislation If we want closer integration of the two systems, these differences have to be understood and changes made

Next steps (2) EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 12 This workshop offers a chance for both sides to learn in detail about the system of Eurocodes and the current Russian construction standards First step towards closer cooperation and greater convergence of EU and Russian systems Need a framework for taking this work forward EU-RU Regulatory dialogue - construction subgroup offers this framework The work needs to begin EU side is ready

EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 13 Thank you for listening Nick Burge Relations with Russia and CIS countries International Unit DG Enterprise and Industry European Commission