United States v. Nicoletti, et al. Criminal Docket No (KAM)

Similar documents
Bail Right to bail; recognizance or unsecured appearance bond. Secured bonds. Factors to be considered in determining conditions of release.

Case 5:09-cr JHS Document 31 Filed 07/23/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. v. : CRIMINAL NO

Case 1:10-cr NGG Document 8 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 110

Case 1:17-cr ABJ Document 21 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CHIEF JUDGE ORDER SETTING FORTH BOND GUIDELINES

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE GOVERNMENT S MOTION FOR A PERMANENT ORDER OF DETENTION

United States v. Abdurasul Juraboev, et al. Criminal Docket No. 15-M-172

x x BWB:JHK F.#2009R01793 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Case 1:18-cr TFH Document 4 Filed 10/08/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Pretrial release. A. Hearing. (1) Time. If a case is initiated in the district court, and the conditions of release have not been set by the

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cr KBJ Document 6 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

[Bail] Pretrial release. A. Hearing. (1) Time. The court shall conduct a hearing under this rule and issue an order setting conditions of

Case 2:10-cr MHT -WC Document 833 Filed 03/29/11 Page 1 of 9

Summary of Investigation SiRT File # Referral from RCMP - PEI December 4, 2017

Case 1:10-cr LEK Document 425 Filed 08/21/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1785 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Felony and Misdemeanor Bail Schedule

Order [setting conditions of release and appearance bond] for release on recognizance by designee. [No.] v. No.

SUPERIOR AND DISTRICT COURT DIVISIONS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Case: 1:10-cr SL Doc #: 898 Filed: 06/04/12 1 of 5. PageID #: 18606

Case 3:09-cr JAJ-TJS Document 17 Filed 11/25/2009 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C (a) and. that it believes that the circumstances of this case are such

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

Bail: An Abridged Overview of Federal Criminal Law

2:13-mj DUTY Doc # 16 Filed 08/13/13 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 256 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

United States Court of Appeals

) NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

(A) subject to the condition that the person not commit a Federal, State, or local crime during the period of release

PC: , 457.1, 872, CVC: (C) TITLE 8: INMATE RELEASE I. PURPOSE:

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULES 3:26 BAIL

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPEALS COURT COMMONWEALTH. vs. MICHAEL S. GILL. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28

Defending a Federal Criminal Case: Detention & Release. Lunchtime CLE April 3, 2015 Laine Cardarella Federal Defender, WDMO

Immigration Violations

Chapter 3 - General Institution

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 7, 2005

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Southern District of Texas

NEVADA COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Southern District of New York

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT APPELLANT S MOTION FOR RELEASE PENDING APPEAL

FACT SHEET. Juveniles (children aged 16 or under):

Pretrial Release of Felony Defendants, 1992

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY

CARLOS VIVEROS COLORADO

Case 3:16-mj Document 47 Filed 02/02/16 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division

PART H - SPECIFIC OFFENDER CHARACTERISTICS. Introductory Commentary

Case 2:05-cr JFW Document 2724 Filed 02/14/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 4:14-cr JPG Document 92 Filed 04/21/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #369 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:18-mj EGT Document 5-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/31/2018 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Case 1:17-mj UA Document 8 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 7. UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT for the Southern District of New York ) ) ) APPEARANCE BOND

United States Attorney Eastern District of New York NB:JMM/LTG

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

2012 FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR BAIL SCHEDULE COUNTY OF IMPERIAL

Taking Bail Notes. 1. Introduction. a. Importance of Pretrial Release

MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL BOND

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

MARIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE GENERAL ORDER. DATE Chapter 5- Operations GO /11/2014 PAGE 1 of 6. Immigration Status (Trust Act implementation)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF RAMSEY SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FILE NO.: PROSECUTOR FILE NO.: State of Minnesota,

U.S. District Court District of South Carolina (Greenville) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE#: 6:17-cr KFM All Defendants

Said acts constituting the offense of Murder in the Second Degree in violation of MN Statute: (1) Maximum Sentence: 40 years.

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 56 1

DONALD SCOTT TAYLOR, is convicted of one or both of the capital offenses relating

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

MECKLENBURG COUNTY PRETRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT & PRAXIS. Instruction Manual

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

) SS: ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ) CAUSE NO. 71D FD MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

Case 2:17-mj KJN Document 1 Filed 04/24/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 2:13-cr MHW-TPK Doc #: 56 Filed: 08/28/14 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 368

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Ventura County Probation Agency. Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiatives and Pretrial Services

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Pretrial Release and Detention: A First Look

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. CASE NO.: 5D STATE S RESPONSE TO THE HABEAS PETITION

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

SENATE BILL No. 54. December 5, 2016

INTRODUCTION TO THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES

ARLENE PRISCILLA GARCIA

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

F I L E D June 28, 2011

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR ) COUNTY OF BEAUFORT ) THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

MOTION OF DEFENDANT ROBERT E. STEWART FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DETENTION ORDER, WITH SUGGESTIONS IN SUPPORT

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

North Carolina District Attorney Candidate Questionnaire

Case 1:11-cr LO Document 41 Filed 02/29/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 126 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Transcription:

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Eastern District of New York 271 Cadman Plaza East F.#2008R02060 Brooklyn, New York 11201 Via Facsimile and ECF The Honorable Roanne L. Mann United States Magistrate Judge Eastern District of New York 225 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn, New York 11201 January 7, 2009 Re: United States v. Nicoletti, et al. Criminal Docket No. 09-002 (KAM) Dear Judge Mann: The United States submits this letter in support of its application, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3142(a), for (1) a permanent order of detention with respect to defendant Ralph Nicoletti; and (2) the imposition of significant pretrial release conditions, including home confinement with electronic monitoring, regular reporting to Pretrial Services, drug testing and substance abuse treatment as directed by Pretrial Services, and the establishment of appearance bonds signed by responsible suretors, with respect to defendants Michael Contreras and Brian Carranza. As set forth in more detail below, the serious and violent nature of the charged offenses, the strength of the government s evidence, and the history and character of Ralph Nicoletti warrant the requested detention and imposition of pretrial release conditions. A. The Defendants Criminal Conduct The government hereby proffers the following facts relevant to the charge filed against the defendants and Ralph Nicoletti s other criminal conduct. See United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-131 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); United States v. Ferranti, 66 F.3d 540, 542 (2d Cir. 1995)(same).

1. Charged Criminal Conduct The charges in the Indictment stem from a hate crime conspiracy to assault African-American residents in Staten Island in retaliation for President-Elect Obama s election victory, and from a series of assaults perpetrated by the defendants as part of that conspiracy. On the night of the presidential election, November 4, 2008, the defendants and several friends were gathered at a makeshift outdoor clubhouse in the Rosebank section of Staten Island, New York. Throughout the evening, the group received updates on the election results from friends and via the Internet. Shortly after learning of Barack Obama s victory, the defendants and a fourth friend decided to find African-Americans to assault in retaliation for an African-American winning the election. Nicoletti drove the group to Park Hill, a predominantly African-American neighborhood in Staten Island, where they came upon Ali Kamara, a 17-year-old African-American man who was walking home after watching the election at a friend s house. The four men then got out of the car and attacked Kamara. During the attack, Nicoletti beat Kamara with a metal pipe, and another member of the group hit Kamara with a collapsible police baton. Kamara, who managed to escape and run home, suffered injuries to his head and legs. Resuming their hunt, the group found another African- American man in the Port Richmond section of Staten Island and assaulted him, pushing him to the ground. One of the men also verbally accosted a Latino man, demanding to know for whom he had voted, and later yelled profanities about Obama as they drove past an election night gathering of African-Americans at a hair salon. The group s final assault involved a man they mistakenly believed to be African-American, whom they spotted walking along Blackford Avenue in Port Richmond. The group agreed that one of the men would hit the victim, Ronald Forte, with the police baton as they drove by him. Instead, as they approached Forte, Nicoletti decided to hit him with the car, causing Forte to be thrown onto the hood of the car and into the front windshield, shattering it. Although Forte survived, he was in a coma for a period of time after the attack. - 2 -

2. Nicoletti s Other Criminal Conduct Although only 18 years old, Nicoletti has an extensive history of illegal and violent activity, including distribution of marijuana and cocaine, burglary, car break-ins, destruction of property, including firebombing a neighbor s home and another neighbor s car, and numerous assaults. Nicoletti is a member of the Rosebank Crew or RBK, started by Nicoletti s younger brother, Anthony Nicoletti. The group s primary purpose is to defend its members in inter-neighborhood disputes, some of which have resulted in significant violence. During a search of Nicoletti s home, the FBI found in Nicoletti s dresser drawer an envelope addressed to My RBK Brothers from the Boss Behind Bars. 1 The envelope contained a handwritten note addressed to All my RBK brothers and signed by The Biggest Boss Ever. In part and substance, the note discussed how the RBK Brothers must stand strong together and not talk to the police. The note also stated, in substance, that the Boss has 10 brothers behind him and that he can kill a person s family. In the same drawer, the agents found a cache of weapons, including a collapsible police baton (the same type used during the election night assaults), 2 two butterfly knives, five folding knives, and a leather slapjack, which is a leather-covered piece of metal that is used as an impact weapon. Within days of the assaults, Nicoletti approached a potential witness and told the witness not to speak to law enforcement authorities. Thereafter, the witness was approached several times by Nicoletti s associates and told not to talk to the authorities. The witness also received an anonymous telephone threat from a male caller telling him not to speak to the police. 1 The letter is believed to be from Anthony Nicoletti, who currently is incarcerated on charges stemming from, inter alia, an incident in which Anthony Nicoletti ran down one or more individuals with his car in the aftermath of a fight involving Anthony Nicoletti and Contreras, who belong to RBK, against youths from another Staten Island neighborhood. 2 Nicoletti obtained two police batons during a series of car break-ins that included vehicles owned by police officers. The baton used during the assaults was one of the two that Nicoletti stole. - 3 -

About three weeks ago, Nicoletti, apparently believing that co-defendant Contreras was cooperating with authorities, went to Contreras s home with three male friends and attacked Contreras, calling him a "snitch." Nicoletti punched Contreras, causing Contreras's ear to bleed. Significantly, Nicoletti engaged in this conduct after having been released on bail in his pending criminal case in Richmond County stemming from the Kamara assault. C. Detention of Ralph Nicoletti and Imposition of Significant Pretrial Restrictions and Bail Conditions on the Other Defendants are Warranted 1. Detention of Nicoletti Detention of a defendant pending trial is warranted where the Court finds that no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of any other person and the community. In making that determination, the Court must consider several factors, including: (1) the nature and circumstances of the charged offense; (2) the weight of the evidence against the person; (3) the history and characteristics of the person; and (4) the nature and seriousness of the danger to the community which would be posed by the person s release. 18 U.S.C. 3142(g)(1)-(4). Here, these factors weigh heavily in favor of Nicoletti s pretrial detention. a. Nature and Circumstances of the Charged Offense Nicoletti and the other defendants are charged in this case with a crime of violence. The Bail Reform Act defines a crime of violence as an offense that has as one of its elements the attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another, or any other offense that is a felony and that, by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense. 18 U.S.C. 3156(a)(4)(A) and (B). Here, the defendants engaged in a criminal conspiracy that had as its sole purpose the use of force and infliction of injury on African-Americans. On the night of the election, the defendants deliberately set out to hunt down African-Americans to assault, and they brutally assaulted three people as part of that conspiracy. Nicoletti, in particular, was responsible for the - 4 -

most serious and depraved violence that night, when he ran Forte down with his car. Nicoletti also beat Kamara repeatedly with a metal pipe. Thus, the nature of the charged offense, as well as Nicoletti s role and conduct in that offense, demonstrate that he is a danger to the community. b. Strength of the Evidence The evidence against Nicoletti is very strong. It includes eyewitness testimony, corroborative testimony by third parties, and documentary and physical evidence. If convicted of the charged hate crime conspiracy, Nicoletti faces a sentence of up to 10 years and a guidelines range of 97-121 months. 3 The likelihood of conviction, coupled with the severity of the potential sentence, creates a significant risk that Nicoletti will seek to tamper with, intimidate or harm witnesses, or flee. c. History and Characteristics of the Defendant Nicoletti has been committing crimes, causing destruction and engaging in violence since he was 14 years old, and his misconduct has only escalated and grown more violent over time. He has a demonstrated propensity for engaging in violence, retaliation and obstruction of justice and a complete disregard for the law. The fact that Nicoletti assaulted Contreras while on bail in his State case demonstrates that the threat of incarceration will not deter him from engaging in violence or obstruction. d. Nature and Seriousness of the Danger Posed to the Community by the Defendant s Release For the reasons discussed above, Nicoletti presents a serious risk of harm to the community and witnesses in this case if he is not detained. 2. Imposition of Pretrial Restrictions and Bail Conditions on Contreras and Carranza The Court may impose restrictions upon the pretrial release of a defendant if the Court concludes that release on personal recognizance or unsecured appearance bond will not reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required or 3 Furthermore, the government anticipates superseding to add substantive hate crime charges, which will substantially increase the potential penalties faced by the defendants. - 5 -

will endanger the safety of any other person or the community. 18 U.S.C. 3142(c). Should the Court conclude that an unsecured or personal recognizance bond will not assure the appearance of the defendant, it may order detention or impose additional conditions of release. See 18 U.S.C. 3142(c)(B)(I) et seq. The nature and circumstances of this offense and the strength of the evidence against these defendants, as discussed above, counsel strongly in favor of imposing significant pretrial release conditions and requiring appearance bonds signed by responsible suretors with respect to Contreras and Carranza. Given the seriousness of the charged offense and the defendants conduct, which resulted in three separate assaults and lifethreatening injuries to one of the victims, the defendants should be placed on home confinement to ensure that they do not engage in any further violence prior to trial. Because all of the defendants have histories of alcohol abuse, including on the night of the assaults, and drug use, such as marijuana and Xanax, the additional conditions of drug testing and substance abuse treatment as directed by Pretrial Services should be imposed. C. Conclusion For the reasons stated above, the government respectfully requests that the Court (1) issue a permanent order of detention with respect to Ralph Nicoletti; and (2) require home confinement with electronic monitoring, regular reporting to Pretrial Services, drug testing and substance abuse treatment as directed by Pretrial Services, and the establishment of significant personal appearance bonds signed by responsible suretors, with respect to defendants Contreras and Carranza. Respectfully submitted, BENTON J. CAMPBELL United States Attorney By: /s/ Pamela K. Chen Margo K. Brodie Assistant U.S. Attorneys (718) 254-7575 (718) 254-6277 - 6 -