Case 2:15-cv NVW Document 73 Filed 11/02/15 Page 1 of 4

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:15-cv NVW Document 115 Filed 12/14/15 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:15-cv NVW Document 150 Filed 03/02/16 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:15-cv NVW Document 86 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:15-cv NVW Document 47 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:15-cv NVW Document 169 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:13-cv MMS Document 393 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS JOINT MOTION TO ADOPT QUICK PEEK ORDER

Case 1:17-cv KPF Document 1 Filed 09/05/17 Page 1 of 5

INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE

SUMNER SQUARE 1615 M STREET, N.W. SUITE 400 WASHINGTON, D.C (202) FACSIMILE: (202) July 30,2008

Case 1:15-cv MLW Document 44 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:15-cv LM Document 8 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 1:06-cv JR Document 19 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:10-cv BR Document 262 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) resolution and ordinance purporting to authorize a 20-year lease of the City s Jobing.com Arena

Attorneys for Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PRESCOTT DIVISION

Case 9:09-cv DWM-JCL Document 32 Filed 04/09/10 Page 1 of 10

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

No In The. MOHAMED ALI SAMANTAR, Petitioner, v.

Case 2:15-cv DN-BCW Document 111 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Prescott Division

In The Supreme Court of the United States

Case 1:13-cv EGS Document 89 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:10-cv BR Document 345 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:12-cv JRG Document 403 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 17492

SUMNER SQUARE 1615 M STREET, N.W. SUITE 400 WASHINGTON, D.C (202) FACSIMILE: (202) August 20, 2008

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Case 1:96-cv TFH-GMH Document 4234 Filed 11/08/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:15-cv GBL-MSN Document 31 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 317

Case 1:13-cv MMS Document 218 Filed 08/03/15 Page 1 of 7 Redacted Version IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Case 1:13-cv RCL Document 77 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

REPLY BRIEF FOR THE PETITIONERS

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 276 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:10-cv BR Document 77 Filed 12/10/12 Page 1 of 6 Page ID#: 998


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Prescott Division

Pakootas, Donald R. Michel, and State of Washington,

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Debtors.

Case 1:96-cv TFH Document 3761 Filed 05/16/11 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:96-cv TFH-GMH Document 4315 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:15-cv MHL Document 69 Filed 08/12/16 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 1055

Case 2:16-cv SWS Document 39 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5. Paul M. Seby (admitted pro hac vice) Robert J. Walker (Wyo. Bar No.

Case 5:15-cv DDC-KGS Document 44 Filed 06/02/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Prescott Division

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. to reach agreement by the end of the business day on March 14 th, and some parties were not

Association For Molecular Pathology et al v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al Doc. 98. Plaintiffs, :

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:13-cv RMC Document 29 Filed 07/30/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED Nos (L), (con.), (con.), (con.)

Case 1:13-cv BJR Document 81 Filed 11/18/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 05-CV-274-HA

Case 3:12-cv SI Document 140 Filed 11/10/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Case 2:10-cv TSZ Document 138 Filed 10/01/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv NDF Document 29 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No (1:15-cv GBL-MSN)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 4:17-cv JM Document 58 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:06-cv GK Document 37 Filed 09/05/2008 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv BAH Document 28 Filed 01/11/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Center for Biological Diversity, No. 09-CV-8011-PCT-PGR ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No lfn '<Ebe CROW ALLOTTEES, ET AL., UNITED STATES; STATE OF MONTANA; AND APSAALOOKE (CROW) TRIBE.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF TWIN FALLS

ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 15, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Motion Picture Association of America v. CrystalTech Web Hosting Inc. Doc. 769

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION. In re: Case No TOM7 NEW WEI, INC., et al.

Attorneys for Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PRESCOTT DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv TC Document 153 Filed 05/10/17 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT liro:30. instrier OF NEW JERSEY

U.S. District Court District Of Arizona (Phoenix Division) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:04-cv NVW

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 6:15-cv TC Document 163 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 of 7

FILED SEP ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

Case 2:07-cv SMM Document 59 Filed 04/30/08 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:13-cv EGS Document 87 Filed 06/03/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:99-cv EGS Document 685 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOINT STATUS REPORT

Defendants hereby move for a stay of all case deadlines in the abovecaptioned. 1. At the end of the day on December 21, 2018, the appropriations act

Daniel L. Alterman Arlene F. Boop. resolution. attorneys and. attorneys time. TRAUB. By: ARLENE F. BOOP. By: DORIS G.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-1164-WO-JEP

Case 1:13-cv MMS Document 53 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 15. No C (Judge Sweeney) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

i Control Number: MINEIMENNI Item Number: 6. Addendum StartPage: 0

In The Supreme Court of the United States

Case 1:99-mc Document 667 Filed 08/07/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:07-cv JPJ -PMS Document 305 Filed 09/30/11 Page 1 of 6 Pageid#: 2830

Supreme Court and Appellate Alert

Case4:08-cv JSW Document320 Filed01/28/15 Page1 of 3

Case 1:13-cv WMS Document 54 Filed 05/24/13 Page 1 of 4 NEW YORK STATE RIFLE AND PISTOL

Transcription:

Case :-cv-0-nvw Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation at the GOLDWATER INSTITUTE Clint Bolick (0) Aditya Dynar (0) 00 E. Coronado Rd. Phoenix, Arizona 00 (0) -000 litigation@goldwaterinstitute.org COOPER & KIRK, PLLC Michael W. Kirk (admitted pro hac vice) Brian W. Barnes (admitted pro hac vice) Harold S. Reeves (admitted pro hac vice) New Hampshire Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 0 () -00 () -0 (fax) Attorneys for Plaintiffs IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA A.D. and C. by CAROL COGHLAN CARTER, their next friend; S.H. and J.H., a married couple; M.C. and K.C., a married couple; for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals, Plaintiffs, vs. KEVIN WASHBURN, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS; SALLY JEWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; GREGORY A. McKAY, in his official capacity as Director of ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY, Defendants. No. CV---PHX-NVW MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE AMICUS BRIEFS of

Case :-cv-0-nvw Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 Defendants Jewell, Washburn, and McKay filed their Motions to Dismiss on October,. Plaintiffs response to the two Motions to Dismiss is due on November,. On October,, two sets of amicus curiae briefs were filed in support of Defendants Motions to Dismiss. Additionally, Gila River Indian Community filed a Motion to Intervene to which a response was duly filed on November,. In a span of four weeks, thus, Plaintiffs are burdened with drafting responses to: ) State Defendant s Motion to Dismiss; ) Federal Defendants Motion to Dismiss; ) Gila River Indian Community s Motion to Intervene; ) Amicus Brief filed by National Congress of American Indians, et al.; and ) Amicus Brief filed by Casey Family Programs, et al. Pursuant to court order, Plaintiffs response to the Defendants Motions to Dismiss is due and will be filed on November,. Plaintiffs filed their Opposition to Gila River Indian Community s Motion to Intervene on November,. Plaintiffs, therefore, respectfully request an extension of time to respond to the amicus briefs. Plaintiffs asked counsel for all parties and amici whether they would consent. All but the state Defendant take no position on Plaintiffs request. Plaintiffs have not heard from the state Defendant as to the state Defendant s position on Plaintiffs request as of the time of this filing. Ordinarily, there is no set schedule for responses to amicus briefs. Amicus briefs at the motion to dismiss stage are highly unusual and Plaintiffs want to ensure the Court has the benefit of Plaintiffs position on the contents of the amicus curiae briefs. An extension is appropriate and non-prejudicial. The extension sought is in good faith and not for purposes of delay. The extension of time best serves the administration of justice in this case. of

Case :-cv-0-nvw Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant Plaintiffs motion and enter an order to the effect that Plaintiffs response to amicus curiae briefs is due to be filed no later than November,. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this nd day of November, by: /s/ Aditya Dynar Clint Bolick (0) Aditya Dynar (0) Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation at the GOLDWATER INSTITUTE Michael W. Kirk (admitted pro hac vice) Brian W. Barnes (admitted pro hac vice) Harold S. Reeves (admitted pro hac vice) COOPER & KIRK, PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs of

Case :-cv-0-nvw Document Filed /0/ Page of 0. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Document Electronically Filed and Served by ECF this th day of November, MARK BRNOVICH ATTORNEY GENERAL John S. Johnson Heather Pellegrino West Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 00 John.Johnson@azag.gov Heather.Pellegrino@azag.gov Steven M. Miskinis Ragu-Jara Gregg U.S. Department of Justice ENRD/ Indian Resources Section P.O. Box Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 0- Steven.miskinis@usdoj.gov RGregg@ENRD.USDOJ.GOV Pratik A. Shah James E. Tysse Hyland Hunt Z.W. Julius Chen AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 0- pshah@akingump.com jtysse@akingump.com hhunt@akingump.com chenj@akingump.com Samuel F. Daughety Samuel Kohn DENTONS US LLP 0 K Street, NW, Suite 00, East Tower Washington, DC 00- samuel.daughety@dentons.com samuel.kohn@dentons.com /s/ Kris Schlott Kris Schlott of

Case :-cv-0-nvw Document - Filed /0/ Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 0 A.D. and C. by CAROL COGHLAN CARTER, their next friend; S.H. and J.H., a married couple; M.C. and K.C., a married couple; for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals, Plaintiffs, vs. KEVIN WASHBURN, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS; SALLY JEWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; GREGORY A. McKAY, in his official capacity as Director of ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY, Defendants. No. CV---PHX-NVW PROPOSED ORDER of

Case :-cv-0-nvw Document - Filed /0/ Page of The Court having considered the Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time to November, to Respond to the Amicus Briefs, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file their response to amicus briefs no later than November,. 0 of