Follow this and additional works at:

Similar documents
Ben Miller dba Miller Enterprises vs. COMMERCE AND INSURANCE

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, COMPLIANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. FIDELITY HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Respondent

Follow this and additional works at:

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, COMPLIANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. FIRST CHOICE FUNDING, INC., Respondent

Terry W. Rankin vs. COMMERCE AND INSURANCE

Commerce and Insurance vs. KEITH ODENE DODD, Respondent

Follow this and additional works at:

TENNESSEE INSURANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. Docket No.: J JAMES MICHAEL FOLEY, Respondent

Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions, Compliance Division, Petitioner, vs. Charlton Hildreth, Respondent

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Azam Mani Khwaga dba Hickory Hollow Wine and Liquor vs. Alcoholic Beverage Commission

Gloria Sanchez vs. DHS

Cornelius Sorina vs. Safety

Gregory Candebat vs. Commerce And Insurance

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:

Humphreys Flowers, Inc. vs. AGRICULTURE

Mark Singer vs. Commerce and Insurance

William K. Bryant vs. Safety

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, Department/, Petitioner, vs. CSGP 06-52VINCENT TUROCY, Grievant/, Respondent

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Commerce and Insurance vs. MEMPHIS SECURITY, INC., Respondent

Follow this and additional works at:

BOARD OF EDUCATION vs. NATASHA KRUITHOF, Respondent.

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Robert M. Russell vs. Safety

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

SECTION 4 DEED RESTRICTIONS

BUILDING PERMIT ORDINANCE TOWN OF WOODSTOCK

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at:

Vanessa Quilantan vs. Safety

Follow this and additional works at:

CHAPTER 9 BUILDING AND ELECTRICAL CODES

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

Tennessee Insurance Division, Petitioner, vs. John Porter Franklin, Jr., Respondent

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION (BOPP), Department, vs. BARBARA DATTULO, Grievant

Valorie D. Thacker vs. Department of Safety

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. One 1996 Honda Accord Vin Number 1HGCE1822TA , Date of Seizure: October 21, 2010, Claimant: Lesile Frazier

Follow this and additional works at:

Amended Bill No. 26, Ordinance No. 26, Session 2015 ARTICLE 1701 BOCA National Building Code

Follow this and additional works at:

Brown, Angela v. Yates Services, LLC

Wicomico Amendments to the 2015 IRC & IBC IRC:

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF WASAGA BEACH BY-LAW # A BY-LAW TO PROVIDE FOR THE NUMBERING OF BUILDINGS

CUMBERLAND MANOR NURSING HOME, Petitioner, vs. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BUREAU OF HEALTH LICENSURE AND REGULATION, Respondent

BEFORE THE TENNESSEE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF HEARING REGARDING PETITION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER

One 1994 Chevrole Pickup, VIN.: 1GCCS14W4R , SEIZED FROM: Trevor A. Coleman, DATE OF SEIZURE: March 12, 2012, CLAIMANT: Trevor A.

1606_15067_ STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK, TEXAS:

Trey & Michael Torres vs. Safety

CHAPTER BUILDING PERMITS

Vaughn, Billy v. Kenneth Parsons d/b/a Performance Mechanical

Chapter 21. Streets and Sidewalks

ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 112 (ZONING) OF THE 1976 CODE OF THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA

A LOCAL LAW PROVIDING FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE NEW YORK STATE UNIFORM FIRE PREVENTION AND BUILDING CODE

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Petitioner, vs. LINDA A. JOHNSON, Grievant

Amended Bill No. 26, Ordinance No. 26, Session 2012 ARTICLE 1701 BOCA National Building Code

Public hearing to adopt Ordinance 1375 C.S. amending Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Martinez Municipal Code

Follow this and additional works at:

BROOKWOOD ESTATES HOA

Gregory Brunson vs. Safety

TENNESSEE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) DIVISION OF AIR POLLUTION NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. ) ) CASE NO. APC RESPONDENT )

Follow this and additional works at:

53 NYS UNIFORM FIRE PREVENTION & BUILDING CODES 53. Chapter 53

Sanford Historic Preservation Commission. Rules and Procedures ARTICLE I: PURPOSE

ARTICLE F. Fences Ordinance

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. REPORT TO: Planning Committee 3 December 2014 Planning and New Communities Director

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN S SERVICES, Petitioner, vs. DARREN BIVINGS, Grievant.

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Department/, Petitioner, vs. CSGP-07-14DOYLE WITCHER, Grievant/, Respondent

Gary F. Bickford vs. Safety

The Council President at the request of the County Executive.

Deed Restrictions. Hillside Terrace Estates

APPROVED. GHEHA Board of Managers, President. Steve Roberts

ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY

A LOCAL LAW #1-15 of 2015 PROVIDING FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE NEW YORK STATE UNIFORM FIRE PREVENTION AND BUILDING CODE

Chapter 10 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS*

TITLE 12 BUILDING, UTILITY, ETC. CODES 1

Joel P. Landeen, City Attorney Phone: City web: Fax:

Title 10: COMMERCE AND TRADE

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at:

AMENDMENTS TO THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (Effective August 1, 2010)

Minutes of the Board of Adjustment of the Township Of Hanover February 6, 2018

Wilhite, Donna v. Lowes Millwork

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No (OMB)

Transcription:

University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-6-01 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE & INSURANCE, Petitioner Vs. MICHAEL W. HAWKINS, as an individual, And d/b/a HAWKINS & SONS REMODELING, CO., Respondent Follow this and additional works at: http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_lawopinions This Initial Order by the Administrative Judges of the Administrative Procedures Division, Tennessee Department of State, is a public document made available by the College of Law Library, and the Tennessee Department of State, Administrative Procedures Division. For more information about this public document, please contact administrative.procedures@tn.gov

BEFORE THE TENNESSEE BOARD FOR LICENSING CONTRACTORS IN THE MATTER OF: TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE & INSURANCE, Petitioner DOCKET NO. 1.14-116114A Vs. MICHAEL W. HAWKINS, as an individual And d/b/a HAWKINS & SONS REMODELING, CO., Respondent INITIAL ORDER This contested case was heard in Nashville, Tennessee on June 6, 01, before Lynn M. England, Administrative Judge, assigned by the Secretary of State, Administrative Procedures Division (APD, to sit on behalf of the Tennessee Board for Licensing Contractors. The Petitioner, the Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance was represented by Michael Driver, Assistant General Counsel. The Respondent did not appear and was not represented by counsel. ENTRY OF DEFAULT Pursuant to TENN. CODE ANN. 4-5-307 and 6-6-501, on March 16, 01, the Petitioner filed a NOTICE OF HEARING AND CHARGES. The Respondent failed to appear for the hearing. Based upon the Respondent s failure to appear for the hearing on June 6, 01, the Petitioner moved for a default pursuant to TENN. CODE ANN. 4-5-309. In support of the motion for default, the Petitioner presented evidence demonstrating that attempts were made to serve the Respondent with the NOTICE OF HEARING AND CHARGES.

Service attempts were made at the Respondent s last known business address. The certified mail along with the green return receipt card that accompanied the NOTICE OF HEARING AND CHARGES was signed for on March 6, 01 by a Christina Hawkins. (HEARING EX. 1. Further evidence presented showed additional certified mail attempt by the Tennessee Board for Licensing Contractors. The certified mail along with the green return receipt card that accompanied the NOTICE OF HEARING AND CHARGES was returned unclaimed on June 9, 01. (HEARING EX.. It is determined that the Petitioner proved actual service of the NOTICE OF HEARING AND CHARGES on March 6, 01 and then made sufficient attempts of service of the NOTICE OF HEARING AND CHARGES in compliance with RULE 1360 04 01.06 of the Uniform Rules of Procedure for Hearing Contested Cases before State Administrative Agencies, TENN. COMP. R. & REGS. ch. 1360 4 01.06 (June 004 (Revised. The Respondent did not appear for the hearing. Accordingly, pursuant to TENN. CODE ANN. 4-5-309 and RULE 1360 04 01.15, the Respondent is held in Default for failure to appear at the hearing. Pursuant to RULE 1360 04 01.15((b, the hearing was held as an uncontested hearing. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Respondent did not possess a Tennessee Home Improvement License at any time relevant to this matter.. Respondent did not possess a Tennessee Contractor s License at any time relevant to this matter. 3. On or about November 30, 009, Respondent entered a contract with Chyrall White to perform remodeling work at her home located at 855 Jefferson Avenue, Knoxville, Tennessee in Knox County. 4. The contract was for work to be performed by the Respondent and included constructing a finished 15 x 18 addition to her home, installation of new vinyl windows,

installation of a new front door, re-roofing her home and installation of new gutters for a total price of Fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00. 5. The contract required payment as follows: $7500.00 up front (materials and labor, $4,500.00 when ready to finish inside, $3,000.00 upon completion. 6. Ms. White paid the Respondent $7,500.00 as a down payment on November 30, 3009. 7. By December 17, 009, Respondent had performed the following: removed the roof from Ms. White s home, replaced shingles on the front portion of the roof, made some repairs, dug and poured footers for the room addition, laid the block foundation for the expansion, built floor joists for the expansion and framed three walls of the addition. He also tore off a storage shed and left her water heater exposed, causing the water heater to freeze for approximately four days. 8. On December 17, 009, the Respondent informed Ms. White that he had run out of money and needed the second draw in the amount of $4,500.00, even though it was not yet due. Ms. White paid the Respondent $4,500.00 on December 18, 009. 9. The Respondent has performed no work on Ms. White s home since December 18, 009. ANALYSIS and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Respondent s acts and conduct, as found above in the FINDINGS OF FACT, are in violation of TENN. CODE ANN. 6-6-50(a, which states: (a No person may engage in or transact any home improvement business, represent to the public as doing home improvement business or offer to transact any home improvement business n this state, except in compliance with the applicable provisions of this part. No person, whether subject to licensing by any law or otherwise may engage in this state in any trade practice or other act that is prohibited by this part. Every person who

willfully participates in a prohibited act or violation with knowledge of the prohibited act or violation is subject to the criminal penalty for the prohibited act or violation. This part may not be waived by agreement. Each licensee who is licensed under this chapter shall, as a condition to licensing, carry errors and omissions insurance to cover all activities contemplated under this chapter. The requirements of this section shall not apply to acquisition agents.. Respondent s acts and conduct, as found above in the FINDINGS OF FACT, are in violation of TENN. CODE ANN. 6-6-501(4(A, which states: (A Home improvement means the repair, replacement, remodeling, alteration, conversion, modernization, improvement or addition to any land or building, or that portion of the land or building, that is used or designed to be used as a residence or dwelling unit for one (1, two (, three (3 or four (4 dwelling units, and includes the construction, replacement or improvement of driveways, swimming pools, porches, garages, landscaping, fences, fall-out shelters, roofing, painting and other improvements to structures upon land that is adjacent to a dwelling house for one (1, two (, three (3 or four (4 dwelling units. Without regard to the extent of affixation, home improvement includes the installation of central heating or air conditioning systems, storm windows or awnings. 3. TENN. CODE ANN. 6-6-509(c which states in relevant part: the commission may impose a civil penalty not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00 against any person who engages in unlicensed home improvement contracting.

4. Each day of continued violation constitutes a separate violation. TENN. CODE ANN. 56-1-308. The Respondent s acts and conduct constitute a continuing act of unlicensed home improvement contracting. The Respondent s violations constitutes grounds for the discipline of the Respondent pursuant to TENN. CODE ANN. 6-6-509(c; the imposition of civil penalties pursuant to TENN. CODE ANN. 56-1-308(a; and the imposition of investigatory and hearing costs pursuant to TENN. CODE ANN. 56-1-311 and RULE 0780 05 11.01. It is hereby ORDERED that the Respondent shall pay a civil penalty in the amount of $19,000.00, which represents nineteen days of unlicensed activity between November 30, 009 and December 18, 009, which is the penalty requested by the Petitioner. It is further ORDERED that the Respondent shall pay the actual costs of the investigation, prosecution and hearing of this matter including the costs billed by APD and by the court reporter. The Respondent shall make the payment for the penalty in addition to the assessed costs to the Tennessee Board for Licensing Contractors, which is located at 500 James Robertson Parkway, Nashville, Tennessee 3743-1151. POLICY REASONS FOR DECISION This ORDER is issued to protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the State of Tennessee. It is so ORDERED. This INITIAL ORDER entered and effective this the day of 01. LYNN M. ENGLAND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES DIVISION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE

Filed in the Administrative Procedures Division, Office of the Secretary of State, this the day of 01. THOMAS G. STOVALL, DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES DIVISION